Head-to-Head Comparison between High-Resolution Microultrasound Imaging and Multiparametric MRI in Detecting and Local Staging of Bladder Cancer: The BUS-MISS Protocol

BACKGROUND

MRI has been proposed as a new staging tool for bladder cancer (BC), but use is limited by its high costs and low availability. 29-MHz high-resolution micro-ultrasound (mUS) technology has been suggested as an alternative to detect BC and distinguish between muscle-invasive and non-muscle invasive BC.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of mUS vs. magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in differentiating NMIBC and MIBC at definitive pathological examination.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of patients with a primary diagnosis of BC with either positive urine cytology (UC) or negative UC and a tumor size > 25 mm from a tertiary care high volume center. mUS, with the ExactVu system with an EV29L 29 MHz side-fire transducer, and a 3-Tesla MRI were performed before transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) in every patient before undergoing TURBT. We compared the imaging results with pathological reports.

RESULTS

The analyzed population consisted of 58 individuals. The reported mUS and MRI sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were 85.0%, 76.3%, 65.4%, and 90.6%, versus 85.0%, 50.0%, 47.2%, and 86.4%, respectively. In accuracy analysis, the AUC for mUS and MRI were respectively 0.807 and 0.675.

CONCLUSIONS

In our population mUS seems to have a better performance in distinguishing NMIBC from MIBC. The main limitation of mUS is the probe shape that makes its use problematic in cases with a large prostate and inadequate rectal preparation. Further studies with a larger population are ongoing to compare and validate these techniques in this setting.