Association between different sequences of vessel ligation during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Impact of pulmonary vein-first ligation during lobectomy on the postoperative survival and recurrence rates in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter propensity score-matched study

PURPOSE

Surgical manipulation of the lungs increases the number of circulating tumor cells and the subsequent risk of metastasis in patients with lung cancer. This study investigated whether or not ligating the tumor-draining pulmonary vein first during lobectomy could improve the prognosis of these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent curative lobectomy for solitary nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma between January 2012 and December 2016. We divided the patients into the vein-first group, in which all associated pulmonary veins were dissected and severed before cutting the pulmonary artery, bronchus, or pulmonary fissure, and the other procedure group.

RESULTS

Overall, we included 177 and 413 patients in the vein-first and other procedure groups, respectively. Propensity score matching yielded 67 pairs of patients. The 5-year overall survival (85.6% [95% confidence interval, 77.3-94.8%] vs. 69.4% [58.7-81.9%], P = 0.03%) and recurrence-free survival (73.4% [63.3-85.1%] vs. 53.5% [42.5-67.3%], P = 0.02) were significantly better in the vein-first group than in the other procedure group. The cumulative recurrence rate at 5 years post-surgery was significantly lower in the vein-first group than in the other procedure group (21.7% vs. 38.3%, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that ligating the pulmonary vein first during lobectomy for lung cancer can improve the overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and cumulative recurrence rate.

Vein-first vs. artery-first robotic lobectomy outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Data remains limited as to whether the order of pulmonary vessel division during performance of a lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) affects survival outcomes. Some authors have suggested that ligation of the pulmonary veins should be conducted first in order to minimize the spread of tumor cells secondary to manipulation of the lung. This study examines whether there is a difference in outcomes between patients who undergo robotic lobectomies for NSCLC using a vein-first (V-first) vs. artery-first (A-first) technique.

Methods

A retrospective review of electronic medical record data was performed for patients who underwent robotic lobectomies from January 2013 to May 2019. Patients were separated into two groups based on the sequence in which the pulmonary vessels were divided: V-first or A-first. Baseline characteristics and postoperative events were recorded and compared between groups using Chi-squared and Student's t-tests. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for overall and recurrence-free survival were constructed and compared with log-rank tests.

Results

A total of 374 patients were identified: 94 V-first and 280 A-first patients. There was no significant difference between the V-first and A-first groups with regards to postoperative complications, length of stay, recurrence-free survival, or overall survival.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that choosing a V-first vs. A-first technique for a robotic lobectomy does not significantly impact overall survival or cancer recurrence for patients with NSCLC. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether the order of pulmonary vessel resection affects outcomes for patients with NSCLC.

The influence of different sequences of vessel ligation on long-term survival during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: A matched cohort study

In lobectomy of patients with lung cancer, the principle of operation is to cut off the pulmonary vein first, but it is often not taken seriously in clinical practice. We conducted this research to compare the impact of different sequences of pulmonary vessel ligation on the long-term survival of patients. This cohort study included 1239 patients treated surgically with video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy from January 2015 to December 2019 at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. Survival and perioperative indicators were compared between a Vein-first group (VF) and an artery-first group. After matching, 364 patients were included in each group for analysis. VF was associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio: 1.96 [1.4~2.74], P < .0001) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio: 1.65 [1.22~2.24], P = .0011). Meanwhile, the survival advantage of VF was achieved in almost all subgroups, particularly in the pathological tumor node metastasis stage I-II group and squamous cell carcinoma group. We obtained no significant differences in perioperative indications (operation time, hospital stay, etc) between VF and artery-first group. With better overall survival and disease-free survival, especially for pathological stage I-II squamous cell carcinoma, vein-first ligation should be strictly observed in lobectomy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Circulating Tumor Cells and the Non-Touch Isolation Technique in Surgery for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are dislodged from the primary tumor into the bloodstream, travel within the bloodstream to distant organs, and finally extravasate and proliferate as epithelial metastatic deposits. The relationship between the existence of CTCs and tumor prognosis has been demonstrated by many researchers. In surgery for malignancies, the surgical manipulation of tumors and tissues around the tumor may lead to the release of CTCs into the bloodstream. The non-touch isolation technique (NTIT) has been advocated to prevent the release of CTCs during surgery. The concept of NTIT is the prevention of intraoperative increment of CTCs from the primary tumor by the early blockade of outflow vessels, and ‘pulmonary vein (PV)-first lobectomy’ during surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) corresponds to this technique. The concept of PV-first lobectomy is well known among thoracic surgeons, but evidence of its efficacy for preventing the increase of intra- and postoperative CTCs and for improving postoperative prognosis is still uncertain. Our study summarizes evidence regarding the relationship between NTIT and CTCs in NSCLC and suggests the need for further research on CTCs and CTC-detecting modalities.

