Accuracy of Reference Axes for Femoral Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computed Tomography-Based Study of 2,128 Femora

Accuracy of the Lesser Trochanter Profile as a Marker of Femoral Rotation: Computed Tomography-Based Study of 1,722 Femora

BACKGROUND

The lesser trochanter (LT) profile is an often-used marker for proximal femoral rotation, particularly during the operative fixation of femoral fractures. Previous studies have come to conflicting conclusions about its reliability for this purpose.

METHODS

The SOMA (Stryker Orthopaedic Modeling and Analytics) database (Stryker) was used to identify 1,722 computed tomographic (CT) scans of whole femora. Each femur was taken through an 80° rotational arc in 2.5° increments, and the LT profile was constructed for each position. These 56,826 LT profile measurements were then correlated with the femoral rotation.

RESULTS

Across the arc of motion studied, the LT correlated weakly with proximal femoral rotation (R 2 = 0.32). There was a 35° arc, between 10° and 45° relative external rotation of the proximal femur, within which the LT profile only changed by 1 mm. The mean overall femoral anteversion was 21.2°, and women tended to have more femoral anteversion (23.9°) than men (19.2°). On average, men had a 1.6-mm more prominent LT than women. Side-to-side differences in femoral anteversion as well as LT position and size were not significant or were clinically unimportant.

CONCLUSIONS

A large-scale, CT-based study shows that the LT profile is a less reliable marker of proximal femoral rotation than previously thought. This is true particularly if there is relative external rotation of the proximal femur, where the proximal femur can undergo up to 35° of rotation before 1 mm of change in the LT profile occurs. Care must be taken to check other markers of rotation such as by clinical examination during fixation of femoral fractures and not rely solely on the LT profile.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In the largest study of its kind, this CT-based study of 56,826 LT profile measurements found that when the proximal femur is externally rotated, the LT profile becomes an unreliable marker of rotation, which can lead to excessive internal rotation of the distal fracture fragment. The LT profile should be used with caution, and confirmation of rotation by other means is recommended.

Evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasty: an approach based on common etiologies for total knee arthroplasty revision

A differential diagnosis with emphasis on the common indications for revision should be utilized in the workup of painful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The physician should identify the exact etiology of the patient's pain to maximize outcomes from treatment. Evaluation for infection should be completed using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. When common causes of revision TKA do not appear to be the cause of the pain, less likely causes should be not be ignored. Further advancements such as pressure sensing devices may be able to improve patient satisfaction and decrease the incidence of pain following TKA.

Accuracy and reproducibility of two-dimensional computed tomography-based positioning of femoral component rotational alignment in preoperative planning for total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Poor rotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can result in various postoperative complications, underscoring the critical importance of preoperative planning.

PURPOSE

To improve the accuracy of femoral component positioning during TKA, this study compared the accuracy and repeatability of different two-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) measurement methods for measuring the posterior condylar angle (PCA) in preoperative TKA planning.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 75 patients (150 knees) who underwent bilateral lower extremity computed tomography angiography (CTA) at Fuyang People's Hospital from January 2021 to July 2021. Three different methods were used to measure the PCA based on 2D CT images (axial CT slices) and three-dimensional(3D) models (femoral models reconstructed from CT data) in this study. Method 1: Single-plane 2D CT measurement, measuring PCA in the most obvious single-plane CT slice of the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA); Method 2: multi-plane 2D CT measurement, identifying and locating anatomical landmarks in multiple 2D CT slices and measuring PCA; Method 3: 3D model measurement, measuring PCA in the reconstructed femur 3D model. Compare the differences in PCA measurements between the three measurement methods. A positive PCA measurement was recorded when the sTEA was externally rotated relative to the posterior condylar line (PCL). Any difference exceeding 3° between the PCA measurement in the 2D CT and the PCA reference value in the 3D model was classified as an outlier. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method were utilized to assess the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the three measurement methods.

RESULTS

The PCA measurement in the single-plane 2D CT was 1.91 ± 1.94°, with a measurement error of - 1.22 ± 1.32° and 12.7% of outlier values. In the multi-plane 2D CT, the PCA measurement was 2.96 ± 1.68°, with a measurement error of -0.15 ± 0.91° and 6.0% of outlier values. The PCA measurement in the 3D model was 3.12 ± 1.69°. The PCA measurement in single-plane 2D CT was notably smaller than that in multi-plane 2D CT and 3D models, with no significant difference between the latter two. The multi-plane 2D CT showed significantly lower measurement error and outlier values than the single-plane 2D CT. All three PCA measurement methods exhibited high reproducibility (ICC: 0.93 ~ 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Using of multi-plane 2D CT for measuring PCA in preoperative planning of TKA has high reproducibility and accuracy, with fewer outlier values. We recommend preoperative measurement of PCA using muti-plane 2D CT to improve the accuracy of positioning the femoral component rotational alignment during surgery.

