Public Health Conditions for Successful Broad-Scale Integration of HIV and HCV Screening in Emergency Departments

Performance of an Electronic Medical Record-Based "Syphilis Flag" in Identifying At-Risk Patients in an Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

The United States has seen a > 40% increase in syphilis cases since 2017. Early disease identification and treatment are crucial. This review sought to identify emergency department (ED) patients at risk for syphilis.

METHODS

A 30-day retrospective review was conducted of visits to a single ED. Patient visits were assessed for predetermined syphilis "flags" to include a history of sexually transmitted infection (STI), current chief complaint or reason for visit (RFV) keyword(s) suggestive of potential STI or a positive pregnancy test result. Flagged charts were assessed for STI testing results within 6 months of ED visit. Data were analyzed using χ2 .

RESULTS

There were 5537 total patient encounters, resulting in 455 flagged visits from 408 (8.4%) unique individuals, majority of whom were female (282, 69.1%; P < 0.001), Black (251, 61.5%; P < 0.001), aged 15 to 44 years (308, 75.5%; P < 0.001). Chief complaint was the most frequent flag (65.3%), followed by RFV (37.4%), prior STI (31.0%), and pregnancy (12.3%). Syphilis testing data were available for 120 flagged patients; 29 (24.2%) screened positive, including 11 (2.7% of total flagged cohort) with evidence for active infection. Among those, most were Black (90.9%), male (72.7%), aged 25 to 34 years (63.6%), and 9 (81.8%) had concomitant HIV. In active infection, prior STI flag was most common (72.7%), followed by chief complaint (54.5%) and RFV (45.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates the performance of an electronic medical record-based "syphilis risk flag" screener applied to ED patients. Sex- and race-based discrepancies exist in flag rates, which may be reflective of sex- and race-based epidemiologic discrepancies in STI incidence.

Examining the Impact of State-Level Factors on HIV Testing for Medicaid Enrollees With Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

People with schizophrenia experience unique barriers to routine HIV testing, despite increased risk of HIV compared with the general US population. Little is known about how health care delivery system factors affect testing rates or whether there are testing differences for people with schizophrenia.

SETTING

Nationally representative sample of Medicaid enrollees with and without schizophrenia.

METHODS

Using retrospective longitudinal data, we examined whether state-level factors were associated with differences in HIV testing among Medicaid enrollees with schizophrenia compared with frequency-matched controls during 2002-2012. Multivariable logistic regression estimated testing rate differences between and within cohorts.

RESULTS

Higher HIV testing rates for enrollees with schizophrenia were associated with higher state-level Medicaid spending per enrollee, efforts to reduce Medicaid fragmentation, and higher federal prevention funding. State-level AIDS epidemiology predicted more frequent HIV testing for enrollees with schizophrenia versus controls. Living in rural settings predicted lower HIV testing, especially for people with schizophrenia.

CONCLUSION

Overall, state-level predictors of HIV testing rates varied among Medicaid enrollees, although rates were generally higher for those with schizophrenia than controls. Increased HIV testing for people with schizophrenia was associated with coverage of HIV testing when medically necessary, higher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention prevention funding, and higher AIDS incidence, prevalence, and mortality when compared with controls. This analysis suggests that state policymaking has an important role to play in advancing that effort. Overcoming fragmented care systems, sustaining robust prevention funding, and consolidating funding streams in innovative and flexible ways to support more comprehensive systems of care delivery deserve attention.

Real-world clinical effectiveness and sustainability of universal bloodborne virus testing in an urban emergency department in the UK

