Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients Who Have Multiple Prostheses in Place: What Should Be Done with the Silent Prosthetic Joints

Risk factors for metachronous periprosthetic joint infection in patients with multiple prosthetic joints: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECT

Although periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can affect multiple joints simultaneously, most individuals with multiple joint involvement exhibit PJI in only one joint. Data regarding the metachronous PJI management for these patients are limited. This study aimed to explore the risk factors for metachronous PJI in patients with multiple prosthetic joints, thereby guiding and optimizing clinical practice.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for all clinical studies of metachronous PJI from inception until May 2024. The clinical studies on risk factors for metachronous PJI in patients with multiple prosthetic joints after experiencing a periprosthetic infection were collected, with two authors independently screening the literatures. Newcastle Ottawa scale was used as a quality assessment tool for the included studies, and the meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the potential risk factors of metachronous PJI.

RESULTS

A total of 1,544 patients with PJI after multiple joint arthroplasties were reported in 9 studies, including 189 with metachronous PJI. The meta-analysis showed that methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; OR, 3.43; 95%CI, 1.71-6.88; p = 0.0005), rheumatoid arthritis (RA; OR, 2.38; 95%CI, 1.06-5.38; p = 0.04), history of steroid use (OR, 2.93; 95%CI, 1.58-5.43; p = 0.0007), and previous or ongoing non-periprosthetic infection (OR, 4.47; 95%CI, 1.45-13.82; p = 0.009) were identified as significant risk factors for metachronous PJI in patients with multiple prosthetic joints. However, there was no significant difference between the metachronous PJI group and non-metachronous group in terms of revision, age, diabetes, and gender.

CONCLUSION

Patients with MRSA, RA, history of steroid use, previous or ongoing non-periprosthetic infection are at significantly higher risk for metachronous PJI. Further research is needed to optimize management strategies for preventing metachronous PJI in patients with multiple prostheses after a single joint PJI.

Key risk factors and adverse outcomes in metachronous vertebral osteomyelitis following periprosthetic joint infection: A 5-year retrospective study

Purpose

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a leading cause of joint arthroplasty failure, potentially leading to critical complications like vertebral osteomyelitis (VO). The factors contributing to VO after PJI and the outcomes for these patients are not well understood. Our study aims to (1) identify risk factors for VO following PJI and (2) assess the clinical outcomes in these cases.

Methods

We included PJI patients treated surgically at our centre from January 2006 to December 2020, excluding those with simultaneous VO post-PJI. Our focus was on patients with VO occurring after PJI, monitored for at least 5 years. Analysis included patient comorbidities, PJI treatment approaches, pathogen identification and clinical outcomes.

Results

Of 1701 PJI cases, 21 (1.23%) developed VO. Key risk factors for VO post-PJI were identified: systemic inflammatory response syndrome, substance misuse, polymicrobial infection and undergoing at least three stages of resection arthroplasty (odds ratios: 1.86, 54.28, 52.33 and 31.88, respectively). Adverse outcomes were noted in VO patients, with recurrent VO in 6/21 and repeated PJIs in 18/21 cases.

Conclusions

Patients with PJI, especially those with certain risk factors, have an increased likelihood of developing VO and encountering negative outcomes. The potential role of bacteremia in the development of VO after PJI needs further exploration.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients With Ipsilateral Infected Arthroplasties

Background

The risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) subsequently developing at a second site after an initial PJI has been documented to be approximately 18%-20%. To the best of our knowledge, only a single study has evaluated the incidence in ipsilateral joints and if the risk of infection would be different. While this was the only other study to evaluate this specific subfield, we set to re-evaluate and confirm the incidence of developing a second PJI in the setting of an ipsilateral prosthesis and possible associated risk factors.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated surgically for lower-extremity PJI at our institution by 5 surgeons from 2015 to 2021. Patients with multiple arthroplasties on the ipsilateral extremity were included. Time between initial and subsequent infection, risk factors for infection, bacterial source, and bacteremia were identified.

Results

Of 392 patients treated for PJI, 179 (45.6%) had multiple prosthetic joints. Forty-seven of those 179 patients had ipsilateral extremity prosthesis, which made up our study population. Three patients (6.4%) developed a separate infection at an ipsilateral TJA. In total, 10 patients (21.3%) developed a separate PJI. Patients on immunosuppressants had a higher likelihood of developing second PJI on the ipsilateral extremity (P = .02).

