1
|
Kim AG, Rizk AA, Ina JG, Magister SJ, Salata MJ. Declining Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Physician Fees: An Unsustainable Trend in Hip Arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024:00124635-990000000-00925. [PMID: 38626441 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although hip arthroscopy continues to be one of the most used arthroscopic procedures, no focused, comprehensive evaluation of reimbursement trends has been conducted. The purpose of this study was to analyze the temporal Medicare reimbursement trends for hip arthroscopy procedures. METHODS From 2011 to 2021, the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool was queried for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes related to hip arthroscopy (29860 to 29863, 29914 to 29916). All monetary data were adjusted to 2021 US dollars. The compound annual growth rate and total percentage change were calculated. Mann-Kendall trend tests were used to evaluate the reimbursement trends. RESULTS Based on the unadjusted values, a significant increase in physician fee was observed from 2011 to 2021 for CPT codes 29861 (removal of loose or foreign bodies; % change: 3.49, P = 0.03) and 29862 (chondroplasty, abrasion arthroplasty, labral resection; % change: 3.19, P = 0.03). The remaining CPT codes experienced no notable changes in reimbursement based on the unadjusted values. After adjusting for inflation, all seven of the hip arthroscopy CPT codes were observed to experience a notable decline in Medicare reimbursement. Hip arthroscopy with acetabuloplasty (CPT: 29915) and labral repair (CPT: 29916) exhibited the greatest reduction in reimbursement with a decrease in physician fee of 24.69% (P < 0.001) and 24.64% (P < 0.001), respectively, over the study period. DISCUSSION Medicare reimbursement for all seven of the commonly used hip arthroscopy services did not keep up with inflation, demonstrating marked reductions from 2011 to 2021. Specifically, the inflation-adjusted reimbursements decreased between 19.23% and 24.69% between 2011 and 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew G Kim
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mo KC, Ortiz-Babilonia C, Musharbash FN, Raad M, Aponte JS, Neuman BJ, Jain A, Kebaish KM. Inflation-adjusted medicare physician reimbursement for adult spinal deformity surgery substantially declined from 2002 to 2020. Spine Deform 2024; 12:263-270. [PMID: 38036867 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00779-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Physician fees for orthopaedic surgeons by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) are increasingly scrutinized. The present retrospective review aims to assess whether adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgeries are properly valued for Medicare reimbursement. METHODS Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes related to posterior fusion of spinal deformity of ≤ 6, 7-12, and ≥ 13 vertebral levels, as well as additional arthrodesis and osteotomy levels, were assessed for (1) Compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 2002 to 2020, calculated using physician fee data from the CMS Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool; and (2) work relative value units (RVUs) per operative minute, using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. RESULTS From 2002 to 2020, all CPT codes for ASD surgery had negative inflation-adjusted CAGRs (range, - 18.49% to - 27.66%). Mean physician fees for spinal fusion declined by 26.02% (CAGR, - 1.66%) in ≤ 6-level fusion, 27.91% (CAGR, - 1.80%) in 7- to 12-level fusion, and 28.25% (CAGR, - 1.83%) ≥ 13-level fusion. Fees for both 7-12 (P < 0.00001) and ≥ 13 levels (P < 0.00001) declined more than those for fusion of ≤ 6 vertebral levels. RVU per minute was lower for 7- to 12-level and ≥ 13-level (P < 0.00001 for both) ASD surgeries than for ≤ 6-level. CONCLUSIONS Reimbursement for ASD surgery declined overall. CAGR for fusions of ≥ 7 levels were lower than those for fusions of ≤ 6 levels. For 2012-2018, ≥ 7-level fusions had lower RVU per minute than ≤ 6-level fusions. Revaluation of Medicare reimbursement for longer-level ASD surgeries may be warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin C Mo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline Street, JHOC 5223, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Carlos Ortiz-Babilonia
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline Street, JHOC 5223, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Farah N Musharbash
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline Street, JHOC 5223, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Micheal Raad
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline Street, JHOC 5223, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Juan Silva Aponte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline Street, JHOC 5223, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Brian J Neuman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline Street, JHOC 5223, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Amit Jain
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline Street, JHOC 5223, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline Street, JHOC 5223, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gerhart CR, Boddu SP, Haglin JM, Bingham JS. Revision Arthroplasty Among Medicare Patients in the United States - Arthroplasty Surgeons are Doing More for Less. J Arthroplasty 2024:S0883-5403(24)00033-0. [PMID: 38266687 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previously documented trends of major joint arthroplasty demonstrate increasing volume and decreasing reimbursement for primary total knee and total hip arthroplasty procedures. As such, the purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in revision knee and hip arthroplasty volume and true Medicare reimbursements to physicians. METHODS The publicly accessible Centers for Medicare and Medicaid files were evaluated. Data were retrieved from the Part B National Summary Data File and queried for revision knee and hip arthroplasty billed to Medicare from 2000 to 2021. The total charge submitted to Medicare, Medicare reimbursement, number of revision arthroplasty surgeries performed, and average reimbursement per surgery were collected for each year. All monetary data were adjusted for inflation to 2021 dollars. RESULTS There were 492,360 revision total knee arthroplasty surgeries and 424,163 revision hip arthroplasty procedures billed to Medicare from 2000 to 2021. Medicare was billed a total of $919,603,674.86 for revision knee and $862,979,761.57 for revision hip arthroplasty during that time. Medicare reimbursed physicians an average of $1,499.89 per knee revision and $1,603.32 per hip revision surgery. The total volume of revision knee arthroplasty increased by 9,380 (62%) and revision hip decreased by 1,743 (9%) from the year 2000 to 2021. However, there was a decrease of average reimbursement per procedure of more than 37% ($1,987.14 to 1,254) and 39% ($2,149.87 to 1,311.17), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Despite a notable increase in the volume of revision total knee and stagnant revision hip arthroplasty, total billings to and reimbursements from Medicare for these procedures have not changed markedly per year. Importantly, this means that physicians are conducting more of these high-impact procedures yearly, while being reimbursed per procedure at a declining rate. This may indicate a need to re-assess billing and reimbursement rates for revision arthroplasty, in the context of the ever-increasing inflation rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coltin R Gerhart
