Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes of Joint-Preserving Surgery for Rheumatoid Forefoot Deformities: A Retrospective Case Series with Mean Follow-up of 6 Years

Impact of Foot Surgery and Pharmacological Treatments on Functionality and Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) frequently leads to foot deformities, significantly impacting pain, mobility, and quality of life. Surgical and pharmacological treatments are prescribed to manage symptoms, but their long-term effects on foot function remain unclear. This study evaluates the impact of different treatment approaches, including surgery, methotrexate (MTX), and biological therapy (Bio), on foot functionality and pain progression over five years.

METHODS

A longitudinal cohort study was conducted with 103 RA patients classified into five groups: surgery, MTX < 10 years, MTX ≥ 10 years, Bio < 10 years, and Bio ≥ 10 years. Data from 2018 and 2023 were compared using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI), and the Foot Function Index (FFI). Statistical analyses included ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and ROC curve analysis to assess differences between groups and identify key progression factors.

RESULTS

Patients with ≥10 years of disease duration and non-biological treatment (MTX ≥ 10 years) experienced the most severe deterioration in foot function, with a mean FFI increase of +11.89 points (p < 0.01). In contrast, MTX < 10 years was the only group to show an improvement in foot function (FFI: -5.29, p = 0.02). The surgery group exhibited moderate but highly variable functional changes, while patients on biological therapy showed less progression in pain and disability compared to their non-biologic counterparts. Hallux abductus valgus severity increased across all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with long-standing RA on non-biologic therapy exhibited the greatest decline in foot function, whereas early treatment with MTX (<10 years of disease duration) appeared to slow deterioration. Surgery did not consistently provide functional benefits, and biologics helped mitigate progression, though outcomes varied. These findings underscore the importance of early intervention and personalized treatment strategies for foot preservation in RA.

Decreased foot-related quality of life is a risk factor for falls in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to assess the need to treat forefoot lesions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who are unaware of their foot problems.

METHODS

From April to September 2022, 116 RA patients at Yamaguchi Red Cross hospitalwere administered the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q), a self-assessment questionnaire on foot-related issues, and underwent forefoot radiography. We also assessed the occurrence of falls 1 year later. Among the 88 patients who were unaware of foot problems, we analysed the frequency and type of forefoot deformities and conducted a multivariate analysis to identify factors predicting falls during the 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the unaware patients, 64 (72.7%) had forefoot deformities and 17 (19.3%) experienced falls within the first year. The fall group had a history of falls and lower SAFE-Q scores but did not significantly differ from others in terms of forefoot deformities. Multivariate analysis identified a history of falls and lower SAFE-Q scores as predictive factors for future falls.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased foot-related quality of life is a risk factor for falls, even in patients who are unaware of their foot problems. Physicians should regularly assess foot-related quality of life using tools such as SAFE-Q to help prevent falls in RA patients.

Rate and Timing of Progression to Total Knee Arthroplasty After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients With Systemic Inflammatory Disease: A Long-term Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is one of the most common orthopaedic procedures and one of the most well studied. Despite extensive research dedicated to ACLR, there is limited understanding of how chronic inflammatory systemic diseases (CIDs) such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus affect outcomes.

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of ACLR in cohorts of patients with and without CID.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective query of a regional data set was conducted for all patients who underwent ACLR from 1990 to 2021 for traumatic ACL rupture. All patients with CID were identified and propensity matched to non-CID controls. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were identified through retrospective chart review, and patients were contacted for subjective outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients with ACLR and a diagnosis of CID were identified. These patients were propensity matched to 120 non-CID controls. Baseline demographic and surgical characteristics demonstrated no statistical differences. Follow-up duration was similar between the CID and non-CID groups (mean, 14.6 vs 14.2 years; P = .868). The CID cohort had a higher arthrofibrosis rate (16.7% vs 4.3%; P = .031), higher osteoarthritis rate (33.3% vs 16.7%; P = .041), higher total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rate (16.7% vs 3.3%; P = .016), and earlier time to TKA (14.7 vs 23.5 years; P = .032). Knee range of motion, infection rate, retear rate, time to retear, and time to osteoarthritis were not statistically different between the cohorts. The CID cohort had higher visual analog scale pain scores (mean, 2.00 vs 1.20; P = .043) but slightly higher satisfaction (mean, 3.92 vs 3.39; P = .043). There were no differences in preinjury Tegner, postoperative Tegner, change in Tegner, or IKDC score. In a univariate Cox regression model, the CID cohort had a retear hazard ratio of 1.43 (95% CI, 0.46-4.51; P = .537). Kaplan-Meier survival revealed no significant differences in retear-free survival between the CID and non-CID cohorts at 25 years (85.7% vs 87.3%; P = .53). The CID cohort had a TKA hazard ratio of 3.94 (95% CI, 1.05-14.8; P = .042). Kaplan-Meier survival demonstrated significantly decreased TKA-free survival at 25 years in the CID cohort (64.9% vs 91.2%; P = .029).

