The Propeller Flap for Traumatic Distal Lower-Limb Reconstruction: Risk Factors, Pitfalls, and Recommendations

Clinical outcomes of perforator-based propeller flaps versus free flaps in soft tissue reconstruction for lower leg and foot trauma: a retrospective single-centre comparative study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of perforator-based propeller flaps (PPF) versus free flaps (FF) in traumatic lower leg and foot reconstructions are debated. PPFs are perceived as simpler due to advantages like avoiding microsurgery, but concerns about complications, such as flap congestion and necrosis, persist. This study aimed to compare outcomes of PPF and FF in trauma-related distal lower extremity soft tissue reconstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 38 flaps in 33 patients who underwent lower leg and foot soft tissue reconstruction due to trauma at our hospital from 2015 until 2022. Flap-related outcomes and complications were compared between the PPF group (18 flaps in 15 patients) and the FF group (20 flaps in 18 patients). These included complete and partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, delayed osteomyelitis, and the coverage failure rate, defined as the need for secondary flaps due to flap necrosis.

RESULTS

The coverage failure rate was 22% in the PPF group and 5% in the FF group, with complete necrosis observed in 11% of the PPF group and 5% of the FF group, and partial necrosis in 39% of the PPF group and 10% of the FF group, indicating no significant difference between the two groups. However, venous congestion was significantly higher in 72% of the PPF group compared to 10% of the FF group. Four PPFs and one FF required FF reconstruction due to implant/fracture exposure from necrosis. Additionally, four PPFs developed delayed osteomyelitis post-healing, requiring reconstruction using free vascularized bone graft in three out of four cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Flap necrosis in traumatic lower-leg defects can lead to reconstructive failure, exposing implants or fractures and potentially causing catastrophic outcomes like osteomyelitis, jeopardizing limb salvage. Surgeons should be cautious about deeming PPFs as straightforward and microsurgery-free procedures, given the increased complication rates compared to FFs in traumatic reconstruction.

DATA ACCESS STATEMENT

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

How to Transform a Perforator Propeller Flap into a Keystone Flap in Case of Unsatisfying Perforator Vessel Local Perforator Flap Coverage in Limbs

Moderate soft-tissue defects need stable coverage, ideally with tissue of similar characteristics and low donor site morbidity. We propose a simple technique for the coverage of moderate skin defects in the limbs. It allows intraoperative transformation of a propeller perforator flap (PPF) into a keystone design perforator flap (KDPF) in cases of unsatisfying perforator vessel or in cases of unpredictable intraoperative events. Between March 2013 and July 2019, nine patients with moderate soft-tissue defects (mean defect size 4.5 × 7.6 cm) in the limbs (two on the upper limbs and seven on the lower limbs) were covered using this technique. We performed four PPFs and five KDPFs. The mean follow-up was 5 months. There was one complication, partial distal tip necrosis in a PPF located in the leg, which healed by secondary intention within 3 weeks. The donor site was closed directly in all cases. No functional impairments were noted regardless of the perforator flap utilized. This technique enables us to employ flexible surgical strategies and allows us to make adjustments based on the patient's vascular anatomy.

Reconstruction of Small-Sized Complex Defect on the Foot Dorsum Without Microsurgery: Intrinsic Adipofascial Flap

Dorsal foot defects are difficult to cover and often require major flap surgery by microsurgeons, even for defects of limited sizes. Intrinsic adipofascial flaps for small-sized complex defects are simple and do not require microsurgery; thus, a flap specialist is unnecessary. This study aimed to assess our institutional experience with this technique and define its role in dorsal foot reconstruction. Nine patients aged 48 to 86 years with soft tissue defects of the dorsal foot were treated with the intrinsic adipofascial flap by rotating the adjacent adipofascial tissues from May 2019 and January 2021 in our institution. Demographic, clinical, and followup data were evaluated. Primary outcomes include flap viability, flap bulkiness, ability to wear shoes, and donor site morbidity. The mean followup period was 24.5 months (range, 10-30 months) and the mean defect size was 6.4 cm2 (range, 3.0-9.0 cm2). Eight flaps survived providing an adequate contour and durable coverage with a thin flap. Among 8 cases of healed flaps, 6 required secondary skin grafts while the other 2 healed spontaneously without additional operation. One patient (defect size: 3.0 cm × 3.0 cm) with underlying diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial occlusive disease encountered flap total necrosis. Revisional flap surgery was performed to cover the flap total necrosis. In conclusion, the intrinsic adipofascial flap is a relatively simple and suitable method for complex dorsal foot defect reconstruction because it provides minimal donor site morbidity. However, relatively large defect size and comorbidities, such as underlying diabetes mellitus and vascular occlusive disease could accompany a risk of flap necrosis.

Lower limb reconstruction involving osteosynthesis material: A retrospective study on propeller flaps outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Reconstruction of soft tissue defects in lower limb fractures requiring internal fixation remains a challenging scenario with the optimal surgical treatment still debated. This study aims to recommend, and eventually redefine, surgical indications for propeller flaps reconstruction in the distal lower limb, with a particular focus on the presence or not of metalwork.

