1
|
Sheffer CE. Tobacco quitlines: Opportunities for innovation to increase reach and effectiveness. Prev Med 2022; 165:107319. [PMID: 36283486 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The largest tobacco treatment network in North America, Tobacco Quitlines are an effective population-based approach to increase tobacco cessation; however, overall reach has decreased significantly in the past decade. A new generation of innovations responsive to evolving shifts in communication preferences, supported by research, and focused on increasing the impact of services have the potential to reinvigorate this network. The goal of this narrative review was to identify opportunities for innovation in Quitline service delivery, synthesize evidence for these opportunities, and identify gaps in the research. Innovation was defined as significant shift in current practice by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches, methodologies, or interventions. The Experimental Medicine Approach informed the identification of gaps in the research. The specific domains were selected by reviewing previous reviews, commentaries, calls for action, and a recent report on promising practices. Evidence was garnered primarily from systematic reviews. Opportunities included automated and interactive digital therapeutics, novel health communications for stigma-free media campaigns, methods to increase access to nicotine replacement therapies, novel treatment options and combinations, and methods to promote engagement with digital therapeutics. Research topics that cross multiple domains include the consideration of theoretical frameworks, the identification of therapeutic targets and mechanisms of action, and the development of adapted approaches to address specific challenges and cultural responsivity. Finally, an examination is needed to understand how to improve the speed with which innovations are developed and implemented in this network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Sheffer
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Health Behavior, Elm & Carlton, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu L, He Y, Jiang B, Zhang D, Tian H, Zuo F, Lam TH. Very brief physician advice and supplemental proactive telephone calls to promote smoking reduction and cessation in Chinese male smokers with no intention to quit: a randomized trial. Addiction 2017; 112:2032-2040. [PMID: 28623848 DOI: 10.1111/add.13908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Revised: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS There is inconsistent evidence that behavioural support to promote smoking reduction is effective at increasing smoking cessation. We examined the effectiveness of brief physician advice together with four very brief telephone calls in promoting smoking cessation among Chinese men via reduction compared with equivalent advice on diet and exercise. DESIGN A two-group pragmatic randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING Male patients attending the Endocrinology and Acupuncture out-patient clinics of a general hospital in Beijing, China. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATORS Physicians advised participants allocated to the smoking-reduction intervention (SRI, n = 181) group to reduce smoking to at least half of their current consumption within 1 month at baseline. At follow-up, a telephone counsellor repeated this advice if the participant had not reduced their cigarette consumption. Participants who had reduced consumption were encouraged to quit smoking. Physicians gave participants in the exercise and diet advice (EDA, n = 188) control group brief advice about physical activity and healthy diet at baseline, and a telephone counsellor reinforced this at each follow-up interview. Both groups had one face-to-face interview at baseline plus five telephone interviews and interventions (approximately 1 minute each) at 1 week and 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was self-reported 6-month prolonged abstinence rate at 12-month follow-up interview. FINDINGS By intention-to-treat, the self-reported 6-month prolonged abstinence rate at 12-month follow-up in the SRI groups (19 quitters, 15.7%) was higher, but not significantly, than the EDA control group (10 quitters, 7.8%), and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was 2.26 (0.97-5.26), P = 0.062. The self-reported 7-day point prevalence quit rate (secondary outcome) in the SRI group was significantly higher than the control group at each follow-up interview (at 12-month follow-up: 13.3 versus 6.9%, OR (95% CI) = 2.09 (1.01, 4.34), P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS A very brief, proactive and low-cost smoking-reduction intervention without medications for Chinese male smokers with no intention to quit appears to increase smoking abstinence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Wu
- Institute of Geriatrics, Chinese People's Liberation Army of China General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Aging and Geriatrics, Chinese People's Liberation Army of China General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yao He
- Institute of Geriatrics, Chinese People's Liberation Army of China General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Aging and Geriatrics, Chinese People's Liberation Army of China General Hospital, Beijing, China
- State Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease, Chinese People's Liberation Army of China General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Jiang
- Nanlou Department of Acupuncture, Chinese People's Liberation Army of China General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Di Zhang
- Institute of Geriatrics, Chinese People's Liberation Army of China General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Aging and Geriatrics, Chinese People's Liberation Army of China General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Tian
- Nanlou Department of Endocrinology, Chinese People's Liberation Army of China General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Fang Zuo
- Nanlou Department of Acupuncture, Chinese People's Liberation Army of China General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tai Hing Lam
