Innovative approaches to immunotherapy in breast cancer

Progress in immune checkpoint inhibition in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been particularly effective in treating cancers with robust immune microenvironments and have been successfully incorporated into the management of metastatic ER-negative and HER2-negative breast cancer. This has prompted investigation of immunotherapy in early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) to address the suboptimal clinical outcomes and limited therapeutic options.

AREAS COVERED

This review highlights the studies examining the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with standard chemotherapy in the management of early-stage TNBC and explores ongoing areas of study including the role of adjuvant checkpoint inhibition and novel combination therapies with immunotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The current standard of care for early-stage ER-negative, HER2-negative breast cancer measuring ≥2 cm or with lymph node involvement is neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pembrolizumab followed by ongoing pembrolizumab in the adjuvant setting to complete 1 year of total therapy as per the KEYNOTE-522 study. This approach is associated with improved pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and event free survival, irrespective of PD-L1 status. Many questions remain regarding the optimization of chemotherapy partner(s) for immunotherapy, necessity of adjuvant immunotherapy for patients who achieve pCR, inclusion of other therapies in the adjuvant setting (particularly capecitabine or olaparib), and use of adjuvant immunotherapy when it was not received in the neoadjuvant setting.

Comparative efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in triple negative breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is a lethal subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options. The purpose of this Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) is to compare the efficacy and safety of inhibitors of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in treating TNBC.

METHODS

Our search strategy was used in six databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature database, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science up to November 2nd, 2022, as well as a thorough search in the most used trial registries. We included phase II and III randomized controlled trials that looked at the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of TNBC and reported either Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), or pathological Complete Response (pCR). The risk of bias was assessed utilizing Cochrane's risk of bias 2 tool, and the statistical analysis was performed using a frequentist contrast-based method for NMA by employing standard pairwise meta-analysis applying random effects model.

RESULTS

12 trials (5324 patients) were included in our NMA including seven phase III trials. Pembrolizumab in a neoadjuvant setting achieved a pooled OS of 0.82 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.65 to 1.03), a PFS of 0.82 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.94) and a pCR 2.79 (95% CI 1.07 to 7.24) compared to Atezolizumab's OS of 0.92 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.15), PFS of 0.82 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.97), and pCR of 1.94 (95% CI 0.86 to 4.37). Atezolizumab had less grade ≥ 3 adverse events (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.42) than Pembrolizumab (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.33) in the neoadjuvant setting.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors exhibited varying efficacy in terms of OS, PFS, and pCR. They were associated with an increase in immune-related adverse effects. When used early in the course of TNBC, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors exert their maximum benefit. Durvalumab as a maintenance treatment instead of chemotherapy has shown promising outcomes. Future studies should focus on PD-L1 expression status and TNBC subtypes, since these factors may contribute to the design of individualized TNBC therapy regimens. Systematic review registration PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42022380712.

Circular RNAs Interaction with MiRNAs: Emerging Roles in Breast Cancer

Despite significant advances in cancer therapy strategies, breast cancer is one of the most common and lethal malignancies worldwide. Characterization of a new class of RNAs using next-generation sequencing opened new doors toward uncovering etiopathogenesis mechanisms of breast cancer as well as prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a novel class of RNA with covalently closed and highly stable structures generated primarily from the back-splicing of precursor mRNAs. Although circRNAs exert their function through various mechanisms, acting as a sponge for miRNAs is their primary mechanism of function. Furthermore, growing evidence has shown that aberrant expression of circRNAs is involved in the various hallmarks of cancers. This paper reviews the biogenesis, characteristics, and mechanism of functions of circRNAs and their deregulation in various cancers. Finally, we focused on the circRNAs roles as a sponge for miRNAs in the development, metastasis, angiogenesis, drug resistance, apoptosis, and immune responses of breast cancer.