Femoral coordinate system based on articular surfaces: Implications for computer-assisted knee arthroplasty

Osteoarthritis knee can be restored by total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Imageless TKA requires several anatomical points to construct a reference coordinate system to measure bone resections and implant placement. Inaccuracies in the definition of the coordinate system lead to malalignment and failure of the implant. While the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) is a reliable anatomical axis to define the lateromedial axis for the femoral coordinate system (FCS), the presence of the collateral ligaments and deterioration of the medial sulcus (MS) make the registration of sTEA a challenging task. In this work, sTEA is assigned using the articular surfaces of the femoral condyles, independent of the lateral epicondyle (LE) and MS. A single 3D arc is marked on each condyle, which is transformed into a 2D arc to get the best-fit curve according to the profile of condyles. The turning point of each best-fit curve, when transformed back to 3D, defines an axis parallel to sTEA. The condyles-based sTEA is measured experimentally on a 3D-printed bone using an Optitrack tracking setup. Using the proposed method, the angle between the aTEA, sTEA, and Whiteside's line was (3.77, 0.55, and 92.72)°, respectively. The proposed method provides the same level of accuracy and improves the anatomical points registration efficiency, as there is no need to register the LE or MS.

Accuracy and reproducibility analysis of different reference axes for femoral prosthesis rotation alignment in TKA based on 3D CT femoral model

BACKGROUND

There are many reference axes to determine the rotational positioning of the femoral prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), mainly including the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA), anatomical transepicondylar axis (aTEA), Whiteside line, and the posterior condylar line (PCL), etc., but there is still no definite conclusion on which is the most accurate reference axis.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the reproducibility of each reference axis of femoral external osteotomy based on the 3D CT femoral model, compare the deviation of the simulated femoral prosthesis rotation alignment, positioned based on each reference axis, with the gold standard sTEA, and analyze the accuracy of each reference axis.

METHODS

The imaging data of 120 patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent a 3D CT examination of the knee in our hospital from June 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected. The 3D model of the femur was established by Mimics software. The line relative to PCL externally rotated 3° (PCL + 3°), aTEA, and the vertical line of the Whiteside line were constructed and compared with the gold standard sTEA. Intra-observer, as well as inter-observer reproducibility analysis, was performed by the intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

The angle ∠WS, between the vertical line of Whiteside and sTEA, was 2.54 ± 2.30°, with an outlier of 54.2%; the angle ∠aTEA, between aTEA and sTEA, was 4.21 ± 1.01°, with an outlier of 99.1%; the angle ∠PCL, between PCL + 3° external rotation and sTEA, was 0.50 ± 1.06°, with the highest accuracy and an outlier of 5.8%, and the differences among all three were statistically significant, P < 0.05. The intra-observer ICC values of ∠WS, ∠aTEA, and ∠PCL were 0.975 (0.964-0.982), 0.926 (0.896-0.948), and 0.924(0.892,0.946), respectively, and the reproducibility levels were excellent; the inter-observer ICC values of ∠WS, ∠aTEA, and ∠PCL were 0.968(0.955-0.978), 0.906 (0.868-0.934) and 0.970 (0.957,0.979), respectively, with excellent reproducibility levels; Bland-Altman plots suggested that the scatter points of intra-observer and inter-observer measurement differences more than 95% were within the limits of agreement.

CONCLUSION

The reference axis for locating the distal femoral external rotation osteotomy based on the 3D CT femoral model has good reproducibility. The PCL is easy to operate, has the highest precision, and the lowest outliers among the reference axes is therefore recommended.

Combined femoral and tibial component total knee arthroplasty device rotation measurement is reliable and predicts clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

The optimal total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rotational alignment and how best to obtain and measure it are debatable. The aim was to analyse the reliability of the Berger femoral, three different tibial and four different combined two-dimensional computer tomography (2D-CT) TKA component rotation measurements, and to ascertain which rotational values best predict a successful clinical outcome.

METHODS

The 2D-CT scans were obtained post-operatively on 60 patients who had TKA. We determined one femoral [Berger's femoral angle (BFA)], three tibial [Berger's tibial angle (BTA), anatomical tibial angle (ATA) and bimalleolar posterior tibial component angle (BM_PTCA)] and four combined [transepicondylar posterior tibial component angle (TE_PTCA), bicondylar posterior tibial component angle (BC_PTCA, transepicondylar bimalleolar angle (TE_BM) and bicondylar bimalleolar angle (BC_BM)] TKA rotation angles. We made all measures in 23 patients twice by three observers and determined inter- and intra-observer agreement using the Bland-Altman plot method. We analysed measures of 55 patients using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis to ascertain the discriminative capacity of BFA, ATA, TE_PTCA and BC_PTCA for predicting a successful clinical outcome according to the Knee Society Score (KSS) threshold.