- Anne Burnett School of Medicine at Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Sayi P Boddu
- Alix School of Medicine at Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Jack M Haglin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Joshua S Bingham
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deans CF, Hulsman LA, Ziemba-Davis M, Meneghini RM, Buller LT. Medicaid Patients Travel Disproportionately Farther for Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39:32-37. [PMID: 37549756 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Access to high-quality care for revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA) is poorly understood but may vary based on insurance type. This study investigated distance traveled for hip and knee rTJA based on insurance type. METHODS A total of 317 revision hips and 431 revision knees performed between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Cluster sampling was used to select primary hips and knees for comparison. Median driving distance was compared based upon procedure and insurance type. RESULTS Revision hip and knee patients traveled 18.2 and 11.0 miles farther for surgery compared to primary hip and knee patients (P ≤ .001). For hip rTJA, Medicaid patients traveled farther than Medicare patients followed by commercially insured patients with median distances traveled of 98.4, 67.2, and 35.6 miles, respectively (P = .016). Primary hip patients traveled the same distance regardless of insurance type (P = .397). For knee rTJA, Medicaid patients traveled twice as far as Medicare and commercially insured patients (medians of 85.0, 43.5, and 42.2 miles respectively, P ≤ .046). Primary knee patients showed a similar pattern (P = .264). Age and ASA-PS classification did not indicate greater comorbidity in Medicaid patients. CONCLUSION Insurance type may influence rTJA referrals, with disproportionate referral of Medicaid and Medicare patients to nonlocal care centers. In addition to patient burden, these patterns potentially present a financial burden to facilities accepting referrals. Strategies to improve equitable access to rTJA, while maintaining the highest and most economical standards of care for patients, providers, and hospitals, are encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher F Deans
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Luci A Hulsman
- Department of Graduate Medical Education, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Mary Ziemba-Davis
- Indiana University Health Hip & Knee Center, Saxony Hospital, Fishers, Indiana
| | - R Michael Meneghini
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Leonard T Buller
- Indiana University Health Hip & Knee Center, Saxony Hospital, Fishers, Indiana; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Magnuson JA, Hobbs J, Yakkanti R, Gold PA, Courtney PM, Krueger CA. Lower Revenue Surplus in Medicare Advantage Versus Private Commercial Insurance for Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of a Single Payor Source at One Institution. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39:26-31.e1. [PMID: 37380139 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.06.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010, reductions in Medicare reimbursement have led to larger discrepancies between the relative cost of Medicare patients and privately insured patients. The purpose of this study was to compare reimbursement between Medicare Advantage and other insurance plans in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS Patients of a single commercial payor source who underwent primary unilateral TKA or THA at 1 institution between the dates of January 4 and June 30, 2021, were included (n = 833). Variables included insurance type, medical comorbidities, total costs, and surplus amounts. The primary outcome measure was revenue surplus between Medicare Advantage and Private Commercial plans. t-tests, Analyses of Variance, and Chi-Squared tests were used for analysis. A THA represented 47% of cases and a TKA 53%. Of these patients, 31.5% had Medicare Advantage and 68.5% had Private Commercial insurance. Medicare Advantage patients were older and had higher medical comorbidity risk for both TKA and THA. RESULTS Significant differences were observed in medical costs between Medicare Advantage and Private Commercial insurance for THA ($17,148 versus $31,260, P < .001) and TKA ($16,723 versus $33,593, P < .001). Additionally, differences were seen in surplus amounts between Medicare Advantage and Private Commercial insurance for THA ($3,504 versus $7,128, P < .001) and TKA ($5,581 versus $10,477, P < .001). Deficits were higher in Private Commercial patients undergoing TKA (15.2 versus 6%, P = .001). CONCLUSION The lower average surplus associated with Medicare Advantage plans may lead to financial strain on provider groups who care for these patients and face additional overhead costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin A Magnuson
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John Hobbs
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ramakanth Yakkanti
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Peter A Gold
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - P Maxwell Courtney
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Chad A Krueger
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Honarpisheh P, Parker SL, Conner CR, Anjum S, Stark JR, Quinn JC, Caridi JM. 20-year Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursements (Years: 2000-2020) For Common Lumbar and Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease Procedures. Global Spine J 2024; 14:211-218. [PMID: 35609345 PMCID: PMC10676153 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221100173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Reimbursement trends for common procedures have persistently declined over the past 2 decades. Spinal instrumentational and fusion procedures are increasingly utilized and have increased in clinical complexity, yet longitudinal inflation-adjusted data for Medicare reimbursements of these procedures have not been evaluated. METHODS The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool was used to extract Medicare reimbursements for the 5 most common spinal procedures and associated instrumentations from 2000-2020. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes include 22551, 22600, 22633, 63030, and 63047 as well as instrumentation CPT codes 22840 and 22842-6. The nominal values were adjusted for inflation according to the latest consumer price index (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; reported as 2020 USD) and used to calculate average annual percent changes and compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) in reimbursements. RESULTS After inflation adjustment, the physician fee reimbursement decreased by 11.05% ± 8.46% (mean ± s.d., from $2,009.89 in 2011 to $1,787.85 in 2020) for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), 28.38% ± 8.42% (from $1,889.38 in 2000 to $1,353.14 in 2020) for posterior cervical fusion, 7.85% ± 8.20% (from $2,111.20 in 2012 to $1,945.49 in 2020) for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), 28.17% ± 13.88% (from $1,421.78 in 2000 to $1,021.22 in 2020) for lower back disc surgery, and 31.88% ± 8.22% (from $1,700.38 in 2000 to $1,158.25 in 2020) for lumbar laminectomy. Instrumentation reimbursements showed an average decrease of 33.43% ± 8.4% over this period. Average CAGR was -1.7% ± .41% for procedures and -2.02% ± .14% for instrumentation. CONCLUSION Our analysis reveals a persistent decline in reimbursement rates of the most common spine procedures and instrumentation since the year 2000. If unaddressed, this trend can serve as a substantial disincentive for physicians to perform these procedures and can significantly limit access to spinal care at the population level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedram Honarpisheh