Innovative testing approaches and care pathways are required to meet HIV, hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) elimination goals. Routine testing for blood-borne viruses (BBVs) within emergency departments (EDs) is suggested by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control but there is a paucity of supporting evidence. We evaluated the introduction of routine BBV testing in EDs at a large teaching hospital in northern England. In October 2018, we modified the electronic laboratory ordering system to reflex opt-out HIV, HBV and HCV testing for all ED attendees aged 16-65 years who had a routine blood test for urea and electrolytes (U&Es). Linkage to care (LTC) was attempted for newly diagnosed patients, those never referred and those who had previously disengaged from care. The project operated for 18 months, here we present evaluation of the initial nine months (2 October 2018-1 July 2019). We analysed testing uptake, BBV seropositivity, LTC and treatment initiation within six months post-diagnosis. Over 9 months, 17,026/28,178 (60.4%) ED attendees who had U&Es performed were tested for ≥ 1 BBV. 299 active BBV infections were identified: 70 HIV Ab/Ag-positive (0.4% seroprevalence), 73 HBsAg-positive (0.4%) and 156 HCV RNA-positive (1.0%). Only 24.3% (17/70) HIV Ab/Ag-positive individuals required LTC, compared to 94.9% (148/156) HCV RNA-positive and 53.4% (39/73) HBsAg-positive individuals. LTC was successful in 94.1% (16/17) HIV Ab/Ag-positive and 69.3% (27/39) HBsAg-positive individuals. However, at 6 months LTC was just 39.2% (58/148) for HCV RNA-positive individuals, with 64% (37/58) of these commencing treatment. Universal opt-out ED BBV testing proved feasible and effective in identifying active BBV infections, especially among marginalised populations with reduced healthcare access. Our integrated approach achieved good LTC rates although further service development is necessary, particularly for HCV RNA-positive people who inject drugs.

Cotesting for Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Sexually Transmitted Infections in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines recommend screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in patients aged 15 to 65 years, as well as those at increased risk. Patients screened in the emergency department (ED) for gonorrhea (GC) and/or chlamydia represent an increased-risk population. Our aim was to assess compliance with CDC and USPSTF guidelines for HIV testing in a national sample of EDs.

METHODS

We examined data from the 2010 to 2018 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, which can be used to create national estimates of ED care to query tests for GC, chlamydia, HIV, and syphilis testing. Weighted proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported, and Rao-Scott χ 2 tests were used.

RESULTS

We identified 13,443,831 (weighted n = 3,094,214) high-risk encounters in which GC/chlamydia testing was performed. HIV screening was performed in 3.9% (95% CI, 3.4-4.3) of such visits, and syphilis testing was performed in 2.9% (95% CI, 2.7-3.2). Only 1.5% of patients with increased risk encounters received both HIV and syphilis cotesting.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite CDC and USPSTF recommendations for HIV and syphilis screening in patients undergoing STI evaluation, only a small proportion of patients are being tested. Further studies exploring the barriers to HIV screening in patients undergoing STI assessment in the ED may help inform future projects aimed at increasing guidance compliance.

COVID-19 and beyond: Lessons learned from emergency department HIV screening for population-based screening in healthcare settings

Emergency departments (EDs) have played a major role in the science and practice of HIV population screening. After decades of experience, EDs have demonstrated the capacity to provide testing and linkage to care to large volumes of patients, particularly those who do not otherwise engage the healthcare system. Efforts to expand ED HIV screening in the United States have been accelerated by a collaborative national network of emergency physicians and other stakeholders called EMTIDE (Emergency Medicine Transmissible Infectious Diseases and Epidemics). As the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, EDs nationwide are being tasked with diagnosing and managing COVID-19 in a myriad of capacities, adopting varied approaches based in part on know-how, local disease trends, and the supply chain. The objective of this article is to broadly summarize the lessons learned from decades of ED HIV screening and provide guidance for many analogous issues and challenges in population screening for COVID-19. Over time, and with the accumulated experience from other epidemics, ED screening should develop into an overarching discipline in which the disease in question may vary, but the efficiency of response is increased by prior knowledge and understanding.

A Model for Syphilis Screening in the Emergency Department

The incidence of syphilis infections is on the rise, particularly among African American men and men who have sex with men, and it is reaching epidemic levels in these communities throughout the United States. Although syphilis is relatively inexpensive to treat and cure and is a predictor for HIV incidence among men and transgender women who have sex with men, rates of co-screening for syphilis are low in the emergency department setting, with a dearth of literature on this topic since the 1990s and early 2000s. In this case study, we describe an operational model for routine syphilis screening implemented in June 2017 at the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio. We describe the advantages of screening using a reverse testing algorithm rather than the traditional method and the necessity of partnering with the Cleveland Department of Public Health for both diagnostic and follow-up logistics.