RESULTS

ATA showed the smaller inter- and intra-observer average of differences (-0.1° and 1.6°, respectively) of the studied methods followed by BFA (-0.9° and 1.4°), TE_PTCA (-2.1° and 2.7°) and BC_PTCA (-0.5° and 1.8°). BFA (-4° to 2.1° and -6.1° to 8.8°) and BC_PTCA (-4.4° to 3.4° and -7.9° to 4.4°) showed the narrower inter- and intra-observer limits of agreement. A TKA device rotation (BC_PTCA) < 0.8° of external rotation (ER) predicted a KSS and KSS knee successful outcome, and < 3.8° ER for KSS functional (AUC = 0.889; 0.907 and 0.764, respectively). BFA and ATA < 0.9° ER and < 3.9° internal rotation (IR) predicted a successful KSS knee outcome (AUC = 0.796 and 0.889, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The ATA tibial component rotation measurement was the most reliable of those studied. BFA, TE_PTCA and BC_PTCA were reliable measures for TKA femoral and combined rotation. The presence of a minimal rotation between the TKA components (BC_PTCA) and a small femoral ER or tibial IR predicted a successful KSS outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

The Clinical Outcomes of Measured Resection and Gap Balancing Techniques in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

At present, the clinical efficacy of measured resection (MR) and gap balancing (GB) techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome indexes of the two surgical methods through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

The literature was systematically searched on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG, Weipu (VIP), and China Biomedical Literature (CBM) electronic databases inception until June 12, 2022. RevMan 5.3 software (the Nordic Cochrane Center, the Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used to analyze all data of this study. The Cochrane risk bias assessment tool is a risk bias evaluation criterion recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews.

RESULTS

Eleven studies involving 1268 knees in total were included. The main outcome indexes showed that the Knee Society Score (KSS) knee score (MD: -1.40; 95% CI: -2.57 to -0.22; p = 0.02) and KSS knee function score (MD: -3.11; 95% CI: -3.72 to -2.50; p < 0.001) in the GB group were higher 1 year after operation, while femoral component rotation angle (FCRA; MD: -0.75; 95% CI: -1.34 to -0.07; p = 0.03) and the osteotomy volume of the posterior medial femoral condyle (MD: -0.76; 95% CI; -1.13 to -0.38; p < 0.001) were greater in the GB group. In addition, there was no significant difference in the joint line change (MD: -0.03; 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.01; p = 0.16) between the two groups. Secondary outcome results showed that the knee joint range of motion (ROM) in 3 months, and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score after 1 year were better in the GB group. However, the operation time of the MR group was shorter. In addition, this study revealed no significant differences in post-complications between these two groups.

CONCLUSION

Although the GB technique may not provide better radiographic results or reduce the complication rate, the recovery of joint function showed earlier improvement.

"Grand-piano sign" as a femoral rotational indicator in both varus and valgus knees: a simulation study of anterior resection surface in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The "Grand-piano sign" is a popular indicator of the appropriate rotational alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of the study was to investigate the shape of the anterior femoral resection surface of varus and valgus knees.

METHODS

A cohort of 80 varus knees and 40 valgus knees (hip-knee-ankle angle > 2° for varus and < - 2° for valgus knees) matched for age, sex, height, body weight, and KL grade was made using propensity score matching. Virtual TKA was performed using 3 patterns of components (anterior flange flexion angles of 3°, 5°, and 7°). The anterior femoral resection surface was evaluated for 3 patterns of rotational alignments: parallel to the surgical epicondylar axis (NR, neutral rotation), 3° internal rotation (IR), and 3°external rotation (ER) relative to the surgical epicondylar axis. In each anterior femoral resection surface, the vertical height of medial and lateral condyles was measured, and the ratio of the medial to the lateral height (M/L ratio) was evaluated.

RESULTS

The M/L ratio in NR for both varus and valgus knees was 0.57 to 0.64, with no significant difference between the cohorts (p value > 0.05). The M/L ratio showed a similar pattern of increasing at IR and decreasing at ER in both varus and valgus knees. The variation in the M/L ratio with malrotation in valgus knees was smaller than in varus knees.

CONCLUSION

During TKA, the anterior femoral resection surface was similar in varus and valgus knees; however, the variation with malrotation was smaller in valgus knees than in varus knees. TKA for valgus knees requires precise surgical technique and careful intraoperative assessment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Case series.

Postoperative femoral component rotation using posterior condylar referencing is difficult to predict preoperatively in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Many modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems use posterior condylar axis (PCA) to derive the surgical trans-epicondylar axis (sTEA), which is widely regarded as the gold standard for femoral component rotation. However, the previous imaging studies showed that cartilage remnants can alter component rotation. We therefore conducted this study to determine how the postoperative femoral component rotation deviated from the preoperative plan using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) which does not consider cartilage thickness.