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
- UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Samantha L Parker
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher R Conner
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sami Anjum
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jessica R Stark
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John C Quinn
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John M Caridi
- Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Federico VP, McCormick JR, Nie JW, Mehta N, Cohn MR, Menendez ME, Denard PJ, Simcock XC, Nicholson GP, Garrigues GE. Costs of shoulder and elbow procedures are significantly reduced in ambulatory surgery centers compared to hospital outpatient departments. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:2123-2131. [PMID: 37422131 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent literature has shown the advantages of outpatient surgery for many shoulder and elbow procedures, including cost savings with equivalent safety in appropriately selected patients. Two common settings for outpatient surgeries are ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), which function as independent financial and administrative entities, or hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs), which are owned and operated by hospital systems. The purpose of this study was to compare shoulder and elbow surgery costs between ASCs and HOPDs. METHODS Publicly available data from 2022 provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) was accessed via the Medicare Procedure Price Lookup Tool. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify shoulder and elbow procedures approved for the outpatient setting by CMS. Procedures were grouped into arthroscopy, fracture, or miscellaneous. Total costs, facility fees, Medicare payments, patient payment (costs not covered by Medicare), and surgeon's fees were extracted. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate means and standard deviations. Cost differences were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS Fifty-seven CPT codes were identified. Arthroscopy procedures (n = 16) at ASCs had significantly lower total costs ($2667 ± $989 vs. $4899 ± $1917; P = .009), facility fees ($1974 ± $819 vs. $4206 ± $1753; P = .008), Medicare payments ($2133 ± $791 vs. $3919 ± $1534; P = .009), and patient payments ($533 ± $198 vs. $979 ± $383; P = .009) compared with HOPDs. Fracture procedures (n = 10) at ASCs had lower total costs ($7680 ± $3123 vs. $11,335 ± $3830; P = .049), facility fees ($6851 ± $3033 vs. $10,507 ± $3733; P = .047), and Medicare payments ($6143 ± $2499 vs. $9724 ± $3676; P = .049) compared with HOPDs, although patient payments were not significantly different ($1535 ± $625 vs. $1610 ± $160; P = .449). Miscellaneous procedures (n = 31) at ASCs had lower total costs ($4202 ± $2234 vs. $6985 ± $2917; P < .001), facility fees ($3348 ± $2059 vs. $6132 ± $2736; P < .001), Medicare payments ($3361 ± $1787 vs. $5675 ± $2635; P < .001), and patient payments ($840 ± $447 vs. $1309 ± $350; P < .001) compared with HOPDs. The combined cohort (n = 57) at ASCs had lower total costs ($4381 ± $2703 vs. $7163 ± $3534; P < .001), facility fees ($3577 ± $2570 vs. $6539.1 ± $3391; P < .001), Medicare payments ($3504 ± $2162 vs. $5892 ± $3206; P < .001), and patient payments ($875 ± $540 vs. $1269 ± $393; P < .001) compared with HOPDs. CONCLUSION Shoulder and elbow procedures performed at HOPDs for Medicare recipients were found to have average total cost increase of 164% compared with those performed at ASCs (184% savings for arthroscopy, 148% for fracture, and 166% for miscellaneous). ASC use conferred lower facility fees, patient payments, and Medicare payments. Policy efforts to incentivize migration of surgeries to ASCs may translate into substantial health care cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent P Federico
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - James W Nie
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nabil Mehta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Xavier C Simcock
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gregory P Nicholson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Grant E Garrigues
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rizk AA, Kim AG, Bernhard Z, Moyal A, Acuña AJ, Hecht CJ, Kamath AF. Mark-Up Trends in Contemporary Medicare Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38:1642-1651. [PMID: 36972856 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding mark-up ratios (MRs), the ratio between a healthcare institution's submitted charge and the Medicare payment received, for high-volume orthopaedic procedures is imperative to inform policy about price transparency and reducing surprise billing. This analysis examined the MRs for primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) services to Medicare beneficiaries between 2013 and 2019 across healthcare settings and geographic regions. METHODS A large dataset was queried for all THA and TKA procedures performed by orthopaedic surgeons between 2013 and 2019, using Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes for the most frequently used services. Yearly MRs, service counts, average submitted charges, average allowed payments, and average Medicare payments were analyzed. Trends in MRs were assessed. We evaluated 9 THA HCPCS codes, averaging 159,297 procedures a year provided by a mean of 5,330 surgeons. We evaluated 6 TKA HCPCS codes, averaging 290,244 procedures a year provided by a mean of 7,308 surgeons. RESULTS For knee arthroplasty procedures, a decrease was noted for HCPCS code 27438 (patellar arthroplasty with prosthesis) over the study period (8.30 to 6.62; P = .016) and HCPCS code 27447 (TKA) had the highest median (interquartile range [IQR]) MR (4.73 [3.64 to 6.30]). For revision knee procedures, the highest median (IQR) MR was for HCPCS code 27488 (removal of knee prosthesis; 6.12 [3.83-8.22]). While no trends were noted for both primary and revision hip arthroplasty, median (IQR) MRs in 2019 for primary hip procedures ranged from 3.83 (hemiarthroplasty) to 5.06 (conversion of previous hip surgery to THA) and HCPCS code 27130 (total hip arthroplasty) had a median (IQR) MR of 4.66 (3.58-6.44). For revision hip procedures, MRs ranged from 3.79 (open treatment of femoral fracture or prosthetic arthroplasty) to 6.10 (revision of THA femoral component). Wisconsin had the highest median MR by state (>9) for primary knee, revision knee, and primary hip procedures. CONCLUSION The MRs for primary and revision THA and TKA procedures were strikingly high, as compared to nonorthopaedic procedures. These findings represent high levels of excess charges billed, which may pose serious financial burdens to patients and must be taken into consideration in future policy discussions to avoid price inflation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam A Rizk