CONCLUSION

CID increases the incidence of arthrofibrosis, osteoarthritis, and TKA in those undergoing ACLR. Patients with CID also undergo TKA significantly sooner than non-CID counterparts. Notably, the majority of patient-reported outcome measures are no worse in patients who have a CID diagnosis. Thus, ACLR constructs themselves may not necessarily fare worse in patients with CID. Nonetheless, these patients need to be cautiously counseled on the clinical outlook after their ACLR.

Association of calcaneal pitch angle with recurrence of postoperative hallux valgus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Hallux valgus (HV) and flatfoot deformities are frequently seen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed to determine whether flatfoot deformity contributes to the recurrence of HV in RA patients. This study examined 62 feet from 45 RA patients who were diagnosed with HV and underwent the first metatarsal joint-preserving surgery between November 2010 and October 2021. Recorded data included age at surgery, sex, disease duration, body mass index [BMI], RA disease duration, medical treatment of RA, Larsen grade, blood test, pre/postoperative Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot, HV angle, M1M2 angle, M1M5 angle, calcal pitch angle, and Meary's angle. HV recurrence on radiography was defined as an HV angle exceeding 20°. HV recurrence was observed in 17 feet. Significant differences were observed due to risk factors such as BMI, disease duration, Larsen grade 4-5, and preoperative calcaneal pitch angle. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that lower BMI, a higher M1M2 angle, and a lower calcaneal pitch angle are preoperative risk factors for the recurrence of postoperative HV in RA patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

First Metatarsophalangeal Joint-Preserving Surgery Is Effective for Forefoot Deformity With Moderate to Severe Joint Destruction in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background

The study compares the clinical outcomes of first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint fusion vs joint-preserving surgery in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with severe forefoot deformities.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study at Kyushu University Hospital reviewed RA patients who underwent either first MTP joint arthrodesis or joint-preserving surgery for hallux valgus (HV) deformity between January 2008 and December 2022. A total of 103 feet (73 cases) were analyzed, with 75 feet (58 cases) showing radiographic bone destruction of Larsen grade 3 or higher. One foot underwent resection arthroplasty, so ultimately 74 feet in 57 cases were evaluated. Surgical procedures included joint-preserving biplane osteotomy or arthrodesis with crossed screws. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) Hallux scale, whereas radiographic assessments included HV angle (HVA). Propensity score matching was used to minimize bias when comparing postoperative outcomes between the arthrodesis and joint-preserving surgery groups.

Results

This study analyzed 74 feet undergoing either arthrodesis (27 feet) or joint-preserving surgery (47 feet) for HV. Patients in the 2 groups showed similar demographic and clinical characteristics except with respect to length of follow-up, which was greater in the arthrodesis group (5.1 ± 2.6 years vs 2.4 ± 2.0 years, P < .01) than the joint-preserving group. In the arthrodesis group, all patients underwent resection arthroplasty on the second to fifth toes. The joint-preserving group included first MTP joint surgery alone (n = 5) and first MTP joint and lesser MTP joint surgeries (resection arthroplasty, n = 29; joint-preserving surgery, n = 13). Functional scores significantly improved in both groups, with first metatarsophalangeal joint-preserving surgery yielding better postoperative outcomes. In cases of deformity recurrence, the recurrent cases exhibited greater immediate postsurgical HVA, but other foot function outcomes remained similar at the end of follow-up.

Conclusion

Joint-preserving surgery for advanced rheumatoid forefoot deformity showed better functional improvement than arthrodesis using the propensity score matching and comparable clinical outcomes, highlighting it as a potential treatment option for severe joint destruction.