Vein-first Lobectomy for Lung Cancer Assessed According to the Status of Clustered Circulating Tumour Cells

BACKGROUND/AIM

Vein-first lobectomy (VFL) in lung cancer might reduce shedding of circulating tumour cells (CTCs). This study assessed the clinical significance of VFL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Lung cancer patients undergoing lobectomy and CTC testing were evaluated. The primary evaluation item was postoperative clustered CTC detection, and the secondary outcome measures were the 2-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates according to the status of VFL and postoperative clustered CTC.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients with similar backgrounds, except for lobe resection and pulmonary vein dissection time, showed postoperative clustered CTC identification rates of 43.8% and 37.9% in the VFL group (n=57) and no-VFL group (n=29), respectively. However, prognosis was not significantly different, although the presence of clustered CTC after surgery was a predictor of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The status of postoperative clustered CTC was similar regardless of VFL or not, although the detection of clustered CTC was a predictor of recurrence.

Vein-first versus artery-first ligation procedure for lung cancer surgery: An updated review

Background

The optimal sequence of pulmonary vessel interruption during lung cancer resection remains controversial. This review aimed to elucidate the association of vein-first versus artery-first ligation and survival of the patients.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar from their inception to September 2021 for published articles that compared vein-first (the pulmonary vein was interrupted first) and artery-first procedure (the pulmonary artery was ligated first) during lung cancer surgery.

Results

Finally, a total of 13 full articles were obtained. First, 7 studies with survival information were included for meta-analyses. As compared with the artery-first ligation, vein-first approach did not decrease the risk of local recurrence (risk ratio [RR] 0.92 in favour of vein-first; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61–1.39, p = 0.68) or distant metastasis (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.30–2.85, p = 0.89); but it was associated with better disease-free survival (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.37–0.73, p < 0.01) as well as 5-year overall survival (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.41–0.86, p < 0.01). In addition, the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, total complications, and length of postoperative stay were mainly comparable between the two groups. Second, 7 studies provided the data of tumor cells indicated by different biomarkers and detection methods; and 3 of these reports showed that vein-first ligation decreased the extent of intraoperative tumor dissemination. However, a quantitative meta-analysis was not possible due to the significant heterogeneity.

Conclusion

Vein-first ligation in lung cancer surgery may be associated with improved survival of the patients, which might be ascribed to potentially lower risk of tumor cell dissemination. Well-designed, large-scale trials are warranted to clarify these occasional findings.

Effects of Vessel Interruption Sequence During Lobectomy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: For lobectomy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whether interrupting the pulmonary vein first (Vein-first) achieves better perioperative and survival outcomes than interrupting the pulmonary artery first (Artery-first) remains controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare outcomes between the two groups to facilitate better surgical decision-making.

Methods: Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus were searched for eligible studies comparing Vein-first and Artery-first procedures. The primary endpoints were survival indicators [overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS)]. Secondary endpoints included intraoperative indicators, hospitalization, and follow-up indicators.