Conclusions

Our study identified the risk of developing an ipsilateral PJI to not be any greater than that in patients with contralateral TJAs. It appears that sharing an extremity with an infected TJA does not pose substantially increased risk of subsequent infection of the un-involved prosthesis. Furthermore, immunosuppressant use may increase the risk of a separate ipsilateral PJI.

Periprosthetic Infection in Patients With Multiple Joint Arthroplasties

The number of total joint arthroplasties performed in the United States is increasing every year. Owing to the aging population and excellent long-term prosthesis survival, 45% of patients who undergo joint arthroplasty will receive two or more joint arthroplasties during their lifetimes. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is among the most common complications after arthroplasty. Evaluation and treatment of PJI in patients with multiple joint arthroplasties is challenging, and no consensus exists for the optimal management. Multiple PJI can occur simultaneously, synchronous, or separated by extended time, metachronous. Patient risk factors for both scenarios have been reported and may guide evaluation and long-term management. Whether to perform joint aspiration for asymptomatic prosthesis in the presence of suspected PJI in patients with multiple joint arthroplasties is controversial. Furthermore, no consensus exists regarding whether patients who have multiple joint arthroplasties and develop PJI in a single joint should be considered for prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce the risk of future infections. Finally, the optimal treatment of synchronous joint infections whether by débridement, antibiotics and implant retention, and one-stage or two-stage revision has not been defined. This review will summarize the best information available and provide pragmatic management strategies.

Single, Recurrent, Synchronous, and Metachronous Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Patients With Multiple Hip and Knee Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

The rate for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) exceeds 1% for primary arthroplasties. Over 30% of patients who have a primary arthroplasty require an additional arthroplasty, and the impact of PJI on this population is understudied. Our objective was to assess the prevalence of recurrent, synchronous, and metachronous PJI in patients who had multiple arthroplasties and to identify risk factors for a subsequent PJI.

METHODS

We identified 337 patients who had multiple arthroplasties and at least 1 PJI that presented between 2003 and 2021. The mean follow-up after revision arthroplasty was 3 years (range, 0 to 17.2). Patients who had multiple infected prostheses were categorized as synchronous (ie, presenting at the same time as the initial infection) or metachronous (ie, presenting at a different time as the initial infection). The PJI diagnosis was made using the MusculoSkeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria.

RESULTS

There were 39 (12%) patients who experienced recurrent PJI in the same joint, while 31 (9%) patients developed PJI in another joint. Positive blood cultures were more likely in the second joint PJI (48%) compared to recurrent PJI (23%) or a single PJI (15%, P < .001). Synchronous PJI represented 42% of the second joint PJI cases (n = 13), while metachronous PJI represented 58% (n = 18). Tobacco users had 75% higher odds of metachronous PJI (odds ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.9, P = .041).

CONCLUSION

Over 20% of the patients with multiple arthroplasties and a single PJI will develop a subsequent PJI in another arthroplasty with 12% recurring in the initial arthroplasty and nearly 10% ocurring in another arthroplasty. Particular caution should be taken in patients who use tobacco, have bacteremia, or have Staphylococcus aureus isolation at time of their initial PJI. Optimizing the management of this high-risk patient population is necessary to reduce the additional burden of subsequent PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV.

What is the Safe Distance Between Hip and Knee Implants to Reduce the Risk of Ipsilateral Metachronous Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), the most common cause of revision after TKA and THA, is a devastating complication for patients that is difficult to diagnose and treat. An increase in the number of patients with multiple joint arthroplasties in the same extremity will result in an increased risk of ipsilateral PJI. However, there is no definition of risk factors, micro-organism patterns, and safe distance between knee and hip implants for this patient group.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) In patients with hip and knee arthroplasties on the same side who experience a PJI of one implant, are there factors associated with the development of subsequent PJI of the other implant? (2) In this patient group, how often is the same organism responsible for both PJIs? (3) Is a shorter distance from an infected prosthetic joint to an ipsilateral prosthetic joint associated with greater odds of subsequent infection of the second joint?

