Efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas: a propensity score matching analysis

Prognostic implications of synaptophysin, CD56, thyroid transcription factor-1, and Ki-67 in pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas

BACKGROUND

The correlation between the expression of immunohistochemical markers and the clinicopathological characteristics of pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HGNEC) and its impact on the clinical outcomes of individuals with HGNEC has not yet been explored.

METHODS

This study enrolled patients diagnosed with HGNEC between April 2015 and July 2023. Based on the expression levels of synaptophysin (Syn), the neural cell adhesion molecule (CD56), thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), and Ki-67, a comprehensive analysis was conducted. This involved a comparison of clinicopathological characteristics, chemosensitivity, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Furthermore, the study identified prognostic factors associated with patient survival through univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were analyzed. Significant differences were identified in tumor stage (χ2 = 5.473, P = 0.019), lymphatic invasion (χ2 = 8.839, P = 0.003), and distant metastasis (χ2 = 5.473, P = 0.019), respectively, between the CD56 positive and negative groups. A significant difference in lymphatic invasion was observed (χ2 = 9.949, P = 0.002) between the CD56 positive and negative groups. A significant difference in vascular invasion was observed (χ2 = 5.106, P = 0.024) between the low and high Ki-67 groups. Compared to the Syn negative group, the Syn positive group had significantly shorter PFS (P = 0.006). Compared to the Syn negative group, the Syn positive group had significantly shorter OS (P = 0.004). The CD56 positive group also had significantly shorter OS than the CD56 negative group (P = 0.027). Univariate analysis revealed that tumor stage and Syn expression were associated with OS and PFS. Lymphatic invasion and CD56 expression were associated with OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor stage was the strongest predictor of poor prognosis for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.551, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.328-0.927, P = 0.025) and PFS (HR 0.409, 95 % CI 0.247-0.676, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive expression of Syn was associated with reduced PFS and OS, while positive CD56 expression was correlated with a shorter OS in HGNEC. The TNM stage was an independent risk factor that significantly influenced PFS and OS in patients with HGNEC. More studies are needed to make further progress in future treatment.

Role of surgery in high-grade neuroendocrine tumors of the lung

Background

This study aims to evaluate the surgical results for high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas and to identify factors that influence prognosis.

Methods

Between January 2009 and December 2017, a total of 71 patients (58 males, 13 females; mean age: 62±9.6 years; range, 38 to 78 years) with a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival and five-year overall survival rates were evaluated.

Results

The mean overall survival was 60.7±6.9 months with a five-year survival rate of 44.3%. The mean overall survival and five-year overall survival rates according to disease stage were as follows: Stage 1, 67±10.8 months (46%); Stage 2, 61.4±10.8 months (45%); and Stage 3, 33.2±8.6 months (32%) (p=0.02). The mean overall survival and five-year overall survival rate according to histological types were as follows: in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, 59.4±9.2 months (45%); in small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, 68.6±12.2 months (43%); and in combined-type neuroendocrine carcinoma, 40.9±10.1 months (35%) (p=0.34).

Conclusion

Thoracic surgeons should be very selective in performing pulmonary resection in patients with Stage 3 high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas and combined cell subtype tumors.

Effect of Adjuvant and Palliative Chemotherapy in Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Adjuvant chemotherapy revealed a better outcome than surgery only, but there was no statistical difference in patients with stage IA. The small cell lung cancer regimen (SCLC) was frequently selected in adjuvant chemotherapy. The SCLC regimen showed better survival than the non-SCLC regimen as palliative chemotherapy at the endpoint of the odds ratio of mortality after two years.

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subset of lung carcinoma with poor overall survival. Methods: A systematic review following a meta-analysis of studies was performed to identify the effect of different selections of chemotherapy in LCNEC. Articles providing overall survival data for adjuvant chemotherapy or palliative chemotherapy for LCNEC were eligible. The odds ratio (OR) of mortality at one or two years after chemotherapy was evaluated. Results: A total of 16 reports were finally included in the quantitative synthesis, involving a total of 5916 LCNEC patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 1303 patients, and palliative chemotherapy was administered to 313 patients using either a small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) regimen. The OR for adjuvant chemotherapy was 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 to 0.89, p = 0.002). The SCLC regimen showed an OR of 0.52 (95% CI: 0.11 to 2.38, p = 0.40) after one year, and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.11 to 0.89, p = 0.03) after two years, compared with the NSCLC regimen. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy for pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma improved the outcome after surgery. The SCLC regimen showed better survival than the NSCLC regimen as palliative chemotherapy.