METHODS

A total of 123 knees of 97 consecutive osteoarthritis patients who underwent the same primary TKA system using PCA reference guide were included. External rotation was set at 3°or 5° according to the preoperative 3D CT plan. The number of varus knees (hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle >5° varus) and valgus knees (HKA >5° valgus) were 100 and 5, respectively. The deviation from the preoperative plan was measured using overlapping pre- and postoperative 3D CT images.

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation, range) deviation from the preoperative plan in varus group, external rotation setting of 3°, 5° in varus group and valgus group were 1.3° (1.9°, -2.6° - 7.3°), 1.0° (1.6°, -2.5° - 4.8°), 3.3° (2.3°, -1.2° - 7.3°), and -0.8° (0.8°, -2.0°-0.0°), respectively. No correlation was found between the deviation from the plan and the preoperative HKA angle in varus group (R = 0.15, P = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of asymmetric cartilage wear for rotation in the present study was supposed to be approximately 1° as mean value, but it can vary widely from patient to patient.

Reference Axes for Tibial Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computed Tomography-Based Study of 1,351 Tibiae

BACKGROUND

Many anatomic landmarks have been described for setting tibial component rotation intraoperatively. There is no consensus as to which axis is best for reducing outliers and preventing malrotation.

METHODS

The SOMA (Stryker Orthopaedic Modeling and Analytics) database (Stryker) was used to identify 1,351 computed tomography (CT) scans of the entire tibia. Several reference axes for the tibia (including the Mayo axis, Akagi line, Insall line, anterior condylar axis [ACA], posterior condylar axis [PCA], lateral tibial cortex [LTC], Cobb axis, tibial crest line [TCL], and transmalleolar axis [TMA]) were constructed according to published guidelines. The Berger method served as the reference standard.

RESULTS

The Mayo method (involving a line connecting the medial and middle one-thirds of the tibial tubercle and the geometric center of the tibia) and the Insall line (involving a line connecting the posterior cruciate ligament [PCL] insertion and the intersection of the middle and medial one-thirds of the tibial tubercle) both had low variability relative to the Berger method (7.8° ± 1.0° and 5.1° ± 2.2°, respectively) and a low likelihood of internal rotation errors (0.7% and 1.8%, respectively). No clinically significant gender-based differences were found (<0.7° for all). The same was true for ethnicity, with the exception of consistently greater tibial intorsion in Asian versus Caucasian individuals (mean difference in TCL position, +4.5° intorsion for Asian individuals; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This CT-based study of 1,351 tibiae (which we believe to be the largest study of its kind) showed that the Mayo and Insall methods (both of which reference the medial and middle one-thirds of the tibial tubercle) offer an ideal balance of accuracy, low variability, and a reduced likelihood of internal rotation errors. Setting rotation on the basis of distal landmarks (tibial shaft and beyond) may predispose surgeons to substantial malrotation errors, especially given the differences in tibial torsion found between ethnic groups in this study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Utility of anterior wall of greater trochanter in predicting femoral anteversion angle: a three-dimensional computed tomography-based simulation study

Background

The femoral anteversion angle is an important factor in performing surgery in the proximal part of the femur. Predicting the femoral anteversion angle based on the morphology of the proximal femur is clinically useful. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether an anatomical landmark can be used to predict the femoral anteversion angle intraoperatively.

Materials and methods

We analysed CT data obtained from 100 hips in 69 patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head with no more than 2 mm collapse and no evidence of osteoarthritic changes. The measured variables were the femoral anteversion angle, the femoral neck-shaft angle, and the AW angle (defined as the angle between the femoral shaft axis and the tangential line of the anterior wall of the greater trochanter). The correlations between variables were also investigated. Multiple regression analysis by the forced input method was performed for the degree of femoral anteversion angle, using sex and the AW angle as explanatory variables.

Results

On CT, the mean femoral anteversion angle was 14.8° ± 10.8°, the mean AW angle was 17.5° ± 8.0°, and the mean femoral neck-shaft angle was 127.3° ± 5.4°. There was a positive correlation between the femoral anteversion angle and the AW angle. The approximation equations based on the multiple regression analysis were as follows: male femoral anteversion angle = AW angle × 0.7 − 0.7 and female femoral anteversion angle = AW angle × 0.7 + 4.3.

Conclusions

Femoral anteversion angle can be predicted based on the AW angle of the greater trochanter.

Osseous Morphological Differences in Knee Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Improved understanding of the morphological characteristics of knees with osteoarthritis (OA) and various deformities can enable personalized implant positioning and balancing in total knee arthroplasty in an effort to continue improving clinical outcomes and optimizing procedural value. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to outline morphological differences in the medial and lateral distal femur and proximal tibia associated with varus and valgus deformities in knee OA.

