Oral and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Are Equivalent at Reducing Blood Loss Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Oral tranexamic acid for immediate use in major trauma: implications for mass casualty events

The early administration of tranexamic acid is recognised as significantly reducing mortality in traumatically injured patients with major haemorrhage, typically given via intravenous or intramuscular routes. In the context of mass casualty events, there may exist multiple traumatically injured casualties that would benefit from tranexamic acid, however, it's administration may be delayed through the need to establish intravenous access. Additionally, if the initial assessment of the traumatically injured casualty is undertaken by an individual who cannot administer intravenous or intramuscular medications, time to administration will be further delayed. This concepts paper seeks to discuss the potential for utilising oral tranexamic acid, in the context of mass casualty events, as an alternative administration route.

Application of high-dose tranexamic acid in the perioperative period: a narrative review

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of high-dose tranexamic acid in different types of surgeries and provide a reference for clinical practice.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science, Embase, and CNKI databases, from their inception to January 2025, to include representative literature related to high-dose tranexamic acid in the perioperative period for a thematic synthesis. The analysis focused on clinical evidence related to obstetric, cardiac, urologic, orthopedic, and spinal surgeries.

Results

High-dose tranexamic acid markedly reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in most types of surgery; however, the optimal dose varies by surgery type. Available studies have shown a favorable safety profile; however, some areas (e.g., cardiac surgery) still require careful monitoring for seizures and risk of thrombotic events.

Conclusion

The clinical benefit of high-dose tranexamic acid should be assessed based on surgical characteristics and patient individualization. More multicenter studies are needed to clarify the dose-effect relationship and long-term safety.

Effect of Oral + Topical and Only Topical Tranaxamic Acid Application on Blood Loss and Postoperative Transfusion in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Objectives: Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most common procedures performed to reduce pain and improve hip functions in patients with advanced hip osteoarthritis, but perioperative blood loss, acute anemia and transfusion requirement increase the risk of morbidity and mortality during and after surgery and negatively affect functional recovery. We aimed to present the comparative results of oral + topical and only topical tranexamic acid application to reduce blood loss and postoperative transfusion in primary total hip arthroplasty. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the patients who applied to the Orthopedics and Traumatology outpatient clinic with complaints of hip pain and limited movement between January 2014 and December 2020, who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with the diagnosis of coxarthrosis and who were administered oral + topical and only topical tranexamic acid before and during surgery, in terms of blood loss and transfusion requirement. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between the preoperative, day 0 and day 1 hemoglobin means in those that were applied oral + topical tranexamic acid and those that were applied only topical (p > 0.05). However, the second- and third-day hemoglobin means in those that were treated with topical medication alone were found to be statistically significantly lower than in those that were treated with oral + topical tranexamic acid (p = 0.032, p = 0.0001). Conclusions: Oral + topical tranexamic acid application in total hip arthroplasty surgery is more effective than topical applications alone when it comes to reducing blood loss, hemoglobin and hematocrit decrease without increasing the risk of thromboembolic diseases and wound complications.

Intravenous versus oral tranexamic acid in elderly transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion patients: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) can effectively reduce intraoperative blood loss and transfusion rates. However, in spinal surgery, the number of surgical levels can significantly influence intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, particularly among the elderly, contributing to the persistently high rate of transfusion during the perioperative period. To verify the safety and efficacy of different application methods of TXA in elderly patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), a prospective cohort study was conducted.

METHODS

A total of 958 patients undergoing TLIF were randomly assigned to receive 2 g of oral TXA two hours before surgery or 15 mg/kg of intravenous TXA 30 min before surgery, or to a control group. The samples were further divided into three categories based on the number of fused segments (one-level fusion, two-level fusion, and three-level fusion). The primary outcomes were the total blood loss and transfusion rate. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood loss, drainage volume, time until drain removal, perioperative transfusion volume, length of stay, thrombotic events, and other adverse events.

RESULTS

336 patients received intravenous TXA and 314 patients were received oral TXA. Patient demographic factors were similar between groups. In the one-level fusion surgery cohort, comparisons across the three groups revealed no statistically significant disparities in total blood loss, transfusion rates, or drainage volumes (P > 0.05). In both two-level and three-level fusion surgeries, patients administered with TXA experienced a notably reduced perioperative bleeding compared to the control group (P < 0.01). Interestingly, a significant disparity was observed in the drainage volumes between the intravenous and oral administration groups (P = 0.026), specifically within the context of two and three-level fusion procedures.

CONCLUSION

In elderly patients undergoing TLIF surgery, both intravenous and oral administrations of TXA are safe and effective. Oral TXA, being more economical and non-invasive compared to intravenous injection, holds promise for clinical use.

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Tranexamic Acid vs. Other Routes in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is often associated with significant blood loss, leading to complications such as acute anemia and increased risk of infection and mortality. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, has been recognized for effectively reducing blood loss during TJA. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral TXA compared with other administration routes in TJA.

METHODS

Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, focusing on randomized clinical trials involving oral TXA in TJA. The studies were assessed for quality using the Cochrane risk assessment scale. Data synthesis involved network meta-analyses, comparing outcomes including hemoglobin drop, estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion rate, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) rate.

RESULTS

Our comprehensive literature search incorporated 39 studies with 7,538 participants, focusing on 8 TXA administration methods in TJA. The combination of oral and intra-articular (oral + IA) TXA markedly reduced hemoglobin drop more effectively than oral, intravenous (IV), and IA alone, but the difference was not significant. Oral + IA TXA significantly reduced EBL more effectively than oral + IV, IA + IV, and oral, IV, and IA alone. Perioperative transfusion rates with oral + IA TXA was significantly lower than that of oral, IA, and IV alone. The DVT rate with oral + IA was significantly lower than that with all other routes, including oral + IV, IA + IV, and oral, IA, and IV alone.

CONCLUSION

Oral TXA, particularly in combination with IA administration, demonstrates significantly higher efficacy in reducing blood loss and transfusion rates in TJA, with a safety profile comparable with that of other administration routes. The oral route, offering lower costs and simpler administration, emerges as a viable and preferable option in TJA procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effectiveness of Tranexamic Acid in the Postoperative Period in Body Contour Surgery: Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is used to reduce bleeding in body contouring procedures; however, there are no studies that show the effectiveness of TXA when it is also used in the immediate postoperative period.

Methods

A controlled, randomized, parallel, and open-label clinical trial was carried out in adult patients undergoing liposculpture and/or abdominoplasty. A control group administering presurgical TXA and a study group with presurgical and postsurgical TXA were formed. The decrease in hemoglobin and the incidence of blood transfusions between both groups were compared as well as the possible adverse effects of TXA.

Results

Four hundred twenty-seven subjects were included, 208 (48.7%) in the control group and 219 (51.3%) in the study group. The median age was 34 years (interquartile range 28-42). Median postoperative hemoglobin levels at 24 hours were similar in both groups (study 11.3 g/dL versus control 11.1 g/dL, P = 0.07); however, at 72 hours, postoperative hemoglobin was higher in the study group versus control (10.8 versus 10.0 g/dL, P ≤ 0.001). The incidence of transfusions at 72 hours was 1.8% in the study group and 8.6% in the control group, for a risk ratio of 0.21 (95% confidence interval 0.07-0.61). There were no adverse or thromboembolic events.

Conclusion

TXA proved to be more effective in reducing intra- and postsurgical bleeding and the need for transfusions, when used preoperatively and continued for 48 hours after surgery, than when used only preoperatively, without reporting adverse or thromboembolic effects.

A Randomized Trial of Three Routes of Tranexamic Acid Administration in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to decrease blood loss and transfusion rates across a variety of routes of administration and doses in the setting of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Oral TXA is less studied but has decreased cost and increased ease of administration. This prospective, randomized study compared the efficacy and cost of three routes of TXA administration in the setting of primary TKA. Primary outcomes were 24-hour hemoglobin loss, calculated blood loss, and blood transfusion rate. One-way analysis of variance, Pearson's chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis. One hundred eleven patients were enrolled. The mean 24-hour hemoglobin loss for the intravenous (IV), oral, and topical TXA groups was 2.50±0.95 g/dL, 2.64±0.94 g/dL, and 2.52±0.90 g/dL, respectively, with no clinical or statistically significant differences among the groups (P=.79). Calculated blood loss was not significantly different (P=.61) among the IV TXA (1067±371 mL), oral TXA (1127±455 mL), and topical TXA (1027±454 mL) groups. No patients in any treatment group required a blood transfusion. IV, oral, and topical routes of TXA administration offer similar clinical benefits for perioperative bleeding and blood transfusion rate in TKA. Oral TXA provides a cost-benefit relative to the other routes of administration ($14 vs $114 per patient), making it a more cost-effective choice. Oral TXA has additional logistical challenges compared with other routes of administration due to increased absorption time, which may impact its use in clinical practice. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):285-290.].

