1
|
Rombaut B, Ureel M, Van der Smissen B, Dhooghe N, Coopman R. Training of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residents in Virtual Surgical Planning: A Feasibility Study Comparing Open-Source Freeware and Commercially Available Software for Mandibular Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2025; 18:10. [PMID: 40271475 PMCID: PMC11995818 DOI: 10.3390/cmtr18010010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2024] [Revised: 01/06/2025] [Accepted: 01/06/2025] [Indexed: 04/25/2025] Open
Abstract
Study Design: This is an experimental feasibility study. Objective: The objective was to analyze the potential of open-source freeware (OSF) to train residents in virtual surgical planning (VSP) and compare this workflow with commercially available software (CAS). Methods: A workflow for mandibular reconstruction with a fibular free flap (FFF) was developed in 3D-Slicer® and Blender® and compared to our clinical workflow in Materialise Mimics Innovation Suite version 25 (Materialise InPrint®, ProPlan CMF® and 3-Matic®). Five CMF residents, inexperienced in VSP, were trained to use both the OSF and CAS workflows and then performed four planning sessions on OSF and CAS. The duration (minutes) and the amount of mouse clicks (MCs) of every step in the workflow were recorded. Afterwards, the experience with VSP was investigated with the System Usability Scale (SUS) and a self-developed questionnaire. Results: The total VSP time with CAS took 91 ± 15 min and needed 2325 ± 86 MCs compared to 111 ± 26 min and 1876 ± 632 MCs for OSF, respectively. The questionnaire had an 80% response rate. The SUS for CAS was 67.5 compared to 50 for OSF. The participants believe it is extremely valuable to learn VSP during their training and to be able to perform VSP as a surgeon. Conclusion: We believe OSF can be a cost-effective alternative compared to CAS for the training of surgical residents to gain insight in complex surgeries and to better understand CAD limitations and possibilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bert Rombaut
- Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; (B.R.); (R.C.)
| | - Matthias Ureel
- Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; (B.R.); (R.C.)
- Swiss MAM Research Group, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Van der Smissen
- Department of Health Technology, Vives University, Doorniksesteenweg 145, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium;
| | - Nicolas Dhooghe
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
| | - Renaat Coopman
- Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; (B.R.); (R.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jeddi FR, Momen-Heravi M, Farrahi R, Nabovati E, Akbari H, Khodabandeh ME. Computer case-based reasoning simulation versus traditional lectures for medical interns teaching of diagnosis and antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infection: a comparative quasi-experimental study. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:1463. [PMID: 39696163 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06453-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 12/04/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute respiratory infections are a common presentation in clinical practice and medical interns must learn proper diagnosis and antibiotic prescribing. Traditional lecture-based teaching may not provide sufficient opportunities for students to apply their knowledge in realistic scenarios, whereas computer case-based simulations offer an alternative approach that allows active learning and decision-making in simulated patient cases. This study investigated the effectiveness of computer case-based reasoning simulation versus traditional lectures for medical interns teaching of diagnosis and antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections. METHODS This comparative quasi-experimental study was conducted from 2020 to 2022 in the Department of Infectious Diseases at Shahid Beheshti Hospital, affiliated to Kashan University of Medical Sciences. The samples were selected using a convenience method and assigned to the intervention and control groups using a permuted block randomization approach. Over a period of ten months (Each month, an average of eight medical interns), a total of 40 medical interns received traditional lecture-based teaching, while another 40 medical interns were taught using a Computer Case-based Reasoning simulation. The medical interns' knowledge in both groups was assessed using pre- and post-tests. The collected data from the pre- and post-tests were then analyzed statistically using paired t-tests, independent t-tests, and ANCOVA. RESULTS The posttest scores of the medical interns in both groups were significantly higher than the pretest scores (P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two teaching methods regarding mean knowledge gains in diagnoses and antibiotic prescribing practices. (P > 0.21). The results of the ANCOVA, after controlling for pre-test scores, showed no statistically significant difference between the two teaching methods in their effect on medical interns' diagnostic and antibiotic prescribing performance (P > 0.33). CONCLUSION The study found that both computer case-based reasoning simulation and traditional lectures were effective in improving medical interns' knowledge of diagnosis and antibiotic prescribing practices for acute respiratory infections. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two teaching methods. Thus, computer- based simulation could replace face-to-face teaching when this method is impractical or computerized methods are more cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Rangraz Jeddi
- Health Information Management Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Mansooreh Momen-Heravi
- Infectious Diseases Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Razieh Farrahi
- Department of Health Information Technology, Ferdows Faculty of Medical Sciences, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
- Ferdows Faculty of Medical Sciences, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Imam Khomeini St, Ferdows, Southern Khorasan, 9771763931, Iran.
