Reconstruction of Extended Bone Defects Using Massive Allografts Combined with Surgical Angiogenesis: A Case Report

Efficacy of superficial femoral artery as a recipient in free flap reconstruction around the knee: Four case reports and a literature review

Purpose

Reconstructing soft tissue defects around the knee with free flaps presents challenges in recipient vessel selection. Although the superficial femoral artery (SFA) offers exposure ease and anatomical stability, concerns arise regarding its distance from the defect site, difficulty in performing anastomosis and potential peripheral ischaemia. This study aimed to reassess the suitability of SFA as a recipient vessel for knee reconstructions by examining our cases and those from previous reports.

Methods

We reviewed four cases of knee soft tissue defects reconstructed with free flaps using the SFA, detailing surgical techniques and outcomes. Additionally, a comprehensive literature search was conducted for articles on using SFA as a recipient vessel for knee free flaps, using PubMed, Web of Science and EBSCOhost databases.

Results

In all four cases, latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps were used, with end-to-side anastomosis performed using a large slit-shaped arteriotomy. All flaps demonstrated successful survival without complications. Our analysis included 85 cases, comprising four of our cases and 81 cases from 16 articles. Sarcoma resection was the most common aetiology, followed by total knee prosthesis-related defects, trauma and osteomyelitis. Complete flap necrosis occurred in 5% of cases. The LD flap was the predominant choice, alongside other long-pedicle flaps. The SFA provided coverage for all knee areas except the distal lateral patellar region.

Conclusion

Despite the limited evidence, the SFA appears to be a reliable recipient vessel for knee soft tissue reconstruction. Comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of the SFA and flaps used enhances the safety and efficacy of soft tissue defect reconstruction around the knee.

Skeletal regeneration for segmental bone loss: Vascularised grafts, analogues and surrogates

Massive segmental bone defects (SBD) are mostly treated by removing the fibula and transplanting it complete with blood supply. While revolutionary 50 years ago, this remains the standard treatment. This review considers different strategies to repair SBD and emerging potential replacements for this highly invasive procedure. Prior to the technical breakthrough of microsurgery, researchers in the 1960s and 1970s had begun to make considerable progress in developing non autologous routes to repairing SBD. While the breaktthrough of vascularised bone transplantation solved the immediate problem of a lack of reliable repair strategies, much of their prior work is still relevant today. We challenge the assumption that mimicry is necessary or likely to be successful and instead point to the utility of quite crude (from a materials technology perspective), approaches. Together there are quite compelling indications that the body can regenerate entire bone segments with few or no exogenous factors. This is important, as there is a limit to how expensive a bone repair can be and still be widely available to all patients since cost restraints within healthcare systems are not likely to diminish in the near future. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This review is significant because it is a multidisciplinary view of several surgeons and scientists as to what is driving improvement in segmental bone defect repair, why many approaches to date have not succeeded and why some quite basic approaches can be as effective as they are. While there are many reviews of the literature of grafting and bone repair the relative lack of substantial improvement and slow rate of progress in clinical translation is often overlooked and we seek to challenge the reader to consider the issue more broadly.

Use of a novel Screen-Enrich-Combine(-biomaterials) Circulating System to fill a 3D-printed open Ti6Al4V frame with mesenchymal stem cells/β-tricalcium phosphate to repair complex anatomical bone defects in load-bearing areas

Background

Repairing complex anatomical load-bearing bone defects is difficult because it requires the restoration of the load-bearing function, reconstructing the anatomical shape, and repair by regenerated bone. We previously developed a Screen–Enrich–Combine(-biomaterials) Circulating System (SECCS) for rapid intraoperative enrichment of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to enhance the osteogenic ability of porous bone substitutes. In this study, we prepared a 3D-printed Ti6A14V macroporous frame matching the defect shape to provide early load-bearing support and evaluated the efficacy of filling the frame with SECCS-processed MSCs/beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) for long-term bone growth.

Methods

Fifteen 2-year-old goats were involved in this study, and the lateral part of their distal femur was removed by an electric saw and was fitted by a matching electron beam melting technology-prepared (EBM) Ti6Al4V frame. Three types of frames, filled with nothing, pure porous β-TCP, or SECCS-processed MSCs/β-TCP, were fixed onto the defect site. Repair efficacy was evaluated by X-ray radiography, computed tomography (CT), histology, and histomorphometry.

Results

In the basic regular hexagon printing unit, the combined side width (w) and the inscribed circle diameter (d) determines the printing frame’s mechanical strength. The compressive load was significantly higher for w=1.9 mm, d=4.4 mm than for w=1.7 mm, d=4.0 mm or w=2.0 mm, d=5.0 mm (P<0.05). The EBM-prepared Ti6Al4V defect-matched frame was well maintained 9 months after implantation. The MSCs successfully adhered to the wall of the porous β-TCP in the SECCS-processed group and had spread fully in the test samples. Each goat in the MSCs/β-TCP–the filled group, had approximately 31,321.7±22,554.7 of MSCs and a larger area of new bone growth inside the frame than the control and blank areas groups.

Conclusions

Filling the 3D-printed Ti6Al4V large-aperture frame with osteogenic materials achieved biological reconstruction over a larger area of regenerated bone to repair complex anatomical weight-bearing bone defects under the condition of early frame-supported load bearing. MSCs/β-TCP prepared by SECCS can be used as a filling material for this type of bone defect to obtain more efficacious bone repair.