Efficacy and safety of single- and double-dose intravenous tranexamic acid in hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

With the increasing prevalence of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee, total joint replacement, the end-stage treatment, provides pain relief and restoration of function, but is often associated with massive blood loss. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been reported to reduce perioperative blood loss in hip or knee arthroplasty. However, the optimal dose of TXA administration remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis combining data from 5 trials comparing the efficacy and safety of one fixed dose of 1 g intravenously administered TXA with two doses of 1 g each administered intravenously for hip or knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library were searched from January 2000 to February 2023. Our meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing the efficacy and safety of different doses of intravenous TXA (IV-TXA) for THA or TKA. The observation endpoints included total blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin drop, blood transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE). Meta-analysis was performed according to Cochrane's guidelines and PRISMA statement. The Danish RevMan5.3 software was used for data merging.

RESULTS

Five cohort studies involving 5542 patients met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis showed that the two groups were significantly higher in total blood loss (mean difference (MD) = - 65.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) [- 131.46, 0.26], P = 0.05); blood transfusion rate (risk difference (RD) = 0.00, 95% CI [- 0.01, 0.02], P = 0.55); postoperative hemoglobin (MD = 0.02, 95% CI [- 0.09, 0.13], P = 0.31); postoperative hospital stay days (MD = - 0.13), 95% CI [- 0.35, 0.09], P = 0.25); DVT (RD = 0.00, 95% CI [- 0.00, 0.01], P = 0.67); PE (RD = 0.00, 95% CI [- 0.01, 0.00], P = 0.79). There was some inherent heterogeneity due to variance in sample size across each major study.

CONCLUSION

1 dose of 1 g and 2 doses of 1 g IV-TXA each time have similar effects on reducing blood loss, blood transfusion rate, postoperative hemoglobin level, and postoperative hospital stay after TKA or THA, without increasing the risk of postoperative complications risk. For patients at high risk of thromboembolic events, one dose of 1 g TXA throughout surgery may be preferred. However, higher-quality RCT is needed to explore the optimal protocol dose to recommend the widespread use of TXA in total joint arthroplasty. Trial registration We conducted literature selection, eligibility criteria evaluation, data extraction and analysis on the research program registered in Prospero (CRD42023405387) on March 16, 2023.

The optimal regimen, efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid and aminocaproic acid to reduce bleeding for patients after total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the optimal regimen, efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) and aminocaproic acid (EACA) for patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

The network meta-analysis was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guideline. The outcomes were total blood loss, transfusion rates, hemoglobin (HB) drop, and risk for pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Subgroup analyses were performed among most effective regimens to determine the influences of timing and number of doses.

RESULTS

A total of 56 eligible RCTs with different regimens were assessed. For reducing total blood loss, all high doses of TXA and EACA except high dose of intra-articular (IA) TXA, as well as medium dose of combination of intravenous and intra-articular (combined IV/IA) TXA were most effective. All high doses of TXA, as well as medium dose of combined IV/IA TXA did not show inferiority in reducing transfusion rates and HB drop compared with other regimens. No regimens showed higher risk for PE or DVT compared with placebo, and no statistical differences were seen among most effective regimens in subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

As effective as high doses of EACA and TXA, medium dose (20-40 mg/kg or 1.5-3.0 g) of combined IV/IA TXA was enough to control bleeding for patients after THA without increasing risk for PE/DVT. TXA was at least 5 times more potent than EACA. Timing and number of doses had few influences on blood conserving efficacy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Transfusion Rates in the Operative Treatment of Prosthetic Hip and Knee Infection

Surgery for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) can often lead to significant blood loss, necessitating allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT). The use of ABT is associated with higher rates of morbidity and death in revision total joint arthroplasty, particularly in the treatment of PJI. We compared ABT rates by procedure type among patients treated for PJI. We retrospectively reviewed 143 operative cases of hip and knee PJI performed at our institution between 2016 and 2018. Procedures were categorized as irrigation and debridement (I&D) with modular component exchange (modular component exchange), explantation with I&D and placement of an antibiotic spacer (explantation), I&D with antibiotic spacer exchange (spacer exchange), or antibiotic spacer removal and prosthetic reimplantation (reimplantation). Rates of ABT and the number of units transfused were assessed. Factors associated with ABT were assessed with a multilevel mixed-effects regression model. Of the cases, 77 (54%) required ABT. The highest rates of ABT occurred during explantation (74%) and spacer exchange (72%), followed by reimplantation (36%) and modular component exchange (33%). A lower preoperative hemoglobin level was associated with higher odds of ABT. Explantation, reimplantation, and spacer exchange were associated with greater odds of ABT. Antibiotic spacer exchange and explantation were associated with greater odds of multiple-unit transfusion. Rates of ABT remain high in the surgical treatment of PJI. Antibiotic spacer exchange and explantation procedures had high rates of multiple-unit transfusions, and additional units of blood should be made available. Preoperative anemia should be treated when possible, and further refinement of blood management protocols for prosthetic joint infection is necessary. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(6):353-359.].

Oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture undergoing proximal femur intramedullary nailing: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate and compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous and oral application of tranexamic acid (TXA) in geriatric patients undergoing intertrochanteric fracture surgeries.

METHODS

All patients with intertrochanteric fracture admitted to the trauma center of the Zhongda hospital were selected after January 1st, 2020. The final patients were divided into three groups. Oral group: 2 ​g oral TXA 2 ​h preoperatively; intravenous group: 15 ​mg/kg intravenous TXA before incision; control group: no intervention. The main outcome measures were blood transfusion rate and total blood loss. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood loss, perioperative blood transfusion volumes, length of hospital stay, thromboembolism events and other adverse events.

RESULTS

From January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, 124 patients with intertrochanteric fracture were enrolled. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 105 patients were included, including 32 patients in the oral group, 36 patients in the intravenous group and 37 patients in the control group. The demographic characteristics of each group were similar. The blood transfusion rate in the control group was significantly more than that in the experimental group (64.9% vs 40.6% vs 36.1%, P ​= ​0.041). There was no significant difference between the oral group and the intravenous group (P ​= ​0.704). The total blood loss of the oral group and the intravenous group were less than the control group (990.29 ​± ​250.19 ​ml vs 997.47 ​± ​452.34 ​ml vs 1408.54 ​± ​461.74 ​ml), the difference was statistically significant (P ​= ​0.001), and there was no significant difference between the intravenous group and the oral group (P ​= ​0.459). The perioperative blood transfusion volumes of the oral group and the intravenous group were less than the control group (250.00 ​± ​198.62 ​ml vs 227.78 ​± ​179.27 ​ml vs 367.57 ​± ​323.90 ​ml), the difference was statistically significant (P ​= ​0.001), and there was no significant difference between the intravenous group and the oral group (P ​= ​0.832). During hospitalization and follow-up, there were no thromboembolism events such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSION

It is safe and effective to use TXA intravenously and orally in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture. The results of the two methods are similar in safety and effectiveness. Oral TXA is recommended because of its cost-benefit superiority and its ease of administration.

THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE

The result of this prospective cohort study shows that the utilization of oral TXA in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture undergoing proximal femur intramedullary nailing possesses great potential in reducing blood loss and cost-benefit superiority.

Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in primary total hip arthroplasty performed using the direct anterior approach: a one-center retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

It is still unknown whether tranexamic acid (TXA) is beneficial for the minimally invasive surgical approach to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous TXA in primary THA via the direct anterior approach (DAA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 70 patients with nontraumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head who underwent THA via the DAA between October 2017 and October 2018. Patients were divided into two groups: TXA group (39 patients received 1.5 g TXA intravenously) and control group (31 patients did not receive TXA). Patients were assessed by operative time, postoperative hemoglobin (HB) drop, transfusion rate, postoperative length of hospital stays (LHS), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and Harris hip score (HHS).

RESULTS

Total blood loss, hidden blood loss, and postoperative HB drop in the TXA group were significantly lower than in the control group (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss, operative time, transfusion rate, postoperative LHS, HHS, or incidence of DVT (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TXA may reduce perioperative blood loss without increasing complications in THA via the DAA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Oral Is as Effective as Intravenous Tranexamic Acid at Reducing Blood Loss in Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusions: A Prospective Randomized Trial

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized trial at a university affiliated tertiary medical center between February 2017 and March 2020.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing elective posterior thoracolumbar fusion who were treated with IV versus PO TXA.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The use of antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid (TXA) to decrease operative blood loss and allogenic blood transfusions is well documented in the literature. Although evidence supports the use of intravenous (IV) and topical formulations of TXA in spine surgery, the use of oral (PO) TXA has not been studied.

METHODS

A total of 261 patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion were randomized to receive 1.95 g of PO TXA 2 hours preoperatively or 2 g IV TXA (1 g before incision and 1 g before wound closure) intraoperatively. The sample was further stratified into three categories based on number of levels fused (one-to two-level fusions, three to five, and more than five). The primary outcome was the reduction of hemoglobin. Secondary outcomes included calculated blood loss, drain output, postoperative transfusion, complications, and length of hospital stay. Equivalence analysis was performed with a two one-sided test.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-seven patients received IV and 124 received PO TXA. The average age was 62 ± 13 years (mean ± SD), including 141 females and 120 males. Revision cases comprised of 67% of the total sample. Patient demographic factors were similar between groups except for weight, BMI, and preoperative platelet count. The mean reduction of hemoglobin was similar between IV and PO groups (3.56 vs. 3.28 g/dL, respectively; P = 0.002, equivalence). IV TXA group had a higher transfusion rate compared to PO TXA group (22 patients [19%] vs. 12 patients [10%]; P = 0.03). In addition, IV group had longer length of stay (LOS) than PO group (4.4 vs. 3.7 days; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with IV and PO TXA experienced the same perioperative blood loss after small and large spinal fusions. In subgroup analysis, the intermediate (three to five level) spinal fusions had less blood loss with PO TXA than IV TXA. Given its lower cost, PO TXA represents a superior alternative to IV TXA in patients undergoing elective posterior thoracolumbar fusion and may improve health care cost-efficiency in the studied population.Level of Evidence: 1.

Tranexamic Acid in Patients With Cancer Undergoing Endoprosthetic Reconstruction: A Cost Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Tranexamic acid (TXA) decreases blood loss, perioperative transfusion rates, and cost in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. In a previous study, topical TXA decreased both perioperative blood loss and transfusions in patients undergoing resection of aggressive bone tumors and endoprosthetic reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to explore the cost effectiveness of TXA in patients undergoing resection of an aggressive bone tumor and endoprosthetic reconstruction, assessing transfusion cost, TXA administration cost, postoperative hospitalization cost, posthospital disposition, and 30-day readmissions.

METHODS

This study included 126 patients who underwent resection of an aggressive bone tumor and endoprosthetic resection at a single academic medical center; 61 patients in the TXA cohort and 65 patients in the non-TXA cohort. The cost of 1 unit of packed red blood cells, not including administration or complications, was estimated at our institution. The cost of hospitalization was estimated for lodging and basic care. The cost of TXA was $55 per patient. Patients were followed up for 30 days to identify hospital readmissions.

RESULTS

Patients in the TXA cohort experienced a TXA and blood transfusion cost reduction of $155.88 per patient (P = 0.007). Proximal femur replacement patients experienced a $282.05 transfusion cost reduction (P = 0.008), whereas distal femur replacement patients only experienced a transfusion cost reduction of $32.64 (P = 0.43). An average hospital admission cost reduction of $5,072.23 per patient (P < 0.001) was associated with TXA use. Proximal femur replacement patients who received TXA experienced a hospital cost reduction of $5,728.38 (P < 0.001), whereas distal femur replacement patients experienced a reduction of $3,724.90 (P = 0.01). No differences between the cohorts were identified in discharge to home (P = 0.37) or readmissions (P = 0.77).

DISCUSSION

TXA administration is cost effective in patients undergoing resection of an aggressive bone tumor and endoprosthetic reconstruction through reducing both perioperative transfusion rates and postoperative hospitalization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III-Retrospective Cohort Study.

Utilization of Tranexamic Acid in Surgical Orthopaedic Practice: Indications and Current Considerations

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a lysine analog that exhibits an anti-fibrinolytic effect by directly preventing the activation of plasminogen as well as inhibiting activated plasmin from degrading fibrin clots, thereby promoting hemostasis and reducing the duration and quantity of blood loss. The aims of this study were to summarize the indications, routes of administration, safety, and clinical outcomes of TXA use throughout the different subspecialities in orthopedic surgery. Given that orthopedic procedures such as TKA, THA, fracture fixation, and various spine surgeries involve significant intraoperative blood loss, TXA is indicated in providing effective perioperative hemostasis. Additionally, use of TXA in orthopedic trauma has been indicated as a measure to reduce blood loss especially in a group with potential for hemodynamic compromise. TXA has been implicated in reducing the risk of blood transfusions in orthopedic trauma, joint surgery, and spine surgery, although this effect is not seen as prominently in sports medicine procedures. There remains disagreement in literature as to whether TXA via any route of administration can improve other clinically significant outcomes such as hospital length of stay and total operative time. Procedures that rely extensively on clarity on visualization of the surgical field such as knee and shoulder arthroscopies can greatly benefit from the use of TXA, thereby leading to less intraoperative bleeding, with better visual clarity of the surgical field. While most studies agree thrombosis due to TXA is unlikely, new research in cells and animal models are evaluating whether TXA can negatively impact other aspects of musculoskeletal physiology, however with conflicting results thus far. As of now, TXA remains a safe and effective means of promoting hemostasis and reducing intraoperative blood loss in orthopedic surgery.

Fragility Index as a Measure of Randomized Clinical Trial Quality in Adult Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Background

The Fragility Index (FI) and Reverse Fragility Index are powerful tools to supplement the P value in evaluation of randomized clinical trial (RCT) outcomes. These metrics are defined as the number of patients needed to change the significance level of an outcome. The purpose of this study was to calculate these metrics for published RCTs in total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

Methods

We performed a systematic review of RCTs in TJA over the last decade. For each study, we calculated the FI (for statistically significant outcomes) or Reverse Fragility Index (for nonstatistically significant outcomes) for all dichotomous, categorical outcomes. We also used the Pearson correlation coefficient to evaluate publication-level variables.

Results

We included 104 studies with 473 outcomes; 92 were significant, and 381 were nonstatistically significant. The median FI was 6 overall and 4 and 7 for significant and nonsignificant outcomes, respectively. There was a positive correlation between FI and sample size (R = 0.14, P = .002) and between FI and P values (R = 0.197, P = .000012).

Conclusions

This study is the largest evaluation of FI in orthopedics literature to date. We found a median FI that was comparable to or higher than FIs calculated in other orthopedic subspecialties. Although the mean and median FIs were greater than the 2 recommended by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines to demonstrate strong evidence, a large percentage of studies have an FI < 2. This suggests that the TJA literature is on par or slightly better than other subspecialties, but improvements must be made.

Level of Evidence

Level I; Systematic Review.

Blood Management in Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty

Based on a series of 407 outpatient total hip arthroplasties performed by a single surgeon, a standardized protocol for blood loss management in outpatient arthroplasty was developed consisting of a presurgical hematocrit of greater than 36%, administration of tranexamic acid, prophylactic introduction of albumin, hypotensive epidural anesthesia, monopolar electrocautery, and bipolar sealer. This protocol uses techniques that alone are not novel but together create a standardized and reproducible pathway that when implemented can increase the safety of outpatient hip arthroplasty.

