Orthostatic Intolerance-Type Events Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A randomised trial to assess the impact of midodrine on early mobilisation after elective primary hip replacement surgery

Early mobilisation following elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) facilitates quicker rehabilitation, and reduces complications and hospital length of stay. Reasons for delayed mobilisation are multifactorial, but the most common cause is orthostatic intolerance. Midodrine, an oral alpha-1 agonist, is used off-label for perioperative hypotension. However, there are few randomised trials assessing its use in the perioperative setting to improve patient outcomes. The aim of the study was to determine whether midodrine improves early mobilisation following primary THA, and whether this relates to reduced orthostatic intolerance. This prospective, triple-blinded, multicentre study involved 42 patients randomised to either placebo or 20 mg midodrine, 2 h before physiotherapy, on Day 1 postoperatively. The inclusion criteria were adults undergoing elective unilateral THA under spinal anaesthesia. The primary endpoint was the ability to walk 5 m with physiotherapists. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of orthostatic intolerance and hypotension. A preplanned interim analysis showed no statistical difference in ability to mobilise 5 m (78.26% vs 78.95%, P = 1.0). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of orthostatic intolerance between the groups 17.4% vs 31.6% (P = 0.45). Pre-emptive use of midodrine did not improve patient mobilisation the morning after elective primary THA and had no significant effect on the incidence of orthostatic hypotension.

Orthostatic intolerance during early mobilization following thoracoscopic lung resection: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Early postoperative mobilization is important for enhanced recovery but can be hindered by orthostatic intolerance. However, study on postoperative orthostatic intolerance in thoracoscopic lung resection is limited. Thus, this investigation aims to examine the prevalence and variables contributing to orthostatic intolerance on the first day following thoracoscopic lung cancer resection.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted from February 01 to May 05, 2023, at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Typically, 215 subjects subjected to thoracoscopic lung resection were enrolled in this study. Their general information, disease, and treatment information were collected, and the occurrence of orthostatic intolerance was recorded.

RESULTS

Typically, 64 patients (29.77%) demonstrated orthostatic intolerance during early mobilization, and 43.75% failed to walk. The prevalence of nausea, dizziness, and impaired vision was 60.94%, 92.19%, and 25.00%, respectively, and no patient experienced syncope. The factors shown to be independently linked with orthostatic intolerance were being female (OR = 2.98, 1.53 to 5.82) and high pain level during sitting (OR = 2.69, 1.79 to 4.04). Individuals with orthostatic intolerance had a longer postoperative hospital stay with a mean of 5.42 days against 4.25 days (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Orthostatic intolerance was prevalent following thoracoscopic lung cancer resection and affected patients' capability to mobilize and prolonged postoperative hospitalization. Being female and having high pain levels during sitting were identified as independent factors for orthostatic intolerance. This suggests that more emphasis should be given to risky patients, and for these groups, we may optimize pain management to adjust the risk of emerging orthostatic intolerance, facilitating early mobilization and early postoperative rehabilitation.

Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Volume up Nearly 8-Fold After Regulatory Changes With Expanding Demographics and Unchanging Outcomes: A 10-Year Analysis

BACKGROUND

With the removal of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the inpatient-only (IPO) lists, the orthopedic landscape across the United States has changed rapidly. Thus, this study aimed to: 1) characterize the change in THA volume for outpatient and inpatient surgeries; 2) elucidate demographical differences before and after removal from the IPO list; and 3) analyze 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for primary THAs between January 2010 and December 2021. The primary outcome was the annual volume of outpatient and inpatient THAs. Secondary outcomes involved 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations. The variables between cohorts were analyzed using goodness-of-fit Chi-square tests with summary statistics.

RESULTS

Of the 332,423 THAs between 2010 and 2021, 88% were inpatient THAs (n = 292,974) and 12% were outpatient THAs (n = 39,449). From 2019 to 2021, the volume of inpatient THA decreased by 55% (42,779 to 19,075), while outpatient THA increased by 751% (2,518 to 21,424). Patients who had a THA after 2019 were older (P < .001), more commonly women (P < .001), white (P < .001), and more likely American Society of Anesthesiologists Class III (P < .001). The outpatient cohort had fewer 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations. The length of stay for both cohorts decreased until 2019, before increasing in 2020 and 2021 for inpatient THAs, while home discharge and operative time increased for both.

CONCLUSIONS

The volume of outpatient THA increased almost eightfold after its removal from the IPO lists in 2020. Despite expanding eligibility with older patients and more comorbidities, 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations remain low. These findings support the safe transition to outpatient THA with appropriate patient selection and optimization.