Level of Evidence

Level Ⅳ, retrospective study.

Short-term efficacy and limitations of foot care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Foot and ankle impairments are major issues in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Foot deformities often lead to skin disorders, such as callosities, ingrown toenails, and interdigital tinea pedis. This study was aimed at investigating the efficacy and limitations of foot care by experts in patients with RA.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with RA who began receiving foot care from nurses at our institution between September 2020 and February 2023 were included. Responses to a survey using the self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q) for patient-reported outcome measures were compared at baseline, the second visit (1.3 ± 0.5 months after baseline), and the third visit (3.6 ± 1.6 months after baseline).

RESULTS

Scores for 'Pain and pain-related' and 'General health and well-being' components of SAFE-Q markedly improved after foot care. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in the scores for 'Physical functioning and daily living', 'Social functioning', and 'Shoe-related' components during observation periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Foot care for rheumatoid feet is effective in providing pain relief and improving general health and well-being. However, physical and social functioning and footwear issues did not improve. Clinicians must understand the effects and limitations of foot care in patients with RA.

Flatfoot Surgery for Flexible Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity With Inflammatory Joint Diseases: A Report of 3 Cases

CASE

Three cases of inflammatory joint diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus and ongoing juvenile idiopathic arthritis) with painful flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) underwent flatfoot surgery. All cases maintained sufficient radiological correction and achieved good clinical condition at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Although the prospect for recurrence of the deformity is not clear, even in inflammatory joint diseases, flat foot surgery such as flexor digitorum longs transfer, spring ligament reconstruction, and lateral column lengthening could have a possibility to be indicated against PCFD, as long as disease activity could be well suppressed by drug therapy, subsequently subtalar and talonavicular joints could be preserved.

Outcomes of Joint-Preserving Surgery for Forefoot Deformities in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND

With the advent of effective disease-modifying medications, the surgical treatment of forefoot deformities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved from joint-sacrificing to joint-preserving surgery. However, it is unclear whether joint-preserving surgery is effective for the full range of metatarsophalangeal joint involvement. Hence, this study investigated the postoperative outcomes of joint-preserving surgery for rheumatoid forefoot deformities with a wide range of joint destruction.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 68 feet from 68 patients with RA who underwent joint-preserving surgery for forefoot deformities between 2014 and 2020. The Larsen grade classification was used to assess the first metatarsophalangeal joint destruction and classify patients into 4 groups as follows: 0 and 1 (n = 14), 2 (n = 21), 3 (n = 19), and 4 and 5 (n = 14). The Self-Administered Foot and Ankle Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) score, hallux valgus angle (HVA), and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) were determined before surgery and at the last follow-up visit.

RESULTS

The median observation duration was 40 (range, 24-78) months. SAFE-Q scores of all groups significantly improved in all subscales at the last observation, with no significant differences among the study groups. Radiographic evaluations of all groups revealed significant improvements in HVA and IMA after surgery, with no significant differences among the groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients using the surgical approaches described in this study, joint-preserving surgery for rheumatoid forefoot deformities led to satisfactory clinical and radiographic improvements, regardless of the severity of joint destruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

Impact of pain in other body regions on the foot-specific quality of life in patients with hallux valgus

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to clarify the prevalence of pain outside the foot, and to determine the associations of pain outside the foot with foot-specific quality of life (QOL) in patients with hallux valgus.

METHODS

Patients scheduled to undergo hallux valgus surgery were recruited. Patients answered whether they experienced disabling pain in 13 body regions other than the foot. Foot-specific QOLwas assessed using the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q). Foot pain was quantified using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Patient characteristics, including age, sex, comorbidity, anxiety, and depression, were also surveyed. The association between pain elsewhere and the SAFE-Q and pain VAS scores were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of 102 patients, 55 (54%) experienced pain other than the foot. All SAFE-Q subscale scores were lower, and pain VAS was higher in patients with pain elsewhere than in patients without. In the multivariate analysis, an increase in the number of pain regions was independently associated with a decrease in SAFE-Q scores and an increase in pain VAS.

CONCLUSION

More than half of the patients with hallux valgus experienced pain elsewhere. The presence of pain elsewhere was associated with poorer foot-specific QOL and severer foot pain.

