Comparative Analysis of Serial Union Patterns After Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with and without Bone-Void Fillers

Serial Quantitative Evaluation of Load Redistribution and Osteotomy Gap After Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

The goal of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOW-HTO) is to redistribute load by realigning the lower limb. This surgery is indicated for mild to moderate medial compartment osteoarthritis with varus deformity in cases unresponsive to conservative treatment. Procedures for accompanying cartilage lesions, such as multiple drilling on the medial femoral condyle (MFC), are often performed simultaneously, potentially affecting bone metabolism along with load redistribution and union progression. This study assessed changes in bone metabolism following MOW-HTO. Two-year follow-up data were collected from 51 knees undergoing MOW-HTO between March 2019 and December 2020. Single-photon emission computed tomography and conventional CT (SPECT/CT) were performed on postoperative Day 1, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured in each compartment and the osteotomy gap. At 1 year postoperatively, SUVmax decreased in the medial femur and tibia zones (p < 0.001). SUVmax decreased in the lateral osteotomy gap zones at 1 year (p = 0.001 anterior; p = 0.002 posterior), while medial zones showed a sustained increase. At the posteromedial zone, SUVmax decreased at 2 years (p = 0.012). Subjects were divided into two groups: those with MFC drilling (group one) and those without (group two). SUVmax was higher in group one throughout the 2 years (p < 0.001). Unloading effects were notable in the medial compartment. MFC drilling increased SUVmax, creating different patterns between groups. SUVmax decrease in the osteotomy gap occurred earlier in the lateral zone.

The Osteotomy Gap Filling Rate of Multiple Time Points After Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Without Bone Graft

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to analyze osteotomy gap filling of multiple time points until 2 years post-medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). The absolute value of gap filling and postoperative changes relative to the preoperative void osteotomy gap were evaluated using computed tomography (CT) at each time point.

METHODS

Data of 30 patients who underwent MOWHTO between September 2019 and July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical procedures without bone grafts were performed; a standardized rehabilitation protocol was implemented. The osteotomy gap filling rate was measured using computed tomography scans at the immediate postoperative period and at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Statistical analyses were performed to assess changes over time.

RESULTS

The osteotomy gap filling rate showed a significant continuous increase after MOWHTO, reaching 45.2% at 6 months and 66.7 and 84.4% at 1 and 2 years, postoperatively, respectively. The most substantial increase occurred within the initial 6 months, thus indicating a critical period for bone healing.

CONCLUSIONS

The osteotomy gap filling rate showed a significant and gradual increase from immediately after surgery to 2 years after MOWHTO without bone grafting, the greatest of which was achieved in the initial 6-month period. Therefore, this study may be helpful for planning postoperative rehabilitation, including the extent of weight-bearing load and the period of crutch use.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of Evidence IV.

Intraoperative Complications in Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy has been established for treatment of medial symptomatic knee arthrosis with varus malalignment in young and elderly but active patients. To obtain satisfactory results, it is essential for surgeons performing osteotomy to identify, prevent, and treat potential intraoperative adverse events. Lateral hinge fracture (LHF) is the most common intraoperative complication while popliteus artery injury is rare but limb-threatening. Computed tomography is the benchmark to detect LHF, the risk of which increased markedly with the opening gap larger than 11 mm. Setting the lateral hinge in a safe zone is the most important preventive measure. Medial long locking plate fixation may allow patients even with unstable hinge fractures to start early full weight bearing. Additional fixation of LHF is optional, and bone void filling is not routinely used. For protection of popliteus artery injury, flexing the knee joint is unreliable. It is paramount to place a protective retractor just behind the posterior tibial cortex toward the proximal tibiofibular joint before osteotomy, particularly in case of aberrant artery. A repertoire of surgical pearls is described in detail in this review to identify, prevent, and manage those intraoperative complications.

Simoultaneous bilateral medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy can be performed safely and effectively without bone grafting: analysis of a monocentric retrospective series

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous bilateral high tibial osteotomy (SBHTO) is a potential solution to treat bilateral medial osteoarthritis (OA) associated with tibial varus deformity. Concerns on the potential problems related to bone healing exists, and most of the surgeon performing SBHTO use bone void filler as associated procedure. This paper aim to evaluate safety and efficacy of SBHTO using locking plate, autologous cancellous bone mobilization and no bone void filler with immediate weight bearing at tolerance protocol.