METHODS

We designed a retrospective study of a longitudinally maintained institutional database that identified all one-stage and two-stage procedures performed for chronic PJI of the hip and knee at our tertiary referral arthroplasty center between January 2010 and December 2018 (n = 2352). Of these patients, 6.8% (161 of 2352) had an ipsilateral hip or knee implant in situ at the time of receiving surgical treatment for a PJI of the hip or knee. The following criteria led to the exclusion of 39% (63 of 161) of these patients: 4.3% (seven of 161) for incomplete documentation, 30% (48 of 161) for unavailability of full-leg radiographs, and 5% (eight of 161) for synchronous infection. With regard to the latter, per internal protocol, all artificial joints were aspirated before septic surgery, allowing us to differentiate between synchronous and metachronous infection. The remaining 98 patients were included in the final analysis. Twenty patients experienced ipsilateral metachronous PJI during the study period (Group 1) and 78 patients did not experience a same-side PJI (Group 2). We analyzed the microbiological characteristics of bacteria during the first PJI and ipsilateral metachronous PJI. Calibrated, full-length plain radiographs were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were analyzed to determine the optimal cutoff for the stem-to-stem and empty native bone distance. The mean time between the initial PJI and ipsilateral metachronous PJI was 8 ± 14 months. Patients were followed for a minimum of 24 months for any complications.

RESULTS

The risk of ipsilateral metachronous PJI in the other joint secondary to a joint implant in which PJI develops can increase up to 20% in the first 2 years after the procedure. There was no difference between the two groups in age, sex, initial joint replacement (knee or hip), and BMI. However, patients in the ipsilateral metachronous PJI group were shorter and had a lower weight (1.6 ± 0.1 m and 76 ± 16 kg). An analysis of the microbiological characteristics of bacteria at the time of the initial PJI showed no differences in the proportions of difficult-to-treat, high virulence, and polymicrobial infections between the two groups (20% [20 of 98] versus 80% [78 of 98]). Our findings showed that the ipsilateral metachronous PJI group had a shorter stem-to-stem distance, shorter empty native bone distance, and a higher risk of cement restrictor failure (p < 0.01) than the 78 patients who did not experience ipsilateral metachronous PJI during the study period. An analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve showed a cutoff of 7 cm for the empty native bone distance (p < 0.01), with a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 75%.

CONCLUSION

The risk of ipsilateral metachronous PJI in patients with multiple joint arthroplasties is associated with shorter stature and stem-to-stem distance. Appropriate position of the cement restrictor and native bone distance are important in reducing the risk of ipsilateral metachronous PJI in these patients. Future studies might evaluate the risk of ipsilateral metachronous PJI owing to bone adjacency.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Periprosthetic joint infection in patients with multiple arthroplasties

Despite numerous studies focusing on periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), there are no robust data on the risk factors and timing of metachronous infections. Metachronous PJIs are PJIs that can arise in the same or other artificial joints after a period of time, in patients who have previously had PJI. Between January 2010 and December 2018, 661 patients with multiple joint prostheses in situ were treated for PJI at our institution. Of these, 73 patients (11%) developed a metachronous PJI (periprosthetic infection in patients who have previously had PJI in another joint, after a lag period) after a mean time interval of 49.5 months (SD 30.24; 7 to 82.9). To identify patient-related risk factors for a metachronous PJI, the following parameters were analyzed: sex; age; BMI; and pre-existing comorbidity. Metachronous infections were divided into three groups: Group 1, metachronous infections in ipsilateral joints; Group 2, metachronous infections of the contralateral lower limb; and Group 3, metachronous infections of the lower and upper limb. We identified a total of 73 metachronous PJIs: 32 PJIs in Group 1, 38 in Group 2, and one in Group 3. The rate of metachronous infection was 11% (73 out 661 cases) at a mean of four years following first infection. Diabetes mellitus incidence was found significantly more frequently in the metachronous infection group than in non-metachronous infection group. The rate of infection in Group 1 (21.1%) was significantly higher (p = 0.049) compared to Groups 2 (6.2%) and 3 (3%). The time interval of metachronous infection development was shorter in adjacent joint infections. Concordance between the bacterium of the first PJI and that of the metachronous PJI in Group 1 (21/34) was significantly higher than Group 2 (13/38; p = 0.001). The findings of this study suggest that metachronous PJI occurs in more than one in ten patients with an index PJI. Female patients, diabetic patients, and patients with a polymicrobial index PJI are at significantly higher risk for developing a metachronous PJI. Furthermore, metachronous PJIs are significantly more likely to occur in an adjacent joint (e.g. ipsilateral hip and knee) as opposed to a more remote site (i.e. contralateral or upper vs lower limb). Additionally, adjacent joint PJIs occur significantly earlier and are more likely to be caused by the same bacteria as the index PJI.

