Open Reduction and Tunneled Suspensory Device Fixation Compared with Nonoperative Treatment for Type-III and Type-IV Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: The ACORN Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

A ten-year prospective randomized trial comparing non-operative treatment to hook plate fixation for Rockwood III acromio-clavicular dislocation

BACKGROUND

Despite new modern surgical techniques, no short-term functional differences have been demonstrated between operative and non-operative treatment for acute acromio-clavicular (AC) dislocations Rockwood III-V. Few studies describe the long-term clinical and radiological results of these lesions. We aim to compare the one- and ten-year outcome of patients either treated non-operatively or with hook plate fixation for Rockwood III AC lesions.

HYPOTHESIS

Non-operative treatment is not inferior to surgical treatment at short and long-term follow-up when considering patient function and radiological degenerative changes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective randomized trial including 56 consecutive patients aged between 18 and 60, admitted to a level one trauma center for an acute Rockwood III AC joint dislocation. Patients were randomized to two groups: non-operative or surgical treatment with hook plate. Outcome measures were obtained by an independent examiner and included Constant score, DASH score, complications, and radiological results at one and minimum ten years (last visit delayed due to COVID-19 pandemia). Data analysis with a 5% alpha error.

RESULTS

We observed no difference between the two groups for the Constant score at one year (non-operative 93.3 ± 7.4 vs surgical 92.7 ± 6.7, p = 0,41) and ten years (93.3 ± 10 vs 98.2 ± 5.2, p = 0,08). Similar results for all other clinical outcomes were censed. The reoperation rate was higher in the surgical group (88.5 vs 3.3%, p < 0,01), but consisted of hardware removal in most cases. Radiological degenerative changes were present in both groups at ten years (non-operative 33.3% vs surgical 50%, p = 0,24).

DISCUSSION

This study confirmed that non-operative treatment was not inferior to surgical treatment with a hook plate for acute Rockwood III AC joint lesion at both short and long-term follow-up periods. Patients treated non-operatively achieved very high clinical scores, nearly equivalent to normal function. Further research should identify the patient-specific risk factors associated with the rare cases of failed non-operative treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I; randomized controlled study, therapeutic.

Surgeons consider Rockwood classification the most important factor for decision-making in acute, high-grade acromioclavicular dislocations

Purpose

The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of patient-specific factors, including age, lifestyle considerations as well as the extent of injury according to the Rockwood classification (RW), on the surgeon's decision-making in the choice between operative and nonoperative treatment for acute, high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations.

Methods

Orthopaedic and trauma surgeons were requested to complete an online questionnaire consisting of closed and open questions regarding the treatment of acute, high-grade AC joint dislocations and 24 fictive clinical scenarios.

Results

A total of 133 answered questionnaires were collected. 27 different nationalities from five continents were represented. The included participants had a median experience of 12 years (interquartile range: 2-41). Overall, the treatment option for surgery (answer: YES) was chosen in 2426 answers (76% of cases) compared to 'NO' in 766 (24% of cases). RW classification was considered the most important factor influencing surgical decision-making for most surgeons (69%). Two thirds of the participants answered that smoking does not impact their decision towards surgery and as to the influence of body mass index (BMI) on decision-making, half of the respondents would not alter their preferred treatment based on BMI. Finally, there were no significant differences in decision-making regarding the influence of the participant's demographics.

Conclusion

This study highlights that RW classification is the most important factor to consider in the surgeon's decision-making between operative and nonoperative treatment in acute, high-grade AC joint dislocations. Participants preferred operative treatment over nonoperative treatment in acute, high-grade AC joint dislocation in 76% of case scenarios, increasing up to 90% when RW Grade III lesions were not taken into account. These findings contrast with recent studies reporting good functional outcomes of conservatively treated acute, high-grade AC injuries and highlight the need to bridge the gap between evidence and practice.

Level of Evidence

Level V.

High Vertical and Horizontal Stability at Short-Term Follow-Up After an All-Endoscopic Double Cerclage Endobutton Technique for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Separations

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations using an all-endoscopic double cerclage endobutton technique compared with an arthroscopic-assisted single-bundle endobutton technique and to analyze the complication, failure, and revision rates of both procedures.

METHODS

All patients with acute Rockwood type IIIB and V AC joint separations who were operated on using an all-endoscopic double cerclage technique (2019-2022) or an arthroscopic-assisted single-bundle technique (2017-2019) were included. The follow-up period was at least 12 months. Clinical and radiographic assessment was performed at follow-up. Complications, failures, and revisions were also investigated.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (14 double cerclage group, 14 single-bundle group, all male) with an average age of 37 years (interquartile range [IQR], 15) were available for follow-up after 45 months (IQR, 38). The median time between trauma and surgery was 7 days (IQR, 8). Very good clinical results without significant differences were observed in both groups (Constant score, 94 [IQR, 12] vs 95 [IQR, 15], P = .427, AC joint instability score, 95 [IQR, 11] vs 87 [IQR, 22], P = .210). All patients returned to sport, with an average sports level of 95% compared with preoperative status. The single-bundle group showed significantly increased anteroposterior instability (6 vs 0, P = .006). A total of 5 complications occurred (2 vs 3), leading to 1 revision surgery in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent clinical results and high vertical and horizontal stability can be achieved with the all-endoscopic double cerclage technique. Horizontal instability occurred significantly more frequently with the single-bundle technique. The prolonged operation time in the double cerclage group had no negative impact on postoperative outcomes, including complication and failure rates, and a learning curve to reduce this prolonged operative time should be considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative clinical series.

Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of High-Grade Acromioclavicular Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis investigated differences between operative and nonoperative management for functional, as well as radiological, outcomes in Rockwood III-V acromioclavicular (AC) injuries. A literature search of several databases was conducted including Elsevier, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to May 28, 2024. Included studies reported patients older than 16 years with a diagnosis of AC joint (ACJ) injury of Rockwood grade III or higher. This review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023431602). Thirteen studies met the eligibility criteria (n = 729) of patients receiving either operative or nonoperative treatment for acute AC injuries. At 24-48 months follow-up, constant score outcomes favored the operative group compared to the nonoperative group (MD = 2.38, 95% CI: 0.14, 4.62; I2 = 66%). Radiological outcomes were in favor of the operative group such that the ACJ width was narrower (MD = -5.60, 95% CI: -6.67, -4.54; I2 = 11%), and the incidence of ACJ dislocations/subluxation was less compared to the nonoperative group (OR = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.07; I2 = 0%). More patients in the nonoperative group had "good" subjective evaluation of results compared to the operative group (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.90; I2 = 80%). There were 54 (18.3%) complications in the operative group. On the other hand, there were 39 (15.9%) adverse events in the nonoperative group. Operative management of Rockwood III-V AC injuries appears to confer greater functional and radiological patient outcomes. Further long-term research is required to elucidate whether this remains longitudinally, with specific investigation for individual Rockwood grading.

Use of the pectoralis minor and coracoacromial ligament for a biplanar coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular reconstruction: A cadaveric feasibility study

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a novel technique that focuses on vertical and horizontal stabilization of the acromioclavicular joint using two local autologous grafts, the pectoralis minor (Pm) and the coracoacromial ligament (CAL).

Methods

Ten fresh-frozen shoulder cadaveric pieces were dissected. Length and width of the Pm and CAL were measured in their anatomical position and anatomical variants were noted. The Pm tendon was harvested at the myothendinous junction keeping the insertion at the coracoid process. The CAL was detached from the coracoid process keeping the acromial insertion. The free limbs of both grafts were prepared with the Krackow technique and the Arthrex SpeedWhip technique, respectively. The primary coracoclavicular reduction and fixation were with the button system or with two subcoracoid ultrahigh-strength suture cerclage through and around the clavicle. The Pm graft was fixed inside a clavicular tunnel by a cortical button and the CAL was transferred and fixed to the lateral clavicle using a knotless anchor or intramedullary when lateral clavicle resection was performed.

Results

The median length of the Pm was 50 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 50-54), and the median length of the CAL was 36.5 mm (IQR 34-40) which decreased by 15% and 23% once were prepared with the Krackow and Arthrex SpeedWhip techniques to 44.5 mm (IQR: 30-65) and 30 mm (IQR: 22-32), respectively. The diameter of the prepared Pm graft was 5 mm (IQR: 4.5-6) and the CAL graft 5.5 mm (5-6). All grafts were able to reach the fixation points. The procedure was feasible in 100% of the cases.

Conclusion

A biplanar reconstruction using autologous Pm and CAL appears feasible in restoring the acromioclavicular joint stability.

Level of Evidence

Level IV. Basic science, anatomy, cadaveric dissection.

Double figure of eight technique using fiber tape for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocations - Reconstruction technique

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are not uncommon injuries. High-grade dislocations can be managed by arthroscopic as well as open techniques, but the most important thing is to address both vertical and horizontal stability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcome of a cost effective double figure of eight technique of stabilizing both coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments in acute high-grade disruption (Type IIIB -VI) using fibre tape. This study was performed at our tertiary care centre from 2017 to 2020 after appropriate IRB approval and patient consent. Out of 134 cases, 23 high-grade AC joint disruptions treated with our technique were included in the study. Demographic data analysis, pre-op and post-op Constant score and UCLA scoring were done to assess the functional outcome; Coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and CCD ratio were used to assess the radiological outcome. Significant improvement in Constant and UCLA shoulder scores were observed from pre-op to final follow up. With respect to the radiological outcome, all cases had a significant improvement in CCD and CCD ratio from baseline to final follow-up. To conclude, our double figure of eight technique is more anatomical, addresses both vertical and horizontal stability, easily reproducible, cost-effective and safe technique.

Current Concepts in Management of Acromioclavicular Joint Injury

Background: The management of acromioclavicular joint injuries requires a thorough understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics of the joint, as well as knowledge of the pertinent physical exam findings and classification to determine an appropriate treatment approach, whether operative or nonoperative. In this article, we present a narrative review of the current state of understanding surrounding these issues. Although there are a large number of options for operative intervention, we additionally present our experience with anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) with imbrication of the deltoid fascia. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data on a total of 45 patients who had undergone ACCR between 2003 and 2016 were collected. Results: We found that improvements were seen in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) (53 ± 19 to 81 ± 23), Simple Shoulder Test (SST) (6 ± 3 to 12 ± 13), Constant-Murley (CM) (60 ± 18 to 92 ± 8), and Rowe (67 ± 14 to 89 ± 11) and the mean post-operative SANE score was 86 ± 17. Conclusions: ACCR has the advantage of addressing both horizontal and vertical stability with good outcomes.