Tranexamic acid versus aminocapróic acid in multiple doses via the oral route for the reduction of postoperative bleeding in total primary hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study

To compare the effects of oral ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA) as a hemostatic agent versus the use of oral tranexamic acid (TXA) administered in multiple doses pre and postsurgery in patients undergoing elective primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). We enrolled 102 patients that were randomly divided into two groups: received three oral doses of EACA (2000 mg per dose) or three oral doses of TXA (1300 mg per dose). The medication was given according to the following schedule: 2 h before surgery and 6 and 12 h after surgery. The variables analyzed to compare the effectiveness of the hemostatic agents were total blood loss, hidden blood loss, external blood loss, transfusion rate, intraoperative blood loss, decreases in hemoglobin and hematocrit values, surgical drainage output, visual analog scale, and surgical complications. There were no significant differences between any of the study variables for the group receiving oral TXA and the group receiving oral EACA (P > 0.05). Our study showed that the use of oral EACA was similar to its counterpart TXA regarding the evaluated parameters. TXA did not have superior blood conservation effects, safety profile, or differences in functional scales compared with EACA in THA. We consider the use of multiple oral doses of aminocaproic acid at the selected dose to be effective as a standard protocol to achieve less blood loss and a lower rate of transfusion and adverse events related to the medication in patients undergoing a THA.

Topical, intravenous tranexamic acid and their combined use are equivalent in reducing blood loss after primary total hip arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To determine the equivalence of tranexamic acid (TXA) administration topically, intravenously or the combination of both routes are equivalent in reducing blood loss after primary total hip arthroplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective study, we divided 285 total hip arthroplasty into 4 groups. Group A received 2,5g of intraarticular topical TXA, Group B did not receive TXA, Group C received 1g intravenous TXA and group D a combination of topical and intravenous TXA. The main outcome was blood loss according to Nadler's formula and total hemoglobin.

RESULTS

Blood loss was significantly greater in Group B (Group A. 797.13ml; Group B: 1,308.24; Group C: 986.30 and Group D: 859.09ml; P<.01) with no differences between the other groups. Hemoglobin loss was greater in Group B (11.81, 19.46, 14.52 and 12.78 respectively, P<.001). Two patients (3,1%) were transfused in Group A, 4 (5,3%) in Group B, 3 (3,4%) in Group C, and 1 (1,8%) in Group D (P=.75). The mean reduction in hemoglobin at 48hours was less in the topical Group (P<.05). In comparison with Group B the mean reduction in hemoglobin after 48hours was greater (P<.001) and we can also see a longer hospital stay (P<.001). One patient in Group A presented pulmonary thromboembolism 72hours after surgery, which was resolved without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of TXA topically, intravenously or in combination in primary total hip arthroplasty, is a simple and safe procedure that provides equivalent reductions in hemoglobin and blood loss.

Should We Use Intra-articular Tranexamic Acid Before or After Capsular Closure During Total Knee Replacement? A Study of 100 Knees

BACKGROUND

Intraarticular (IA) administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) is a proven way of reducing blood loss in total knee replacement (TKR). However, different methods of administration have been described in literature such as placement of an intra-articular swab soaked in TXA before capsular closure or injecting TXA intraarticularly after capsular closure. We decided to compare these two methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients planned for unilateral TKR between December 2018 and March 2019 were selected for the study and divided into 2 groups of 50 patients each. All patients received IV and oral TXA identically-15 mg/kg TXA IV preoperatively, 10 mg/kg IV TXA at 3 and 6 h postoperatively, and 1 g oral TXA for the next 2 days. Group A was given IA TXA via swab soaked with 1 g TXA in 100 ml normal saline (NS) before closure of arthtrotomy, while Group B was given 1 g of IA TXA via injection in the knee after capsular closure. Preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) and postoperative day 4 Hb values were measured. Blood loss was calculated and compared in both groups using Mann Whitney test.

RESULT

The mean blood loss was 652.23 ± 64.36 ml in Group A and 542.68 ± 266.23 ml in Group B. The difference in blood loss between both groups was found to be clinically significant with a p-value of 0.03236 (significant, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Injecting TXA intraarticularly after capsular closure is more effective than using an intra-articular swab containing TXA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III Retrospective Comparative study.

Routine Postoperative Complete Blood Counts Are Not Necessary After Most Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Routine postoperative complete blood count tests are commonplace after total joint arthroplasty. The goal of this study was to identify if these result in any clinically meaningful action and if it would be safe to forego this testing in a population without known risk factors for transfusion.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 1060 patients undergoing a total knee or total hip arthroplasty at a single institution was performed. Data points including patient demographics, preoperative and postoperative laboratory results, tranexamic acid use, preoperative and postoperative medication for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and anticoagulation, as well as 90-day readmission related to anemia were collected.

RESULTS

The transfusion rate for all patients was 0.66% (7/1060) and there was only one transfusion for a patient with a preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) greater than 12 g/dL (1/976; 0.1%). There was no difference in the change from preoperative to postoperative day 1 Hb levels in patients treated with aspirin compared with those on direct oral anticoagulation (P = .73). There were no 90-day readmissions related to acute blood loss anemia.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that routine postoperative complete blood count testing is not absolutely necessary and does not provide additional value in the vast majority of patients with preoperative Hb levels equal to or greater than 12 g/dL when tranexamic acid is administered. This could avoid unnecessary testing in patients and increased savings to the health care system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, retrospective cohort.

First Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of the Use of Tranexamic Acid against ε-Aminocapróic Acid via the Oral Route for the Reduction of Postoperative Bleeding in TKA: A Clinical Trial

Total primary knee replacement results in significant postoperative bleeding. There are reports that 20 to 50% of the patients require a blood transfusion, which has been related to many complications, resulting in the search for strategies to reduce bleeding. The use of oral antifibrinolytics is becoming a low cost and safe way of achieving this goal. The hypothesis of this study was that the use of oral aminocaproic acid could provide similar results to the use of oral tranexamic acid (TXA). The purpose was to compare the effects of oral aminocaproic acid as a hemostatic agent versus the use of oral TXA administered in multiple doses pre and postsurgery in patients undergoing total primary knee replacement. We enrolled 92 patients that were randomly divided into two groups: received three doses of aminocaproic acid (2,000 mg per dose) or three doses of oral TXA (1,300 mg per dose). The drugs were administered according to the following schedule: 2 hours before surgery and 6 and 12 hours after surgery. The variables that were analyzed to compare the effectiveness of the hemostatic agents were total blood loss; hidden blood loss; external blood loss; transfusion rate; intraoperative blood loss; decreases in hemoglobin and hematocrit values; surgical drainage output; visual analogue scale; and surgical complications. There were no significant differences between any of the study variables for the group receiving oral aminocaproic acid and the group receiving oral TXA (p > 0.05), with the exception of patients who received TXA, who presented with more adverse events (p = 0.04). Our study showed that the use of oral aminocaproic acid was similar to its counterpart TXA regarding the evaluated parameters. Although patients who received TXA presented an average of 140 mL less blood loss than patients in the ε-ACA group, the difference did not appear to be clinically important, the transfusion rate was very low, and there were no between-group differences in postoperative complications.

Is There a Synergistic Effect of Topical Plus Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Versus Intravenous Administration Alone on Blood Loss and Transfusions in Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties?

BACKGROUND

The optimal route and dosing regimen of tranexamic acid (TXA) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain unclear. As such, we sought to analyze if there was a synergistic effect of intravenous (IV) and topical TXA on blood loss and transfusions.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 6720 primary TKAs and 6559 THAs performed from February 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019 at a single institution in patients who received a double IV dose (6159 TKAs and 6276 THAs) compared with a combined single IV and topical dose (561 TKAs and 283 THAs) of TXA. Multivariate logistic regression models, adjusting for age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, preoperative hemoglobin, and TXA administration, were performed for significant variables from a univariate analysis.

RESULTS

In the TKA cohort, the mean total blood loss was statistically similar for double IV (305 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 301-310 mL) TXA compared with combined TXA (310 mL, 95% CI = 299-321 mL) (P = .43). Furthermore, there was no difference in the rate of transfusion (odds ratio = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.57-2.67, P = .598). In the THA cohort, there was statistically higher blood loss with double IV (328 mL, 95% CI = 323-333 mL) TXA than in the combined group (295 mL, 95% CI = 280-310 mL) (P < .001). The rate of transfusion was statistically similar at ~2% (P = .970).