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Andrew G Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Zachary Bernhard
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Andrew Moyal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alexander J Acuña
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Christian J Hecht
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Atul F Kamath
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Federico VP, Zavras AG, Butler A, Nolte MT, Munim MA, Lopez GD, DeWald C, An HS, Colman MW, Phillips FM. Medicare Reimbursement Rates and Utilization Trends in Sacroiliac Joint Fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:923-930. [PMID: 37192412 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion is a surgical treatment option for SIJ pathology in select patients who have failed conservative management. More recently, minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques have been developed. This study aimed to determine the trends in procedure volume and reimbursement rates for SIJ fusion. METHODS Publicly available Medicare databases were assessed using the National Summary Data Files for 2010 to 2020. Files were organized according to current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. CPT codes specific to open and MIS SI joint fusion (27279 and 27280) were identified and tracked. To track surgeon reimbursements, the CMS Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool was used to extract facility prices. Descriptive statistics and linear regression were used to evaluate trends in procedure volume, utilization, and reimbursement rates. Compound annual growth rates were calculated, and discrepancies in inflation were corrected for using the Consumer Price Index. RESULTS A total of 33,963 SIJ fusions were conducted in the Medicare population between 2010 and 2020, with an overall increase in procedure volume of 2,350.9% from 318 cases in 2010 to 7,794 in 2020. Since the introduction of the 27279 CPT code in 2015, 8,806 cases (31.5%) have been open and 19,120 (68.5%) have been MIS. Surgeon reimbursement for open fusions increased nominally by 42.8% (inflation-adjusted increase of 20%) from $998 in 2010 to $1,425 in 2020. Meanwhile, reimbursement for MIS fusion experienced a nominal increase of 58.4% (inflation-adjusted increase of 44.9%) from $582 in 2015 to $922 in 2020. CONCLUSION SIJ fusion volume in the Medicare population has increased substantially in the past 10 years, with MIS SIJ fusion accounting for most of the procedures since the introduction of the 27279 CPT code in 2015. Reimbursement rates for surgeons have also increased for both open and MIS procedures, even after adjusting for inflation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent P Federico
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jella TK, Manyak GA, Cwalina TB, Roth AL, Mesko NW, Kamath AF. Declining Geographic Access to High-Volume Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgeons: A National Medicare Analysis. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38:S103-S110. [PMID: 36634884 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While trends in the economics of revision THA (revTHA) procedures have been well-described from the standpoint of both hospitals and surgeons, their population-level effects of these trends on patient access are not well-understood. METHODS The Medicare fee-for-service provider utilization and payment public use files were used to extract data for primary and revTHA for beneficiaries between 2013 and 2019. Primary and revTHA procedures were identified using the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System code; 27130 for primaries and 27132, 27134, 27137, or 27138 for revisions. Geospatial analyses were performed by aggregating surgeon practice locations at the level of individual counties, hospital service areas, and hospital referral regions. RESULTS The number of high-volume primary THA surgeons within the Medicare population increased by 17.6% over the study period (3,838 in 2013 to 4,515 in 2019). Conversely, the number of high-volume revTHA surgeons decreased by 36.1% (178 in 2013 to 129 in 2019). Linear regression revealed a significant increase and decrease in high-volume primary (β = 109.07, P ≤ .001) and revision (β = -13.04, P = .011) THA surgeons, respectively. Over the study period, the number of counties with at least 1 high-volume primary THA surgeon increased by 6.1% (1,194 to 1,267), while the number of counties with at least 1 high-volume revTHA surgeon decreased by 30.2% (159 to 111). CONCLUSION The present findings of declining geographic access may represent a consequence of shifting economic incentives and declining reimbursements for the care of complicated revTHA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarun K Jella
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Grigory A Manyak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Thomas B Cwalina
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alexander L Roth
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nathan W Mesko
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Atul F Kamath
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang R, Li X, Gu X, Cai Q, Wang Y, Yi ZM, Chen LC. The impact of China's zero markup drug policy on drug costs for managing Parkinson's disease and its complications: an interrupted time series analysis. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1159119. [PMID: 37228740 PMCID: PMC10203530 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1159119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In April 2009, the Chinese government launched Zero Markup Drug Policy (ZMDP) to adjust medical institutions' revenue and expenditure structures. Objective This study evaluated the impact of implementing ZMDP (as an intervention) on the drug costs for managing Parkinson's disease (PD) and its complications from the healthcare providers' perspective. Methods The drug costs for managing PD and its complications per outpatient visit or inpatient stay were estimated using electronic health data from a tertiary hospital in China from January 2016 to August 2018. An interrupted time series analysis was conducted to evaluate the immediate change following the intervention (step change, β1) and the change in slope, comparing post-intervention with the pre-intervention period (trend change, β2). Subgroup analyses were conducted in outpatients within the strata of age, patients with or without health insurance, and whether drugs were listed in the national Essential Medicine List (EML). Results Overall, 18,158 outpatient visits and 366 inpatient stays were included. Outpatient (β1 = -201.7, 95%CI: -285.4, -117.9) and inpatient (β1 = -372.1, 95% CI: -643.6, -100.6) drug costs for managing PD significantly decreased when implementing ZMDP. However, for outpatients without health insurance, the trend change in drug costs for managing PD (β2 = 16.8, 95% CI: 8.0, 25.6) or PD complications (β2 = 12.6, 95% CI: 5.5, 19.7) significantly increased. Trend changes in outpatient drug costs for managing PD differed when stratifying drugs listed in EML (β2 = -1.4, 95% CI: -2.6, -0.2) or not (β2 = 6.3, 95%CI: 2.0, 10.7). Trend changes of outpatient drug costs for managing PD complications significantly increased in drugs listed in EML (β2 = 14.7, 95% CI 9.2, 20.3), patients without health insurance (β2 = 12.6, 95% CI 5.5, 19.7), and age under 65 (β2 = 24.3, 95% CI 17.3, 31.4). Conclusions Drug costs for managing PD and its complications significantly decreased when implementing ZMDP. However, the trend in drug costs increased significantly in several subgroups, which may offset the decrease at the implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruilin Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xinya Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xinchun Gu