METHODS

Consecutive patients performing primary SBHTO between January 2019 and December 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Functional and pain score, subjective satisfaction and complications were noted at 2, 3, 6 months and final follow up, with a minimum of 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients (80 knees) were included. Mean correction for each limb was 8.67° ± 2.24°. No patients presented with major complications. Pain was reduced but activity level worsened 2 months after surgery. All pain and functional scores improved significantly from months 3 up to final follow up. 95% of patients reported to be subjectively satisfied with surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper showed that SBHTO can be performed safely and with good results without bone grafting the osteotomy gap, even for correction up to 12°. Pain improved already 2 months after surgery, while activity level and function start to improve at 3 months after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Radiographic Assessment of Bone Union in Proximal Tibia and Distal Femur Osteotomies: A Systematic Review

Background

Osteotomies around the knee are a well-established treatment option for early and moderate unicompartmental osteoarthritis combined with a lower extremity malalignment. Moreover, osteotomies are often combined with cartilage treatment. Current image-based bone union assessments lack an accepted definition despite widespread use in research and clinical settings. The aim of this systematic review was to identify definitions and classification systems for bone union on radiographs after a proximal tibia or distal femur osteotomy.

Methods

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we systematically searched MEDLINE and Embase database, applying specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full-texts. The modified Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool were used. Data extraction included study characteristics, imaging modality, bone union definition, classification systems, assessment of gap fillers, use of modifiers, and osteotomy type.

Results

Of the 1,180 screened titles and abstracts, 105 studies were included, with the majority (69 studies [65.7%]) using a retrospective design. Fifty-five studies (52.4%) defined bone union based on one or more criteria, while 50 studies (47.6%) used a classification system. There were 13 different criteria for bone union and 9 different classification systems. Interestingly, none of the classification systems incorporated negative criteria, such as hardware failure. Notably, 137 studies (49.1%) described bone union as either a primary or secondary outcome but do not describe a system for assessing bone union.

Conclusion

This systematic review highlights the lack of consensus in the literature in defining bone union after a proximal tibia or distal femur osteotomy, revealing many criteria and different classifications. None of the classification systems were applicable to osteotomies with and without gap filler. This systematic review shows the need for a straightforward, reproducible, and accurate method to assess bone union after a proximal tibia or distal femur osteotomy.

Level of Evidence

Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

No Superior Bone Union Outcomes with Allografts Compared to No Grafts and Autografts Following Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

There has been long-standing debate about whether a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) gap should be filled with autologous bone graft or any other filler to expedite the healing process. The main purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of MOWHTO with an opening gap ≥10 mm, utilizing autograft, allograft, or no graft at 1 year postoperatively.

METHODS

A total of 68 patients were included in this retrospective study and divided into three treatment groups: Group A (no bone graft), Group B (autologous iliac crest graft), and Group C (allogenous tibia plateau graft). At postoperative 1-year follow-up, the area of callus filling in the most medial side of the knee was measured using anteroposterior radiographs, and a modified van Hemert scoring system was used to evaluate bone union outcomes in five mediolaterally divided zones. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores and relevant complications were assessed. The correlations between the gap width and bone union scores were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients in the autograft group demonstrated better bone union progression (p = 0.031) and higher bone union scores (p < 0.01) compared to patients in the allograft or no graft groups. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative WOMAC scores and incidence of complications among the three groups. No discernible linear relationships between the width of the opening gap and the bone union score were found.

CONCLUSION

For MOWHTOs with an average gap opening width of 12.1 mm, autografts resulted in superior bone union outcomes compared to allografts and no graft at 1 year postoperatively. However, no bone graft achieved similar outcomes to allografts, suggesting that routine use of allografts should not be recommended.

Finite element analysis of medial closing and lateral opening wedge osteotomies of the distal femur in relation to hinge fractures

PURPOSE

Intraoperative hinge fractures in distal femur osteotomies represent a risk factor for loss of alignment and non-union. Using finite element analysis, the goal of this study was to investigate the influence of different hinge widths and osteotomy corrections on hinge fractures in medial closed-wedge and lateral open-wedge distal femur osteotomies.