CONCLUSIONS

A double IV TXA dose and a combined single IV and topical TXA dose were equally effective in minimizing blood transfusions (~2%) at primary TKA and THA. We did not find a synergistic effect when combining a systemic IV TXA with a topical TXA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The Optimal Dosing Regimen for Tranexamic Acid in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this multicenter, randomized trial was to determine the optimal dosing regimen of tranexamic acid (TXA) to minimize perioperative blood loss in revision total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Six centers prospectively randomized 175 patients to 1 of 4 regimens: (1) 1-g intravenous (IV) TXA prior to incision (the single-dose IV group), (2) 1-g IV TXA prior to incision followed by 1-g IV TXA after arthrotomy wound closure (the double-dose IV group), (3) a combination of 1-g IV TXA prior to incision and 1-g intraoperative topical TXA (the combined IV and topical group), or (4) 3 doses totaling 1,950-mg oral TXA (the multidose oral group). Randomization was based on revision subgroups to ensure equivalent group distribution. An a priori power analysis (α = 0.05; β = 0.80) determined that 40 patients per group were required to identify a >1-g/dL difference in postoperative hemoglobin reduction between groups. Per-protocol analysis involved an analysis of variance, Fisher exact tests, and two 1-sided t tests for equivalence. Demographic and surgical variables were equivalent between groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between TXA regimens when evaluating reduction in hemoglobin (3.4 g/dL for the single-dose IV group, 3.6 g/dL for the double-dose IV group, 3.5 g/dL for the combined IV and topical group, and 3.4 g/dL for the multidose oral group; p = 0.95), calculated blood loss (p = 0.90), or transfusion rates (14% for the single-dose IV group, 18% for the double-dose IV group, 17% for the combined group, and 17% for the multidose oral group; p = 0.96). Equivalence testing revealed that all possible pairings were statistically equivalent, assuming a >1-g/dL difference in hemoglobin reduction as clinically relevant. There was 1 venous thromboembolism, with no differences found between groups (p = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

All 4 TXA groups tested had equivalent blood-sparing properties in the setting of revision total hip arthroplasty, with a single venous thromboembolism reported in this high-risk population. Based on the equivalence between groups, surgeons should utilize whichever of the 4 investigated regimens is best suited for their practice and hospital setting. Given the transfusion rate in revision total hip arthroplasty despite TXA utilization, further work is required in this area.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid in total knee and hip arthroplasty: A GRADE analysis and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid (TXA) remain controversial because of the small number of clinical studies. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral TXA with intravenous TXA in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving oral and intravenous TXA in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty up to December 2019 by searching databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Library China Biology Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database and Wanfang. The mean difference or standard mean difference was used to assess continuous outcomes such as hemoglobin (Hb) drop, total blood loss, drain blood loss, and length of hospital stay, with a 95% confidence interval. Relative risks with a 95% confidence interval were used to assess dichotomous outcomes such as transfusion rate and the incidence of deep venous thrombosis and calf muscular vein thrombosis. Review Manager was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs containing 1080 participants met the inclusion criteria. We found no significant differences in terms of the average Hb drop (P = .60), total blood loss (P = .60), transfusion rate (P = .99), drain blood loss (P = .91), length of hospital stay (P = .95), and the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (P = .55) and calf muscular vein thrombosis (P = .19) between oral and IV TXA.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the IV TXA, oral TXA has similar effects on reducing the Hb drop, total blood loss, transfusion rate, drain blood loss, and length of hospital stay without increasing the risk of calf muscular vein thrombosis and deep venous thrombosis. Furthermore, oral TXA is easy to access and administer, which decreases the workload of nurses and even delivers cost-saving benefits to the health care system. We thus conclude that oral TXA may be an optimal approach in total joint arthroplasty. However, more high-quality and multicenter RCTs are still needed to confirm our conclusions.

REGISTRATION

The current meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews), and the registration number was CRD42018111291.

Effectiveness of administering tranexamic acid to high-risk hip and knee arthroplasty patients: a systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to assess the safety and effectiveness in administering tranexamic acid in high-risk hip and knee arthroplasty patients.

INTRODUCTION

Arthroplasty surgery is associated with a significant amount of perioperative blood loss. Tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic used to counteract blood loss. Although various studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of tranexamic acid without significant adverse effects, a majority of these studies have excluded high-risk patients. Due to this selection bias there is a lack of clear evidence of the safety of administering tranexamic acid in high-risk patients.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will consider studies that included high-risk patients aged >18 years who had previous myocardial infarction including cardiac stents, deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, transient ischemic attacks and/or stroke and clotting disorders. No exclusions will be made for the dosing route of tranexamic acid. The outcomes measured will be 1) thromboembolic complications of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, transient ischemic attacks, stroke, myocardial infarction and death; 2) requirements of blood transfusion and 3) the amount of blood loss.

METHODS

A search will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases with the results being reported in a PRISMA flow diagram. Selected studies will be critically appraised by two independent reviewers for methodological quality. Study and outcome quality will be reported using the GRADE approach. Data will be extracted using a standardized data extraction tool. Studies will, where possible, be pooled in statistical meta-analysis. Effect sizes will be expressed as either odds ratios (for dichotomous data) or standardized mean differences (for continuous data) and their 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for analysis.

Administration of Tranexamic Acid Improves Long-Term Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Blood transfusion in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with increased morbidity, including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood transfusion rates, but there is limited evidence demonstrating improved outcomes in TKA resulting from TXA administration. The objectives of this study are determining whether TXA is associated with decreased rate of PJI, decreased rate of outcomes associated with PJI, and whether there are differences in rates of adverse events.

METHODS

A multicenter cohort study comprising 23,421 TKA compared 4423 patients receiving TXA to 18,998 patients not receiving TXA. Primary outcome was PJI within 2 years of TKA. Secondary outcomes included revision surgery, irrigation and debridement, transfusion, and length of stay. Adverse events included readmission, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary emboli, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Adjusted odds ratios were determined using linear mixed models controlling for age, sex, thromboembolic prophylaxis, Charlson comorbidity index, year of TKA, and surgeon.

RESULTS

TXA administration reduced incidence of PJI by approximately 50% (odds ratio [OR], 0.55; P = .03). Additionally, there was decreased incidence of revision surgery at 2 years (OR, 0.66; P = .02). Patients receiving TXA had reductions in transfusion rate (OR, 0.15; P < .0001) and length of stay (P < .0001). There was no difference in the rate of pulmonary emboli (OR, 1.20; P = .39), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.78; P = .55), or stroke (OR, 1.17; P = .77).

CONCLUSION

Administration of TXA in TKA resulted in reduced rate of PJI and overall revision surgery. No difference in thromboembolic events were observed. The use of TXA is safe and improves outcomes in TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Observational Cohort Study.

Pre-operative hemoglobin level and use of sedative-hypnotics are independent risk factors for post-operative delirium following total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a well-known complication following surgery, especially with the increasing age of patients undergoing surgery. The increasing demands resulting from a prolonged healthy life expectancy has resulted in more arthroplasties despite their age and existing comorbidities. The purpose of this study is to explore the various risk factors that may contribute to delirium in unilateral and bilateral total knee arthroplasties in the elderly population.

METHODS

170 patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral total knee arthroplasties were analyzed retrospectively for delirium. Age, sex, comorbidities, use of sedative-hypnotics, peri-operative blood loss, pre- and post-operative laboratory blood test results were investigated and analyzed.

RESULTS

The incidence of post-operative delirium was 6.5% (11 out of 170 patients) with a mean age of 79.5 (± 6.9) years, compared to 73.0 (± 9.0) years in the non-delirium group. Higher age, use of sedative-hypnotics, low pre-operative Hb and Ht, low post-operative Hb, Ht and BUN were observed in the delirium group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that the use of sedative-hypnotics and pre-operative Hb level were independent risk factors for post-operative delirium after TKA. The odds ratios for the use of sedative-hypnotics and pre-operative Hb level were 4.6 and 0.53, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that pre-operative Hb of less than 11.1 g/dL was a predictor for the development of delirium, with a sensitivity of 54.6% and a specificity of 91.6%.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a pre-operative Hb level of < 11.1 g/dL or those using sedative-hypnotics are associated with post-operative delirium. Peri-operative management and preventative measures are therefore needed to reduce the risks of post-operative delirium in such patients.