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Qian Cai
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Yayong Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhan-Miao Yi
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Li-Chia Chen
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Blackburn CW, Du JY, Marcus RE. Medicare Payments to Hospitals and Physicians for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Declined From 2009 to 2019. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38:419-423. [PMID: 36243278 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent research has reported hospital payments for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) from commercial payers to be increasing, despite increasing price pressure from the increasing scale and scope of alternative reimbursement schemes. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to analyze the recent trends in Medicare payments to hospitals and surgeons for primary THA and TKA. METHODS The primary data source for this study was the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review Limited Data Set (MEDPAR) for the years 2009, 2014, and 2019. A total of 331,721 patients undergoing primary elective THA and 742,476 patients undergoing primary elective TKA were included. Total Medicare payments and total hospital reimbursements, which included Medicare payments and patient copayments, were calculated. Physician fees were obtained from the Medicare physician fee schedule (MPFS) look-up tool. All financial data were inflation-adjusted. Patient comorbidities were identified as a measure of health status. The data were stratified by year and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS From 2009 to 2019, inflation-adjusted Medicare payments declined by 11.5% and total hospital reimbursements (Medicare payments plus copayments) declined by 6.5% for THA, while Medicare payments declined by 13.4%, and total hospital reimbursements declined by 7.7% for TKA. Over the same period, surgeons' fees declined by 13.1% for THA and 18.9% for TKA. CONCLUSION From 2009 to 2019, Medicare payments to hospitals and physicians declined markedly. Physician payments decreased faster than hospital payments. These results may have implications for the future viability of performing THA and TKA on Medicare patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Collin W Blackburn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jerry Y Du
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Randall E Marcus
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Meghpara MM, Goh GS, Magnuson JA, Hozack WJ, Courtney PM, Krueger CA, Krueger CA. The Ability of Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in Matching the Efficiency of Its Conventional Counterpart at an Orthopaedic Specialty Hospital. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38:72-77.e3. [PMID: 35940350 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has become a popular technology. Studies have investigated the learning curve for surgeons incorporating RA-TKA into practice, but less is known regarding the change in operative efficiency when introducing RA-TKA into a facility. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of RA-TKA on operative and turnover time at an orthopaedic specialty hospital. METHODS A total of 148 cases (74 RA-TKA and 74 conventional TKA [C-TKA]) performed by 2 surgeons with previous robotic experience were identified following the introduction of RA-TKA at our facility. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative times (ie, wheels-in to incision, incision to closure, closure to wheels-out, and turnover time) were recorded. Cumulative summation analyses were used to investigate learning curves of factors extraneous to surgeon proficiency with RA-TKA. RESULTS While RA-TKA had a slightly longer set up (3 minutes; range, 12-45), surgical (5 minutes; range, 33-118), and breakdown time (3 minutes; range, 2-7), there was no difference in turnover time between the groups. The learning curve for surgeon A was 6 robotic cases, whereas surgeon B demonstrated no learning curve. There was no identifiable learning curve for turnover time. CONCLUSION There was a mean of 8 minutes of increased time required to perform a RA-TKA compared to C-TKA. However, these small increases for the RA-TKA group for set-up, surgical, and breakdown times are not likely to be clinically relevant compared to the C-TKA. It appears that the RA-TKA technology was able to be incorporated into this specialty hospital with minimal changes to surgical efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Meghpara
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Graham S Goh
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Justin A Magnuson
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - William J Hozack
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - P Maxwell Courtney
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Chad A Krueger
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Khan IA, Baker CM, Magnuson JA, Courtney PM, Krueger CA, Lonner JH. Surgeons Experience More Physiologic Stress and Strain During Revision Than Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2022; 38:1126-1130. [PMID: 36529196 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) procedures are more complex than primary TKA and THA, but their physiologic burden to the surgeon has not been quantified. While rTKA and rTHA have longer operative times, it is unknown whether differences exist in stress and strain compared to primary TKA and primary THA. The study was conducted to elicit whether differences exist in surgeon physiological response while performing rTKA and rTKA compared to primary TKA and primary THA. METHODS We evaluated a prospective cohort study of 70 consecutive cases (23 primary TKAs, 12 primary THAs, 16 rTKAs, and 19 rTHAs). Two high-volume fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons wore a smart vest that recorded cardiorespiratory data while performing primary THA, primary TKA, rTHA, and rTKA. Heart rate (beats/minute), stress index (correlates with sympathetic activation), respiratory rate (respirations/minute), minute ventilation (L/min), and energy expenditure (Calories) were collected for every case, along with patient body mass index (kilograms/meter2) and working operative time (minutes). T-tests were used to assess for differences between the two groups. RESULTS Compared to primary TKA, performing rTKAs had a significantly higher surgeon stress index (17 versus 15; P = .035), heart rate (104 versus 99; P = .007), energy expenditure per case (409 versus 297; P = .002), and a significantly lower heart rate variability (11 versus 12; P = .006). Compared to primary THA, performing rTHA had a significantly higher energy expenditure per case (431 versus 307; P = .007) and trended towards having a higher surgeon stress index (16 versus 14; P = .272) and a lower heart rate variability (11 versus 12; P = .185), although it did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION Surgeons experience higher physiological stress and strain when performing rTKA and rTHA compared to primary TKA and primary THA. This study provides objective data on what many surgeons feel and should promote further research on the specific stress and strain felt by surgeons who perform revision arthroplasty procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irfan A Khan