METHODS

A large computed tomography (CT) database was used to identify 1,158 knees, which were divided into normal and osteoarthritic groups; the latter was further divided on the basis of deformity into neutral, varus, and valgus subgroups. Morphological measurements included the non-weight-bearing hip-knee-ankle angle (nwHKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), rotation of the posterior condylar axis (PCA) relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA), ratio of medial to lateral posterior condylar offset, ratio of medial to lateral condylar radius, medial posterior slope (MPS), lateral posterior slope (LPS), medial coronal slope (MCS), and lateral coronal slope (LCS).

RESULTS

Compared with the normal group, the OA group was in overall varus (nwHKA, -2.2° ± 5.0° compared with -0.2° ± 2.4°) and had a significantly smaller MPS (8.4° ± 4.0° compared with 9.2° ± 4.0°), larger LPS (9.2° ± 3.6° compared with 7.2° ± 3.3°), and smaller MCS (82.1° ± 4.3° compared with 83.9° ± 3.3°). Differences among the OA subgroups were also observed for the MCS and LCS. Compared with the normal group, the sTEA of the OA group was less externally rotated relative to the PCA (0.3° ± 1.5° compared with 1.2° ± 1.9°), and both the condylar offset ratio (1.01 ± 0.06 compared with 1.04 ± 0.07) and the condylar radius ratio (0.98 ± 0.07 compared with 1.03 ± 0.07) were smaller. Only the condylar radius ratio showed differences among the OA subgroups, with valgus deformity associated with a larger ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

An analysis of CT scans of 965 healthy and 193 osteoarthritic knees revealed significant differences in PCA, condylar offset, and condylar radius as well as tibial slope in both the sagittal and coronal planes.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

There is a strong need to evolve toward a more personalized treatment for osteoarthritic knees that utilizes implants and technology to help tailor total knee arthroplasty on the basis of the patient's morphologic characteristics.

The Presence of Cartilage Affects Femoral Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Objective

To assess the difference between the posterior condylar angle (PCA) and the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) in the osseous and cartilaginous contours in a non-arthritic Chinese population.

Methods

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were obtained from 83 patients with knee injuries before arthroscopy, and femur and distal femoral cartilage three-dimensional (3D) models were constructed. The 3D cartilage model was arranged to share physical space with the 3D femoral model, and then PCA and mLDFA were measured on the osseous and cartilaginous contours, respectively. The differences between the measurements with and without cartilage were evaluated.

Results

The average PCA with cartilage was 2.88 ± 1.35° and without was 2.73 ± 1.34°. The difference was significant in all patients and females but not in males. The average mLDFA with cartilage was 84.73 ± 2.15° and without cartilage was 84.83 ± 2.26°, but the difference was statistically insignificant in all groups.

Conclusion

PCA on the osseous and cartilaginous contours significantly differed with and without cartilage in the female group, suggesting that cartilage thickness should be considered during preoperative femoral rotational resection planning.

Finite element analysis of the tibial component alignment in a transverse plane in total knee arthroplasty

The research aims to analyze the tibial component rotation using the finite element method by resecting the tibia in a transverse plane at an angle between 1.5° (external rotation) and -1.5° (internal rotation). We used a three-dimensional scanner to obtain the tibia's geometrical model of a cadaveric specimen. We then exported the surfaces of the tibial geometrical model through the Computer-Aided Three-dimensional Interactive Application (CATIA), which is a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) program. The CAD program three-dimensionally shaped the tibial component, polyethylene, and cement. Our analysis determined that the maximum equivalent stress is obtained in the case of proximal tibial resection at -1.5° angle in a transverse plane (internal rotation) with a value of 12.75 MPa, which is also obtained for the polyethylene (7.693 MPa) and cement (6.6 MPa). The results have shown that detrimental effects begin to occur at -1.5°. We propose the use of this finite element method to simulate the positioning of the tibial component at different tibial resection angles to appreciate the optimal rotation.

Appropriate determination of the surgical transepicondylar axis can be achieved following distal femur resection in navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Background

Many surgeons have determined the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) after distal femur resection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, in most navigation systems, the registration of the sTEA precedes the distal femur resection. This sequential difference can influence the accuracy of intraoperative determination for sTEA when considering the proximal location of the anatomical references for sTEA and the arthritic environment. We compared the accuracy and precision in determinations of the sTEA between before and after distal femur resection during navigation-assisted TKA.

Methods

Ninety TKAs with Attune posterior-stabilized prostheses were performed under imageless navigation. The sTEA was registered before distal femur resection, then reassessed and adjusted after distal resection. The femoral component was implanted finally according to the sTEA determined after distal femur resection. Computed tomography (CT) was performed postoperatively to analyze the true sTEA (the line connecting the tip of the lateral femoral epicondyle to the lowest point of the medial femoral epicondylar sulcus on axial CT images) and femoral component rotation (FCR) axis. The FCR angle after distal femur resection (FCRA-aR) was defined as the angle between the FCR axis and true sTEA on CT images. The FCR angle before distal resection (FCRA-bR) could be presumed to be the value of FCRA-aR minus the difference between the intraoperatively determined sTEAs before and after distal resection as indicated by the navigation system. It was considered that the FCRA-bR or FCRA-aR represented the differences between the sTEA determined before or after distal femur resection and the true sTEA, respectively.