Outcomes of Patients with Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma in I-IV Stage

Background and Objectives: Large cell neuroendocrine cancer is characterised by poor prognosis. The standard of treatment is still not established. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive factors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and combined LCNEC. Materials and Methods: All patients had confirmed pathology stage I-IV disease recorded between period 2002–2018. Survival curves were estimated by Kaplan–Meier method. Uni- and multivariable analysis was conducted using Cox-regression analysis. Results: A total of 132 patients with LCNEC and combined LCNEC were included. Half of them had clinical stage IIIB/C-IV. Patients were treated with radical (n = 67, including surgery alone; resection with neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, radiochemotherapy, or adjuvant radiotherapy; patients treated with radiochemotherapy alone), palliative (n = 41) or symptomatic (n = 24) intention. Seventeen patients were treated with resection margin R1 or R2. Non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC) chemotherapy (platinum-vinorelbine; PN schedule) and small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) chemotherapy approaches (platinum/carboplatinum-etoposide; PE/KE schedule) were administered in 20 and in 55 patients, respectively. The median (95% Confidence Interval (CI)) OS and PFS were 17 months (9.0–36.2 months) and 7 months (3.0–15.0 months), respectively. Patients treated with negative resection margin, with lower clinical stage, without lymph node metastasis, and with size of primary tumour ≤4 cm showed significantly better OS and PFS. The main risk factors with an adverse effect on survival were advanced CS and positive resection margin. Conclusions: Patients with LCNEC characterized poor prognosis. Independent prognostic factors influencing PFS were initial clinical stage and resection margin R0 vs. R1-2.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Progresses and Future Approaches

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors, their treatment being challenging and requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Though the only curative treatment is surgery, up to 50% of patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease. In the last years, neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy has become part of the standard of care in the treatment of different cancer types. However, evidence of its efficacy and safety in NEN patients has not yet been confirmed in the literature. The aim of the present review is to perform an extensive review of the scientific evidence for neoadjuvant therapy in patients with gastroenteropancreatic and thoracic NENs.

DLL3 expression is a predictive marker of sensitivity to adjuvant chemotherapy for pulmonary LCNEC

Background

The mammalian Notch family ligands delta‐like 3 (DLL3) is reported to be a potential therapeutic target for large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC). The effect of DLL3 expression on LCNEC prognosis has not yet been elucidated.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of 70 LCNEC patients undergoing surgical resection between 2001 and 2015 using a prospectively maintained database. We performed immunohistochemistry for DLL3 and investigated the correlation between the sensitivity of LCNEC to platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

DLL3 expression was positive in 26 (37.1%) LCNEC patients. A total of 23 patients (32.9%) received platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy. Among patients with DLL3 expression‐positive tumors, no difference was found in the five‐year overall survival (OS) or recurrence‐free survival (RFS) between patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy (surgery + chemotherapy vs. surgery alone, five‐year OS: 58.3% vs. 35.7% P = 0.36, five‐year RFS: 41.7% vs. 35.7% P = 0.74). In contrast, among patients with DLL3‐negative tumors, significantly greater five‐year OS and RFS rates were observed for patients with adjuvant chemotherapy than for those without it (surgery + chemotherapy vs. surgery alone: five‐year OS: 90.0% vs. 26.9% P<0.01, five‐year RFS: 80.0% vs. 21.7% P < 0.01). A multivariate analysis for the RFS revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy was a significant independent prognostic factor among patients with DLL3‐negative tumors (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01–0.41, P < 0.01), although it was not a factor among patients with DLL3‐positive tumors (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.23–2.27, P = 0.58).

Conclusions

Our results revealed that DLL3 is a predictive marker of sensitivity to platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy for LCNEC.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

DLL3 was a predictive marker of sensitivity to platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy for LCNEC. Among patients with DLL3 expression‐negative LCNEC, platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved the OS and RFS, although it did not do so among patients with DLL3 expression‐positive LCNEC.

What this study adds

Our results suggest that DLL3 expression‐positive LCNEC may be better treated with other types of adjuvant chemotherapy, such as the anti‐DLL3 therapies if these effects are confirmed by ongoing clinical research.

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 is a prognostic biomarker in pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma

BACKGROUNDS AND OBJECTIVES

Recent studies have suggested that insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a useful marker for pathological diagnosis of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. In the present study, we investigated the association between INSM1 expression and prognosis in patients with pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HGNEC) and assessed the usefulness of INSM1 as a prognostic biomarker in these patients.

METHODS

Seventy-five consecutive patients with HGNEC who underwent complete surgical resections from January 2000 to December 2018 were enrolled in this study. We classified these patients into two groups: the INSM1-positive group (n = 59) and INSM1-negative group (n = 16). We compared the clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the groups. In addition, we performed univariate and multivariate analyses to identify the prognostic factors associated with postoperative survival.

RESULTS

Significant differences in tumor diameter and vascular invasion between the groups were found. OS and RFS were significantly poorer in the INSM1-positive group than in the INSM1-negative group. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that INSM1 expression was the strongest predictor of poor prognosis for OS and RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

INSM1 expression had the greatest influence on the prognosis in patients with HGNEC and may be a prognostic biomarker in these patients.