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Colin M Baker
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Justin A Magnuson
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - P Maxwell Courtney
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Chad A Krueger
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jess H Lonner
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rizk AA, Jella TK, Cwalina TB, Pumo TJ, Erossy MP, Kamath AF. Are Trends in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty Sustainable? Declining Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement for Hospitalizations. J Arthroplasty 2022:S0883-5403(22)00964-0. [PMID: 36280161 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.10.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the burden of revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures increases within the United States, it is unclear whether health care resource allocation for these complex cases has kept pace. This study examined the trends in hospital-level reimbursements for revision TJA hospitalizations. METHODS The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) inpatient utilization and payment public use files from 2014 to 2019 were queried for diagnostic-related groups (DRGs) for revision TJA: DRG 467 (revision of hip or knee arthroplasty with complication or comorbidity [CC]) and DRG 468 (revision of hip or knee arthroplasty without CC or major CC). From 2014 to 2019, 170,808 revision TJA hospitalizations were billed to Medicare, and revision TJA procedures increased by 3,121 (10.7%). After adjusting to 2019 US dollars with the consumer price index, a multiple linear mixed-model regression analysis was performed. Analysis of covariance compared regressions from 2014 to 2019 for mean-adjusted Medicare payment and mean- adjusted charge were submitted for these DRGs. RESULTS Mean-adjusted average Medicare payment for DRG 467 decreased by $804.37 (-3.5%) from 2014 to 2019, whereas, that for DRG 468 decreased by $647.33 (-3.6%). The average inflation-adjusted Medicare payment for DRG 467 decreased at a greater rate during the study period, compared to that for DRG 468 (P = .02). CONCLUSION The decline in reimbursement for DRGs 467 and 468 reveals decreasing incentives for revision TJA hospitalizations. Further research should assess the efficacy of current Medicare payment algorithms and identify modifications which may provide for fair hospital level reimbursements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam A Rizk
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Tarun K Jella
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Thomas B Cwalina
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Thomas J Pumo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michael P Erossy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Atul F Kamath
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Polveroni TM, Haglin JM, McQuivey KS, Tokish JM. Getting paid less for more: shoulder arthroplasty incidence and reimbursement within Medicare from 2000 to 2019. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:1840-1845. [PMID: 35398167 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shoulder arthroplasty has grown in popularity in the past 2 decades, especially following US Food and Drug Administration approval of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in 2003. Studies have shown that Medicare reimbursement for a variety of orthopedic procedures has decreased significantly over the past 2 decades. No study has evaluated this trend in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty, however. The purpose of this study was to assess true reimbursement trends in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty since 2000. METHODS Information was collected from the publicly available Medicare Part B National Summary Data Files for the period of 2000 to 2019. Data from Current Procedural Terminology codes 23470 (shoulder hemiarthroplasty), 23472 (TSA), 23473 (single-component revision shoulder arthroplasty), and 23474 (both-component revision shoulder arthroplasty) were analyzed. Reimbursement amounts were adjusted for inflation to May 2021 dollars. RESULTS From 2000 to 2019, the number of shoulder hemiarthroplasty procedures billed to Medicare decreased 70% (from 5847 to 1750) whereas the number of TSA procedures increased 1527% (from 4044 to 65,477). During the same period, per-procedure Medicare reimbursement for hemiarthroplasty decreased 35% (from $1545.71 to $1003.43) after adjustment for inflation to 2021 dollars. Similarly, TSA reimbursement decreased 22% (from $1600.98 to $1248.76) after adjustment for inflation. For revision procedures, the number of single- and both-component revisions billed to Medicare increased 381% (from 344 to 1655) and 1331% (from 220 to 3147), respectively. Adjusted reimbursement per procedure decreased 36% (from $1931.62 to $1244.49) and 37% (from $2293.08 to $1449.43), respectively. CONCLUSION This study shows an increase in the annual volume of primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty procedures from 2000 to 2019. During the same period (2000-2019), true Medicare reimbursement to physicians for TSA decreased when adjusted for inflation. This study provides data that may be useful for surgeons, hospitals, and policy makers to maintain access to quality shoulder arthroplasty care moving forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jack M Haglin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Kade S McQuivey
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - John M Tokish
