mHealth impact on secondary stroke prevention: a scoping review of randomized controlled trials among stroke survivors between 2010-2020

Novel Multicomponent Digital Care Assistant and Support Program for People After Stroke or Transient Ischaemic Attack: A Pilot Feasibility Study

Evidence is increasing for digital health programs targeting the secondary prevention of stroke. We aimed to determine the feasibility of the novel Care Assistant and support Program for people after Stroke (CAPS) or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) by combining person-centred goal setting and risk-factor monitoring through a web-based clinician portal, SMS messages, a mobile application (app), and a wearable device. We conducted a 12-week mixed-methods, open-label feasibility study. Participants (6 months-3 years after stroke or TIA, access to the internet via a smartphone/tablet) were recruited via the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry. Participants set one or two secondary prevention goals with a researcher and provided access and training in technology use. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, usability, acceptability, and satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included goal attainment, health outcomes, and program costs. Following 600 invitations, 58 responded, 34/36 (94%) eligible participants commenced the program (one withdrawal; 97% retention), and 10 were interviewed. Participants (27% female, 33% TIA) generally rated the usability of the mobile application as 'Good' to 'Excellent' (System Usability Scale). Most (94%) agreed the program helped with engagement in health self-monitoring. Overall, 52 goals were set, predominantly regarding exercise (21/52), which were the most frequently achieved (9/21). At 12 weeks, participants reported significant improvements (p < 0.05) in self-efficacy (Cohen's d = 0.40), cardiovascular health (d = 0.71), and the mental health domain of the PROMIS GH (d = 0.63). CAPS was acceptable, with good retention and engagement of participants. Evaluation of this program in a randomised controlled trial is warranted.

Current Status of Barriers to mHealth Access Among Patients With Stroke and Steps Toward the Digital Health Era: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Mobile health (mHealth) offers significant benefits for patients with stroke, facilitating remote monitoring and personalized health care solutions beyond traditional settings. However, there is a dearth of comprehensive data, particularly qualitative insights, on the barriers to mHealth access. Understanding these barriers is crucial for devising strategies to enhance mHealth use among patients with stroke.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine the recent literature focusing on barriers to mHealth access among patients with stroke.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus Full Text was conducted for literature published between 2017 and 2023. Abstracts and full texts were independently screened based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data synthesis was performed using the convergent integrated analysis framework recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority were qualitative studies (about 42%), followed by mixed methods (25%), pilot studies (about 17%), nonrandomized controlled trials (about 8%), and observational studies (about 8%). Participants included patients with stroke, caregivers, and various health care professionals. The most common mHealth practices were home-based telerehabilitation (30%) and poststroke mHealth and telecare services (20%). Identified barriers were categorized into two primary themes: (1) at the patient level and (2) at the health provider-patient-device interaction level. The first theme includes 2 subthemes: health-related issues and patient acceptability. The second theme encompassed 3 subthemes: infrastructure challenges (including software, networking, and hardware), support system deficiencies, and time constraints.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review underscores significant barriers to mHealth adoption among patients with stroke. Addressing these barriers in future research is imperative to ensure that mHealth solutions effectively meet patients' needs.

Mobile Technology-Based Interventions for Stroke Self-Management Support: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest in enhancing stroke self-management support using mobile health (mHealth) technology (eg, smartphones and apps). Despite this growing interest, "self-management support" is inconsistently defined and applied in the poststroke mHealth intervention literature, which limits efforts to synthesize and compare evidence. To address this gap in conceptual clarity, a scoping review was conducted.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives were to (1) identify and describe the types of poststroke mHealth interventions evaluated using a randomized controlled trial design, (2) determine whether (and how) such interventions align with well-accepted conceptualizations of self-management support (the theory by Lorig and Holman and the Practical Reviews in Self-Management Support [PRISMS] taxonomy by Pearce and colleagues), and (3) identify the mHealth functions that facilitate self-management.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted according to the methodology by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al. In total, 7 databases were searched. Article screening and data extraction were performed by 2 reviewers. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies (26 interventions) were included. The interventions addressed 7 focal areas (physical exercise, risk factor management, linguistic exercise, activities of daily living training, medication adherence, stroke education, and weight management), 5 types of mobile devices (mobile phones or smartphones, tablets, wearable sensors, wireless monitoring devices, and laptops), and 7 mHealth functions (educating, communicating, goal setting, monitoring, providing feedback, reminding, and motivating). Collectively, the interventions aligned well with the concept of self-management support. However, on an individual basis (per intervention), the alignment was less strong.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the results, it is recommended that future research on poststroke mHealth interventions be more theoretically driven, more multidisciplinary, and larger in scale.

