2D ultrasound diagnosis of middle compartment prolapse: a multicenter study

Diagnostic utility of translabial ultrasound in pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The increasing awareness of women's health issues, specifically pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI), has spurred a surge in patients seeking specialised advice for these conditions, necessitating modern diagnostic approaches for such issues. This study explored the diagnostic utility of translabial ultrasound for POP, emphasising its correlation with clinical assessments based on International Continence Society (ICS) criteria.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients with POP Quantification System (POP-Q) stage 0-IV with or without UI were prospectively enrolled at Jagiellonian University Medical College between 2014 and 2016. The study objectives included evaluating diagnostic accuracy and concordance across pelvic compartments, correlating the diagnoses with patient-reported symptoms, and identifying variables contributing to diagnostic discrepancies.

RESULTS

Translabial ultrasound identified POP in 74.5% of the patients, aligning closely with clinical evaluations. Concordance was the highest in assessments performed in the medial compartment (85.8%), while assessments performed in the anterior (29.6%) and posterior (29.6%) compartments showed higher rates of discrepancies. Correlation analyses showed varying associations, with the posterior compartment exhibiting the least pronounced correlation (R = 0.72, p < 0.0001). Self-perceive POP showed no discernible differences in relation to ultrasonographic and clinical assessments. Among the respondents, 55.9% reported experiencing the sensation of POP. Mean POP levels determined using the two approaches precisely matched in 46.5% of these cases. Discrepancies involved variables such as self-perceived POP, number of deliveries, child weight at birth, UI, and sexual activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Translabial ultrasound showed robust correlation with clinical assessments for evaluating POP, especially for defining defects and facilitating treatment-related decision-making. Our findings highlight the reliability of this method, particularly for assessments in the medial compartment. The evidence did not indicate the superiority of either method in detecting POP disorders for symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients. Significantly, a higher POP-Q measurement in clinical examination was correlated with greater sexual activity.

A systematic review of uterine cervical elongation and meta-analysis of Manchester repair

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to consolidate current research on cervical elongation, a common but often overlooked complication in pelvic organ prolapse and hysteropexy procedures. It seeks to define, diagnose, and manage cervical elongation, aiming to establish standardized criteria and strategies to enhance clinical outcomes for this condition.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was executed utilizing the keywords: "cervical elongation," "long cervix uteri," "Manchester," and "cervical amputation". Data were gathered and organized in an Excel spreadsheet, with the analysis conducted according to each category, methodology, or reference range.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All types of study designs with full-text availability, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, case reports, and systematic reviews, were considered for inclusion. Included studies were fully accessible in English and focused on the topic of interest. Exclusions were made for studies addressing cervical elongation not pertinent to pelvic organ prolapse, and publications such as secondary analyses, case reports, literature reviews, and opinion papers.

RESULTS

Out of 108 relevant studies, only 63 defined their inclusion criteria; of these, 57 were utilized for the narrative review and 8 were used in a meta-analysis comparing the Manchester operation with vaginal hysterectomy. Magnetic Resonance Imaging offers the highest sensitivity in measuring cervical elongation, its practical limitations and high cost necessitate the use of the more feasible Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q), particularly effective for stage 2 and 3 prolapse cases. The POP-Q point C emerges as a pivotal marker for identifying cervical elongation, with specific measurements indicating the condition's presence. The Manchester-Fothergill procedure presents a viable management option for isolated cervical elongation, showing fewer complications and comparable recurrence rates to vaginal hysterectomy.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the diagnostic and definitional diversity of cervical elongation within populations experiencing pelvic organ prolapse. It emphasizes the critical role of preoperative cervical evaluation, particularly in patients with uterine descensus for selecting the most appropriate surgical intervention.

Is the Presence of Levator Ani Muscle Avulsion Relevant for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse?

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the addition of the assessment of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion to the measurement of the difference in the pubis-uterine fundus distance between rest and with the Valsalva maneuver could increase the diagnostic capacity of ultrasound for uterine prolapse (UP).

METHODS

This multicenter, observational and prospective study included 145 patients. Ultrasound assessment was performed, establishing the diagnosis of UP as a difference between the pubic-uterine fundus distance at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver ≥15 mm (standard technique), while LAM avulsion was defined as an abnormal LAM insertion in three central slices using multislice ultrasound. A binary multivariate logistic regression model was made using nonautomated methods to predict surgical UP (general population, premenopausal, and postmenopausal patients), including the difference between the pubis-uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver as well as LAM avulsion.

