Vasoepididymostomy: an insight into current practice patterns

The Diversity of Vasectomy Reversal Providers and Their Web-based Advertising Habits in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To better understand the internet advertising material published on clinician websites for the 30,000 men who undergo evaluation for vasectomy reversal (VR), which is a technically demanding procedure requiring microsurgical expertise.

METHODS

Internet search trends for "vasectomy" and "vasectomy reversal" from 2004 to 2022 were assessed using Google Trends. Search engines were then queried on a state-by-state basis for physicians performing VR and the available information aggregated and analyzed using standard statistical approaches.

RESULTS

VR search volume consistently represented roughly one-tenth of the search volume for vasectomy. One hundred and ninety reversal clinics were identified in 44 of 50 states with the highest number identified in the southeast region and an overall median price of $6500. Ninety percent of physicians were male and completed residencies in urology. Other specialties included obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, family medicine and orthopedic surgery. Forty-two percent of urologists had completed infertility fellowships. Sixty percent of physicians utilized a microscope, and 4.7% of physicians explicitly stated they did not perform vasoepididymostomy even when indicated. Fifty two percent of clinics reported VR success rates as high as 100%, and 34% of clinics reported pregnancy outcomes. Twenty-five percent of clinics reported out-of-pocket VR pricing and 26% discussed possible complications.

CONCLUSION

VR is a technically demanding cash-pay procedure being performed by physicians with a wide array of backgrounds and outcomes. Urologists should strive to lead by example and report their training, personal experiences, and expected outcomes to enable optimal medical decision making for each patient.

Practice patterns of vasal reconstruction in a large United States cohort

We aimed to characterise diverse practice patterns for vasal reconstruction and to determine whether surgeon volume is associated with vasoepididymostomy performance at the time of reconstruction. We identified adult men who underwent vasal reconstruction from 2000 to 2020 in Premier Healthcare Database and determined patient, surgeon, cost and hospital characteristics for each procedure. We identified 3,494 men who underwent either vasovasostomy-alone (N = 2,595, 74.3%) or any-vasoepididymostomy (N = 899, 25.7%). The majority of providers (N = 487, 88.1%) performed only-vasovasostomy, 10 (1.8%) providers performed only-vasoepididymostomy and 56 (10.1%) providers performed both. Median total hospital charge of vasoepididymostomy was significantly higher than vasovasostomy ($39,163, interquartile range [IQR]$11,854-53,614 and $17,201, IQR$10,904-29,986, respectively). On multivariable regression, men who underwent procedures at nonacademic centres (OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.12-3.49) with higher volume surgeons (OR 11.60, 95% CI 8.65-16.00) were more likely to undergo vasoepididymostomy. Furthermore, men who underwent vasoepididymostomy were more likely to self-pay (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.83-3.04, p < .001) and more likely had procedures in the Midwest or West region (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.66-2.96 and OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.61-2.76, respectively; p < .001). High-volume providers have increased odds of performing vasoepididymostomy at the time of reconstruction but at a significantly higher cost. These data suggest possibly centralising reconstructive procedures among high-volume providers.

Vasectomy Reversal Online Marketing Practices: What Are We Putting Out There?

OBJECTIVE

To determine characteristics of providers marketing vasectomy reversal (VR) online, degree of information available online, the ease with which patients can compare providers, and the differences in VR practice patterns between academic and private practices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified VR practices operating within the top 50 most populous metropolitan areas in the US. Practice websites were reviewed to obtain information such as provider educational background, level of magnification, ability to perform vasoepididymostomy, surgical volume, and cost. Based on information available, providers were assigned a novel REVERSAL score created by the authors. Descriptive statistics were used to compare results.

RESULTS

Of the 107 providers identified (29 academic, 78 private), the majority were male urologists with a Doctor of Medicine degree. Academic providers were more likely to have fellowship training than private practice providers, 96.6 vs 43.6%, respectively (P = 0.00001). Compared to non-urologists, urologists were less likely to purchase online ads or disclose cost. Non-urologists charged significantly less than urologists, $3,584 ± 1,554 and $6,591 ± 1,518, respectively (P = 0.00001). Only one provider provided complete information as defined by REVERSAL score of 12, with the majority (61.7%) of providers achieving score ≤6.

CONCLUSION

There is significant lack of transparency in publicly available information from VR practices. Practices should implement measures to improve dissemination of information to the public, so that patients can more easily compare providers and make informed decisions regarding VR.