Results: After screening 2,505 studies, 8 studies involving 1,714 patients (Vein-First group: 881 patients; Artery-first group: 833 patients) were included. The vein-first group achieved better OS [HR (hazard ratio): 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12–1.91, p = 0.005], DFS (HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.23–2.08, p < 0.001), and LCSS (HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.16–2.31, p = 0.005). The survival rates of OS at 2–5 years, DFS at 1–5 years, and LCSS at 3–5 years were also higher in the Vein-First group. Subgroup analyses suggested that the advantages of survival in the Vein-First group were primarily embodied in the subgroups of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and earlier pathological TNM stage (I–II). Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, total complications, and total recurrences were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions: The Vein-first sequence is the suitable choice of vessel interruption sequence during lobectomy for NSCLC with better survival and similar perioperative outcomes, especially for stage I–II SCC.

The sequence of pulmonary vessels ligation during lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The effects of ligating the pulmonary vein first or pulmonary artery first during lobectomy on the long-term survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain controversial. We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between different sequences of vessel ligation during lobectomy and the prognosis of patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

Literature retrieval was performed by systematically searching Embase, PubMed and Web of Science to identify relevant articles published from the inception of each database to November 2020. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients treated with vein-first ligation versus those treated with artery-first ligation during lobectomy were analyzed. A standard fixed-effect model test (Mantel-Haenszel method) was used to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and I²-test. Sensitivity analysis was performed to further examine the stability of pooled HRs.

RESULTS

Five studies with a total of 1109 patients receiving lobectomy, including one randomized controlled trial and four retrospective studies, were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that patients with vein-first ligation had a significantly better OS (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.50; P = 0.02) and DFS (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.16-2.04; P = 0.003) than those with artery-first ligation during lobectomy. Significant heterogeneity and publication bias were not observed during analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis indicates that vein-first ligation may improve the prognosis of NSCLC patients receiving lobectomy. Therefore, vein-first ligation is recommended during lobectomy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer whenever possible.

Wedge Resection of Tumor Before Lobectomy for Lung Cancer Could Be a No-touch Isolation Technique

BACKGROUND/AIM

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be a surrogate biomarker of prospective prognosis. Surgical manipulation can promote the dissemination of CTCs. Prognosis improvement is expected with the no-touch isolation technique (NTIT), preventing surgical manipulation. The Wedge resection of the tumor site before lobectomy could prevent surgical manipulation during lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and reduce the shedding of tumor cells, similar to a NTIT. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of wedge resection technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 624 resected NSCLC patients were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided in two groups: Wedge and Non-Wedge. Overall survival (OS) curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The 5-year OS rates were 89.9% and 84.0% in the Wedge and Non-Wedge groups, respectively (p=0.033).

CONCLUSION

The OS in the Wedge group was significantly better than that in the Non-Wedge group. Wedge resection technique for NSCLC may be a NTIT.

Analysis of Released Circulating Tumor Cells During Surgery for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Tumor cells from patients with lung cancer are expelled from the primary tumor into the blood, but difficult to detect in the peripheral circulation. We studied the release of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) during surgery to test the hypothesis that CTC counts are influenced by hemodynamic changes (caused by surgical approach) and manipulation.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or open surgery for (suspected) primary lung cancer were included. Blood samples were taken before surgery (T0) from the radial artery (RA), from both the RA and pulmonary vein (PV) when the PV was located (T1) and when either the pulmonary artery (T2 open) or the PV (T2 VATS) was dissected. The CTCs were enumerated using the CellSearch system. Single-cell whole-genome sequencing was performed on isolated CTCs for aneuploidy.

RESULTS

CTCs were detected in 58 of 138 samples (42%) of 31 patients. CTCs were more often detected in the PV (70%) compared with the RA (22%, P < 0.01) and in higher counts (P < 0.01). After surgery, the RA but not the PV showed less often CTCs (P = 0.02). Type of surgery did not influence CTC release. Only six of 496 isolated CTCs showed aneuploidy, despite matched primary tumor tissue being aneuploid. Euploid so-called CTCs had a different morphology than aneuploid.

CONCLUSIONS

CTCs defined by CellSearch were identified more often and in higher numbers in the PV compared with the RA, suggesting central clearance. The majority of cells in the PV were normal epithelial cells and outnumbered CTCs. Release of CTCs was not influenced by surgical approach.