Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in “primary” and “secondary” muscle-invasive bladder cancer—is it a surrogate for molecular subtypes?

[Predictive biomarkers in bladder cancer]

BACKGROUND

In the last few years, significant progress has been achieved in the therapeutic options for advanced urothelial bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this work was to give an overview of the status and future perspective of the therapeutic options in this setting. Its focus is on the discussion of tissue-based therapy-predictive markers, which are evaluated through (molecular) pathology and thereby strengthening the role of pathology itself.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Current (clinical study) data, the literature, and our own expertise were considered and summarized in the areas of therapy prediction of platinum-based chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and other therapeutic approaches.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Molecular subtypes exhibit a predictive value both in platinum-based chemotherapy as well as in immunotherapy. However, further work is required to elucidate the predictive role of molecular subtypes in both settings. Changes in the DNA damage repair enzyme (DDR) genes, ERCC2, and ERBB2 as well as differences in the expression of EMMPRIN, survivin, and HMGA2 show promising results as further markers of chemotherapy efficacy. In the prediction of immunotherapy success, this mainly relates to the evaluation of the tumor mutation burden (TMB), tumor neoantigen burden (TNB), APOBEC signatures (MSig1; 3A/3B), and CD8-positive T‑effector cell signature. When using the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor erdafitinib, which has not yet been approved in Germany, the evaluation of specific FGFR mutations and/or gene fusions by a companion diagnostic test is mandatory in the USA.

[Predictive biomarkers in oncologic uropathology]

BACKGROUND

Tumors of the genitourinary system are common. In recent years, our understanding of their molecular background and therefore the number of potential predictive biomarkers has massively increased.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current work is to give an overview of recent (molecular) developments and predictive biomarkers in urologic oncology and to give a perspective of what might become relevant in the future of the field.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We considered the recent literature and study data and combined it with our own expertise in tumors of the urinary system, kidneys, and prostate.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The molecular subtypes of muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (MIBC) hold a predictive and prognostic significance and correlate with clinicopathological features. Immune therapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has a major role in urothelial carcinoma (UC), but also in renal cell carcinoma and a subgroup of prostate cancers. The first-line use in UC is restricted to PD-L1-"positive" cases (≥IC2/3, CPS ≥ 10). Further predictive markers are currently under evaluation, while the predictive significance of tumor mutational burden (TMB) is under debate. In addition to a subgroup of renal cell carcinomas, a subgroup of prostate carcinomas with alterations in the DNA repair system might benefit from a customized therapy approach (PARP inhibitors, platin-containing chemotherapy). The multitude of potentially therapy-relevant molecular alterations and related predictive biomarkers calls for the implementation of sophisticated molecular analyses in daily routine. This will lead to an even more rapid dynamic in the field of genitourinary pathology.