Treatment options for acute Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular dislocations: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Acute Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations have been treated with numerous surgical techniques over the years. The purpose of this study was to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials to quantitatively define the optimal treatment for AC dislocations requiring operative treatment.

METHODS

A literature search of 3 databases was performed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Randomized controlled trials comparing 1 of 10 treatments for acute Rockwood type III-V AC dislocations-nonoperative treatment, Kirschner wire fixation (KW), coracoclavicular screw fixation (Scr), hook plate (HP), open coracoclavicular cortical button (CBO), arthroscopic coracoclavicular cortical button (CBA), ≥2 coracoclavicular cortical buttons (CB2), isolated graft reconstruction (GR), cortical button with graft augmentation (CB-GR), and coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular fixation (AC)-were included. Clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist approach to NMA, with statistical analysis performed using the R program. Treatment options were ranked using the P-score, which estimates the likelihood that the investigated treatment is the ideal method for an optimal result in each outcome measure on a scale from 0 to 1.

RESULTS

Of 5362 reviewed studies, 26 met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1581 patients included in the NMA. AC, CB-GR, GR, CB2, CBA, and CBO demonstrated superiority over HP, Scr, KW, and nonoperative treatment at final follow-up for the Constant-Murley score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, with AC and CB-GR showing the highest P-scores for the Constant-Murley score (0.957 and 0.781, respectively) and GR and CBO showing the highest P-scores for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (0.896 and 0.750, respectively). GR had the highest P-score for the visual analog scale score (0.986). HP, CB2, CB-GR, AC, CBA, and CBO demonstrated superiority in the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and recurrence at final follow-up, with HP and CB2 having the highest P-scores for the CCD (0.798 and 0.757, respectively) and with GR and CB-GR having the highest P-scores for recurrence (0.880 and 0.855, respectively). KW and Scr showed the shortest operative times (P-scores of 0.917 and 0.810, respectively), whereas GR and CBA showed the longest operative times (P-scores of 0.120 and 0.097, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are multiple fixation options for acute Rockwood type III-V AC dislocations, adding AC fixation or graft augmentation likely improves functional outcomes and decreases the CCD and recurrence rate at final follow-up-at the expense of longer operative times.

Treatment of acromioclavicular dislocations with a concomitant coracoid fracture: a systematic review of 37 patients

Background

Acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations with a concomitant fracture of the coracoid process (CP) are rare and there is ambiguity on treatment options. This systematic review was performed to address the clinically relevant question: what are the shoulder functions, union rates, and expected time until return to daily life in patients with a dislocation of the AC joint with a concomitant CP fracture after (1) nonsurgical treatment, (2) sole fixation of the AC joint, and (3) fixation of both the AC joint and the coracoid process?

Methods

Studies were identified by conducting an online. Thirty records met the inclusion criteria and were suitable for data extraction.

Results

A total of 37 shoulders from 37 patients were included. Surgical treatment was provided to 22 out of 37 patients, and 15 patients had nonsurgical treatment. Out of the surgically treated patients, 12 patients were treated with a fixation of both the AC joint and the CP, 9 patients with a sole fixation of the AC joint, and 1 patient with a sole fixation of the CP.

Conclusion

Existing literature does not indicate that one treatment option is superior, and more data are needed to guide evidence-based decisions on this rare injury.

Delayed acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using a modern suspensory device does not increase the risk of fixation failure or major complications

BACKGROUND

Management of displaced acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries remains contentious. It is unclear if delayed vs. acute reconstruction has an increased risk of fixation failure and complications. The primary aim of this study was to compare complications of early vs. delayed reconstruction. The secondary aim was to determine modes of failure of ACJ reconstruction requiring revision surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on all patients who underwent operative reconstruction of ACJ injuries over a 10-year period (Rockwood III-V) using suspensory devices with or without hamstring allograft. Reconstruction was classed as early (<12 weeks from injury) or delayed (≥12 weeks). Patient demographics, fixation method, and postoperative complications were noted, with 1-year follow-up a minimum requirement for inclusion. Patient-reported outcomes with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and EuroQol-5 Dimension were undertaken. Fixation failure was defined as loss of reduction requiring revision surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were analyzed (n = 59 early and n = 45 delayed). The mean age was 42.0 (standard deviation: 11.2; 17-70 years); 84.6% were male and 15.4% were smokers. No difference was observed between fixation failure (P = .39) or deep infection (P = .13) with regard to acute vs. delayed reconstruction. No patient demographic or timing of surgery was predictive of fixation failure on regression modeling. Overall, 11 patients underwent revision surgery for loss of reduction and implant failure (n = 5 suture fatigue, n = 2 endobutton escape, n = 2 coracoid stress fracture, and n = 2 deep infection). The EuroQol-5 Dimension (P = .084) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (P = .062) were comparable for early and delayed groups respectively and below the minimal clinically important difference.