Radiographic factors associated with painful callosities after forefoot surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Operative procedures for rheumatoid forefoot deformities have gradually changed from arthrodesis or resection arthroplasty to joint-preserving surgery. Although joint-preserving arthroplasty has yielded good outcomes, painful plantar callosities may occur post-operatively. This study aimed to reveal the radiographic factors associated with painful callosities after joint-preserving surgery for forefoot deformities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 166 feet in 133 patients with RA who underwent forefoot joint-preserving arthroplasty, including proximal rotational closing-wedge osteotomies of the first metatarsal, between January 2012 and December 2015. Logistic regression analysis was performed with the objective variable set as the presence/absence of painful plantar callosities at the final observation and the explanatory variables set as several radiographic factors, including post-operative relative first metatarsal length (RML), amount of dorsal dislocation of the fifth metatarsal (5DD), and arc failure of the lesser toes.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, 42 of the 166 feet (25.3%) had painful callosities under the metatarsal heads post-operatively. Logistic regression analysis showed that the RML, 5DD, and lesser toes' arc failure were significantly associated with painful callosities.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified that RML, 5DD, and arc failure of the lesser toes were associated with painful plantar callosities after the surgery.

Unterschiede in der Therapie entzündlich rheumatischer und degenerativer Füße. Die Vorfußchirurgie

Der Unterschied zwischen rheumatischen und degenerativen Veränderungen am Fuß liegt in der fortschreitenden Destruktion der Gelenke bei persistierender Synovialitis der rheumatoiden Arthritis (RA). Unter der heute wirksameren immunsuppressiven Therapie und eines frühen und aggressiven Beginns zeigen sich mildere Verlaufsformen. So können zunehmend auch gelenkerhaltende Verfahren der Vorfußchirurgie Anwendung finden. Entscheidend ist hier jedoch die Remission mit sicherer Krankheitskontrolle für den gelenkerhaltenden Eingriff. Dennoch ist das Rezidiv- und Fehlstellungsrisiko aufgrund wiederkehrender arthritischer Phasen höher. Rheumaorthopädische Standardverfahren, wie die Arthrodese des Großzehengrundgelenkes mit Resektion der Metatarsaleköpfchen haben aber Ihren Stellenwert beim Vollbild des erosiven rheumatischen Vorfußes nicht verloren. Ein standardisiertes Vorgehen fehlt. Umso wichtiger ist es, mit jedem Patienten individuell die richtigen Maßnahmen zu festzulegen.

More than 20 years' follow-up of metatarsal neck shortening oblique osteotomy for rheumatoid forefoot deformity

BACKGROUND

In recent years, advances in pharmacotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have dramatically improved the control of disease activity. However, a significant number of patients still develop forefoot deformity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the results of more than 20 years' follow-up of metatarsal neck shortening oblique osteotomy (SOO) for forefoot deformity in patients with RA.

METHODS

The metatarsal neck SOO was performed on 163 feet in 108 patients between January 1985 and December 1996 in the authors' hospital. For the patients, who met the survey criteria, an observational study was performed clinically and radiologically at the baseline and at more than 20 years after surgery.

RESULTS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 36 feet in 22 patients, all of whom were female, and the mean age at surgery was 45.6 (35.0-63.0) years old. The follow-up period was 25.1 (21.0-31.0) years. The presence of painful callosities in the surgically treated feet without revised surgeries decreased from 32 feet (100%) to 4 feet (12.5%) at the last follow-up with mild pain that did not cause any footwear problems. Re-osteotomy at the metatarsal of the lessor toe was performed on four feet in two patients. Radiologically, among 128 toes without revised surgeries, 85% were able to have the joint space preserved, and 89% maintained a pain-free condition without any recurrence of deformity. The mean total Japanese Society for Surgery for the Foot (JSSF) RA foot and ankle score was 64.0/100, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of overall satisfaction was 62 (0: dissatisfied, 100: highly satisfied). The overall satisfaction had a positive correlation with calcaneal pitch and negative correlation with joint space narrowing at the talocrural joint.

CONCLUSIONS

Metatarsal neck SOO appeared to be effective for patients with RA. The deformity was corrected and retained for a long time.

Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty

Background: Joint-preserving surgery for the forefoot has been increasingly performed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared joint-preserving surgeries with resection arthroplasty for RA in the forefoot. Methods: Forefoot surgeries were performed on 62 toes in 42 patients with RA (men: 2; women: 40) between 2002 and 2018. Three groups were compared: PP—31 toes treated with joint-preserving surgery involving the modified Mann method for the big toe and offset osteotomy for lesser toes, PR—15 toes treated with joint-preserving surgery for the big toe and resection arthroplasty for lesser toes, and RR—16 toes treated with resection arthroplasty for all the toes. Results: The PP group had significantly higher mean scores on a scale for RA in the foot and ankle at the latest follow-up than the RR group (86 vs. 75 points; p < 0.05). Hallux valgus (angle > 20°) of the big toe at the latest follow-up recurred in 10 (32%), 9 (60%), and 16 (100%) patients in the PP, PR, and RR groups, respectively. A revision surgery was performed in one patient each in the PP and PR groups. Conclusions: Joint-preserving surgery is superior to resection arthroplasty in preventing function loss and the recurrence of hallux valgus.

Outcomes of Scarf and Akin Osteotomy with Intra-Articular Stepwise Lateral Soft Tissue Release for Correcting Hallux Valgus Deformity in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background. The effectiveness of scarf and Akin osteotomy with intra-articular lateral soft tissue release for the correction of hallux valgus (HV) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has not been elucidated. Methods. A total of 36 feet in 28 patients with RA who had scarf and Akin osteotomy with intra-articular stepwise lateral soft tissue release between 2015 and 2020 at a single institute were investigated retrospectively, with a mean follow-up period of 32.0 ± 16.9 months. Radiographic evaluations including the HV angle, intermetatarsal angle, and sesamoid position were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Society of Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) hallux scale and self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q). Results. The procedure resulted in significant HV correction, with a recurrence rate of 13.9%. The JSSF scale and all five SAFE-Q subscale scores significantly improved (p < 0.05), with no major complications. More than 90% of cases achieved adequate lateral soft tissue release without sacrificing the adductor tendon of the hallux. Conclusions. Intra-articular stepwise lateral soft tissue release in combination with scarf and Akin osteotomy provided satisfactory radiographic and patient-reported outcomes for the correction of HV in patients with RA with minimum lateral soft tissue release.

Combination of Modified Scarf Osteotomy and Metatarsal Shortening Offset Osteotomy for Rheumatoid Forefoot Deformity

With the progress of medical treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), several joint-preserving forefoot surgical procedures have been established and performed. In this situation, we have been choosing the combined surgery: modified scarf osteotomy for the great toe and metatarsal shortening offset osteotomy for the lesser toes in RA cases. A retrospective observational study of 53 RA patients (mean follow-up period: 4.6 years) who underwent the surgery was completed. RA foot ankle scores were assessed, using the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) standard rating system, and a self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q) was also checked to evaluate clinical outcomes. For radiological evaluations, deformity parameters were measured using radiographs of the feet with weight-bearing. JSSF hallux and lesser toes scores and the SAFE-Q score showed significant improvement in all indices. HVA, M1-M2A, M1-M5A, M2-M5A, and sesamoid position were significantly improved after surgery. At the final follow-up, the hallux valgus deformity had recurred in 4 feet (7.5%), and hallux varus deformity had developed in 8 feet (15.1%). No case of recurrent hallux valgus deformity required revision surgery. Recurrence of dorsal dislocation/subluxation of the lesser toe MTP joint was seen in 6 feet (11.3%) after surgery. A combination of modified scarf osteotomy for the great toe and modified metatarsal shortening offset osteotomy for the lesser toes is one of the novel surgical procedures for rheumatoid forefoot deformity. Preoperative disease activity of RA negatively affected the clinical score of the hallux. The spread of M2-M5A was a risk factor for resubluxation of the lesser toe MTP joint.

Joint-Preserving Surgery for Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Literature Review

The combination of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis and resection arthroplasty of all lesser metatarsal heads has been historically considered the golden standard treatment for rheumatoid forefoot deformities. However, as recent improved management of rheumatoid arthritis have reduced progression of joint destruction, the surgical treatments for rheumatoid forefoot deformities have gradually changed from joint-sacrificing surgery, such as arthrodesis and resection arthroplasty, to joint-preserving surgery. The aim of this literature review was to provide current evidence for joint-preserving surgery for rheumatoid forefoot deformities. We focused on the indications, specific outcomes, and postsurgical complications of joint-preserving surgery in this review.