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients completed the study. The addition of LAM avulsion criteria to the standard dynamic distance-based protocol for the diagnosis of UP resulted in a higher sensitivity for the general population (79.7 vs 68.1%) as well as for premenopausal (89.3 vs 79.9%) and postmenopausal patients (76 vs 66.1%). In contrast, the standard technique showed a higher specificity than the model based on the standard technique associated with LAM avulsion for the general population (89.2 vs 74.3%) and premenopausal women (91.7 vs 63.2%). For postmenopausal patients, the model based on the standard technique associated with LAM avulsion had a higher sensitivity (76 vs 66.1%) and specificity (91.7 vs 86.8%) than the ultrasound diagnosis of UP.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of the assessment of LAM avulsion in the ultrasound diagnosis of UP is useful in postmenopausal patients, increasing sensitivity and specificity relative to the ultrasound assessment based only on the difference between the pubis-uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver.

Is It Possible to Diagnose Surgical Uterine Prolapse With Transperineal Ultrasound? Multicenter Validation of Diagnostic Software

OBJECTIVES

To validate an ultrasound software that uses transperineal ultrasound to diagnose uterine prolapse (UP).

METHODS

Multicenter, observational and prospective study with 155 patients that had indications for surgical intervention for dysfunctional pelvic floor pathology. Each patient underwent an examination with Pozzi tenaculum forceps was performed in the operating room with the patient anesthetized, followed by surgical correction of stages II-IV UP. Transperineal ultrasound was used to assess the difference in the pubis-uterine fundus measurement. With a multivariate logistic regression binary model (with the measurement ultrasound at rest, the Valsalva maneuver and age) using nonautomated methods to predict UP. With the purpose of evaluating the model, a table with coordinates of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, after which sensitivity and specificity were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were included (73 with a diagnosis of surgical UP). It was obtained from the AUC (0.89) of the probabilities predicted by the model (95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.95; P < .0005). Based on the ROC curve for the model, obtaining a sensitivity of 91.8% and a specificity of 72.7%, values that were superior to those for the clinical exam for surgical UP (sensitivity: 80.8%; specificity: 71.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

We validated software that uses transperineal ultrasound of the pelvic floor and patient age to generate a more reliable diagnosis of surgical UP than that obtained from clinical examinations.

Identification of Surgical Uterine Prolapse in Premenopausal Patients With Clinical or Ultrasound Criteria? A Multicenter Comparative Study

OBJECTIVES

It is unknown whether diagnosing uterine prolapse (UP) via ultrasound or surgical criteria is superior. Our objective is to determine whether the diagnostic capacity of ultrasound with surgical criteria differs from that of surgical criteria only.

METHODS

This was a multicenter prospective observational study with 54 premenopausal patients with surgical criteria for a dysfunctional pelvic floor pathology who were consecutively recruited for 1 year. Clinical UP with surgical criteria was defined when UP stage II-IV was identified (during pelvic floor consultation), and UP diagnosed by ultrasound with surgical criteria was established when a difference ≥15 mm was found between rest and Valsalva applied to the pubis-uterine fundus. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were determined to evaluate clinical and ultrasound methodologies as diagnostic tests.

RESULTS

UP diagnosed by ultrasound with surgical criteria presented better sensitivity (78.57 vs 35.71%), specificity (92.11 vs 81.58%), positive predictive value (61.83 vs 23.99%), and negative predictive value (96.35 vs 11.37%) than UP diagnosed by surgical criteria only.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound with surgical criteria is superior to surgical criteria alone when diagnosing UP.

Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse Based on Transperineal Ultrasound

We want to describe a model that allows the use of transperineal ultrasound to define the probability of experiencing uterine prolapse (UP). This was a prospective observational study involving 107 patients with UP or cervical elongation (CE) without UP. The ultrasound study was performed using transperineal ultrasound and evaluated the differences in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver. We generated different multivariate binary logistic regression models using nonautomated methods to predict UP, including the difference in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver. The parameters were added progressively according to their simplicity of use and their predictive capacity for identifying UP. We used two binary logistic regression models to predict UP. Model 1 was based on the difference in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver and the age of the patient [AUC: 0.967 (95% CI, 0.939−0.995; p < 0.0005)]. Model 2 used the difference in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver, age, avulsion and ballooning (AUC: 0.971 (95% CI, 0.945−0.997; p < 0.0005)). In conclusion, the model based on the difference in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver and the age of the patient could predict 96.7% of patients with UP.