Active ankylosing spondylitis increases blood loss during total hip arthroplasty for a stiff hip joint

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been highlighted as the best treatment option for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with advanced hip involvement. The huge blood loss associated with THA is a common concern of postoperative complications. Disease activity is a specific reflection of systematic inflammation of AS. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of disease activity on blood loss during THA in patients with AS.

Methods

Forty-nine patients with AS who underwent unilateral THAs were retrospectively studied. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) was employed to evaluate the disease activity. Orthopedic Surgery Transfusion Hemoglobin European Overview (OSTHEO) formula was used to assess the surgical blood loss. The patients were divided into active group (ASDAS≥1.3; n = 32) and stable groups (ASDAS< 1.3; n = 17) based on the ASDAS. Peri-operative laboratory values, plain radiographs, intra-operative data, transfusion volume, and use of hemostatic agents were recorded and statistically analyzed.

Results

The ASDAS, pre-operative C-reactive protein level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and fibrinogen concentration in the active group were higher than the stable group (all P < 0.05); however, the pre-operative hemoglobin concentration and albumin level were higher in the stable group (both P < 0.05). The total blood loss during THA in stable patients was 1415.31 mL and 2035.04 mL in active patients (P = 0.006). The difference between the two groups was shown to be consistent after excluding the gender difference (P = 0.030). A high transfusion rate existed in both groups (stable group, 76.47% with an average of 1.53 units; active group, 84.37% with an average of 2.31 units), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (both P > 0.05). Compensated blood loss, corresponding to transfusion, was noted significantly more in the active group compared to the stable group (P = 0.027). There was no significant difference with regard to functional recovery (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Active AS patients are at high risk for increased blood loss during THA compared to stable patients. The underlying mechanism includes disorders of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems, poor nutrition status, osteoporosis, imbalance of oxidative–antioxidative status and local inflammatory reaction. It is strongly recommended to perform THA in AS patients with stable disease.

Comparison of oral and intravenous tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty is associated with substantial blood loss which can lead to postoperative anemia. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid (TXA) and intravenous TXA.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception until December 2019. A combined searching strategy of subject words and random words was adopted. Only clinical randomized controlled trials were included. The comparisons were made with regard to total blood loss, hemoglobin drop, transfusion rate, and postoperative thromboembolic complications including deep vein thrombolism (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). The meta-analysis was conducted by using the Review Manager 5.3, and bias evaluation was performed based on the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis, five randomized controlled trials were included. The results showed that there were no significant differences between the oral TXA group and intravenous TXA group concerning total blood loss [mean difference (MD) =3.01, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): - 43.90 to 49.92, p = 0.90], hemoglobin drop (MD = 0.05, 95% CI: - 0.10 to 0.20, p = 0.50) and transfusion rate of allogeneic blood [risk ratio (RR) =1.09, 95% CI: 0.46 to 2.62, p = 0.84]. No significant difference was found in the incidence of thromboembolic events (RR = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.71 to 4.16, p = 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with intravenous TXA, oral TXA is equally able to reduce total blood loss, hemoglobin drop, and transfusion requirement for total hip arthroplasty. It is a lower-cost method that does not increase the incidence of thromboembolic events.

The efficacy and safety of multiple-dose intravenous tranexamic acid in reducing perioperative blood loss in patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) for single-segment thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurologic injury underwent pedicle screw fixation via Wiltse approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 264 patients with single-segment thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurologic injury underwent pedicle screw fixation via Wiltse approach (January 2016-June 2019) at a single center. The cohort was separated into three groups. Group A received 20 mg/kg TXA at 5 min before skin incision and 16 h after first dose; Group B received 20 mg/kg TXA at 5 min before skin incision; Group C received NS at each same time point. The outcomes were evaluated by hidden blood loss (HBL), total blood loss (TBL), intraoperative blood loss (IBL), transfusion rate, maximum hemoglobin (Hb) drop, prethrombotic state molecular markers, liver and renal function, coagulation function, inflammatory factor and adverse events.

RESULTS

The HBL, TBL and maximum Hb drop were significantly lower in Group A than those of Group B and Group C, while the difference between Group B and Group C was statistically significant. The IBL was significantly lower in Group A and Group B than that of Group C. However, there was no significantly difference among the three groups in live and renal function, coagulation function, prethrombotic state molecular markers, transfusion rate and complications during the perioperative period. There was significantly lower level of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in Group A than Group C at the day after surgery, and lower level of C-reactive protein (CRP) at the third day after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous TXA used in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture underwent pedicle screw fixation via Wiltse approach is effective and safe in decreasing perioperative blood loss. The two-dose TXA regimen can further reduce blood loss and alleviate post-operative inflammation response, without affecting prethrombotic state molecular marks and without increasing the risk of complications.

Comparison of efficacy and safety between oral and intravenous administration of tranexamic acid for primary total knee/hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

Background

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been demonstrated to reduce blood loss following primary total knee and hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oral and intravenous tranexamic acid for primary total knee and hip arthroplasty.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies published before June 20, 2019. Studies clearly reporting a comparison of oral and intravenous TXA were selected, and total blood loss (TBL), the decline in hemoglobin (DHB), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), intramuscular venous thrombosis (IVT), the length of hospital stay, and the transfusion rate were evaluated. The weighted mean differences and relative risks were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model.

Results

Ten studies involving 1140 (oral 557; intravenous 583) patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in terms of total blood loss, the decline in hemoglobin, the length of hospital stay, the incidence of DVT or IVT, or the transfusion rate between the oral and intravenous groups, and five studies reported that oral TXA was associated with a lower cost.

Conclusion

Our research suggests that compared with intravenous use of TXA, the oral approach has similar clinical outcomes and is less expensive for total joint replacement patients.

The efficiency and safety of oral tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intravenous (IV), topical and combination of both application of tranexamic acid (TXA) can reduce blood loss, hemoglobin drop, and transfusion rate in patients following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Lately, published articles reported that oral TXA had as similar blood-saving as IV and topical TXA in THA. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the efficiency and safety of oral TXA in THA.

METHODS

We systematically searched articles about oral administration of TXA in THA from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and the Chinese Wanfang database.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

The outcomes were collected and analyzed by the Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs and 1 CCT, containing 1305 patients, were ultimately included according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria in the meta-analysis. The effectiveness of oral TXA was as similar as the IV or topical TXA in regard to hemoglobin drop (SMD = -0.14; 95% CI, [-0.28, 0.01]; P = .06), total blood loss (SMD = 0.01; 95% CI, [-0.13, 0.16]; P = .84), transfusion rate (OR = 0.76; 95% CI, [0.38, 1.55]; P = .37). Compared with single oral TXA or blank group, multiple oral TXA effectively reduced hemoglobin drop (SMD = -1.06; 95% CI, [-1.36, -0.77]; P < .05), total blood loss (SMD = -1.30; 95% CI, [-1.66, -0.94]; P < .05), transfusion rate (OR = 0.53; 95% CI, [0.29, 0.95]; P = .03). There were no significant difference in terms of length of stay and complication among all of enrolled studies.

CONCLUSION

Oral TXA has favorable effect of blood-saving and do not increase risk of complication in patients following THA. Oral TXA may have no effect in the length of stay. More high quality RCTs are necessary.

Preoperative Tranexamic Acid for Treatment of Bleeding, Edema, and Ecchymosis in Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Evidence has emerged on the efficacy of tranexamic acid to control blood loss and postoperative complications after rhinoplasty.

Objective

To investigate the results of tranexamic acid use to reduce intraoperative bleeding, postoperative eyelid edema, and periorbital ecchymosis in rhinoplasty.

