Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI in lymphoma-comparison of global apparent diffusion coefficient histogram parameters for differentiation of diseased nodes of lymphoma patients from normal lymph nodes of healthy individuals

A whole-body diffusion MRI normal atlas: development, evaluation and initial use

BACKGROUND

Statistical atlases can provide population-based descriptions of healthy volunteers and/or patients and can be used for region- and voxel-based analysis. This work aims to develop whole-body diffusion atlases of healthy volunteers scanned at 1.5T and 3T. Further aims include evaluating the atlases by establishing whole-body Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values of healthy tissues and including healthy tissue deviations in an automated tumour segmentation task.

METHODS

Multi-station whole-body Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) and water-fat Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of healthy volunteers (n = 45) were acquired at 1.5T (n = 38) and/or 3T (n = 29), with test-retest imaging for five subjects per scanner. Using deformable image registration, whole-body MRI data was registered and composed into normal atlases. Healthy tissue ADCmean was manually measured for ten tissues, with test-retest percentage Repeatability Coefficient (%RC), and effect of age, sex and scanner assessed. Voxel-wise whole-body analyses using the normal atlases were studied with ADC correlation analyses and an automated tumour segmentation task. For the latter, lymphoma patient MRI scans (n = 40) with and without information about healthy tissue deviations were entered into a 3D U-Net architecture.

RESULTS

Sex- and Body Mass Index (BMI)-stratified whole-body high b-value DWI and ADC normal atlases were created at 1.5T and 3T. %RC of healthy tissue ADCmean varied depending on tissue assessed (4-48% at 1.5T, 6-70% at 3T). Scanner differences in ADCmean were visualised in Bland-Altman analyses of dually scanned subjects. Sex differences were measurable for liver, muscle and bone at 1.5T, and muscle at 3T. Volume of Interest (VOI)-based multiple linear regression, and voxel-based correlations in normal atlas space, showed that age and ADC were negatively associated for liver and bone at 1.5T, and positively associated with brain tissue at 1.5T and 3T. Adding voxel-wise information about healthy tissue deviations in an automated tumour segmentation task gave numerical improvements in the segmentation metrics Dice score, sensitivity and precision.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole-body DWI and ADC normal atlases were created at 1.5T and 3T, and applied in whole-body voxel-wise analyses.

Whole body MRI with Diffusion Weighted Imaging versus 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT in the staging of lymphomas

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic performance of Whole Body (WB)-MRI in comparison with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT) in lymphoma staging and to assess whether quantitative metabolic parameters from 18F-FDG-PET/CT and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values are related.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with a histologically proven primary nodal lymphoma to  undergo 18F-FDG-PET/CT and WB-MRI, both performed within 15 days one from the other, either before starting treatment (baseline) or during treatment (interim). Positive and negative predictive values of WB-MRI for the identification of nodal and extra-nodal disease were measured. The agreement between WB-MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the identification of lesions and staging was assessed through Cohen's coefficient k and observed agreement. Quantitative parameters of nodal lesions derived from 18F-FDG-PET/CT and WB-MRI (ADC) were measured and the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between them. The specified level of significance was p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

Among the 91 identified patients, 8 refused to participate and 22 met exclusion criteria, thus images from 61 patients (37 men, mean age 30.7 years) were evaluated. The agreement between 18F-FDG-PET/CT and WB-MRI for the identification of nodal and extra-nodal lesions was 0.95 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.98) and 1.00 (95% CI NA), respectively; for staging it was 1.00 (95% CI NA). A strong negative correlation was found between ADCmean and SUVmean of nodal lesions in patients evaluated at baseline (Spearman coefficient r_s = - 0.61, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

WB-MRI has a good diagnostic performance for staging of patients with lymphoma in comparison with 18F-FDG-PET/CT and is a promising technique for the quantitative assessment of disease burden in these patients.

The diagnostic performance of whole-body MRI in the staging of lymphomas in adult patients compared to PET/CT and enhanced reference standard-systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Morphology highlighted by diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is the basis of whole-body MRI (wbMRI). The aim of this study was to analyze current knowledge on the diagnostic performance of wbMRI in the pretreatment staging of patients with lymphoma.

METHODS

A search for original articles reporting the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity) of pretreatment (first staging or staging in relapsed patients after complete remission) wbMRI in nodal and extranodal involvement by extracranial lymphoma and the agreement of stage by the Cotswolds-modified Ann Arbor classification in adult patients compared to the reference standard (PET/CT or enhanced reference standard) was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov.

RESULTS

Altogether 15 studies with 519 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for nodal involvement were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.96) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98 to 1.00). For nodal staging, most studies used the size criterion of 10 mm in the short diameter (n=10) and the absence of prominent fatty hilum (n=4). Restricted diffusion on diffusion-weighted imaging as a sign of nodal involvement was either not used (n=5), used for detection (n=4), semi-quantitatively (n=4), or quantitatively (n=1). Only one study (7) relied solely on restricted diffusion as the main criterion for nodal involvement. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for extranodal involvement were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.79 to 0.98) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.00). Seven studies considered diffuse splenic involvement when its long or vertical axis was greater than 13 cm regardless of the patient's physiognomy. The pooled agreement in staging (Cohen's kappa) was almost perfect (0.90, 95% CI: 0.84 to 0.95).

DISCUSSION

The sensitivity and specificity of wbMRI in the assessment of the nodal and extranodal involvement by lymphoma is high. The agreement of wbMRI with the reference standard is almost perfect.