Urologic issues in pediatric transplant recipients

[Kidney transplantation in children with complex urogenital malformations-what should be considered?]

BACKGROUND

Congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract (CAKUT) are the most common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in children. Approximately one third of children with CAKUT have lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD).

AIM

This article highlights the important aspects that need to be considered in kidney transplantation of children with complex urogenital malformations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The paper reviews the existing literature regarding the evaluation, preparation, perioperative management, and follow-up of children with complex urogenital malformations and ESRD undergoing renal transplantation.

RESULTS

Comprehensive diagnostics are required before any pediatric kidney transplantation. If LUTD is suspected, voiding cystourethrography and a urodynamic examination should be performed. Treatment of symptomatic vesicoureterorenal reflux and LUTD is mandatory prior to pediatric kidney transplantation. Following successful kidney transplantation of children with congenital urogenital malformations, lifelong follow-up is required. Regular reevaluations of the bladder by means of urodynamic examinations are necessary. In patients following bladder augmentation with intestinal segments or urinary diversions in childhood, regular endoscopic examinations of the urinary tract are recommended to rule out secondary malignancy.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of children with complex urogenital malformations should be carried out in centers with appropriate expertise.

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

Pearls and Pitfalls in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation After 5 Decades

Worldwide, over 1,300 pediatric kidney transplantations are performed every year. Since the first transplantation in 1959, healthcare has evolved dramatically. Pre-emptive transplantations with grafts from living donors have become more common. Despite a subsequent improvement in graft survival, there are still challenges to face. This study attempts to summarize how our understanding of pediatric kidney transplantation has developed and improved since its beginnings, whilst also highlighting those areas where future research should concentrate in order to help resolve as yet unanswered questions. Existing literature was compared to our own data of 411 single-center pediatric kidney transplantations between 1968 and 2020, in order to find discrepancies and allow identification of future challenges. Important issues for future care are innovations in immunosuppressive medication, improving medication adherence, careful donor selection with regard to characteristics of both donor and recipient, improvement of surgical techniques and increased attention for lower urinary tract dysfunction and voiding behavior in all patients.

Surgical considerations in paediatric kidney transplantation: an update

Background

Kidney transplantation has established itself as the most appropriate mode of renal replacement therapy for the majority with end-stage kidney disease. Although at present this is applicable for children as well as adults, a few decades back kidney transplantation was not considered a first-line option in children. This was due to inferior outcomes following transplantation in this age group compared to that of adults. These poor results were attributed to challenges in paediatric transplantation such as the shortage of suitable donors, technical difficulties in performing a sound vascular anastomosis and the adverse effects of immunosuppressive medication on growth and development. However, current patient and graft-centred outcomes after paediatric transplantation equal or surpass that of adults. The advances in evaluation and management of specific surgical concerns in children who undergo transplantation, such as pre-transplant native nephrectomy, correction of congenital anomalies of the urinary tract, placement of an adult-sized kidney in a small child and minimizing the risk of allograft thrombosis, have contributed immensely for these remarkable outcomes.

Conclusions

In this review, we aim to discuss surgical factors that can be considered unique for children undergoing kidney transplantation. We believe that an updated knowledge on these issues will be invaluable for transplant clinicians, who are dealing with paediatric kidney transplantation.

Pediatric kidney transplantation, a technical update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pediatric kidney transplantation is the definitive therapy for infants and children suffering from renal failure. It is a distinct endeavor demanding specialized care for optimal results. This includes a dedicated preoperative workup accounting for unique predisposing urologic conditions, specialized surgical techniques, and careful hemodynamic monitoring and maintenance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Historically, size-matched renal allografts from pediatric donors to pediatric recipients suffered from poor outcomes. Advances in surgical technique performed at high volume centers have shown that these operations can be performed safely, helping expand the donor pool for these patients. Concurrently, transplantation of increasingly small for size infants with complex medical and surgical backgrounds has become a reality.

SUMMARY

On a policy front, efforts to expand access to size-matched organs, combined with advances in medical management and immunosuppression have seen pediatric renal transplantation reach new heights. Now, these breakthroughs are heightened by the ability to transplant such organs into the smallest infants. The net result will be diminished transplant waiting times and, accordingly, improved quality of life and longevity for children suffering from renal failure.

Update on the Management of Urological Problems Following Kidney Transplantation

Urological problems in kidney transplant recipients are not limited only to posttransplantation urological complications. These problems are a cause of significant patient mortality and morbidity that have wide-ranging effects on graft survival throughout the entire life of the graft. Ultimately, the transplant comprises a major portion of the urinary system; therefore, the transplant team should be prepared for foreseeable and unforeseeable urological problems in the short and long terms. These mainly include postoperative urological complications (urine leakage, ureteral stenosis, and vesicoureteral reflux), bladder outlet obstruction, and graft urolithiasis. In recent years, significant advances have been made in the management of urological complications, especially due to advances in endourologic interventions. The aim of this review is to summarize the management of urological problems after kidney transplantation in the context of the current literature.