A simple method for tension-free Billroth I anastomosis after gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Billroth I, a Viable Alternative in Early Distal Gastric Cancers: Short-Term Results from an Indian Tertiary Care Center

The only hope of cure in carcinoma stomach is gastrectomy; it can be total or partial depending upon the location of the tumor. While there is no controversy in the extent of resection, the choice of anastomosis after partial gastrectomy is a matter of debate. For pyloric lesions, we felt that in spite of the ease of performing surgery, simplicity, being physiological, and time-saving, Billroth I is underutilized. Hence, the study rationale was to compare Billroth I and Billroth II anastomosis post-gastric resection in the surgical management of gastric cancer. This was a retrospective study performed in the Department of Surgical Oncology, Acharya Harihar Regional Cancer Centre (AHRCC), Cuttack, Odisha. A total of 95 patients who underwent distal radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer during 2016 and 2017 were included in the study. Nineteen patients underwent Billroth I reconstruction and 76 patients underwent Billroth II reconstruction. In the case of both groups, no statistically significant differences (p˂0.05) were found in terms of early post-operative complications or long-term post-operative follow-up in our experience. Billroth I reconstruction is a simple, oncologically safe, economical, and physiological procedure. It can be performed when there is availability of large stomach remnant post-gastric resection. However, there is no significant difference between Billroth I and Billroth II in terms of patient's recovery and post-operative complications.

Ten Thousand Consecutive Gastrectomies for Gastric Cancer: Perspectives of a Master Surgeon

As radical gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is currently the best strategy to cure gastric cancer, the role of the surgeon remains quite important in conquering it. Dr. Sung Hoon Noh, a surgeon and surgical oncologist specializing in gastric cancer, has treated gastric cancer for 30 years and has conducted over 10000 cases of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. He first adapted an electrocautery device into gastric cancer surgery and has led standardization of surgical procedures, including spleen preserving gastrectomy. His procedures based on patient-oriented insights have become the basis of the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery. He has also contributed to improving patient's survival through adoption of a multidisciplinary approach: he proved the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical D2 gastrectomy for stage II/III gastric cancer in clinical trials, updating treatment guidelines throughout the world. Dr. Noh also opened the era of precision medicine for treating gastric cancer, as he developed and validated a mRNA expression based algorithm to predict prognosis and response to chemotherapy. This article reviews his contribution and long history of service in the field of gastric cancer. The perspectives of this master surgeon, based on his profound experience and insights, will outline directions for integrative multidisciplinary health care and how can surgeons prepare for the future.

Curative Effect of Digestive Tract Reconstruction After Radical Gastrectomy for Distal Gastric Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Short-term complications and long-term prognoses of three kinds of digestive tract reconstructions after radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer were compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer were divided into three groups according to the type of digestive tract reconstruction: Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Clinicopathological characteristics, intraoperative conditions, short-term complications, and long-term prognoses were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the clinicopathological characteristics and postoperative complications among the three groups (P > .05). There was no significant difference in the operative times of the Billroth I and Billroth II anastomosis groups, but the operative times in both groups were shorter than the operative time in the Roux-en-Y anastomosis group (P < .05). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in the Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y anastomosis groups was 58.3%, 55.0%, and 62.2%, respectively, with no significant difference among the three groups. There was no significant difference in the OS rate according to the tumor node metastasis stage among the three groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

The postoperative complications and prognoses were similar in the different digestive tract reconstruction groups. Billroth I anastomosis is a simple surgical method that can be used for gastrointestinal reconstruction after distal gastrectomy.