Results

The FCRA-bR was −1.3 ± 2.4° and FCRA-aR was 0.3 ± 1.7° (p < 0.001). The range of FCRA-bR was from −6.6° to 4.1° and that of FCRA-aR was from −2.7° to 3.3°. The proportion of appropriate FCRA (≤ ±3°) was significantly higher after distal femur resection than that before resection (91.1% versus 70%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The FCR was more appropriate when the sTEA was determined after distal femur resection than before resection in navigation-assisted TKA. The reassessment and adjusted registration of sTEA after distal femur resection could improve the rotational alignment of the femoral component in navigation-assisted TKA.

Level of evidence

IV.

Measuring stem anteversion after total hip arthroplasty: posterior condylar tangent versus transepicondylar axis

OBJECTIVE

Stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been measured using two different distal references, the posterior condyle (PC) or the transepicondylar axis (TEA). The reliability, the difference in value between these two techniques, and the possible confounding factors are scarcely known. Aims of this work were to assess (1) the intraclass correlation and the difference between the two measurement techniques and (2) the possible influence of condylar dysmorphisms on the anteversion value discrepancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of post-THA CT scans were selected, excluding hip dysplasia, end-stage knee osteoarthritis, and replaced knees. Using a surgical planning software, stem anteversion was measured using the PC or the TEA reference. The intraclass reliability was assessed. The anteroposterior femoral condyle diameters were measured: the difference and the ratio were measured and correlated with the stem anteversion values.

RESULTS

91 CT scans were included. Inter/intra-observer TEA measurements were more reliable than PC. The intraclass correlation between PC and TEA anteversion measurements was good, 0.954 (CI 95% 0.922-0965). The mean difference between PC and TEA anteversion was 5.27 ± 2.41°. The difference and the ratio between the two anteroposterior condyle diameters did not influence the anteversion difference (respectively, p 0.797 and p 0.901).

CONCLUSIONS

TEA and PC demonstrated to achieve a good correlation, not dependent from the condyle morphology. However, the difference between the two measurements (5°) can severely influence the combined anteversion (10-20%): due to clinical applicability and better inter/intra-observer agreement, TEA should be preferred for measuring stem anteversion.

Three Degrees External to the Posterior Condylar Axis Has Little Relevance in Femoral Component Rotation: A Computed Tomography-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty Simulation Study

BACKGROUND

Femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has a significant impact on balance and patellofemoral kinematics. However, normal anatomic relationships between rotational axes are poorly understood. As such, we sought to characterize anatomic femoral rotational axes in patients undergoing primary TKA.

METHODS

We identified 100 patients who underwent a primary TKA with a preoperative computed tomography scan. The angles between the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) and the anterior-posterior (AP) axis to the posterior condylar axis (PCA) were measured independently by a musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiologist and a fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon. We simulated an ideal TKA in which the femoral component was placed exactly 3° external to the PCA and measured resulting rotation.

RESULTS

The SEA was on average 1.5° externally rotated to the PCA (range 3.1° internal to 7.0° external). The AP axis was on average 4.5° externally rotated to the PCA (range 2.3° internal to 10.3° external). The AP axis was a mean 2.7° externally rotated to the SEA (range 6.3° internal to 10.3° external). Routinely setting femoral rotation 3° external to the PCA would result in only 51 (51%) TKAs within ±2° of the SEA and 23 (23%) femoral components internally rotated relative to the SEA.

CONCLUSION

Normal anatomic rotational axes of arthritic knees are highly variable, with a 10° range in the SEA and 16° range in the AP axis. Routinely setting femoral rotation 3° external to the PCA will yield significant error in aligning the femoral component with either the SEA or AP axis.

Gender-Based Quantitative Analysis of the Grand Piano Sign in Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty in Asians

In mechanically aligned (MA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the grand piano sign helps surgeons to further ensure the proper external rotation of the femoral component. The goal of this study was to determine the sex-related differences in the shape of the anterior resection surface using 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) models. MRI scans were performed on 267 consecutive patients (202 women and 65 men) with osteoarthritis who underwent TKA in order to reconstruct a 3D model. Virtual anterior condylar resection was performed based on the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA), Whiteside's line (WSL), and flexion-extension axis (FEA). On the anterior resection surface, both lateral length (LatL) and medial length (MedL) were measured, and the ratio between the two (MedL/LatL) was calculated. The mediolateral width of the distal femur (ML) and anterior resection surface (M'L') were measured, and the ratio between the M'L' and ML (M'L'/ML) was calculated. Both the lateral deviation (LD) and the ratio between LD and ML (LD/ML) were also determined. Morphological classification of the anterior resection surface was conducted based on the presence of a definite medial peak. When based on the sTEA or WSL, the MedL/LatL of female subjects was significantly greater than that of male subjects (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). The MedL/LatL of the FEA was consistently larger than that obtained using the sTEA or WSL. Among female subjects, the MedL/LatL of the sTEA was significantly greater than that of the WSL, although this was not the case in either the total study population or the male subjects alone. When based on the sTEA, the M'L'/ML was statistically greater in the female subjects (p < 0.01). The LD was greater in the male subjects (p < 0.01), but there was no difference between the male and female subjects when comparing the LD/ML (p = 0.93). The proportion of double- and single-peak types was not significantly different between the sexes (p = 0.196). Surgeons should be aware that the shape of the anterior resection surface may differ depending on the sex of the patient. The results of this study provide more consistent surgical outcomes as well as fundamental anatomical data for designing suitable prostheses applicable to the Korean population.