A retrospective study of risk factors, causative micro-organisms and healthcare resources consumption associated with prosthetic joint infections (PJI) using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum database

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after joint replacement surgery and it is associated with risk of mortality and morbidity along with high direct costs.

METHODS

The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) data were utilized to quantify PJI incidence after hip or knee replacement up to 5 years after implant and a variety of risk factors related to patient characteristics, medical and treatment history along with characteristics of the original surgery were analyzed through Cox proportional hazard.

RESULTS

221,826 patients (individual joints 283,789) met all the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study; during the study follow-up period (5 years), 707 and 695 PJIs were diagnosed in hip and knee, respectively. Patients undergoing joint replacement surgery during an unscheduled hospitalization had greater risk of PJI than patients whose surgery was elective; similarly, the risk of developing PJI after a secondary hip or knee replacement was about 4 times greater than after primary arthroplasty when adjusted for all other variables considered. A previous diagnosis of PJI, even in a different joint, increased the risk of a further PJI. Distribution of average LoS per each hospitalization caused by PJI exhibited a right skewed profile with median duration [IQR] duration of 16 days [8-32] and 13 days [7.25-32] for hip and knee, respectively. PJIs causative micro-organisms were dependent on the time between initial surgery and infection offset; early PJI were more likely to be multispecies than later (years after surgery); the identification of Gram- pathogens decreased with increasing post-surgery follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers a contemporary assessment of the budgetary and capacity (number and duration of hospitalizations along with the number of Accident and Emergency (A&E) visits) posed by PJIs in UK for the national healthcare system (NHS). The results to provide risk management and planning tools to health providers and policy makers in order to fully assess technologies aimed at controlling and preventing PJI. The findings add to the existing evidence-based knowledge surrounding the epidemiology and burden of PJI by quantifying patterns of PJI in patients with a relatively broad set of prevalent comorbidities.

Clinically unsuspected orthopedic implants during S. aureus bacteremia do not require additional diagnostic work-up

PURPOSE

To assess the likelihood of occult infection in patients with clinically unsuspected orthopedic implants during Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB).

METHODS

In a retrospective study in two Dutch hospitals, we included all patients with SAB between 2013 and 2020 with one or more orthopedic implants in whom [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT was performed. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who had an orthopedic implant-related infection by S. aureus. We also compared clinical parameters in patients with clinically suspected and unsuspected implants.

RESULTS

Fifty-five of 191 (29%) orthopedic implants in 118 SAB patients included had clinical signs of infection. Of all 136 unsuspected implants, 5 (3%, all arthroplasties), showed increased [¹⁸F]FDG uptake around the prosthesis on [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT. The clinical course of these patients without clinically overt infection or relapse of bacteremia during follow-up of a median of 48 months (range 0-48), however, argued against prosthetic joint infection.

CONCLUSION

Although orthopedic implants are evidently a risk factor for metastatic infection during SAB, the absence of clinical symptoms obviate the need of additional investigations or prolonged antibiotic treatment.

Synchronous Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) occurring in multiple joints at the same time (synchronous PJI) are an extremely rare complication, frequently associated with bacteremia, and are associated with high mortality rates. The presence of three or more prosthetic joints, rheumatoid arthritis, neoplasia, bacteremia and immune-modulating therapy seem to be the recurring risk factors for synchronous PJI. In case of PJIs, all other replaced joints should be considered as potentially infected and investigated if PJI is suspected. Treatments of synchronous multiple PJIs vary and must be decided on a case-by-case basis. However, the advantages of one-stage exchange seem to outweigh the two-stage protocol, as it decreases the number of necessary surgical procedures. Nonetheless, too few studies have been conducted to allow firm conclusions about the best handling of synchronous PJI. Thus, additional studies are needed to understand this devastating complication and to design the most appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic path.

Periprosthetic Knee Infection - Part 1: Risk Factors, Classification and Diagnosis

Infection is one of the most feared complications in the postoperative period of knee arthroplasties. With the progressive aging of the population and the increased incidence of degenerative joint diseases, there is an exponential increase in the number of arthroplasties performed and, consequently, in the number of postoperative infections. The diagnosis of these should follow a hierarchical protocol, with well-defined criteria, which lead to diagnostic conclusion, thus guiding the most appropriate treatment. The aim of the present update article is to present the main risk factors, classifications and, mainly, to guide diagnostic investigation in an organized manner.

