Orthopaedic Society Leadership Diversity and Academic Participation: Where Do We Stand Now?

The Perception of Residency Experiences Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents in the United States Differs by Race and Gender

INTRODUCTION

Women and racial minorities remain underrepresented in orthopaedic surgery. While there is extensive research into the recruitment of these groups into the field, as well as more recent research regarding their representation in academic medicine and research, there is limited data on their experiences during residency. The purpose of this study is to assess the perceptions of orthopaedic surgery residents regarding their experiences during residency.

METHODS

In mid-2022, a voluntary survey was sent to 2,122 orthopaedic surgery residents addressing mentorship, access to opportunities, and "fit" within their residency programs. Responses were compared by race and gender, with 345 responses received, yielding a response rate of 16.3%.

RESULTS

Compared to male and Caucasian residents, female and underrepresented in medicine (URM) residents reported feeling less satisfied with the training they received, felt less supported, and perceived greater difficulty for women and minorities in being promoted within orthopaedics. Female residents also reported having less mentorship, receiving less recognition for their accomplishments, and being less satisfied with their career choice than male residents.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study highlight the need to improve equity and inclusion within orthopaedic surgery residencies in order to continue advancing diversity in the field.

Sex, Race, and Ethnic Diversity of the Emerging U.S. Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Workforce Is Limited

PURPOSE

To analyze the demographics and trends of orthopaedic surgeons entering the U.S. orthopaedic sports medicine workforce over the past decade.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of allopathic medical students, orthopaedic surgery residents, and orthopaedic sports medicine fellows in the United States (2013-2022) that leveraged data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Medical Association. Disparities in demographic representation between orthopaedic sports medicine fellows and the 2020 U.S. population census were quantified with participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs). A PPR between 0.8 and 1.2 was classified as equivalent representation and a PPR<0.8 was classified as under-representation, relative to the U.S.

POPULATION

RESULTS

The representation of female, Hispanic, Black, and Asian trainees decreased at each stage of the training pipeline to orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship training. In contrast, the representation of White trainees increased at each stage of the training pipeline. Over the study period, there were modest increases in female (9.9% to 12.6%) and Hispanic (1.2% to 1.7%) trainee representation in orthopaedic sports medicine. In contrast, Asian (16.6% to 5.6%) and Black (5.1% to 1.9%) trainee representation decreased. Relative to the US population, female (PPR = 0.22), Black (PPR = 0.30), Hispanic (PPR = 0.19), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (PPR = 0.01), and Native American/Alaskan Native (PPR = 0.00) trainees were under-represented. In contrast, male (PPR = 1.79), Asian (PPR = 1.96), and White (PPR = 1.36) trainees were over-represented in orthopaedic sports medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited diversity in the emerging orthopaedic sports medicine workforce relative to the U.S.

POPULATION

Improvements in the representation of female, Black, and Hispanic trainees in orthopaedic sports medicine has been marginal relative to trends observed at U.S. allopathic medical schools.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Promoting diversity and inclusion in the orthopaedic sports medicine workforce can create more surgical provider options for diverse patient populations in the United States.

Analysis of the diversity pipeline for the orthopedic trauma surgeon workforce in the United States

INTRODUCTION

There is a lack of research on the state of racial, ethnic, and gender diversity in the emerging orthopedic trauma workforce. The purpose of this study was to analyze the training pathway for diverse candidates in orthopedic trauma as it relates to race, ethnicity, and sex.

METHODS

Self-reported demographic data were compared among allopathic medical students, orthopedic surgery residents, orthopedic trauma fellows, and the general population in the United States (2013-2022). Race categories consisted of White, Asian, Black, and Native American/Alaskan Native (NA/AN), and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (NH/PI). Ethnicity categories were Hispanic/Latino or non-Hispanic/Latino. Sex categories were male and female. Representation was calculated at each stage of accredited training. Participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) quantified the equitable representation of demographic groups in the emerging orthopedic trauma workforce relative to the US population. PPR thresholds were used to classify representation as overrepresented (PPR > 1.2), equitable (PPR = 0.8-1.2), and underrepresented (PPR < 0.8).

RESULTS

Relative to medical school and orthopedic surgery residency, fewer female (48.5 % vs 16.7 % vs 18.7 %, P < 0.001), Hispanic (6.1 % vs 4.5 % vs 2.6 %, P < 0.001), Black (6.9 % vs 5.0 % vs 3.1 %, P < 0.001), and Asian (24.0 % vs 14.3 % vs 12.2 %, P < 0.001) trainees existed in orthopedic trauma fellowship training. In contrast, more male (51.5 % vs 83.3 % vs 81.3 %, P < 0.001) and White (62.8 % vs 79.1 % vs 84.0 %, P < 0.001) trainees existed in orthopedic trauma fellowship relative to earlier training stages. There were zero NA/AN or NH/PI trainees in orthopedic trauma (PPR = 0). Relative to the US population, Hispanic (PPR = 0.14), Black (PPR = 0.25), and female (PPR = 0.37) trainees were underrepresented in orthopedic trauma. In contrast, Asian (PPR = 2.04), male (PPR = 1.64), and White (PPR = 1.36) trainees were overrepresented in orthopedic trauma.

CONCLUSION

Women, racial, and ethnic minorities are underrepresented in the emerging orthopedic trauma workforce relative to the US population, and earlier stages of training. Targeted recruitment and guided mentorship of these groups may lead to greater interest, engagement, and diversity in orthopedic trauma.