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Patel A, Oladipo V, Kerzner B, McGlothlin JD, Levine BR. A Retrospective Review of Reimbursement in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Disparity Between Case Complexity and RVU Compensation. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:S807-S813. [PMID: 35283235 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Revision total hip arthroplasties (THA) are time-consuming, expensive, and technically challenging. Today's Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and relative value units (RVU) may in fact disincentivize surgeons to perform revision THAs. Our study reviewed labor and time investments for each component-specific revision THA and analyzed the gap between procedural value billed and final reimbursement. METHODS A retrospective review of 165 primary and revision THAs were validated using operative notes and billing records. We stratified revision THAs by standard CPT coding (with modifiers) as single acetabular component, single femoral component, femoral head plus polyethylene liner (head/liner) exchange, all-components, and spacer placement for infection. Operative time, RVUs, total charges, deductions, and final reimbursement data was collected. Mann-Whitney U tests studied final reimbursement per minute vs per RVU in revision and primary THAs. RESULTS Our cohort consisted of 27 primary THAs, 26 acetabular component revisions, 32 head/liner exchanges, 26 femoral component revisions, 27 all-component revisions, and 27 spacer placements. Compared to primary THAs, every revision subgroup except for head/liner exchanges were found to reimburse less per minute and all revision subgroups reimbursed less per RVU (P < .05). CONCLUSION Physicians face less reimbursement per minute and per RVU for revision THAs. With cuts in reimbursement set forth by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and insurers, revisions may be financially unfavorable. This ultimately will lead to an impending access to care problem in the future. Our study supports the need to re-examine the RVU allocation amongst revision THAs and evaluate changes to the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpan Patel
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Victoria Oladipo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Benjamin Kerzner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Brett R Levine
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Patel A, Oladipo VA, Kerzner B, McGlothlin JD, Levine BR. A Retrospective Review of Relative Value Units in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Dichotomy Between Surgical Complexity and Reimbursement. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:S44-S49. [PMID: 35304033 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Revision total knee arthroplasties (TKA) are costly, time-intensive, and technically demanding procedures. There are concerns regarding the valuation of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and the assigned relative value units (RVU) as a potential disincentive to perform revision TKAs. This study evaluated the labor and time investment for each component-specific revision and assessed the disparities between procedural value billed and reimbursement. METHODS A retrospective review of 154 primary and revision TKA cases were thoroughly vetted using operative notes and internal billing data. Revision TKAs were stratified by single femoral component, single tibial component, polyethylene liner only, all-component, and spacer placement for prosthetic infection. Operative time, RVUs billed, total charges, deductions, and reimbursements were recorded. Mann-Whitney U tests compared final reimbursement per minute and per RVU between revision and primary TKAs. RESULTS There were 28 primary TKAs, 11 femoral component revisions, 25 tibial component revisions, 25 liner exchanges, 37 all-component revisions, and 28 spacer placements. Revisions involving the tibial component, all-components, and placement of spacers were reimbursed less dollars per minute than primary TKAs (P < .05). Controlling for RVUs, liner exchanges and all-component revisions had fewer dollars per RVU than primary TKAs (P < .05). CONCLUSION As revision complexity increases, physicians face less reimbursement per minute and per RVU. With reductions set by CMS and private insurers, revisions may be financially unfavorable and lead to restrictions and access to care problems. Our data supports the need for reevaluating RVU allocation amongst revision procedures with potential updates to the CPT coding system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpan Patel
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Victoria A Oladipo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Benjamin Kerzner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Brett R Levine
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Moore HG, Schneble CA, Kahan JB, Sculco PK, Grauer JN, Rubin LE. What Factors Affect Whether Patients Return to the Same Surgeon to Replace the Contralateral Joint? A Study of Over 200,000 Patients. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:425-430. [PMID: 34871749 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with hip and knee arthritis often undergo bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a staged or simultaneous fashion. However, when staged, the incidence and factors associated with having both procedures performed by the same surgeon or different surgeon are not well studied. METHODS All patients undergoing nonsimultaneous bilateral THA or TKA for osteoarthritis were abstracted from the 2010 to 2020 PearlDiver Mariner administrative database. The National Provider Identifier number was used to determine whether the same surgeon performed both surgeries. Demographics, comorbidities, and 90-day complications after the first joint replacement were assessed as possible independent predictors of utilizing a different surgeon for the contralateral joint. RESULTS Of 87,593 staged bilateral THAs, the same surgeon performed 40,707 (46.5%) arthroplasties. Of 147,938 staged bilateral TKAs, the same surgeon performed 77,072 (52.1%) arthroplasties. Notably, older cohorts of patients had independent, stepwise, and significantly greater odds of changing surgeons for the contralateral THA and TKA. Those patients who were insured by Medicare and Medicaid had significantly lower odds of changing surgeons. For both THA and TKA, surgical and implant-related adverse events (surgical site infection/periprosthetic joint infection, periprosthetic fracture, dislocation, manipulation) carried the greatest odds of undergoing the contralateral replacement with a different surgeon. CONCLUSION Patients covered by Medicaid and sicker patients were significancy less likely to switch surgeons for their contralateral THA or TKA. Additionally, patients experiencing a surgery-related adverse event within 90 days of their first THA or TKA had significantly, increased odds of switching surgeons for their subsequent TJA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joseph B Kahan
- Yale New Haven Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Jonathan N Grauer
- Yale New Haven Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, New Haven, CT
| | - Lee E Rubin