METHODS

A retrospective study of lower limb soft tissue reconstructions performed between January 2015 and July 2018 was carried out including all patients treated with a propeller perforator flap (PPF) with at least 6-month follow-up. Patients were further divided in 2 groups depending on the presence of metalwork fixation beneath the flap (F group, propeller on Framework; NF group, propeller with No-Framework).

RESULTS

21 patients were retained (F group, 11 patients; NF group, 10 patients). There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, BMI, ASA scores, comorbidities or defect size. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups (p<0.05) in the cumulative hospital stay with a mean cumulative hospital stay of 22 ± 9 days in the F group and 12 ± 8 days in NF group. Failures were higher where PPF were used to cover hardware material, with 3 patients requiring a major secondary procedure in F group versus 1 patient in NF group.

CONCLUSION

The presence of underlying metalwork significantly reduced the margin for small, day-case revision procedures such as flap readvancement or STSG. This study emphasizes clinical intuition that whilst PPF are a useful and elegant tool in lower limb reconstruction, their use should be limited when underlying metalwork is present.

Evaluation of pedicled flaps for type IIIB open fractures of the tibia at a tertiary care center

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue coverage plays a vital role in replacing the vascularity of the underlying bone in Gustilo type IIIB fractures. The aim of this article was to evaluate the feasibility of local pedicled flaps in type IIIB fractures at a tertiary care center.

METHODS

We included all cases of open Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB fractures of the tibia treated with local flap coverage from January 2017 to February 2019. We carried out a retrospective analysis to investigate the relationships of complications, hospital stay, and cost-effectiveness with the choice of flap, infective foci, site and size of the defect, and type of fixation.

RESULTS

Out of 138 Gustilo type IIIB fractures analyzed in our study, 27 cases had complications, of which 19 (13.76%) involved flap necrosis, four (2.89%) were infections, three (2.17%) involved partial necrosis, and one (0.72%) was related to bone spur development. Flap complications showed a statistically significant association with the perforator flap category (propeller flaps in particular) (P=0.001). Flap necrosis showed a significant positive correlation with cases treated within 3 weeks after trauma (P=0.046). A significant positive correlation was also found between defect size and the duration of hospital stay (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Although local flaps are harvested from the same leg that underwent trauma, their success rate is at least as high as microvascular flaps as reported from other centers. Amidst the local flaps, complications were predominantly associated with perforator flaps.

Reverse Dermis Flap for Coverage of Distal Leg and Ankle Defects

Soft tissue defects of the distal third of the leg and ankle, which frequently expose tendon, bone or osteosynthesis material, are difficult to cover and pose a major challenge to the plastic surgeon. Traditional reconstructive options for this region usually require complex flaps which made them unsuitable for elderly patients or those with multiple comorbidities. We hereby present the reverse dermis flap as an easy and reliable choice to cover this type of wounds and refer our experience in 9 cases in which clinical, operative, and follow-up data were recorded. Of the 9 flaps performed, 8 survived completely and 1 presented a partial flap necrosis, requiring additional surgery. No other operative procedure was required. In conclusion, the reversed dermis flap is a simple, quick, noninvasive, and safe technique for coverage of noble structures such as tendon or bone in the distal third of the leg that every plastic surgeon should incorporate in his surgical armamentary.

Revisit of flap factors relating to partial necrosis of distally based sural flaps: an analysis of 435 cases in a single center

BACKGROUND

Partial necrosis is an ongoing topic in regard to flap complications of the distally based sural (DBS) flap However, the factors influencing partial necrosis of the flap remain in debate. The aim of the present study is to further illuminate the flap-related risk factors and the effects of several technical improvements.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 429 patients who underwent 435 DBS flaps between April 2001 and December 2019. The reconstruction outcomes, flap viability-related complications, and potential risk factors were compared between the survival group and partial necrosis group, as well as between group A (the procedures performed from April 2001 to March 2010) and group B (those from April 2010 to December 2019).

RESULTS

Among the 435 flaps, 39 flaps (8.97%) exhibited partial necrosis. With the increase of the top edge of the flap, the partial necrosis rate increased significantly (P < 0.05). When the length-to-width ratio [LWR] of the flap was more than 5:1 or the total length of the flap (the length of the skin island plus the length of the adipofascial pedicle) was more than 20 cm, the partial necrosis rate increased significantly (P < 0.05). The partial necrosis rate in group B (5.86%, 15/256) was significantly lower than that in group A (13.41%, 24/179) (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The top edge of the flap is an essential indicator for predicting the prognosis of the DBS flap. When the total length of the flap is more than 20 cm or the LWR of the flap more than 5:1, the partial necrosis rate will increase significantly. Various technical modifications can lower the top edge of the flap and reduce the LWR of the flap and width of the skin island, and thus improve the flap survival effectively.

Propeller Flaps for Reconstruction around the Foot and Ankle

The propeller flap challenges conventional wisdom for the safe raising of flaps. Its unique design is based on a belief that a sizeable fasciocutaneous flap can be perfused by only a single perforator. What is more remarkable is the concept that this cleanly dissected pedicle can continue to safely perfuse the flap even when it is twisted 180 degrees. Clearly, meticulous technique is essential and the key points in raising this flap and its versatility for reconstruction of defects around the foot and ankle are discussed in this article.