Diversity of Backgrounds and Academic Accomplishments for Presidents Elected to Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Societies in the United States

BACKGROUND

Academic accomplishments and demographics for presidents of hip and knee arthroplasty societies are poorly understood. This study compares the characteristics of presidents nominated to serve the Hip Society, Knee Society, and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of arthroplasty presidents in the United States (1990 to 2022). Curriculum vitae and academic websites were analyzed for demographic, training, bibliometric, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding data. Comparisons were made between organizations and time periods (1990 to 2005 versus 2006 to 2022).

RESULTS

There were 97 appointments of 78 unique arthroplasty presidents (80%). Most presidents were male (99%) and Caucasian (95%). There was 1 woman (1%) and 5 non-Caucasian presidents (2% Asian, 3% Hispanic). There were no differences in demographics between the 3 arthroplasty organizations and the 2 time periods (P > .05). Presidents were appointed at 55 ± 10 years old, which was on average 24 years after completion of residency training. Most presidents had arthroplasty fellowship training (68%), and the most common were the Hospital for Special Surgery (21%) and Massachusetts General Hospital (8%). The median h-index was 53 resulting from 191 peer-reviewed publications, which was similar between the 3 organizations (P > .05). There were 2 presidents who had NIH funding (2%), and there were no differences in NIH funding between the 3 organizations (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroplasty society presidents have diverse training pedigrees, high levels of scholarly output, and similar demographics. There may be future opportunities to promote diversity and inclusion among the highest levels of leadership in total joint arthroplasty.

Racial/Ethnic and Gender Diversity of Orthopaedic Journal Editorial Boards

BACKGROUND

In the current era of evidence-based medicine, scientific publications play a crucial role in guiding patient care. While the lack of diversity among orthopaedic surgeons has been well documented, little is known about the diversity of orthopaedic journal editorial boards. The purpose of this study was to assess the racial/ethnic and gender diversity of U.S. orthopaedic journal editorial boards.

METHODS

The editorial boards of 13 orthopaedic journals were examined, including 10 subspecialty and 3 general orthopaedic journals. Race/ethnicity and gender were determined for each editorial board member. The representation observed on orthopaedic journal editorial boards was compared with representation at other phases of the orthopaedic pipeline, as well as within the various subspecialty fields of orthopaedics. Logistic regression and t tests were used to evaluate these comparisons.

RESULTS

We identified 876 editorial board members of the 13 journals; 14.0% were Asian, 1.9% were Black, 1.9% were Hispanic, 2.4% were multiracial/other, and 79.7% were White. Racial/ethnic representation was similar across the subspecialty fields of orthopaedics (p > 0.05). The representation of women on orthopaedic editorial boards was 7.9%, with differences in gender diversity observed across subspecialty fields (p < 0.05). Among journals in the subspecialty fields of spine and trauma, female editorial board representation was lower than expected, even after taking into account the representation of women in these subspecialty fields (2.0% versus 9.0% [p = 0.002] and 3.8% versus 10.0% [p = 0.03], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of 13 subspecialty and general orthopaedic journals, the representation of racial/ethnic minorities and women on editorial boards was similar to their representation in academic orthopaedics. However, these values remain low in comparison with the population of patients treated by orthopaedic surgeons. Given the importance of scientific publications in the current era of evidence-based medicine, orthopaedic journals should continue working to diversify the membership of their editorial boards.

Orthopaedic Research Consortiums: A Review of Scope, Sex and Racial Representation

Introduction The creation of research groups and consortiums has become more common in all medical and surgical specialities. The purpose of this investigation was to assess and describe collaborative research groups and consortiums within orthopaedic surgery. In addition, we aimed to define the demographics of the research consortium members with particular attention to female and minority members. Methods  Journals with a musculoskeletal/orthopaedic focus and a few medical journals were selected to identify articles published by research groups and consortiums. Articles published from 2020 to 2022 were manually reviewed. Bibliographic information, author information and level of evidence (LOE) were recorded. For identified consortium members, sex and race were defined in a binary manner. Results A total of 92 research consortiums were identified. A list of members was identified for 77 groups (83.7%), totalling 2,260 researchers. The remaining group members were not able to be identified due to the lack of information in the included publications, research group websites or after communicating with the corresponding author for respective articles. Most researchers were male (n=1,748, 77.3%) and white (n=1,694, 75%). Orthopaedic surgeons comprised 1,613 (71.4%) identified researchers. The most common fellowship training for orthopaedic surgeons was paediatrics (n=370, 16.4%), trauma (n=266, 11.8%) and sports medicine (n=229, 10.1%). The consortiums published 261 articles: women were lead (first) authors in 23% and senior (last) authors in 11.1%. Non-white researchers were lead authors in 24.5% (n=64) and senior authors in 17.2% (n=45). The most common level of evidence was level 3, accounting for 45.6% (n=119) of all publications. Level 1 evidence accounted for 12.6% (n=33) of published articles. Discussion Representation of women in orthopaedic research consortiums exceeds their representation in almost every orthopaedic professional society. There is less publicly available data to compare the involvement of under-represented minorities (URMs) in research consortiums to general practice. Further investigations should analyse possible avenues in which gender and racial disparity could be improved within orthopaedic surgery research.