Data Sources and Study Selection

For this systematic review of randomized clinical trials, searches were performed in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, SCOPUS, Science Direct, Google Scholar, OpenThesis, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to December 23, 2017. Key words included tranexamic acid, rhinoplasty, and nasal surgical procedures. The following elements were used to define eligibility criteria: (1) population: patients undergoing rhinoplasty surgery; (2) intervention and controls: tranexamic acid vs placebo solution or no-treatment control group; (3) outcomes: intraoperative bleeding, postoperative eyelid edema and periorbital ecchymosis, and thromboembolic events; and (4) study type: randomized clinical trials.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality according to the Cochrane guidelines for randomized clinical trials. Treatment effects were defined as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CIs. The strength of evidence was analyzed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation rating system.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Intraoperative bleeding, postoperative eyelid edema and periorbital ecchymosis. To calculate the effect sizes, means and SDs were obtained for each study group and outcome of interest.

Results

Five studies comprising 276 patients were included in the systematic review: 177 patients (64.1%) were women, and mean age was 26.8 (range, 16-42) years. Four studies comprising 246 patients estimated the amount in intraoperative bleeding as a primary outcome and were included in the meta-analysis. Eyelid edema and ecchymosis were evaluated as outcomes in 2 studies. Tranexamic acid was associated with reduced bleeding during rhinoplasty was found (WMD, -42.28 mL; 95% CI, -70.36 to -14.21 mL), with differences (P = .01) between oral (WMD, -61.70 mL; 95% CI, -83.02 to -40.39 mL; I2 = 0%) and intravenous (WMD, -23.88 mL; 95% CI, -45.19 to -2.58 mL; I2 = 56%) administration. Eyelid edema and ecchymosis scores in patients receiving tranexamic acid were significantly lower compared with the control group within the first postoperative week: lower eyelid edema, WMD, -0.76; 95% CI, -1.04 to -0.49 and lower eyelid ecchymosis, WMD, -0.94; 95% CI, -1.80 to -0.08. No cases of thromboembolic events were reported.

Conclusions and Relevance

Current available evidence suggests that preoperative administration of tranexamic acid is safe and may reduce intraoperative bleeding as well as postoperative eyelid edema and ecchymosis in patients undergoing rhinoplasty.

[Efficacy and safety of a loading high-dose tranexamic acid followed by postoperative five doses in total hip arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a loading high-dose tranexamic acid (TXA) followed by postoperative 5 doses in total hip arthroplasty (THA) by a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients who underwent primary unilateral THA between December 2017 and March 2018 were randomly divided into two groups (36 patients in each group). A single dose of 20 mg/kg TXA was administered intravenously before 5-10 minutes of operation in group A; and a single dose of 40 mg/kg TXA was administered intravenously in group B at the same time point. All patients received 5 doses of 1 g TXA at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after the first dose. There was no significant difference in gender, age, weight, height, body mass index, disease type, and combined medical diseases between the two groups ( P>0.05). Total blood loss (TBL), lowest postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) level, fibrinolysis parameters [fibrin (ogen) degradation products (FDP), D-dimer], inflammatory factors [C-reaction protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6)], adverse events (thrombosis, pulmonary embolism) were recorded and compared between groups.

RESULTS

The TBL was significantly lower in group B than in group A ( P<0.05). Furthermore, the lowest postoperative Hb level was significantly higher in group B than in group A ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in FDP and D-dimer before operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The levels of FDP and D-dimer were significantly lower in group B than in group A at 12 and 36 hours postoperatively ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in CRP and IL-6 before operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The levels of CRP and IL-6 were significant lower in group B than in group A at 12, 24, and 36 hours postoperatively ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference at 14 days ( P>0.05). There were 2 patients with intramuscular venous thrombosis in group A and 1 in group B after operation, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of embolic events ( P>0.05). No deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism occurred in all groups.

CONCLUSION

A loading high-dose TXA followed by postoperative 5 doses can further reduce the blood loss, provide additional fibrinolysis and inflammation control in THA, without increasing the risk of embolic events.

Perioperative complications and causes of 30- and 90-day readmission after direct anterior approach primary total hip arthroplasty

We aimed to report causes of readmission 30 and 90 days following a total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the direct anterior approach (DAA).

METHODS

Three hundred and two patients (335 hips) underwent a DAA-THA for primary osteoarthritis.

RESULTS

The main reasons for 30 and 90-day readmission were wound related problems, dislocation (rate: 0.9%) and deep infection. The readmission rates at 30 and 90 days were 1.8% and 2.7%, respectively. Age over 60 years and morbidly obese patients were at risk for complications.

CONCLUSION

The DAA-THA was associated with low readmission rates. Obesity should be adressed preoperatively.

Intravenous and Oral Tranexamic Acid Are Equivalent at Reducing Blood Loss in Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Trial

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized trial of patients enrolled at a university affiliated tertiary medical center between February and December 2017.

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing elective posterior thoracolumbar fusion who were treated with intravenous (IV) versus oral (PO) tranexamic acid (TXA).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The use of antifibrinolytic agents such as TXA to decrease operative blood loss and allogenic blood transfusions is well documented in the literature. While evidence supports the use of IV and topical formulations of TXA in spine surgery, the use of PO TXA has not been studied.

METHODS

Eighty-three patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion were randomized to receive 1.95 g of PO TXA 2 hours preoperatively or 2 g IV TXA (1 g before incision and 1 g before wound closure) intraoperatively. The sample was further stratified into three categories based on number of levels fused (1-2 level fusions, 3-5, and >5). The primary outcome was the reduction of hemoglobin. Secondary outcomes included calculated blood loss, drain output, postoperative transfusion, complications, and length of hospital stay. Equivalence analysis was performed with a two one-sided test (TOST). A P-value of <0.05 suggested equivalence between treatments.

RESULTS

Fourty three patients received IV TXA and 40 patients received PO TXA. Patient demographic factors were similar between groups except for body mass index (BMI). The mean reduction of hemoglobin was similar between IV and PO groups (3.36 g/dL vs. 3.43 g/dL, respectively; P = 0.01, equivalence). Similarly, the calculated blood loss was equivalent (1235 mL vs. 1312 mL, respectively; P = 0.02, equivalence). Eight patients (19%) in IV TXA group received a transfusion compared with five patients in PO TXA group (13%) (P = 0.44). One patient (2% and 3% in IV and PO, respectively) in each group experienced a deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (P = 0.96).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with IV and PO TXA experienced the same perioperative blood loss after spinal fusions. Given its lower cost, PO TXA represents an excellent alternative to IV TXA in patients undergoing elective posterior thoracolumbar fusion and may improve healthcare cost-efficiency in the studied population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

Proceedings from the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Orthopedic Infections: management of periprosthetic shoulder infection

The Second International Consensus Meeting on Orthopedic Infections was held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in July 2018. A multidisciplinary team of international experts from all 9 subspecialties of orthopedic surgery and allied fields of infectious disease, microbiology, and epidemiology was assembled to form the International Consensus Group. The following consensus proceedings from the International Consensus Meeting involve 30 questions pertaining to the management of periprosthetic shoulder infection.

Does Prophylactic Administration of Edoxaban Increase D-Dimer Levels after Total Hip Arthroplasty?

This study aimed to examine the effect of thromboprophylactic edoxaban on D-dimer levels and anemia after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We retrospectively analyzed data from 349 patients undergoing primary THA. Univariate regression and multivariate regression analyses were performed with D-dimer levels on the 7th, 14th, and 21st days postoperatively as the dependent variable Edoxaban use, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), renal function, drop in hemoglobin (Hb) drop, intraoperative blood loss and duration of surgery as were independent variables. Multivariate regression analysis was also performed with Hb drop as the dependent variable. Edoxaban administration of 15 mg/day and 30 mg/day after THA was correlated with higher D-dimer levels at 21, but not at 7 or 14, days postoperatively. Other significant independent predictors for high D-dimer levels were the duration of surgery (at 7 and 14 days), BMI (at 7 days), sex (at 14 days), and age (at 14 and 21 days). Edoxaban use was significantly, weakly correlated with a larger Hb drop at 7 and 14 days, but this was less than a clinically important difference. D-dimer levels after THA can be elevated by thromboprophylactic edoxaban after three weeks postoperatively.

