Humeral head osteonecrosis after anterior shoulder stabilization in an adolescent. A case report

Rapid Progressive Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery

PURPOSE

To verify the clinical features and the risk factors of rapid progressive osteonecrosis of the humeral head after arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery (ARCS).

METHODS

Data and medical records of 24 patients who had rapid progressive collapse of the humeral head after ARCS performed from October 2012 to March 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 8 patients demonstrated no evidence of osteonecrosis of the humeral head preoperatively yet developed rapid progressive collapse of the humeral head within 12 months after ARCS.

RESULTS

All patients were women with a mean age of 64.0 years (range, 52-74 years), and all of them had surgery on their dominant side. Sudden pain developed at a mean 4 months (range, 0-6 months) after index surgery. The rapid progressive collapse of the humeral head occurred within 12 months after index surgery. No clear risk factor or evidence supporting an association between ARCS and humeral head osteonecrosis was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the cause of the rapid progressive humeral head osteonecrosis after ARCS still needs to be established, surgeons should be aware of the possible development of humeral head osteonecrosis after ARCS, especially in older women with dominant arm involvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic case series.

Editorial Commentary: "Just When I Thought I'd Seen Everything That Could Go Wrong?" (Often Overheard in the Surgeon's Lounge): Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery

Osteonecrosis occurs postoperatively after rotator cuff repair, but is there a cause-and-effect relation?

Rapid collapse of the humeral head after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

This report presents a case of rapidly progressive collapse of the humeral head following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We performed humeral head replacement 8 months after the index surgery; histological examination of the collapsed area revealed necrosis, degeneration, fibrillation, and granulation in the cartilage and trabeculae. Osteonecrosis due to the use of metal anchors was considered the primary cause of the post-operative humeral head collapse. As the demand for arthroscopic cuff repair is expected to increase in the future, we recommend that surgeons become aware of the potential for complications, as seen in the present case.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Anchor-induced chondral damage in the hip

The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes from anchor-induced chondral damage of the hip, both with and without frank chondral penetration. A multicenter retrospective case series was performed of patients with chondral deformation or penetration during initial hip arthroscopic surgery. Intra-operative findings, post-surgical clinical courses, hip outcome scores and descriptions of arthroscopic treatment in cases requiring revision surgery and anchor removal are reported. Five patients (three females) of mean age 32 years (range, 16-41 years) had documented anchor-induced chondral damage with mean 3.5 years (range, 1.5-6.0 years) follow-up. The 1 o'clock position (four cases) and anterior and mid-anterior portals (two cases each) were most commonly implicated. Two cases of anchor-induced acetabular chondral deformation without frank penetration had successful clinical and radiographic outcomes, while one case progressed from deformation to chondral penetration with clinical worsening. Of the cases that underwent revision hip arthroscopy, all three had confirmed exposed hard anchors which were removed. Two patients have had clinical improvement and one patient underwent early total hip arthroplasty. Anchor-induced chondral deformation without frank chondral penetration may be treated with close clinical and radiographic monitoring with a low threshold for revision surgery and anchor removal. Chondral penetration should be treated with immediate removal of offending hard anchor implants. Preventative measures include distal-based portals, small diameter and short anchors, removable hard anchors, soft suture-based anchors, curved drill and anchor insertion instrumentation and attention to safe trajectories while visualizing the acetabular articular surface.

Humeral head osteonecrosis in an adolescent amateur swimming athlete: a case report

Osteonecrosis of the humeral head in an adolescent without clear pathogenesis has not been reported in the literature. In this case report, we present such a case of humeral head osteonecrosis in a 15-year-old adolescent. The lesion was located at the subchondral area of the medial part of the humeral head with characteristic appearances on MRI. The shoulder was immobilized in a sling until the pain disappeared, and the patient was told to refrain any kind of sport activities. Bone remodeling was noted five months after the first visit, and it took 2 years for the lesion to be totally healed.

Techniques for suture anchor removal in shoulder surgery

Although suture anchor complications after arthroscopic shoulder surgery are uncommon, they can be devastating, such as articular cartilage or bone loss secondary to a dislodged or prominent suture anchor. Proper insertion of the anchor is the most important factor in the prevention of this complication, but if a complication occurs, prompt recognition and treatment are important to prevent damage to the shoulder. The goals were to (1) discuss strategies for preventing or dealing with dislodged or prominent suture anchors and (2) introduce techniques for removal of these implants.

Aseptic Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head After Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

Anterior shoulder dislocation is a very common trauma and the main complications are well documented. We report a case of aseptic osteonecrosis of the humeral head following an isolated episode of anterior glenohumeral dislocation without fracture that, to our knowledge, has never been reported in the literature.A 17-year-old male patient sustained an anterior glenohumeral dislocation following a sport accident. It was managed by reduction and immobilization. A radiologically identified aseptic osteonecrosis appeared 6 months later. The instability had been arthroscopically treated. At a follow-up of 4 years, the osteonecrosis has been stabilized leaving a mild arthrosis with stiffness, but without pain.

Subchondral fracture of the femoral head in healthy adults

Subchondral fracture of the femoral head has been reported to occur as an insufficiency fracture associated with poor bone quality or as a fatigue fracture in young military recruits. Transient osteoporosis of the hip has clinical and imaging findings that resemble those of a subchondral fracture, but it usually occurs in healthy middle-aged people not involved in sports or similar activities. The clinical aspects of five cases of subchondral fracture of the femoral head occurring in four healthy adults without antecedent trauma were evaluated. Of particular interest were whether subchondral fracture of the femoral head could occur without a sudden increase in daily activity and what differences could be detected from the imaging and clinical courses between subchondral fracture of the femoral head and transient osteoporosis of the hip. Three cases of subchondral fracture of the femoral head occurred without an increase in daily activity. The only difference in imaging findings between subchondral fracture of the femoral head and transient osteoporosis of the hip was the existence of a subchondral fracture line seen on magnetic resonance images of a subchondral fracture of the femoral head. The clinical courses of these disorders were similar. These findings suggest transient osteoporosis of the hip and subchondral fracture of the femoral head are subchondral bone injuries of different severity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Suture anchors and tacks for shoulder surgery, part II: the prevention and treatment of complications

The use of suture anchors and tacks around the shoulder requires a thorough knowledge of the proper use of the devices and how to insert them. Although typically not technically demanding, suture anchors and tacks can present unique and frustrating challenges to the patient and the surgeon. These challenges can occur whether the procedure is performed via an open or arthroscopic approach, but knowledge of the potential challenges may optimize the surgical result and prevent complications. Complications can be categorized as technique-related or device-related issues (mechanical or biologic failure). Technique-related complications include problems with the delivery systems, anchor malpositioning, and suture management issues, such as knots not sliding. Device-related complications include implant fracture, migration secondary to poor fixation, synovitis from implant degradation, and osteolysis. This review describes the prevention of these and other complications, addresses the indications or need for intervention, and suggests potential solutions when intervention is indicated.