"I Often Feel Conflicted in Denying Surgery": Perspectives of Orthopaedic Surgeons on Body Mass Index Thresholds for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Qualitative Study

How Weight Bias and Stigma Undermine Healthcare Access and Utilization

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight recent evidence of the impact of weight bias and stigma on healthcare access and utilization.

RECENT FINDINGS

Healthcare access for patients with obesity is limited by weight-discriminatory policies such as body mass index cutoffs and weight loss requirements. These policies are based on flawed justifications without demonstrated medical benefits. Healthcare providers continue to hold negative views of patients with obesity, but recent evidence does not suggest that providers' weight-stigmatizing attitudes affect obesity treatment referrals. With the rise of new anti-obesity medications, more research is needed to understand how weight stigma may or may not affect providers' prescribing behavior and patients' access to this form of treatment. Experienced, anticipated, and internalized weight stigma is associated with patients' avoidance of healthcare and reduced utilization. Weight bias and stigma limit healthcare access and utilization. Structural changes are needed to remove weight-discriminatory barriers to care.

Should Body Mass Index Be Considered a Hard Stop for Total Joint Replacement?: An Ethical Dilemma

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is one of the most common surgeries performed in the United States and is a durable and effective option in managing osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Recent research regarding the procedure has focused on preoperative optimization and weight loss in particular. Obesity has been shown in prior studies to increase risks associated with TJA, and, as a result, debate has focused on whether a body mass index (BMI) cutoff is a prudent tool for preoperative optimization. This article discusses the ethical dilemma of instituting a BMI cutoff and reviews current literature regarding the topic.

Consistent Factors Influence Body Mass Index Thresholds for Total Joint Arthroplasty Across Health-Care Systems: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Body mass index (BMI) thresholds are used as eligibility criteria to reduce complication risk in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This approach oversimplifies preoperative risk assessment and inadvertently restricts access to effective surgical treatment for osteoarthritis. A prior survey of orthopaedic surgeons in the United States identified complex underlying factors that influence BMI considerations. To understand whether similar factors exist and influence surgeons in a different health-care system setting, we investigated Canadian surgeons' views and use of BMI criterion thresholds for TJA access.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online qualitative survey was conducted with orthopaedic surgeons performing TJA in the Canadian health-care system. Responses were anonymous and questions were open-ended to allow for candid perspectives. Survey data were coded and a systematic process was followed to identify major themes. Findings were compared with U.S. surgeon perspectives.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine respondents had a mean age of 49.0 ± 11.4 years (range, 33 to 79 years), with a mean surgical experience duration of 15.7 ± 11.4 years (range, 2 to 50 years). Surgeons reported variable use of BMI thresholds in practice. Twelve interconnected factors that influence BMI considerations were identified: (1) variable evidence interpretation, (2) surgical challenge, (3) surgeon beliefs and biases, (4) hospital differences, (5) access to resources, (6) health system bias, (7) patient health status, (8) patient body fat distribution, (9) patient decisional burden (to lose weight or accept risk), (10) evidence gaps and uncertainties, (11) need for innovation, and (12) societal views. Nine themes matched with findings from U.S. surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

Parallel to the United States, complex, interconnected factors influence Canadian orthopaedic surgeons' variable use of BMI restrictions for TJA eligibility. Despite different health-care systems and reimbursement models, similar technical and personal factors were identified. With TJA practice guidelines advising against hard BMI criteria, attention regarding access to resources, surgical training, and innovations to address TJA complexity in patients with large bodies are critically needed. Future advancements in this sphere must balance barrier removal with risk reduction to ensure safe and equitable surgical care.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study may influence surgeon behaviors with regard to hard BMI cutoffs for TJA and encourage critical thought about factors that influence decisions about surgical eligibility for patients with high BMI.

Obesity and body mass index: Past and future considerations in osteoarthritis research

Obesity is an important topic for the osteoarthritis (OA) scientific community. However, the predominant use of body mass index (BMI) to define obesity in OA research is associated with uncertainties and limitations. These include an inability to discern fat and muscle mass, account for sex-differences in fat distribution, or identify adiposity-related health impairments. A focus on BMI in OA research may influence weight bias in clinical practice and impact disparities in access to effective OA treatments. To ensure that our understanding and approaches to improve health outcomes for individuals with or at risk for OA continues to advance in the next decade, future research will need to consider alternative measures beyond BMI for obesity identification and align with evolving obesity science. OA researchers must be aware of issues associated with weight stigma and work to minimize negative generalizations based on BMI.