A comparison of femoral component rotation after total knee arthroplasty in Kanekasu radiographs, axial CT slices and 3D reconstructed images

OBJECTIVE

To compare the posterior condylar angle measured with Kanekasu radiograph and 2D-CT with the gold standard 3D-CT following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Eighty-two knees with pain following TKA were included in this retrospective study. Two independent raters measured the anatomical and surgical posterior condylar angles twice on each Kanekasu radiograph and 2D-CT. These measurements were compared against the 3D-CT measurement. The intra- and interrater reliability of the Kanekasu radiograph and 2D-CT and the correlation with 3D-CT were calculated.

RESULTS

The intra- and interrater reliability for measurements of the anatomical posterior condyle angle for the Kanekasu radiograph and the 2D-CT were excellent for both raters (0.85-0.92). For the less experienced rater 1, the intrarater reliability was significantly better for 2D-CT than Kanekasu radiograph for measuring both the surgical (p < 0.01) and anatomical posterior condyle angles (p < 0.05). For the experienced rater 2, the intrarater reliability was significantly better for Kanekasu radiograph than 2D-CT for measurement of the surgical posterior condyle angle (p < 0.05). The correlation with 3D-CT is higher in 2D-CT than in Kanekasu radiograph (p < 0.01). While the Kanekasu radiograph predicts the 3D-CT angle with 65.9%, 2D-CT can measure the true angle with 82.9% certainty.

CONCLUSION

Measurements using the anatomical transepicondylar axis are easier to replicate compared to the surgical transepicondylar axis. In comparison with the gold standard 3D-CT, 2D-CT showed a significantly higher correlation with 3D-CT than the Kanekasu measurements. If 3D-CT is available, it should be preferred over 2D-CT and Kanekasu view radiograph for femoral component rotation measurements.

Evaluating distal femoral torsion and posterior condylar line reliability for adjusting femoral component rotation in TKA, Egyptian population radiographic study

BACKGROUND

Femoral component rotational alignment is critical for successful TKA. The primary study objective is to measure the preoperative distal femoral torsion (DFT) of an Egyptian patient's cohort using a seated posteroanterior (PA) knee radiograph. The secondary objectives are to check the intraoperative reliability of using the posterior condylar line (PCL) as a reference for rotation and to measure postoperative component rotation using the same radiographic technique.

METHODS

100 arthritic knees, 22 males, 78 females, 95 Varus and five valgus. A long anteroposterior radiograph [Hip to knee to ankle (HKA)] for coronal alignment assessment, and the anatomical posterior condylar angle (aPCA) between the anatomical transepicondylar axis (aTEA) and the PCL was measured in the seated PA knee radiographs for evaluating the DFT and component rotation. Intraoperative rotation was adjusted to 3° external rotation to the PCL.

RESULTS

HKA improved from a preoperative mean 170.4° ± 6.2 to a postoperative mean 178.3° ± 1.5 (p < 0.005). DFT was internal in all knees; the mean aPCA was -4.5 ± 2.4 (0° to -9°), femoral component rotation significantly changed to a mean aPCA of -3.6 ± 2.3 (0° to -7°) (p = 0.005). Acceptable intraoperative patellar tracking in 94%, and patellar subluxation needed a lateral retinacular release in 2% (two valgus knees). The preoperative DFT was not affected by sex or direction of coronal deformity; more external DFT noticed in severe varus deformity.

CONCLUSIONS

All keens had an internal DFT not affected by sex, or coronal deformity direction. Using PCL as a guide to adjust femoral component rotation is a valid technique in our population.