- Institute of Geriatrics, Chinese People's Liberation Army of China General Hospital, Beijing, China
- School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Griffin JM, Malcolm C, Wright P, Hagel Campbell E, Kabat M, Bangerter AK, Sayer NA. U.S. Veteran Health Care Utilization Increases after Caregivers' Use of National Caregiver Telephone Support Line. HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK 2017; 42:e111-e119. [PMID: 28371802 DOI: 10.1093/hsw/hlx016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2016] [Accepted: 08/23/2016] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) established the national Caregiver Support Line (CSL) in February 2011. The CSL is operated by licensed master's degree social workers who provide caregivers of veterans with information about caregiver benefits and services, counseling, and referrals to a caregiver support coordinator at the nearest VA medical center. The authors compared differences in veteran health care utilization patterns in the six months before and after a caregiver call to the CSL, hypothesizing that veterans with caregivers using the CSL had improved access to health care services and improved access increased utilization of health care. A pre- and posttest design was used. CSL calls that resulted in referrals to VA health care services or to local VA caregiver support coordinators were included in the sample. Data were extracted from the CSL database and matched to veteran care utilization data using veteran medical record data. Veteran inpatient stays for general medicine, hospice, respite, and long-term care significantly increased after the CSL call, but other inpatient stays (surgery, neurology) did not. Outpatient services for home health, respite, and mental health all significantly increased. Caregivers' use of the national CSL may help facilitate access for veterans to needed care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan M Griffin
- Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, and Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Avenue SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Care Management and Social Work Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems. Care Management and Social Work Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Cari Malcolm
- Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, and Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Avenue SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Care Management and Social Work Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems. Care Management and Social Work Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Pamela Wright
- Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, and Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Avenue SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Care Management and Social Work Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems. Care Management and Social Work Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Emily Hagel Campbell
- Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, and Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Avenue SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Care Management and Social Work Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems. Care Management and Social Work Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Margaret Kabat
- Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, and Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Avenue SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Care Management and Social Work Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems. Care Management and Social Work Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Ann K Bangerter
- Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, and Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Avenue SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Care Management and Social Work Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems. Care Management and Social Work Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Nina A Sayer
- Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, and Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Avenue SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Care Management and Social Work Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems. Care Management and Social Work Services, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care Systems, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leischow SJ, Okamoto J, McIntosh S, Ossip DJ, Lando HA. Network analysis of global tobacco control collaboration: data from the World Conference on Tobacco or Health (WCTOH). BMC Public Health 2017; 17:338. [PMID: 28427366 PMCID: PMC5397691 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4234-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2016] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The World Conference on Tobacco or Health (WCTOH) is held every three years to foster communication and collaboration on global tobacco control. Very little is known about the nature of interactions between WCTOH attendees and their linkages to tobacco control organizations, so knowing this information could help improve tobacco control efforts. Methods At the 2015 WCTOH, we implemented an online survey to assess barriers to global tobacco control activities, which information sources they use for tobacco control information, and with whom they interact regarding tobacco control. Results A total of 169 respondents completed the survey, with responses from all six World Health Organization (WHO) regions. Respondents worked in all areas of tobacco control; the most common were research (29.2%) and patient care/treatment (23.3%). The top barriers faced regarding tobacco control activities were: funding is weak (56.8%), government commitment (45.0%), tobacco industry interference (43.8%), and lack of coordination (34.3%). The network analysis identified Framework Convention Alliance (FCA) and Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT) as the two most prominent groups that people belonged to and where they went to exchange information and best practices. Important regional and country specific groups also appear to be growing, such as the African Tobacco Control Alliance (ATCA) and the Argentinian Association of Tabacology (ASAT). Discussion Mapping and better understanding the global tobacco control network is important for informing knowledge exchange and best practices, particularly as increasing attention is being focused on global tobacco control efforts in low- and middle-income countries in particular. Conclusions The present study demonstrates that even a subsample of the WCTOH shows considerable collaboration. The full WCTOH network should be mapped in order to foster greater collaboration that has the the potential to improve global tobacco control efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janet Okamoto
- Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Scott McIntosh
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA
| | - Deborah J Ossip
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bricker JB, Copeland W, Mull KE, Zeng EY, Watson NL, Akioka KJ, Heffner JL. Single-arm trial of the second version of an acceptance & commitment therapy smartphone application for smoking cessation. Drug Alcohol Depend 2017; 170:37-42. [PMID: 27870987 PMCID: PMC5183543 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2016] [Revised: 10/21/2016] [Accepted: 10/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The first randomized trial of a smartphone application (app) for adult smoking cessation (SmartQuit 1.0) revealed key features that predict cessation. These findings guided the revision of this Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT)-based application (SmartQuit 2.0), which was primarily tested to examine participant receptivity, short-term cessation and reduction, and the relationship between program completion, smoking cessation and reduction. Secondarily, outcomes were descriptively compared with the SmartQuit1.0 trial. METHOD Adult participants (78% female, 25% with high school or less education, 30% unemployed) were recruited into the single-arm pilot trial (N=99) of SmartQuit 2.0 with a two-month follow-up (85% retention). RESULTS Regarding receptivity, 84% of participants were satisfied with SmartQuit 2.0 (vs. 59% for SmartQuit1.0), 73% would recommend it to a friend (vs. 48% for SmartQuit1.0), 81% found the ACT exercises useful for quitting (vs. 44% for SmartQuit1.0). At the 2-month follow-up, the quit rates were 21% for 7-day point prevalence (vs. 23% for SmartQuit1.0), 11% for 30-day point prevalence (vs. 13% for SmartQuit1.0), and 75% of participants reduced their smoking frequency (vs. 57% for SmartQuit1.0). Among program completers (24% of total sample), the quit rates were 33% for 7-day point prevalence, 28% for 30-day point prevalence, and 88% of participants reduced their smoking frequency. CONCLUSIONS The revised app had high user receptivity, modest quit rates, and high smoking reduction rates. Program completion may be key to boosting the app's effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan B Bricker
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA; University of Washington, Department of Psychology, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| | - Wade Copeland
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Kristin E Mull
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Emily Y Zeng
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Noreen L Watson
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Katrina J Akioka
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Jaimee L Heffner
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) set standards for global tobacco control, including the implementation of evidence-based tobacco dependence treatment. However, efforts to implement tobacco treatment programmes globally have been few. In order to expand tobacco treatment expertise and programmes, a new network called Global Bridges (GB) was established. This network provided training in tobacco treatment and opportunities to share best practices on implementation of tobacco dependence treatment and training programmes. In this analysis of the GB network, we found that 75% of the network members attended trainings, 60% disseminated knowledge gained through GB training, and network centralization was high (0.85). These results demonstrate initial success in network implementation, and create a foundation for expanded focus on tobacco treatment globally.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lemaire RH, Bailey L, Leischow SJ. Meeting the Tobacco Cessation Coverage Requirement of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: State Smoking Cessation Quitlines and Cost Sharing. Am J Public Health 2015; 105 Suppl 5:S699-705. [PMID: 26447918 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2015.302869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We explored whether various key stakeholders considered cost sharing with state telephone-based tobacco cessation quitlines, because including tobacco cessation services as part of the required essential health benefits is a new requirement of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). METHODS We analyzed qualitative data collected from interviews conducted in April and May of 2014 with representatives of state health departments, quitline service providers, health plans, and insurance brokers in 4 US states. RESULTS State health departments varied in the strategies they considered the role their state quitline would play in meeting the ACA requirements. Health plans and insurance brokers referred to state quitlines because they were perceived as effective and free, but in 3 of the 4 states, the private stakeholder groups did not consider cost sharing. CONCLUSIONS If state health departments are going to initiate cost-sharing agreements with private insurance providers, then they will need to engage a broad array of stakeholders and will need to overcome the perception that state quitline services are free.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin H Lemaire