Pragmatic solutions to reduce the global burden of stroke: a World Stroke Organization-Lancet Neurology Commission

Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide. The burden of disability after a stroke is also large, and is increasing at a faster pace in low-income and middle-income countries than in high-income countries. Alarmingly, the incidence of stroke is increasing in young and middle-aged people (ie, age <55 years) globally. Should these trends continue, Sustainable Development Goal 3.4 (reducing the burden of stroke as part of the general target to reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases by a third by 2030) will not be met.

In this Commission, we forecast the burden of stroke from 2020 to 2050. We project that stroke mortality will increase by 50%—from 6·6 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 6·0 million–7·1 million) in 2020, to 9·7 million (8·0 million–11·6 million) in 2050—with disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) growing over the same period from 144·8 million (133·9 million–156·9 million) in 2020, to 189·3 million (161·8 million–224·9 million) in 2050. These projections prompted us to do a situational analysis across the four pillars of the stroke quadrangle: surveillance, prevention, acute care, and rehabilitation. We have also identified the barriers to, and facilitators for, the achievement of these four pillars. Disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) The sum of the years of life lost as a result of premature mortality from a disease and the years lived with a disability associated with prevalent cases of the disease in a population. One DALY represents the loss of the equivalent of one year of full health

On the basis of our assessment, we have identified and prioritised several recommendations. For each of the four pillars (surveillance, prevention, acute care, and rehabilitation), we propose pragmatic solutions for the implementation of evidence-based interventions to reduce the global burden of stroke. The estimated direct (ie, treatment and rehabilitation) and indirect (considering productivity loss) costs of stroke globally are in excess of US$891 billion annually. The pragmatic solutions we put forwards for urgent implementation should help to mitigate these losses, reduce the global burden of stroke, and contribute to achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 3.4, the WHO Intersectoral Global Action Plan on epilepsy and other neurological disorders (2022–2031), and the WHO Global Action Plan for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases.

Reduction of the global burden of stroke, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries, by implementing primary and secondary stroke prevention strategies and evidence-based acute care and rehabilitation services is urgently required. Measures to facilitate this goal include: the establishment of a framework to monitor and assess the burden of stroke (and its risk factors) and stroke services at a national level; the implementation of integrated population-level and individual-level prevention strategies for people at any increased risk of cerebrovascular disease, with emphasis on early detection and control of hypertension; planning and delivery of acute stroke care services, including the establishment of stroke units with access to reperfusion therapies for ischaemic stroke and workforce training and capacity building (and monitoring of quality indicators for these services nationally, regionally, and globally); the promotion of interdisciplinary stroke care services, training for caregivers, and capacity building for community health workers and other health-care providers working in stroke rehabilitation; and the creation of a stroke advocacy and implementation ecosystem that includes all relevant communities, organisations, and stakeholders.

The Lancet Group takes a neutral position with respect to territorial claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A Scoping Review of mHealth Interventions for Secondary Prevention of Stroke: Implications for Policy and Practice

Secondary prevention is a major priority for those living with stroke and may be improved through the use of mobile Health (mHealth) interventions. While evidence for the effectiveness of mHealth interventions for secondary prevention of stroke is growing, little attention has been given to the translation of these interventions into real-world use. In this review, we aimed to provide an update on the effectiveness of mHealth interventions for secondary prevention of stroke, and investigate their translation into real-world use. Four electronic databases and the gray literature were searched for randomized controlled trials of mHealth interventions for secondary prevention of stroke published between 2010 and 2023. Qualitative and mixed-methods evaluations of the trials were also included. Data were extracted regarding study design, population, mHealth technology involved, the intervention, and outcomes. Principal researchers from these trials were also contacted to obtain further translational information. From 1151 records, 13 randomized controlled trials and 4 evaluations were identified; sample sizes varied widely (median, 56; range, 24-4298). Short message service messages (9/13) and smartphone applications (6/13) were the main technologies used to deliver interventions. Primary outcomes of feasibility of the intervention were achieved in 4 trials, and primary outcomes of changes in risk factors, lifestyle behaviors, and adherence to medication improved in 6 trials. Only 1 trial had a hard end point (ie, stroke recurrence) as a primary outcome, and no significant differences were observed between groups. There was evidence for only 1 intervention being successfully translated into real-world use. Further evidence is required on the clinical effectiveness of mHealth interventions for preventing recurrent stroke, and the associated delivery costs and cost-effectiveness, before adoption into real-world settings.