| | - Ehsan Nabovati
- Health Information Management Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Hossein Akbari
- Social Determinants of Health (SDH) Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Maryam Edalati Khodabandeh
- Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Al-Ghazawi M, Saad M, Salameh H, Amo-Afful S, Khasawneh S, Ghanem R. Can YouTube Be Considered a Reliable Learning Tool for Urology Trainees Seeking Information on Testicular Exploration? Cureus 2023; 15:e47340. [PMID: 38021729 PMCID: PMC10657232 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction YouTube, the world's largest video platform, hosts thousands of educational surgical videos that many trainees rely on to enhance their understanding and proficiency in various surgical procedures. Consequently, a crucial inquiry arises regarding the trustworthiness of these videos as a valuable resource for these trainees. In this article, we address this question by focusing on one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in the field of urology and assessing the effectiveness of these videos as an educational tool for urology trainees (ST3+: Specialty Training Year 3 and above). Methodology We conducted a comprehensive search on YouTube for all videos related to 'Testicular Exploration'. After applying specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, we identified a total of nine eligible videos for analysis. These videos were assessed using the LAParoscopic Surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) scoring system, which categorized them into two distinct groups. The first group, known as the 'high-quality group', included videos that scored 11 points or higher according to the LAP-VEGaS scoring criteria. The second group, termed the 'low-quality group', consisted of videos that scored less than 11 points using the LAP-VEGaS scoring tool. Additionally, we collected data on various metrics, such as video view counts, duration, likes and dislikes counts, comments count, like ratio, view ratio, and power index, and performed a comparative analysis between the two aforementioned groups. Results Between April 2013 and September 2023, the selected videos exhibited an average total view count of 95,546±138,000. The videos had an average duration of 6.35±2.26 minutes. Furthermore, the mean values for both likes and dislikes were 461.55±581 and 2.89±2.86, respectively. In contrast, the mean like ratio, view ratio, and power index were 0.98±0.0112, 176,00±13,100, and 173.80±131, respectively. The mean LAP-VEGaS scores for videos related to testicular exploration were 9.94±2.05. It is noteworthy that the first group had a statistically higher number of dislikes; however, the view count, comments count, likes count, and view ratio were statistically lower in the same group. Conclusion Videos related to testicular exploration on YouTube exhibit notably low quality and do not serve as a valuable resource for urology trainees. Key factors such as video duration, total view count, and viewer interactions (including likes, dislikes, and comments) should not be relied upon as indicators of educational video quality. Consequently, it is advisable for urology trainees to refrain from using YouTube as a primary source for learning about testicular exploration. Instead, they should seek guidance and support from experienced senior colleagues, educational supervisors, or consultants to explore more reliable sources of information for this surgical procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munir Al-Ghazawi
- Urology, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, GBR
| | - Mohammed Saad
- Urology, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, GBR
| | - Hamza Salameh
- Orthopedics, North Devon District Hospital, Barnstaple, GBR
| | | | | | - Rami Ghanem
- Urology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, JOR
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Online Survey Evaluation of Three Years of European Society of Thoracic Surgeons Educational Webinars as Part of The E-learning Platform. World J Surg 2023; 47:534-544. [PMID: 36280616 PMCID: PMC9592132 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06790-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND E-learning has become an important tool in surgical education in the last decade. The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons launched its e-learning platform in 2013 and started its educational webinars series in 2018. The aim of this paper is to discuss the introduction, evolution and impact of the educational webinars within this e-learning platform. METHODS Twenty-four English spoken webinars discussing different subdomains in general thoracic surgery (21 expert talks, 2 pro-con debates and 1 multidisciplinary case discussion) were analyzed. An online questionnaire on timing, quality and technical aspects of the webinars was sent to 3012 registrants. RESULTS The webinars reached 3128 unique registrants from 76 countries worldwide. The mean number of registrants was 355 with 171 live attendees (48%) and 155 replay watchers (36%). Hundred and twenty-six attendees (13.1% of people who registered for at least 4 webinars) completed the questionnaire. Timing and duration of the webinars were rated "very good" to "excellent" in 78%, and the quality of the webinar content and the expertise of the webinar presenters were rated "very good" to "excellent" in 88% and 90%, respectively. The impact on knowledge and clinical practice was scored with a weighted average of 7.27 out of 10 and 6.79 out of 10, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The ESTS educational webinars were effective in delivering up-to-date knowledge to almost half of the countries around the globe. The impact of these events on knowledge and clinical practice were rated high. New e-learning tools should be added to the surgical educational curriculum.