How to Handle Concomitant Asymptomatic Prosthetic Joints During an Episode of Hematogenous Periprosthetic Joint Infection, a Multicenter Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic joints are at risk of becoming infected during an episode of bacteremia, especially during Staphylocococcus aureus bacteremia. However, it is unclear how often asymptomatic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) occurs, and whether additional diagnostics should be considered.

METHODS

In this multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with a late acute (hematogenous) PJI between 2005-2015 who had concomitant prosthetic joints in situ. Patients without at least 1 year of follow-up were excluded.

RESULTS

We included 91 patients with a hematogenous PJI and 108 concomitant prosthetic joints. The incident PJI was most frequently caused by Staphylococcus aureus (43%), followed by streptococci (26%) and Gram-negative rods (18%). Of 108 concomitant prosthetic joints, 13 were symptomatic, of which 10 were subsequently diagnosed as a second PJI. Of the 95 asymptomatic prosthetic joints, 1 PJI developed during the follow-up period and was classified as a "missed" PJI at the time of bacteremia with S. aureus (1.1%). Infected prosthetic joints were younger than the noninfected ones in 67% of cases, and prosthetic knees were affected more often than prosthetic hips (78%).

CONCLUSIONS

During an episode of hematogenous PJI, concomitant asymptomatic prosthetic joints have a very low risk of being infected, and additional diagnostic work-up for these joints is not necessary.

The Risk Factor and Outcome of Metachronous Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Analysis With a Minimum Ten-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple prosthetic joints are at risk of developing periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). We aimed to determine whether PJI development at one site may lead to infection at another prosthetic joint site and assess the risk factors leading to this subsequent infection.

METHODS

We reviewed all cases (294 patients with first-time PJI [159 hips, 135 knees]) with PJI treated at our institute between January 1994 and December 2020. The average follow-up period was 11.2 years (range 10.1-23.2). Patients were included if they had at least one other prosthetic joint at the time of developing a single PJI (96 patients). Patients with synchronous PJI were excluded from the study. The incidence of metachronous PJI was assessed, and the risk factors were determined by comparing different characteristics between patients without metachronous PJI.

RESULTS

Of the 96 patients, 19.79% developed metachronous PJI. The identified causative pathogen was the same in 63.16% of the patients. The time to developing a second PJI was 789.84 days (range 10-3386). The identified risk factors were PJI with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, ≥3 stages of resection arthroplasty, and PJI caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

CONCLUSION

PJI may predispose patients to subsequent PJI in another prosthesis with identified risks. Most causative organisms of metachronous PJI were the same species as those of the first PJI. We believe that bacteremia may be involved in pathogenesis, but further research is required.

Synchronous Periprosthetic Joint Infections: High Mortality, Reinfection, and Reoperation

BACKGROUND

Synchronous periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a catastrophic complication with potentially high mortality. We aimed to report mortality, risk of reinfection, revision, reoperation, and implant survivorship after synchronous PJIs.

METHODS

We identified 34 patients treated for PJI in more than one joint within a single 90-day period from 1990 to 2018. PJIs involved bilateral knee arthroplasty (27), bilateral hip arthroplasty (4), 1 knee arthroplasty and 1 elbow arthroplasty (1), 1 knee arthroplasty and 1 shoulder arthroplasty (1), and bilateral hip and knee arthroplasty (1). Irrigation and debridement with component retention was performed in 23 patients, implant resection in 10 patients, and a combination of irrigation and debridement with component retention and implant resection in 1 patient. A competing risk model was used to analyze implant survivorship, and Kaplan-Meier survival was used for patient mortality. Mean follow-up was 6 years.

RESULTS

Mortality was high at 18% at 30 days and 27% at 1 year. The 1-year cumulative incidence of any reinfection was 13% and 27% at 5 years. The 1-year cumulative incidence of any revision or implant removal was 6% and 20% at 5 years. The 1-year cumulative incidence of unplanned reoperation was 25% and 35% at 5 years. Rheumatoid arthritis was associated with increased risk of mortality (HR 7, P < .01), as was liver disease (HR 4, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

In the largest series to date, patients with synchronous PJIs had a high 30-day mortality rate of 18%, and one-fourth underwent unplanned reoperation within the first year.