METHODS

The hinge was located at the proximal margin of adductor tubercle for biplanar lateral open-wedge and at the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle for biplanar medial closed-wedge distal femur osteotomies, corresponding to optimal hinge positions described in literature. Different hinge widths (5, 7.5, 10 mm) were created and the osteotomy correction was opened/closed by 5, 7.5 and 10 mm. Tensile and compressive strain of the hinge was determined in a finite element analysis and compared to the ultimate strain of cortical bone to assess the hinge fracture risk.

RESULTS

Doubling the correction from 5 to 10 mm increased mean tensile and compressive strain by 50% for lateral open-wedge and 48% for medial closed-wedge osteotomies. A hinge width of 10 mm versus 5 mm showed increased strain in the hinge region of 61% for lateral open-wedge and 32% for medial closed-wedge osteotomies. Medial closed-wedge recorded a higher fracture risk compared to lateral open-wedge osteotomies due to a larger hinge cross-section area (60-67%) for all tested configurations. In case of a 5 mm hinge, medial closed-wedge recorded 71% higher strain in the hinge region compared to lateral open-wedge osteotomies.

CONCLUSION

Due to morphological features of the medial femoral condyle, finite element analysis suggests that lateral-open wedge osteotomies are the preferable option if larger corrections are intended, as a thicker hinge can remain without an increased hinge fracture risk.

Research on the Influence of the Allogeneic Bone Graft in Postoperative Recovery After MOWHTO: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

To compare the effects of an allogeneic bone graft and a non-filled bone graft on the rate of osteotomy gap union in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) with an opening width less than 10 mm.

Methods

A total of 65 patients undergoing MOWHTO between January 2018 and December 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into two groups: the allograft group (MOWHTO with allogeneic bone grafting, 30 patients) and the non-filling group (MOWHTO without bone void fillers, 35 patients). The clinical outcomes, including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), Lysholm score, and post-operative complications, were compared. The radiographic evaluation included changes in hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), femorotibial angle (FTA), and weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR) at pre-operation, at two-day post-operation, and the last follow-up. Radiographs were obtained at three, six and twelve months post-surgery, and at the time of the last follow-up to assess the fill area of the osteotomy gap. The union rate of the osteotomy gap was calculated and compared, and risk factors that may affect the rate of osteotomy gap union were also discussed.

Results

The rate of osteotomy gap union at 3 and 6 months after the operation in the allograft group was significantly higher compared with the non-filling group (all P<0.05), while no significant difference was found after the 1-year post-operative and at the last follow-up. Also, the WOMAC and Lysholm scores of the allograft group were significantly higher than those of the non-filling group (all P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at the last follow-up.

Conclusion

Filling the gaps with the allograft bones may accelerate the union of osteotomy gap, improve clinical outcomes, and have important implications for patient rehabilitation in the early post-operative course. Bone grafting did not affect the final rate of osteotomy gap union and the clinical score of patients.

Lack of Efficacy of Bone Void Filling Materials in Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To systematically review the clinical and radiologic outcomes of isolated medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomies with different bone void filling materials and to compare the outcomes by network meta-analysis.

METHODS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis included searches of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to July 30, 2022, for clinical comparative studies comparing 2 or more bone void filling materials in patients undergoing medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomies. We performed Bayesian random-effect network meta-analyses to summarize the evidence and applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation frameworks to rate the certainty of evidence, calculate the absolute effects, and present the findings. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 and modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS

In total, 2,755 citations were identified by our search, of which 25 eligible trials, including 10 randomized controlled trials and 15 nonrandomized comparative trials (NCTs) enrolled 1,420 participants and 6 different interventions (autografts, allografts, synthetic grafts, mixed grafts, xenografts, and without grafts). There were some concerns on the risk of bias assessment among randomized controlled trials, and the median Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score was 6 for NCTs. All fillers showed no significantly superior treatment effects when compared with unfilled group in final Knee Society Scoring, Western Ontario and McMasters Universities score, time to bone union (TBU), and loss of correction (LOC). Exceptionally, moderate-certainty evidence suggested that autograft would produce superior incidence of complete bone union (CBU) than the unfilled at postoperative 1 year (odds ratio [OR] 13.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.60-95.6), whereas low- to very low-certainty evidence suggested allografts (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.06-0.52) and synthetic grafts (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.68) would result in inferior CBU. Low-certainty evidence suggested allografts would result in larger LOC angle than unfilled group (mean difference 1.1, 95% CI 0.1-2.3). As for TBU, low-certainty evidence suggested mixed grafts would take longer time to reach clinical bone union (mean difference -14.04, 95% CI -21.0 to -6.9).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of efficacy for different bone void filling materials to result better outcomes in Knee Society Scoring, Western Ontario and McMasters Universities score, TBU, and LOC than without graft. Although applying the autografts would produce a superior possibility of radiologic CBU than other fillers, because of the inclusion of NCTs, the overall certainty of the evidence synthesis is low.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level Ⅲ, meta-analysis of Level I randomized controlled trials and Level Ⅱ∼Ⅲ non-randomized comparative trails.

Effectiveness of bone substitute materials in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A meta-analysis of eligible studies was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of bone substitute materials (BSMs) in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) for knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). A comprehensive literature search was performed, and studies comparing BSM with bone graft (BG) and without bone graft (WG) were included. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (version 1.0) and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool were used to assess the risk of bias for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRSs), respectively. The outcomes measured were the osteotomy gap size, the occurrence rates of non-union and lateral hinge fractures, knee functional score, infection and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The quality of evidences was evaluated by Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group system.

RESULTS

Five RCTs and eight NRS including 769 participants were included in our meta-analysis. The BSM group had a larger osteotomy gap size than the control group (MD: 0.41 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.06, 0.76], p=.02, I2=0%), with a significant difference. No significant difference was found between BSM and control group in main analysis in terms of bone non-union, but with a higher non-union rate when BSM combined with long locking plate was used. No significant differences were found in other outcome measures except for VAS from NRS subgroup. The quality of evidence for outcomes was low.

CONCLUSIONS

BSM combined with locking plate techniques offers a safe and efficient alternative option in OWHTO for osteotomy gap larger than 10 mm, but be aware of the possibility of bone non-union. Given the inherent heterogeneity and low quality of the included studies, future well-designed RCTs are essential to verify the findings.KEY MESSAGEThe treatment of the osteotomy gap is still controversial.BSM combined with a locking plate offers a safe and efficient alternative option for OWHTO with an over 10 mm of osteotomy gap over 10 mm.Due to the inherent heterogeneity and low quality of the included studies, the results should be cautiously interpreted in clinical practice.

Reinforcement strategy for medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element evaluation of the additional opposite screw technique and bone grafts

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

bone grafts (bgs) and the opposite screw insertion technique are reported to enhance initial stability after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO); however, it is unclear how the general and local biomechanical stability of the proximal tibia is affected by these reinforcement strategies. In this study, we aimed to assess the biomechanical differences among different fixation configurations for OWHTO under two loading conditions using finite element analysis, and to assess the biomechanical contribution of an opposite screw insertion.

METHODS

Models of the proximal tibia with three different gap defects were created to simulate different distraction heights in OWHTO. Four groups of models were then assembled with different fixation configurations, including the no BG (NBG) group, BG group, partially threaded screw (PT) group, and fully threaded screw (FT) group. Testing loads were applied to simulate the static forces on the knee joint during double-limb and single-limb standing. For each group, the stresses of the lateral hinge area (LHA) and the medial implant area (MIA), the maximum displacement of the tibia and the relative displacement (RD) of the medial gap were evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared to NBG group, bone block grafting effectively reduced the stress of the tibia and implant, as well as the maximum displacement of the tibia and the RD of the medial gap. The opposite screw group showed similar trends in alleviating the stress concentration on the LHA and MIA, and contributing to the maintaining the medial gap reduction, especially in the FT group; however, additional stresses were concentrated on the opposite screw itself, which indicated the potential risk of screw breakage.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to NBG group, the BG group bone graft showed superior biomechanical advantages in decreasing the risk of implant failure and lateral hinge fracture, and maintaining the reduction in OWHTO. The additional opposite screw provided an extra support to the proximal tibia, with similar contributions to improve the structural stability after osteotomy, especially in the FT group.