What Can We Do or Change to Encourage People to Seek Out Preexposure Prophylaxis?

HIV PrEP access and affordability: a multidisciplinary specialty pharmacy model

BACKGROUND

Increasing the number of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) providers expands PrEP access to more eligible patients to help end the HIV epidemic. Previous studies have noted providers perceive financial barriers as a limitation to prescribing PrEP.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe PrEP medication access and affordability in patients seen at a multidisciplinary PrEP clinic.

METHOD

We conducted a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of adults initiating tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine in the Vanderbilt PrEP Clinic between September 1, 2016, and March 31, 2019, with prescriptions filled by Vanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy. Data were gathered from the electronic health records and pharmacy claims. We evaluated 3 different time periods: initial evaluation to PrEP initiation, prescription of PrEP to insurance approval, and insurance approval to initiation. Treatment initiation was considered delayed when > 7 days from initial evaluation, and reasons for delay were recorded. Continuous variables are presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]), and categorical variables are presented as percentages.

RESULTS

We included 63 patients; most were male (97%), white (84%), and commercially insured (94%) with a median age of 38 years (IQR 29-47). Primary indication for PrEP was men who have sex with men at high risk of acquiring HIV (97%). Median time from initial appointment to treatment initiation was 7 days (IQR 4-8). Treatment delays occurred in 25% of patients and were mostly driven by patient preference (50%). Insurance prior authorization was required in 27% of patients; all were approved. Median total out-of-pocket medication costs for the entire study period were $0 (IQR $0-$0). Most patients (86%) used manufacturer copay cards.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of mostly commercially insured men, the majority were able to access PrEP with low out-of-pocket costs facilitated by manufacturer assistance. Although generalizability beyond this population is limited, these results contradict perceived financial barriers to PrEP access.

Considering Stigma in the Provision of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: Reflections from Current Prescribers

Efforts to identify and address social inequities in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) access are urgently needed. We investigated early-adopting PrEP prescribers' beliefs about how stigma contributes to PrEP access disparities in health care and explored potential intervention strategies within the context of PrEP service delivery. US-based PrEP prescribers were recruited through professional networks and participant referrals. Qualitative interviews were conducted, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Participants (n = 18) were primarily male (72%); white (39%) or Asian (33%); and heterosexual (56%). Most practiced in the Northeastern (67%) or Southern (22%) United States; were physicians (94%); and specialized in HIV/infectious disease (89%). Participants described multiple forms of structural and interpersonal stigma impeding PrEP access. The requirement that PrEP be prescribed was a perceived deterrent for populations with medical mistrust and/or low health literacy. Practice norms such as discussing PrEP only in response to patient requests were seen as favoring more privileged groups. When probed about personally held biases, age-related stereotypes were the most readily acknowledged, including assumptions about older adults being sexually inactive and uncomfortable discussing sex. Participants criticized providers who chose not to prescribe PrEP within their clinical practice, particularly those whose decision reflected personal values related to condomless sex or discomfort communicating about sex with their patients. Suggested solutions included standardizing PrEP service delivery across patients and increasing cultural competence training. These early insights from a select sample of early-adopting providers illuminate mechanisms through which stigma could compromise PrEP access for key populations and corresponding points of intervention within the health care system.