CONCLUSION

This study found that delayed surgical management of ACJ injuries using a modern device has comparable functional outcomes and is not associated with a higher incidence of fixation failure or major complications.

Acromioclavicular joint injuries revisited: Pathoanatomy, pathomechanics, and clinical presentation

Multiple papers have described aspects of treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. Most have emphasized aspects of surgical treatment, and some papers have addressed non-operative treatment. Few papers have highlighted the specific pathoanatomy of an AC joint injury or have described methods of evaluating the 3-dimensional pathomechanics resulting from the pathoanatomical injury. This paper is based on 3 observations: (1) AC joint injuries exist and present on a spectrum of pathoanatomy; (2) The effect of the pathoanatomy on normal AC joint mechanics to produce pathomechanics is dependent on the extent of the pathoanatomy; and (3) Treatment protocols should be developed to address the specific pathoanatomy to optimize the mechanics. A comprehensive clinical approach emphasizing the evaluation of the extent of the anatomic injury and understanding its mechanical consequences regarding shoulder and arm function is a key in the development of guidelines for developing operative or non-operative treatment protocols and for establishing outcomes of the treatment protocols.

No difference in clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up in patients with type III and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with hook plate or physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The need for operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is unclear. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the outcomes after operative treatment with a hook plate with the outcomes after nonoperative treatment of acute Rockwood type III and type V AC joint dislocations separately.

METHODS

The inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-65 years with an acute type III or type V AC joint dislocation with the availability to start treatment within 3 weeks after trauma. All patients received the same standardized outpatient rehabilitation protocol and were followed up for 24 months. Assessments were based on radiographs, clinical examination findings, and questionnaires. The primary outcome was the Constant score (CS). The secondary outcomes were as follows: Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), QuickDASH score (abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire), shoulder pain at rest and during movement rated using a visual analog scale, EQ-5D (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions) score, patient satisfaction, cosmesis, complications, and adverse events. The 4 groups were compared using 1-way analysis of variance and intention to treat.

RESULTS

The included patients (N = 124) (mean age, 40 years [range, 18-64 years]; 91% male patients) were randomized, stratified by type, to nonoperative treatment (type III, n = 33; type V, n = 30) or operative treatment with a hook plate (type III, n = 30; type V, n = 31) at a single center. Three patients randomized to physiotherapy dropped out before any follow-up measures, leaving 121 patients in the study. Complete clinical follow-up data were obtained from 118 patients at 24 months. At 3 months, patients in both nonoperatively treated groups had a significantly better mean CS, SSV, and QuickDASH score and had less pain at rest and during movement compared with patients treated operatively. At 6, 12, and 24 months, there were no significant differences in the CS, SSV, QuickDASH score, pain, or EQ-5D score between the groups regardless of intervention. At 24 months, the mean CS was 88 for nonoperatively treated type III patients vs. 91 for operatively treated type III patients and was 90 vs. 91 for type V patients (P = .477). At final follow-up, patients had regained 97% of the mean CS comparing the uninjured and injured shoulders and 86% of the patients rated the result as excellent or good. Eleven patients assigned to nonoperative treatment (18%, 6 type III and 5 type V) underwent surgery within 19 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the nonoperative and operative treatment groups had very good restoration of shoulder function and patient satisfaction at 24 months, and operative treatment did not lead to better outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment. In conclusion, our study does not support surgery with a hook plate in patients with acute Rockwood type III or type V AC joint dislocations.

Benefits and Harms of Interventions With Surgery Compared to Interventions Without Surgery for Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the benefits and harms of interventions with and without surgery for musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions.

DESIGN

Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

LITERATURE SEARCH

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and CENTRAL, all up to January 7, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs (English, German, Danish, Swedish, and Norwegian) of interventions with and without surgery conducted in any setting for any non-fracture MSK condition in adults (mean age: 18+ years) evaluating the outcomes on a continuous (benefits) or count (harms) scale. Outcomes were pain, self-reported physical function, quality of life, serious adverse events (SAEs), and death at 1 year.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Random-effects metaanalyses for MSK conditions where there were data from at least 2 trials.

RESULTS

One hundred RCTs (n = 12 645 patients) across 28 different conditions at 9 body sites were included. For 9 out of 13 conditions with data on pain (exceptions include some spine conditions), 11 out of 11 for function, and 9 out of 9 for quality of life, there were no clinically relevant differences (standardized mean difference of 0.50 or above) between interventions with and without surgery. For 13 out of 16 conditions with data on SAEs and 16 out of 16 for death, there were no differences in harms. Only 6 trials were at low risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

The low certainty of evidence does not support recommending surgery over nonsurgical alternatives for most MSK conditions with available RCTs. Further high-quality RCTs may change this conclusion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022;52(6):312-344. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.11075.

