Minimal Scar Formation After Orthopaedic Skin Incisions Along Main Folding Lines

Classification of Distinct Endotypes in Human Skin Scarring: S.C.A.R.-A Novel Perspective on Dermal Fibrosis

Significance: Skin scarring is a permanent, irreversible end point of cutaneous injury. However, not everyone will acquire the same exact scar type. Skin scarring is generally recognized as complex with significant variability in individuals' scar type and response to treatment. Despite these tangible differences in treatment response, to date there has been no simplified approach in defining spectrum of skin scarring in relation to prediction and outcome post-treatment. Thus, in this study we propose that skin scarring consists of distinct endotypes, which is characterized by their specific pathology. Four distinct scar endotypes can be observed: (1) Stretched (flat), (2) Contracted, (3) Atrophic (depressed), and (4) Raised scarring, which can be abbreviated to S.C.A.R. endotypes. Each of these endotypes can certainly include subphenotypes and each phenotype can be present in more than one endotype. To define these endotypes, we also present a structured approach in assessment of all relevant parameters in skin scar evaluation including clinical (scar symptoms and signs) and nonclinical parameters (device measurements of structural, mechanical, and physiological properties of scars as well as gene and protein laboratory studies). Recent Advances: Scars can be phenotypically characterized based on a multitude of parameters assessed; however, not all scar types will share all the same characteristics. This leads to the question of whether skin scarring is a single disease entity with varying phenotypic characteristics or should be classed as several disease entities that have certain similar parameters. We suggest the latter and propose distinct scarring phenotypes arise mainly owing to genetic and environmental susceptibilities associated with the development of each specific scar endotype. Characteristic features of skin scarring, however, can be objectively and quantitively evaluated and used as an aid in the theranostic goal-directed management of scarring. Critical Issues: The concept of identifying different endotypes is key in formulating personalized treatments with improved outcomes beyond what is achieved with current nonspecific approaches in scar management. This approach has gained interest and significant traction in several other medical conditions including asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, and atopic dermatitis. Future Directions: To begin identifying distinct endotypic features in skin scarring, it is important to have a better understanding of underlying pathological mechanisms leading to further insight into the heterogeneous nature of skin scarring endotypes. This approach may lead to improved theranostic outcomes and further understanding of the pathophysiology of the complex nature of human skin scarring.

New Concealed-Incision Extrapelvic Approach for Pubic Symphysis Diastasis and Parasymphyseal Fractures: Preliminary Results

BACKGROUND

The Pfannenstiel approach, which provides good surgical exposure, has been used for the treatment of pubic symphysis diastasis and parasymphyseal fractures. However, it requires a medium-length incision and moderate soft-tissue dissection, resulting in potential damage to anatomical structures and inferior aesthetic outcomes. Here, we introduce a new concealed-incision extrapelvic approach for the internal fixation of pubic symphysis diastasis and parasymphyseal fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 8 patients with pubic symphysis diastasis and parasymphyseal fractures that had been treated via the concealed-incision extrapelvic approach (the "Fu-Liu" approach). All patients presented for treatment during the period from January 2017 to November 2017. Six of the 8 patients had anterior column fractures, 1 patient had a double-column fracture, and 1 patient had parasymphyseal fractures. Operative time, the amount of blood loss, and postoperative radiographic and computed tomography (CT) findings were recorded. The degree of fracture-healing, complications, function, and satisfaction with the skin incisions were also evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients were followed for at least 21 months (range, 21 to 30 months). Postoperative radiographs and CT scans showed good positioning of plates and screws. The average time before surgery, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss (and standard deviation) were 7.8 ± 3.25 days, 41.9 ± 8.99 minutes, and 18.8 ± 7.8 mL, respectively. No complications (including internal fixation failure, vascular injury, nerve palsy, wound infection, and hernia) occurred in any of the patients, and all patients were satisfied with the appearance of the scar.

CONCLUSIONS

We can effectively stabilize pubic symphysis diastasis and parasymphyseal fractures with use of the Fu-Liu approach, which can also enable retrograde anterior column screw placement. The Fu-Liu approach is simple, safe, and minimally invasive, and the aesthetic outcome is more acceptable than that associated with the Pfannenstiel approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.