Oral vs intravenous tranexamic acid in total-knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid (TXA) with intravenous (IV) TXA in reducing perioperative blood loss in total-knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total-hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were fully searched for relevant studies. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of oral TXA with IV TXA in TKA and THA were included in this research. Odds ratio (OR) or risk difference (RD) was applied to compare dichotomous variables, while mean difference (MD) was used to compare continues variables.

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies (5 randomized controlled trials and 2 retrospective studies) were included into this study. As for patients undergoing TKA or THA, there were no obvious differences between oral TXA group and IV TXA group in hemoglobin (Hb) drop (MD = 0.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.01 to 0.13, P = .09), transfusion rate (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.54-1.13, P = .19), total blood loss (MD = 16.31, 95% CI = -69.85 to 102.46, P = .71), total Hb loss (MD = 5.18, 95% CI = -12.65 to 23.02, P = .57), length of hospital stay (MD = -0.06, 95% CI = -0.30 to 0.18, P = .63), drain out (MD = 21.04, 95% CI = -15.81 to 57.88, P = .26), incidence of deep vein deep vein thrombosis (RD = 0.00, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.01, P = .82) or pulmonary embolism (RD = 0.00, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.01, P = .91). The sample size of this study was small and several included studies were with relatively low quality.

CONCLUSION

Oral TXA is equivalent to IV TXA in reducing perioperative blood loss and should be recommended in TKA and THA. More high-quality studies are needed to elucidate this issue.

Pre-operative transfusions are associated with numerous post-operative complications in total hip arthroplasty

Primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is among the most common surgical procedures and known to potentially cause significant blood loss. In total, 74,814 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Database were studied. Complications were divided into post-operative and non-operative complications. Pre-operative transfusion in THA patients was found to be an independent predictor of infection (OR: 5.41), pneumonia (OR: 2.66), failure to wean (OR: 13.84), urinary tract infection (OR: 3.42), cardiac arrest (OR: 5.83), and transfusion post-operatively (OR: 5.94). Future medical decisions in primary THA cases should entail a careful risk-benefit and close monitoring in order to prevent complications.

Transfusions and cost-benefit of oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the cost benefit and transfusions of oral and IV tranexamic acid (TXA) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral and IV TXA in primary THA. Primary outcomes were total blood loss, maximum hemoglobin drop, transfusion requirements, and cost benefit. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE).

RESULTS

Four independent RCTs were included involving 391 patients. There was no difference in the total blood loss (P = .99), maximum hemoglobin drop (P = .73), and the length of stay (P = .95) between the 2 groups. Transfusion requirements (P = .97) were similar. The total mean cost was the US $75.41 in oral TXA group and the US $580.83 in IV TXA group. The incidence of DVT (P = .3) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, and no PE was reported in all studies.

CONCLUSION

Oral TXA shows similar efficacy and safety as IV TXA in reducing total blood loss, maximum hemoglobin drop and transfusion requirements in primary THA. However, oral TXA may be more cost-benefit than IV TXA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Comparison between oral and intravenous application of tranexamic acid for total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Aim: We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of oral and intravenous applications of tranexamic acid (TXA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Materials & methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, ScienceDirect and Embase, were searched to identify the studies comparing the efficacy and safety of oral and intravenous applications of TXA in THA. Relevant journals and conference proceedings were manually searched. The pooled data were analyzed using RevMan 5.1. Results: Four randomized control trials and one retrospective study were identified. A meta-analysis showed no significant differences in hemoglobin reduction, total blood loss and transfusion requirements. Conclusion: Oral applications of TXA are comparable to intravenous applications of TXA in primary unilateral THA for blood conservation and cost-saving measures.

Finding the Optimal Regimen for Oral Tranexamic Acid Administration in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have confirmed that, compared with intravenous and intra-articular formulations, oral tranexamic acid (TXA) provides equivalent reduction in blood loss, at a substantially reduced cost and greater ease of administration. However, the optimal oral dosage regimen to achieve maximum blood-loss reduction remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a regimen of multiple doses of oral TXA on blood loss in primary total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, 200 patients were randomized to 1 of 4 interventions. Group A received a single dose of 2.0 g of TXA orally at 2 hours preoperatively. In addition to this same preoperative dose, Group B received 1.0 g of TXA orally at 3 hours postoperatively, Group C received 1.0 g of TXA orally at 3 and 9 hours postoperatively, and Group D received 1.0 g of TXA orally at 3, 9, and 15 hours postoperatively. All patients received a 1.0-g topical dose of TXA. The primary outcome was total blood loss. Secondary outcomes included hemoglobin reduction, transfusion rate, thromboembolic complications, and adverse events.

RESULTS

The mean total blood loss (and standard deviation) was significantly less in Groups B, C, and D (792.2 ± 293.0, 630.8 ± 229.9, and 553.0 ± 186.1 mL, respectively) than in Group A (983.6 ± 286.7 mL) (p < 0.001). Moreover, Groups C and D had a lower mean reduction in hemoglobin than did Groups A and B. However, no differences were identified between Groups C and D for blood loss and hemoglobin reduction. Additionally, no differences were observed among the groups regarding thromboembolic complications and transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

The multiple postoperative doses of oral TXA further reduced blood loss compared with a single preoperative bolus. The regimen of a preoperative dose and 3 postoperative doses of oral TXA produced maximum effective reduction of blood loss in total hip arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Exclusion criteria and adverse events in perioperative trials of tranexamic acid: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an inexpensive therapy effective at minimizing perioperative blood loss and transfusion. However, it remains underutilized due to safety concerns. To date, no evidence-based guidelines exist identifying which patients should not receive TXA therapy. This study determined patient groups for whom safety information regarding TXA is lacking due to common exclusion from perioperative TXA trials.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic review searching the databases Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) administering systemic TXA perioperatively to elective or emergent surgery patients were eligible. Our primary outcome was to describe exclusion criteria of RCTs, and the secondary outcome was TXA safety. A descriptive synthesis of exclusion criteria was performed, and TXA safety was assessed by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 268 eligible RCTs were included. Meta-analysis showed that systemic TXA did not increase risk of adverse events compared to placebo or no intervention (relative risk, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.12). Patient groups commonly excluded from perioperative TXA trials, and thus potentially lacking TXA safety data, were those with major comorbidities, a history of thromboembolism, medication use affecting coagulation, TXA allergy, and coagulopathy. Exclusion of patients with major comorbidities may not be necessary; we showed that the risk of adverse events was similar in studies that excluded patients with major comorbidities and those that did not.

CONCLUSION

Sufficient evidence exists to develop perioperative guidelines for TXA use in many populations. Further studies evaluating perioperative TXA use in patients with a history of thromboembolism are warranted.

Efficacy and safety of oral compared with intravenous tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss after primary total knee and hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Background

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an anti-fibrinolytic agent successfully preventing blood loss when using intravenously (IV) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). An oral administration, which is available on blood sparing, has been reported exhibit profound cost-saving benefits. The aim of this meta-analysis is to investigate whether the administration of oral and intravenous tranexamic acid postoperatively has equivalent blood-sparing properties in these patients.

Methods

The online electronic databases were searched for eligible literatures updated on September 2018. Studies assessing the effect between oral TXA and intravenous TXA (IV-TXA) in those undergoing TKA or THA were included. All the data were pooled with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) using RevMan software. Based on the heterogeneity, we performed a systematic analysis to explore the overall results across the included studies.

Results

Nine studies met our inclusion criteria. No significant differences were identified with regard to the Hb drop (SMD = − 0.03,95%CI = − 0.18–0.12, P = 0.67), total Hb loss (SMD = 0.10,95%CI = − 0.06–0.26, P = 0.24), total blood loss (SMD = − 0.00,95%CI = − 0.20–0.20, P = 1.00), transfusion rate (OR = 0.77,95%CI = 0.54–1.10, P = 0.14), DVT rate (OR = 0.58,95%CI = 0.19–1.75, P = 0.33), and length of hospital stay (SMD = − 0.05,95%CI = − 0.28–0.17, P = 0.63) between the oral groups and intravenous group.

Conclusion

The blood-sparing efficacy of oral TXA is similar to that of the intravenous forms in the setting of THA and TKA. Considering the cost-benefit superiority and ease of administration of oral TXA, further studies and clinical trials are required to further identify the optimal administration for THA and TKA.