Morphological characteristics and clinical significance of the distal femur in patients with hemophilia-related knee arthritis

This retrospective study aimed to define the morphological characteristics of the distal femur in patients with hemophilia-related knee arthritis (HA) and develop precise femoral component installation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a reference axis.Computed tomography (CT) was performed in 75 patients [HA group: 34 patients, 48 knees; osteoarthritis (OA group): 41 patients, 48 knees] during 2017-2019. CT scans were constructed into three-dimensional models. We measured the medial (MPC) and lateral (LPC) posterior condyle widths, lateral anteroposterior (LAP) height, medial anteroposterior (MAP) height, mediolateral epicondyle (ML) width, and depths of the anterior patellar groove (X2) and the intercondylar notch (X4). Also, angles were measured between the posterior condylar line (PCL) and surgical transepicondylar axis (STEA) (PCA angle), anteroposterior axis (APA angle) and STEA (APSA angle), anterior condylar line (ACL) and STEA (ACA angle), and clinical transepicondylar axis (CTEA) and PCL (CTA angle). ML/MAP, ML/LAP, X4/LAP, X2/LAP, and LPC/ML ratios were calculated.There were no significant differences in any angles between the HA and OA groups (P > .05). However, the HA group had a smaller MPC (P < .05) and larger X4 than the OA group (P < .05). ML, ML/LAP, X2, MAP, and LAP showed no significant differences between the 2 groups.ML, ML/LAP, and PCA showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. During TKA in hemophilia-related knee arthritis patients, the femoral component can be installed with PCL as the reference axis, although individual differences should be considered.

Three-dimensional color map: a novel tool to locate the surgical transepicondylar axis

Background

Accurate localization of the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the most reliable anatomical reference for femoral rotation, has long been a challenge, primarily because it is intractable to locate the center of the sulcus of the medial epicondyle. This study aimed to introduce and verify a novel method to locate the sTEA more precisely.

Methods

This study included 26 adult femoral specimens and 80 adult patients with computed tomography (CT) scan data. Three dimensions (3D) models based on CT scans of the distal femurs were reconstructed with Mimics and imported into Geomagic Studio. The 3D color map method was applied to locate the sTEA. To further verify the accuracy of the method, the identified sTEA was transferred to the femoral specimens and compared with the points identified by the total station machine. We further compared the recognition rate of sTEA between 3D color map method and two-dimensional (2D) CT slices method. The repeatability of this novel method was also evaluated.

Results

The 3D color map method located the centers of the sulcus of the medial epicondyle and the most prominent point of the lateral epicondyle of all the femoral specimens, which were further identified and confirmed by patient-specific guide plates and total station machine on femoral specimens. The 3D color map method achieved a recognition rate of up to 96.23%, while the recognition rate of the 2D CT slices method was only 68.87%. The repeatability of this objective method was excellent.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicated that the 3D color map method could be used to accurately and objectively locate the sTEA, with high repeatability and recognition rate. However, the proposed novel method requires further validation in clinical applications.

Three-step technique for implantation of rotating hinge knee prostheses : Demonstration using the Enduro prosthesis

OBJECTIVE

Implantation of an axis-guided knee prosthesis with consideration of the joint line and balanced flexion and extension gap to reduce the mechanical load on the prosthesis axis and to improve the movement of the prosthesis.

INDICATIONS

Distinct unilateral instability due to ligament insufficiency in association with knee prostheses. Primary implantation of axis-guided knee prostheses with pronounced axial malalignment (>20-25° valgus or varus malalignment) or/and severe flexion contracture > 40°. Replacement of prosthesis with nonsignificant imbalance between flexion and extension gap.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Clearly unstable flexion gap such that the extension gap cannot be adjusted appropriately. Significant femoral bone defects requiring distal femoral replacement prostheses.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Reconstruction of the tibial platform with the trial prosthesis with regard to height in relation to the tip of the fibula. Determination of the femoral prosthesis size. Adjustment of the anteroposterior (AP) cutting block of the selected size, referenced anteriorly and in correct rotation. Determination of the flexion gap with spacers using the stable side of the collateral ligaments. Positioning the distal cutting block and determination of the height of the extension gap. Moving the distal cutting block until the same height of spacer as used in the flexion gap fits into the extension gap, taking into account the stable side of the collateral ligaments. The extent of the displacement D1 is noted. Reverse displacement of the distal cutting block by the distance D2 until a satisfactory bony contact surface for the femoral component in the distal femur can be created. The thickness of the required distal augments on the following chamfer-cutting guide (4-in‑1 cutting block) and thus on the femoral prosthetic component is the sum of D1 + D2. The chamfer-cutting guide (4-in‑1 block) with distal augments of the calculated height (D = D1 + D2) is placed in position. Definition and preparation of the posterior contact surface with positioning of any necessary posterior augments. Completion of the femoral preparation taking into account the distal and posterior augments. Assembly of the trial prostheses with a trial inlay having the height of the spacers used. Implantation of the selected prosthesis components.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Thrombosis prophylaxis, physiotherapy under full weight-bearing and mobility exercises.

RESULTS

After implantation of 104 axis-guided Enduro™ knee prostheses (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) (73 knee prosthesis revisions and 31 primary implantations), the Knee Society Score increased from 42.8 ± 18.8 preoperatively to 84.8 ± 13.9 after 24 months. Complications comprised one deep vein thrombosis and one periprosthetic infection.