- Robin H. Lemaire is with the Center for Public Administration and Policy, School of Public and International Affairs, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg. Linda Bailey is with the North American Quitline Consortium, Phoenix, AZ. Scott J. Leischow is with the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Linda Bailey
- Robin H. Lemaire is with the Center for Public Administration and Policy, School of Public and International Affairs, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg. Linda Bailey is with the North American Quitline Consortium, Phoenix, AZ. Scott J. Leischow is with the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Scott J Leischow
- Robin H. Lemaire is with the Center for Public Administration and Policy, School of Public and International Affairs, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg. Linda Bailey is with the North American Quitline Consortium, Phoenix, AZ. Scott J. Leischow is with the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mercken L, Saul JE, Lemaire RH, Valente TW, Leischow SJ. Coevolution of Information Sharing and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices Among North American Tobacco Cessation Quitlines. Am J Public Health 2015; 105:1814-22. [PMID: 26180993 PMCID: PMC4539799 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2015.302627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We examined the coevolution of information sharing and implementation of evidence-based practices among US and Canadian tobacco cessation quitlines within the North American Quitline Consortium (NAQC). METHODS Web-based surveys were used to collect data from key respondents representing each of 74 participating funders of NAQC quitlines during the summer and fall of 2009, 2010, and 2011. We used stochastic actor-based models to estimate changes in information sharing and practice implementation in the NAQC network. RESULTS Funders were more likely to share information within their own country and with funders that contracted with the same service provider. Funders contracting with larger service providers shared less information but implemented significantly more practices. Funders connected to larger numbers of tobacco control researchers more often received information from other funders. Intensity of ties to the NAQC network administrative organization did not influence funders' decisions to share information or implement practices. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show the importance of monitoring the NAQC network over time. We recommend increased cross-border information sharing and sharing of information between funders contracting with different and smaller service providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth Mercken
- Liesbeth Mercken is with the Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, and the School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Jessie E. Saul is with the North-American Quitline Consortium, Phoenix, AZ. Robin H. Lemaire is with the Center for Public Administration and Policy, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg. Thomas W. Valente is with the Institute for Prevention Research, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Scott J. Leischow is with the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Jessie E Saul
- Liesbeth Mercken is with the Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, and the School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Jessie E. Saul is with the North-American Quitline Consortium, Phoenix, AZ. Robin H. Lemaire is with the Center for Public Administration and Policy, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg. Thomas W. Valente is with the Institute for Prevention Research, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Scott J. Leischow is with the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Robin H Lemaire
- Liesbeth Mercken is with the Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, and the School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Jessie E. Saul is with the North-American Quitline Consortium, Phoenix, AZ. Robin H. Lemaire is with the Center for Public Administration and Policy, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg. Thomas W. Valente is with the Institute for Prevention Research, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Scott J. Leischow is with the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Thomas W Valente
- Liesbeth Mercken is with the Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, and the School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Jessie E. Saul is with the North-American Quitline Consortium, Phoenix, AZ. Robin H. Lemaire is with the Center for Public Administration and Policy, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg. Thomas W. Valente is with the Institute for Prevention Research, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Scott J. Leischow is with the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Scott J Leischow
- Liesbeth Mercken is with the Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, and the School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Jessie E. Saul is with the North-American Quitline Consortium, Phoenix, AZ. Robin H. Lemaire is with the Center for Public Administration and Policy, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg. Thomas W. Valente is with the Institute for Prevention Research, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Scott J. Leischow is with the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
In the United States, the rate of cigarette smoking has significantly declined over the past 2 decades, but much more work is needed, as almost 20% of adults still smoke and smoking continues to be the leading preventable cause of death. Furthermore, rates of smoking in certain subpopulations have remained relatively stable and have historically been neglected in smoking cessation research. Pharmacotherapy (both prescription and over-the-counter) and behavioral support are known to aid cessation, and their combination is more effective than either alone. There are significant barriers to access, use, and adherence, however, especially with pharmacotherapy. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to provide an update and overview of the numerous behavioral approaches that have been used to enhance smoking cessation. The research described can be classified into the type of approach used, the setting in which it is delivered, and the population targeted. Regardless of the classification, all the approaches attempt to provide smokers with the information, motivation, and behavioral skills thought to be necessary for achieving initial cessation and sustained abstinence. Recommendations for future research on behavioral smoking cessation are also included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph T. Ciccolo
- Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York (JTC)
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Centers for Behavioral & Preventive Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University and The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island (AMB)
| | - Andrew M. Busch
- Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York (JTC)
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Centers for Behavioral & Preventive Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University and The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island (AMB)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bricker JB, Mull KE, Kientz JA, Vilardaga R, Mercer LD, Akioka KJ, Heffner JL. Randomized, controlled pilot trial of a smartphone app for smoking cessation using acceptance and commitment therapy. Drug Alcohol Depend 2014; 143:87-94. [PMID: 25085225 PMCID: PMC4201179 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 245] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2014] [Revised: 07/08/2014] [Accepted: 07/08/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a dual need for (1) innovative theory-based smartphone applications for smoking cessation and (2) controlled trials to evaluate their efficacy. Accordingly, this study tested the feasibility, acceptability, preliminary efficacy, and mechanism of behavioral change of an innovative smartphone-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) application for smoking cessation vs. an application following US Clinical Practice Guidelines. METHOD Adult participants were recruited nationally into the double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial (n=196) that compared smartphone-delivered ACT for smoking cessation application (SmartQuit) with the National Cancer Institute's application for smoking cessation (QuitGuide). RESULTS We recruited 196 participants in two months. SmartQuit participants opened their application an average of 37.2 times, as compared to 15.2 times for QuitGuide participants (p<0001). The overall quit rates were 13% in SmartQuit vs. 8% in QuitGuide (OR=2.7; 95% CI=0.8-10.3). Consistent with ACT's theory of change, among those scoring low (below the median) on acceptance of cravings at baseline (n=88), the quit rates were 15% in SmartQuit vs. 8% in QuitGuide (OR=2.9; 95% CI=0.6-20.7). CONCLUSIONS ACT is feasible to deliver by smartphone application and shows higher engagement and promising quit rates compared to an application that follows US Clinical Practice Guidelines. As results were limited by the pilot design (e.g., small sample), a full-scale efficacy trial is now needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan B Bricker
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA; University of Washington, Department of Psychology, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| | - Kristin E Mull
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Julie A Kientz
- University of Washington, Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering, Box 352315, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Roger Vilardaga
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA; University of Washington, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Box 356560, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Laina D Mercer
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Katrina J Akioka
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Jaimee L Heffner
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Saul JE, Bonito JA, Provan K, Ruppel E, Leischow SJ. Implementation of tobacco cessation quitline practices in the United States and Canada. Am J Public Health 2014; 104:e98-105. [PMID: 25122024 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2014.302074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We examined relationships between implementation of tobacco quitline practices, levels of evidence of practices, and quitline reach and spending. METHODS In June and July 2009, a total of 176 quitline funders and providers in the United States and Canada completed a survey on quitline practices, in particular quitline-level implementation for the reported practices. From these data, we selected and categorized evidence-based and emerging quitline practices by the strength of the evidence for each practice to increase quitline efficacy and reach. RESULTS The proportion of quitlines implementing each practice ranged from 3% (text messaging) to 92% (providing a multiple-call protocol). Implementation of practices showing higher levels of evidence for increasing either reach or efficacy showed moderate but significant positive correlations with both reach outcomes and spending levels. The strongest correlation was between reach outcomes and spending levels (r=0.80; P<.01). CONCLUSIONS The strong relationship between quitline spending and reach reinforces the need to increase quitline funding to levels commensurate with national cessation goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessie E Saul
- Jessie E. Saul is with the Research Department, North American Quitline Consortium, Phoenix, AZ. Joseph A. Bonito is with the Department of Communication, College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson. At the time of the study, Keith Provan was with the Center for Management Innovations in Health Care, School of Government & Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson. Erin Ruppel is with the Department of Communication, College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Scott J. Leischow is with the Mayo Clinic-Arizona, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|