Criteria for return to play after operative management of acromioclavicular joint separation: a systematic review

Background

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation is a common cause of shoulder injury among athletes. High-grade injuries may require operative fixation, and comprehensive return-to-play guidelines have not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to summarize criteria for return to play after operative management of AC joint separation.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed from January 1999 to April 2020 to evaluate clinical evidence regarding criteria for return to play after operative management of isolated AC joint separation.

Results

Sixty-three studies with at least 1 explicitly stated return-to-play criterion were identified out of an initial database search of 1253 published articles. Eight separate categories of return-to-play criteria were identified, the most common of which was time from surgery (95.2%). Return-to-play timelines ranged from 2 to 12 months, the most common timeline being 6 months (37.8%). Only 4 (6.3%) studies used conditional criteria to guide return to play, which included range of motion, strength, clinical stability, radiographic stability, functional assessment, safety assessment, and hardware removal.

Conclusion

Most published studies use only time-based criteria for return to play after surgery for AC joint separation, and only a small number of studies use additional subjective or objective criteria. While this systematic review helps provide a foundation for developing a comprehensive return-to-play checklist, further investigation is needed to establish safe and effective guidelines that will enable athletes to safely return to sport and minimize the recurrence of injury.

Return to Play After Surgical Treatment of High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries in the Australian Football League

Background:

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries are the second most common upper limb injuries in the Australian Football League (AFL); however, there is little evidence on the return-to-sport results after surgical stabilization of the ACJ in this sporting population.

Purpose:

To investigate the return-to-sport time, on-field performance, and patient-reported outcomes in a series of professional AFL players after undergoing ACJ stabilization.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective case series of all AFL players who had undergone open twin-tailed dog-bone ACJ stabilization by a single surgeon between September 2013 and April 2017. Outcome measures included time to return to sport, on-field performance indicators (handballs, tackles, kicks, and AFL Fantasy and Supercoach scores), the Nottingham Clavicle Score, Oxford Shoulder Score, and the Specific Acromioclavicular Score. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at a minimum follow-up of 12 months.

Results:

Of 13 senior listed AFL players who underwent twin-tailed dog-bone surgery, 9 players were included. Mean follow-up was 24.8 months (range, 5-41 months) postoperatively. Mean return-to-sport time was 8.6 weeks for injuries that occurred within the season. The number of kicks, marks, handballs, and tackles as well as AFL Supercoach and Fantasy scores did not significantly change after surgery ( P > .05). Outcome measures showed a high level of patient satisfaction after surgery, with a mean Nottingham Clavicle Score of 92.2, Oxford Shoulder Score of 47.7, and the Specific Acromioclavicular Score of 7.5.

Conclusion:

In a collective of professional AFL players with ACJ injury, our twin-tailed dog-bone technique revealed return to competitive play could be achieved at a mean of 8.6 weeks without compromising on-field performance or patient-reported pain, function, and satisfaction.

Nonoperative Management of Traumatic Acromioclavicular Joint Injury: A Clinical Commentary with Clinical Practice Considerations

Traumatic injuries of the acromioclavicular joint result in pain and potentially long-term alterations in scapulohumeral rhythm that occurs due to disruption of the clavicular strut function which is integral to scapular kinematics. Nonoperative treatment remains a valid option in most acromioclavicular joint injuries with the potential of minimizing pain and restoring scapulohumeral rhythm. However, few studies have provided nonoperative treatment details. Therefore, the purpose of this clinical commentary is to discuss the rationale, indications, and techniques of nonoperative treatment and present an organized approach for evaluating and managing such patients based on the best available evidence. Attention will be focused on identifying the treatment methods employed and the results/outcomes of such treatments.

Level of Evidence

5.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Arthroscopically-Assisted Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Tendon Allograft for High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopically-assisted, anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using tendon allograft (AA-ACCR) for the treatment of Rockwood type III-V injuries at minimum 2-year follow-up and to perform subgroup analyses of clinical and radiographic outcomes for acute versus chronic and type III versus type IV-V injuries.

METHODS

In this retrospective study of prospectively collected data, patients who underwent primary AA-ACCR for the treatment of type III-V dislocations and had minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) were collected, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Numeric Assessment Evaluation score, Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary, Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score, and patient satisfaction. Preoperative and postoperative coracoclavicular distance (CCD) was obtained. PROs and CCD were reported for the total cohort and for the subgroups. Complication and revision rates were demonstrated.

RESULTS

In total, 102 patients (10 women, 92 men) with a mean age of 45.0 years (range, 18-73 years) were included. There were 13 complications (12.7%) resulting in revision surgery. After exclusion of revised patients, PROs were available for 69 (77.5%). At mean follow-up of 4.7 years (range, 2.0-12.8 years), all PROs improved significantly (P < .001). Median patient satisfaction was 9.0 (interquartile range, 8.0-10.0). Median preoperative to postoperative CCD decreased significantly (P < .001). Subgroup analyses revealed significant improvements in all PROs and CCD from preoperative to postoperative for both acute and chronic, and type III and type IV-V dislocations (P < .05) with no significant differences in postoperative PROs and satisfaction between (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

AA-ACCR for high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries resulted in high postoperative PROs and patient satisfaction with significant improvements from before to after surgery in those who did not undergo revision surgery. Furthermore, subgroup analyses revealed that acute and chronic, and type III and type IV-V injuries benefitted similarly from AA-ACCR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; therapeutic case series.

Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation

PURPOSE

To systematically review the outcomes of surgical treatments of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

METHODS

Studies were identified by electronic databases (Ovid, PubMed). All studies reporting functional and radiological outcomes of surgical treatments of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations were included. Following data were extracted: authors and year, study design, level of evidence, number of patients, age, classification of acromioclavicular joint dislocation, time to surgery, surgical technique, follow-up, clinical and imaging outcomes, complications, and failures. Descriptive statistics was used, when a data pooling was not possible. Comparable outcomes were pooled to generate summary outcomes reported as frequency-weighted values. Quality appraisal was assessed through the MINORS checklist.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-three studies were included for a total of 4473 shoulders. Mean age of participants was 36.9 years. Mean follow-up was 42.06 months. Arthroscopy showed better ASES (p < 0.0001) and lower VAS pain score (p = 0.0249) compared to an open approach. Biologic and synthetic reconstructions demonstrated better results over osteosynthesis techniques. Biologic techniques showed overall better Constant (p = 0.0001) and DASH (p = 0.0215) scores, while synthetic reconstruction showed better UCLA score (p = 0.0001). Among suture buttons, triple button showed overall better results in Constant (p = 0.0001) and VAS (p = 0.0001) scores, while better results in DASH score (p = 0.0003) were achieved by 2 double button techniques. Overall, the level of evidence was low.

CONCLUSION

Biological and synthetic reconstructions achieved better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis. Among suture buttons, the triple button showed better functional performance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Comparison of the TightRope system versus hook plate in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a retrospective analysis

This study compared the results of the minimally invasive coracoclavicular (CC) fixation with a single TightRope (MITR) procedure and the hook plate (HP) procedure for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation treatment. Sixteen patients with a mean age of 44.9 ± 11 years were treated with the MITR procedure. Nineteen patients with a mean age of 40.2 ± 8.7 years were treated using the HP procedure. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Constant–Murley Score (CMS), and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder score. Vertical displacement of the clavicle with reference to the height of the acromion was measured in standard anteroposterior radiographs. The mean follow-up was 27 months in the MITR group and 30 months in the HP group. No statistically significant differences were found between the MITR group and the HR group in terms of VAS score (0.4 ± 0.6 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.138), UCLA Shoulder score (33.9 ± 2.5 vs 33.7 ± 1.5, P = 0.843), or CMS (95.7 ± 7.3 vs 93.7 ± 6.6, P = 0.400). No redislocation was identified in the HP group, while redislocation occurred in 1 of 16 (6.3%) patients in the MITR group. One patient in the HP group (5.3%) had acromial osteolysis, while no acromial osteolysis was found in the MITR group. No other adverse events, such as infections, tunnel widening, fractures, or implant-related complications, were observed. Both procedures provided satisfactory results. The HP procedure provided better reduction, while the MITR procedure provided a slightly lower tendency of pain. Long-term follow-up is needed to investigate the clinical outcomes and radiological outcomes of both groups.

Early and delayed acromioclavicular joint reconstruction provide equivalent outcomes

BACKGROUND

Some comparative studies have reported improved outcomes for early compared with delayed reconstruction for high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations. However, most are based on older techniques and did not specifically involve reconstruction of both the coracoclavicular (CC) and AC joint ligaments. The purpose of this study was to compare functional outcomes of early vs. delayed surgical intervention of AC joint dislocations managed with combined CC and AC ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was performed of 53 patients who underwent early (<2 weeks after injury) or delayed (≥2 weeks after injury) open stabilization for AC joint dislocation. All patients were managed with the same surgical technique of combined CC reconstruction and stabilization of the AC joint, except for the addition of a gracilis allograft for biologic CC reconstruction in delayed intervention. Outcome was determined at a minimum follow-up of 12 months, using the Acromioclavicular Joint Instability (ACJI) score, Taft score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and overall satisfaction (0-10). Multivariable regression analyses were performed to test associations of ACJI and Taft scores with 5 independent variables (early vs. delayed surgery, age, sex, manual worker, and Rockwood type).

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 47 men (89%) and 6 women (11%) aged 40.1 ± 11.2 years (range, 22-63 years). The early group (n = 31) underwent surgery 1.1 ± 0.5 weeks after injury, whereas the delayed group (n = 22) underwent surgery 84.3 ± 99.1 weeks after injury. There were no significant differences in ACJI scores (87 ± 14 vs. 89 ± 14, P = .267), Taft scores (10.1 ± 1.3 vs. 10.7 ± 1.3, P = .084), pain on VAS (0.3 ± 0.7 vs. 0.6 ± 1.1, P = .541), SSV (95 ± 7 vs. 93 ± 9, P = .427), or overall satisfaction (9.6 ± 0.9 vs. 9.4 ± 1.1, P = .491). Multivariable analyses revealed no associations between any of the independent variables and ACJI or Taft score.

CONCLUSIONS

Early and delayed surgical interventions of high-grade AC joint dislocation provide equivalent clinical scores when combined CC and AC joint fixation is used for stabilization. Rapid surgical intervention for high-grade AC joint dislocation may not be necessary, as most patients can still benefit from surgery at a later stage.