- Yale New Haven Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pollock JR, Richman EH, Estipona BI, Moore ML, Brinkman JC, Hinckley NB, Haglin JM, Chhabra A. Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement Has Decreased for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Procedures: Analysis From 2000 to 2020. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10:23259671211073722. [PMID: 35174250 PMCID: PMC8842183 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211073722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Decreases in Medicare reimbursement have been noted among many medical specialties. An in-depth analysis of the subspecialty of orthopaedic sports medicine is needed to determine changes in Medicare reimbursement in this field. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to elucidate the trends in inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for orthopaedic sports medicine procedures between 2000 and 2020. It was hypothesized that Medicare reimbursement decreased substantially during the study period. Study Design: Economic decision and analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The Physician Fee Schedule Look-up Tool was used to extract Medicare reimbursement information between 2000 and 2020 for 67 procedures related to orthopaedic sports medicine. These values were adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was calculated to measure the annual rate of change, and descriptive analyses were performed using the Student t test. Results: Between 2000 and 2020, inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for the 67 included procedures decreased by an average of 33% (CAGR = –2.2%; R 2 = 0.78). Reimbursement decreased for procedures related to the shoulder and elbow by 34% (CAGR = –2.3%; R 2 = 0.80), for hip-related procedures by 23% (CAGR = –1.4%; R 2 = 0.77), for knee-related procedures by 31% (CAGR = –2.0%; R 2 = 0.81), and for procedures relating to the foot and ankle by 38% (CAGR = –2.5%; R 2 = 0.79). Conclusion: Study findings indicated that inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement decreased substantially between 2000 and 2020 for orthopaedic sports medicine procedures, ranging from a 23% decrease for hip-related procedures to a 38% decrease for foot and ankle–related procedures. The results of this study could be used to provide further context for health care policy decisions and help ensure sustainable financial environments for orthopaedic sports medicine surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - M. Lane Moore
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | | | | | - Jack M. Haglin
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Anikar Chhabra
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Simcox T, Kreinces J, Tarazona D, Zouzias I, Grossman M. Current Relative Value Unit Scale Does Not Appropriately Compensate for Longer Orthopedic Sports Surgeries. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2021; 3:e1913-e1920. [PMID: 34977648 PMCID: PMC8689253 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess whether reimbursement for orthopaedic sports procedures adequately compensates for operative time and surgical complexity. METHODS The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for all orthopedic sports medicine procedures performed greater than 150 times from 2016 to 2018 with regard to operative time, preoperative risk factors, morbidity, and mortality data. Physician work relative value units (wRVU) data were obtained from the 2020 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) fee schedule. The primary outcome was wRVU per minute operative time (wRVU/min). Linear regressions were used to assess wRVU, operative time, and wRVU/min. RESULTS A total of 42 CPT codes, including 84,966 cases, were stratified into the top and bottom 50%, according to mean operative time, complications, mortality, reoperations, and readmissions. Mean wRVU/min was significantly lower for longer procedures (.153 vs .187; P = .02), and comparable with regard to ASA score, complications, mortality, readmissions, and reoperations. Arthroscopy reimbursed more (.187 vs .148 wRVU/min; P = .008), with lower complications (1.5 vs 2.6%; P = .115) and operative time (56.1 vs 82.8 min; P = .001) compared to open. Multivariate linear regression revealed that after adjusting for complication rate, there was a decrease of .054 wRVU/h (P = .026) and $116.90/hour less for every additional hour of operative time. CONCLUSION The current 2020 RVU scale does not fairly compensate sports procedures with longer operative times. When examining the hourly reimbursement rates for the most commonly performed sports procedures, there is a significant trend toward lower reimbursement for longer procedures even after accounting for complication rates. Furthermore, procedures of the knee reimbursed at higher rates relative to the general pool of sports procedures and open procedures are compensated at a lower rate compared to arthroscopic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor Simcox
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Winthrop Hospital, New York University Langone Health, Mineola, New York, U.S.A
| | | | - Daniel Tarazona
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Winthrop Hospital, New York University Langone Health, Mineola, New York, U.S.A
| | - Ioannis Zouzias
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Winthrop Hospital, New York University Langone Health, Mineola, New York, U.S.A
| | - Mark Grossman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Winthrop Hospital, New York University Langone Health, Mineola, New York, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Desai A, Jella TK, Cwalina TB, Wright CH, Wright J. Demographic Analysis of Financial Hardships Faced by Brain Tumor Survivors. World Neurosurg 2021; 158:e111-e121. [PMID: 34687933 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Quantitative analysis of the financial hardship faced by patients with brain tumors is lacking. The present study sought to conduct a longitudinal analysis of responses to the National Health Interview Survey by patients diagnosed with brain tumors and characterize the impact of demographic factors on financial hardship indices. METHODS National Health Interview Survey respondents between 1997 and 2018 who reported previous diagnosis with cancer of the brain and who responded to 4 survey questions that assessed financial stress were included. Sociodemographic exposures included age, ethnicity/race, marriage status, insurance status, and degree of highest educational attainment. RESULTS Educational attainment, marital status, and insurance status were the most significant risk factors for temporary or indefinite delays to necessary medical care. Those with only a high-school diploma had 9.6 times higher odds (adjusted odds ratio, 9.68; 95% confidence interval, 2.96-31.70; P < 0.001) of reporting that, in the past 12 months, one of their family members had to limit their medical care in an effort to save money. Similarly, patients with brain tumors who were not married had 3.94 times greater odds (adjusted odds ratio, 3.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-10.44; P = 0.009) of avoiding necessary medical care because of an inability to afford it. CONCLUSIONS Given this variation in self-reported financial burden, demographics clearly have an impact on a patient's holistic experience after a brain cancer diagnosis. Therefore, by using the comparisons in this study, we hope that medical institutions and neurosurgical societies can more accurately predict which patients are most susceptible to significant financial stress and distribute resources accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ansh Desai
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Tarun K Jella
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Thomas B Cwalina
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Christina Huang Wright
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - James Wright
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
| |
Collapse
|