Outcomes at a Mean of 13 Years After Proximal Humeral Fracture During Adolescence

Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures in Adolescents: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures (PHFx) constitute around 2% of all pediatric fractures. Although younger children with displaced fractures often undergo nonoperative treatments, optimal treatment for adolescents is not well defined. The study aimed to assess the outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures in adolescents via a prospective multicenter study.

METHODS

This prospective study assessed adolescents aged 10 to 16 years with displaced PHFx from 2018 to 2022 at 6 level 1 trauma centers. Displacement criteria for inclusion were >50% shaft diameter or angulation >30 degrees on AP/lateral shoulder X-rays. Operative versus nonoperative treatment was decided by the treating physician. Radiographic and clinical data were collected at 6 weeks, 3, and 6 months. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMIS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and QuickDASH questionnaires. Patients were further grouped into a severe displacement cohort, defined as angulation >40° or displacement >75%. Clinical and radiographic data were compared between the 2 treatment cohorts.

RESULTS

Out of 78 enrolled patients, 36 (46%) underwent operative treatment. Patients treated operatively were significantly older (13.5 vs. 12.2 y, P <0.001) and exhibited greater mean angulation on AP shoulder view at presentation (31.1° vs. 23.5°, P <0.05). All PROs improved over time. At 6 weeks, operative patients demonstrated superior PROMIS upper extremity scores based on the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) (46.4 vs. 34.3, P =0.027); however, this distinction disappeared by 3 months. In a subanalysis of 35 patients with severe displacement, 21 (60.1%) underwent surgical intervention. No metrics showed significant differences between treatment modalities, with all PROs achieving population norm values by 3 months. Range of motion showed no difference between operative and nonoperative treatments, irrespective of fracture displacement.

CONCLUSION

We found no differences in PROs and ROM between operative and nonoperative treatments of PHFx. If not contraindicated, nonoperative treatment may reduce healthcare costs and risks associated with surgery and should be considered for displaced adolescent proximal humerus fractures, irrespective of fracture displacement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Open plate fixation in displaced pediatric proximal humerus fractures is safe and leads to very good functional outcomes

INTRODUCTION

In displaced pediatric proximal humerus fractures (PHF), surgical treatment ranges from closed to open procedures. Soft tissue interposition can impede closed reduction, making open techniques necessary. While K-wire fixation and elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) lead to good results, plate fixation could be an alternative in patients with limited growth potential and highly unstable or insufficiently retained fractures. Only few studies with low sample sizes have assessed plate fixation, yet. In this study, the outcome of pediatric PHFs treated with plate fixation was evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present a retrospective case series of 18 patients with open growth plates and unilateral, displaced PHFs, treated with plate fixation. The mean age at trauma was 12.1 years (± 2.4), the mean follow-up was 6.52 years (± 4.37). A mean fracture angulation of 32.3° (± 10.89°) was seen. Postoperative assessments included range of motion, clinical scores [Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score, Pediatric/Adolescent Shoulder Score (PASS), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score], radiological parameters and subjective satisfaction.

RESULTS

All patients showed excellent results in SST (99.4% ± 0.02), SSV (98.3% ± 0.04), ASES-score (100% ± 0) and PASS (0.99 ± 0.01). In the DASH-score, 17 patients had excellent results, one patient showed a good outcome. Fracture healing occurred in all patients without complications. Eight patients complained about bothering scars. Age, gender and fracture morphology did not affect the outcome. Revision surgery after secondary fracture dislocation did not show a worsened outcome compared to primary plate fixation. Physeal growth plate bridging implants did not worsen the outcome. The timing of implant removal within the first 6 months postoperatively did not affect long-term function.

CONCLUSION

Plate fixation is a safe option in pediatric patients with limited growth potential and highly displaced PHFs. Plate fixation led to a good to excellent functional outcome, regardless of fracture morphology and implant positioning. A higher invasiveness and the need for implant removal must be considered.

Does Treatment of Adolescent Fractures Differ between Specialties? A Survey among Pediatric and Trauma Surgeons

From a traumatological point of view, adolescents (12-18 years) represent a special group of patients. This is due to their biomechanical characteristics being between pediatric and adult fracture types. In Germany, they are treated by both pediatric and trauma surgeons. For this survey, seven cases of adolescent fractures were evaluated by both pediatric and trauma surgeons and their preferred treatment options were raised. The questionnaires were completed anonymously. Additionally, information on the specialty and years of experience were asked. In total, 126 valid questionnaires were obtained (from 78 pediatric and 48 trauma surgeons). The respondents' mean clinical experience was high (71.5% stated more than 10 years of surgical experience). For every single exemplary case, a significant difference in therapy decisions between the groups could be found. For the demonstrated seven cases, a tendency toward more operative and more invasive treatments was found with trauma surgeons compared to pediatric surgeons. On the other hand, there was a risk of underestimating the severity of fracture entities similar to adult fractures in pediatric surgeons. Overall, a continuous interdisciplinary exchange between both surgical specialties is necessary to ensure optimal treatment for adolescent fractures and to develop guidelines in the future.

Outcomes of proximal humerus fractures in children: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Paediatric proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) have historically been treated non-operatively. However, the management of severely displaced PHFs in older children has been debated over the years, with contemporary studies advocating for surgery. The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of a cohort of paediatric patients treated for a PHF to guide management of future paediatric PHFs.

METHODS

The records of the Women's and Children's Hospital in South Australia were reviewed to identify paediatric PHFs occurring between 1 January 2010 and 1 June 2020. Participants completed the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and the Paediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument via phone interview. Participants' shoulder range-of-motion was assessed via telehealth using Zoom. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient and clinical variables that were associated with a poorer outcome.

RESULTS

Of 307 patients contacted, 125 participated. Forty-six patients met the definition of a poorer clinical outcome, defined as a QuickDASH score of ≥2. Fractures of greater severity were predictive of a poorer outcome, and patients aged ≥12 years old at the time of injury had higher total QuickDASH scores. The findings did not suggest that these subgroups of patients have superior outcomes if treated surgically.

CONCLUSION

The majority of paediatric PHFs have an acceptable clinical outcome, irrespective of treatment methodology. Multicentre prospective studies are required to establish the indications for surgery for adolescent patients with severely displaced PHFs.