Is coracoclavicular reconstruction necessary in hook plate fixation for acute unstable acromioclavicular dislocation?

Background

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is a relatively common shoulder injury. For the treatment of cases of severe ACJ dislocation (Rockwood type III–V), hook plate fixation is an easy-to-master and minimally-invasive approach to surgical intervention. Over stress on the acromion following hook plate fixation often leads to acromial complications such as osteolysis and loss of reduction. We hypothesized that suspensory reconstruction alongside hook plate fixation might provide a superior stability and reduce complications as compared with hook plate fixation alone. The purpose of the study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of these two surgical modalities.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 49 patients with acute ACJ dislocation from May 2010 to December 2018. Among them, 19 patients received hook plate fixation only (HP group), and 19 underwent concomitant hook plate fixation and loop suspension fixation with two mersilene sutures (HM group). The demographic data of the patients were recorded and analyzed. All patients underwent a shoulder X-ray initially, immediately postoperatively, and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months to measure the relative coracoclavicular distance (rCCD). Clinical assessment of shoulder function outcome was conducted using the Constant Murley Score (CMS); the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score was also measured at the latest follow-up.

Results

There were no significant differences in the demographic data between the two groups. With regards to the CMS and the UCLA score, the HM group and HP group both had excellent outcomes, and no significant differences in scores were observed between groups (CMS: 93.90 ± 6.16 versus 94.47 ± 7.26, p = 0.47; UCLA score: 32.84 ± 2.91 versus 34.32 ± 1.16, p = 0.07). However, the HM group demonstrated substantial superiority in terms of maintenance of the rCCD over the HP group (91.47 ± 27.47 versus 100.75 ± 48.70, p = 0.015). In addition, there was less subacromial osteolysis in the HM group than the HP group (52.6% versus 15.8%, p = 0.038).

Conclusion

Both fixations yielded excellent functional outcomes. However, concomitant hook plate fixation with loop suspensory reconstruction demonstrated the fewer acromion complications and statistical differences in reduction maintenance with less clinical significance.

Arthroscopically Assisted Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction Using the Infinity-Lock Button System

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries are the most common shoulder injuries in the athletic population. The literature is rife with various surgical techniques and implants as well as opinion on proper timing of surgical options. Patient outcomes are generally similar across fixation method. Complications are common following reconstruction, and the specific type of complication may depend on the technique used. Fracture and graft elongation are associated with use of allograft, whereas button cutout and skin irritation can occur with cortical suture-fixation methods. This technical paper describes an arthroscopically assisted acute AC joint reconstruction technique using the Infinity-Lock Button System. This technique provides a minimally invasive, low-profile reconstruction that may minimize risk of clavicle and coracoid fracture as well as overlying skin irritation. Acute reconstruction may permit healing of the native coracoclavicular and AC ligaments and mitigate risk of future AC joint arthritis.

Review of Weaver and Dunn on treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation

This classic discusses the original publication "Treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation" by Weaver and Dunn, which collaborated to develop a technique for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in 1972. Their surgical technique described resection of 2 cm of the distal clavicle and transfer of the acromial end of the coracoacromial ligament into the medullary canal of the distal clavicle. (modified) Weaver-Dunn procedures have been regarded as one of the most effective techniques to treat complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation for a long time. However, anatomic reconstructions have taken over this position since recent biomechanical studies have demonstrated superior results. Although the Weaver-Dunn procedure has fallen out of favour, it remains of historical significance. For this reason, this review will comprise the historical overview of the Weaver-Dunn procedure, the men behind the eponym and the clinical implication then and now.

Open Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction With Semitendinosus Allograft Utilizing the Cerclage Technique

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries most commonly occur in young males after a direct injury at the acromion. General consensus stresses nonoperative treatment for type I and II injuries and surgical treatment for types IV through VI, whereas management of type III injuries is more controversial. If surgery is indicated, there are multiple techniques including hook plate, screw fixation, coracoclavicular fixation, and anatomic and nonanatomic reconstruction. The overall complication rate is high (14%), regardless of technique. In this Technical Note, we outline a technique for open repair of a chronic AC joint separation using a semitendinosus allograft using the cerclage for enhanced fixation.

Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults

BACKGROUND

Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint is one of the most common shoulder injuries in a sport-active population. The question of whether surgery should be used remains controversial. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of surgical versus conservative (non-surgical) interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocations in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (to June 2019), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library 2019, Issue 6), MEDLINE (1946 to June 2019), Embase (1980 to June 2019), and LILACS (1982 to June 2019), trial registries, and reference lists of articles. There were no restrictions based on language or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised and quasi-randomised trials that compared surgical with conservative treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently performed study screening and selection, 'Risk of bias' assessment, and data extraction. We pooled data where appropriate and used GRADE to assess the quality of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five randomised trials and one quasi-randomised trial. The included trials involved 357 mainly young adults, the majority of whom were male, with acute acromioclavicular dislocation. The strength of the findings in all studies was limited due to design features, invariably lack of blinding, that carry a high risk of bias. Fixation of the acromioclavicular joint using hook plates, tunnelled suspension devices, coracoclavicular screws, acromioclavicular pins, or (usually threaded) wires was compared with supporting the arm in a sling or similar device. After surgery, the arm was also supported in a sling or similar device in all trials. Where described in the trials, both groups had exercise-based rehabilitation. We downgraded the evidence for all outcomes at least two levels, invariably for serious risk of bias and serious imprecision.Low-quality evidence from two studies showed no evidence of a difference between groups in shoulder function at one year, assessed using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) (0 (best function) to 100 (worst function)): mean difference (MD) 0.73 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.70 to 4.16; 112 participants. These results were consistent with other measures of function at one-year or longer follow-up, including non-validated outcome scores reported by three studies. There is low-quality evidence that function at six weeks may be better after conservative treatment, indicating an earlier recovery. Very low-quality evidence from one trial found no difference between groups in participants reporting pain at one year: risk ratio (RR) 1.32, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.19; 79 participants. There is very low-quality evidence that surgery may not reduce the risk of treatment failure, usually resulting in non-routine secondary surgery: 14/168 versus 15/174; RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.94; 342 participants, 6 studies. The main source of treatment failure was complications related to surgical implants in the surgery group and persistent symptoms, mainly discomfort, due to the acromioclavicular dislocation in the conservatively treated group.There is low-quality evidence from two studies that there may be little or no difference between groups in the return to former activities (sports or work) at one year: 57/67 versus 62/70; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.10; 137 participants, 2 studies. Low-quality but consistent evidence from four studies indicated an earlier recovery in conservatively treated participants compared with those treated with surgery. There is low-quality evidence of no clinically important difference between groups at one year in quality of life scores, measured using the 36-item or 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36 or SF-12) (0-to-100 scale, where 100 is best score), in either the physical component (MD -0.63, 95% CI -2.63 to 1.37; 122 participants, 2 studies) or mental component (MD 0.47 points, 95% CI -1.51 to 2.44; 122 participants). There is very low-quality and clinically heterogenous evidence of a greater risk of an adverse event after surgery: 45/168 versus 16/174; RR 2.82, 95% CI 1.65 to 4.82; 342 participants, 6 studies; I² = 48%. Common adverse outcomes were hardware complications or discomfort (18.5%) and infection (8.7%) in the surgery group and persistent symptoms (7.1%), mainly discomfort, in the conservatively treated group. The majority of surgical complications occurred in older studies testing now-outdated devices known for their high risk of complications. The very low-quality evidence from one study (70 participants) means that we are uncertain whether there is a between-group difference in patient dissatisfaction with cosmetic results.It is notable that the evidence for function, return to former activities, and quality of life came from the two most recently conducted studies, which tested currently used devices and interventions in clearly defined participant populations that represented the commonly perceived population for which there is uncertainty over the use of surgery. There were insufficient data to conduct subgroup analysis relating to type of injury and whether surgery involved ligament reconstruction or not.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is low-quality evidence that surgical treatment has no additional benefits in terms of function, return to former activities, and quality of life at one year compared with conservative treatment. There is, however, low-quality evidence that people treated conservatively had improved function at six weeks compared with surgical management. There is very low-quality evidence of little difference between the two treatments in pain at one year, treatment failure usually resulting in secondary surgery, or patient satisfaction with cosmetic result. Although surgery may result in more people sustaining adverse events, this varied between the trials, being more common in techniques such as K-wire fixation that are rarely used today. There remains a need to consider the balance of risks between the individual outcomes: for example, surgical adverse events, including wound infection or dehiscence and hardware complication, against risk of adverse events that may be more commonly associated with conservative treatment such as persistent symptoms or discomfort, or both.There is a need for sufficiently powered, good-quality, well-reported randomised trials of currently used surgical interventions versus conservative treatment for well-defined injuries.

Return to sport after surgical treatment for high-grade (Rockwood III-VI) acromioclavicular dislocation

PURPOSE

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are common in a young and active population, especially in people performing contact sports. Full recovery with a fast and high rate of return to sport is desirable. This systematic review aims to combine patient outcomes in order to help surgeons in addressing patient expectations regarding the return to sport after surgical intervention for AC dislocations.

METHODS

To conduct this systematic review, the PRISMA guidelines were followed. Articles were included if written in English or Dutch and evaluated return to sport after any type of surgical intervention for Rockwood types III to VI AC dislocations in patients practicing sports. Outcome parameters were return to sport, time to return to sport, level of sport, functional outcome scores and complications.

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 498 patients were included, of which 462 patients practiced sports. 432 (94%) patients returned to sport. The weighted mean time to return to sport was 4.0 months. 338 out of 401 patients (84%) returned to the same level of pre-injury sport and 35 patients (9%) lowered their level of sport. The weighted mean Constant score was 92 out of 100.

CONCLUSION

The rate of return to sport after surgical intervention for Rockwood (RW) III-VI AC dislocations is high. However, the level of evidence was low and due to the methodological heterogeneity between studies, subgroup analyses of return to sport outcomes were not feasible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of level I-IV studies, level IV.