No drain policy for "ultimate" enhanced recovery after surgery

A No-Chest-Drain Policy After Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Wedge Resection in Selected Patients: Our 12-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pleural drainage omission after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for wedge resections may facilitate faster recovery. This retrospective cohort study presents our 12-year experience with omitting thoracic drainage in patients who underwent a VATS wedge resection, aiming to assess its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

Records from consecutive patients who underwent a VATS wedge resection at our hospital between February 2008 and October 2020 were retrospectively reviewed and assessed for eligibility. Patient and surgical characteristics as well as postoperative data were collected and compared between patients who received a chest drain (CD) or received no chest drain (NCD) after surgery. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine whether drain placement was associated with complications (primary outcome), and major complications requiring pleural drainage or length of hospital stay (secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

Data of 348 patients were analyzed. The drainless group (n = 98) and drain group (n = 237) were significantly different in the following baseline and surgical characteristics: sex, pulmonary function, interstitial lung disease, final pathology, number of wedges, and surgical approach. No significant differences were detected in postoperative complications (NCD 8.2%, CD 14.8%; P = .10), major complications (NCD 5.1%, CD 5.1%; P > .99), or complications requiring pleural drainage (NCD 5.1%, CD 3.8%; P = .56). The drainless group did show a significantly shorter hospitalization (NCD 2 ± 2, CD 3 ± 2 days; P < .001). Multivariable analyses revealed that drain placement was not significantly correlated with postoperative complications. In contrast, prolonged hospitalization was significantly influenced by drain placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that a no-chest-drain policy after VATS wedge resections can safely fast-track rehabilitation for selected patients.

[Thoracic Surgery Without Chest Tube: The Current Situation in Germany]

BACKGROUND

Over the last decades, several techniques have been implemented to reduce the invasiveness of thoracic surgery. Omitting chest tubes can lead to less postoperative pain and a shorter length of hospital stay. This study examines the extent to which German surgeons use the tubeless technique and what experience they have had with it.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a nationwide survey, supported by the German Society of Thoracic Surgery (DGT). A digital questionnaire was sent to all leading thoracic surgeons with DGT membership between July and September 2020.

RESULTS

63 of 161 surgeons (39%) returned the questionnaires. The tubeless technique was used in 1.9% of thoracic surgery procedures performed last year. 59% of hospitals have implemented the technique; 24% of them also performed lung resections that way. The majority of respondents (79%) believe that the tubeless technique causes less postoperative pain; 16% see no advantage. Pleural effusion was ranked as the most important contraindication (76%). All participating surgeons agree that the absence of an air fistula is a prerequisite for performing lung resections using the tubeless technique - commonly checked by an underwater leak test (73%), and/or with a digital drainage system (53%), partially under pressure controlled ventilated lungs. Almost half of the respondents (46%) have not observed any complications using the tubeless technique.

CONCLUSION

Most German thoracic surgeons consider the tubeless technique safe and advantageous over the conventional technique. However, the case load is low and only 59% of the surgeons surveyed have experience with this technique. Randomised clinical trials concerning selection criteria and the procedural pathway may help increase the use.