Collapse
|
5
|
Erwin PA, Lee AC, Ahmad U, Antonoff M, Arndt A, Backhus L, Berry M, Birdas T, Cassivi SD, Chang AC, Cooke DT, Crabtree T, DeCamp M, Donington J, Fernandez F, Force S, Gaissert H, Hofstetter W, Huang J, Kent M, Kim AW, Lin J, Martin LW, Meyerson S, Mitchell JD, Molena D, Odell D, Onaitis M, Puri V, Putnam JB, Reddy R, Schipper P, Seder CW, Shrager J, Tong B, Veeramachaneni N, Watson T, Whyte R, Ferguson MK. Consensus for Thoracoscopic Lower Lobectomy: Essential Components and Targets for Simulation. Ann Thorac Surg 2022; 114:1895-1901. [PMID: 34688617 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.09.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite demonstration of its clear benefits relative to open approaches, a video-assisted thoracic surgery technique for pulmonary lobectomy has not been universally adopted. This study aims to overcome potential barriers by establishing the essential components of the operation and determining which steps are most useful for simulation training. METHODS After randomly selecting experienced thoracic surgeons to participate, an initial list of components to a lower lobectomy was distributed. Feedback was provided by the participants, and modifications were made based on anonymous responses in a Delphi process. Components were declared essential once at least 80% of participants came to an agreement. The steps were then rated based on cognitive and technical difficulty followed by listing the components most appropriate for simulation. RESULTS After 3 rounds of voting 18 components were identified as essential to performance of a video-assisted thoracic surgery for lower lobectomy. The components deemed the most difficult were isolation and division of the basilar and superior segmental branches of the pulmonary artery, isolation and division of the lower lobe bronchus, and dissection of lymphovascular tissue to expose the target bronchus. The steps determined to be most amenable for simulation were isolation and division of the branches of the pulmonary artery, the lower lobe bronchus, and the inferior pulmonary vein. CONCLUSIONS Using a Delphi process a list of essential components for a video-assisted thoracic surgery for lower lobectomy was established. Furthermore 3 components were identified as most appropriate for simulation-based training, providing insights for future simulation development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip A Erwin
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Andy C Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Usman Ahmad
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mara Antonoff
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew Arndt
- Department of Surgery Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Leah Backhus
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Mark Berry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Thomas Birdas
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Andrew C Chang
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - David T Cooke
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, California
| | - Traves Crabtree
- Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois
| | - Malcolm DeCamp
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | | | - Seth Force
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Henning Gaissert
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Wayne Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas
| | - James Huang
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York
| | - Michael Kent
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anthony W Kim
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jules Lin
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Linda W Martin
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Shari Meyerson
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - John D Mitchell
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Aurora, Colorado
| | - Daniela Molena
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York
| | - David Odell
- Department of Surgery Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mark Onaitis
- Department of Surgery, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Varun Puri
- Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Joe B Putnam
- Department of Surgery, Baptist MD Anderson Cancer Center, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Rishindra Reddy
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Paul Schipper
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Joseph Shrager
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Betty Tong
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Thomas Watson
- Department of Surgery, Beaumont Health-Detroit, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Richard Whyte
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mark K Ferguson
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|