Failure of a Polyaryletheretherketone-Cobalt-Chromium Composite Femoral Stem Due to Coating Separation and Subsidence: A Case Report

Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Evaluation of the Bone Remodeling Effects of a Low-Modulus Composite Hip Stem After 2 Decades of Follow-Up

Background: The Epoch FullCoat Hip Stem (Zimmer) was an isoelastic composite femoral stem developed to address stem stiffness concerns. Purpose: We sought to evaluate the long-term bone mineral density (BMD) of a cohort of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the Epoch isoelastic stem and having more than 2-decade follow-up. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who were study subjects at our institution in a multicenter prospective trial for the Food and Drug Administration of the Epoch implant in the mid-1990s. Through this, we identified 16 patients who had dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans, with which we could determine BMD preoperatively and at 3 points postoperatively. Of these, 5 agreed to participate in the study (the others were deceased, unable or declined to participate, or were lost to follow-up) with mean follow-up of 22 years. These participants underwent clinical and radiographic evaluation consisting of a Harris hip score, anteroposterior (AP) pelvis and AP and lateral hip X-rays, and DEXA evaluation of both hips. BMD in the 7 Gruen zones at last follow-up was compared with immediate postoperative and 2-year follow-up. Results: At last follow-up, all stems were well-fixed with signs of extensive osteointegration. In proximal Gruen zones 1 and 7, patients underwent a decrease in BMD with more modest losses in Gruen zone 1. All patients demonstrated an increase in BMD in zones 2 through 6 at latest follow-up, except for 1 patient in Gruen zone 6. BMD changes were not limited to the first 2 years of follow-up. Conclusion: This small follow-up cohort study found excellent long-term clinical results, no plain radiographic signs of notable stress shielding, and general maintenance of BMD at a follow-up of over 20 years for this isoelastic stem. Long-term bone remodeling after implantation of the isoelastic stem resulted in increased BMD in Gruen zones 2 through 6, suggesting that composite implant designs may still have a role in THA.

Strategies to improve bioactive and antibacterial properties of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for use as orthopedic implants

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has gradually become the mainstream material for preparing orthopedic implants due to its similar elastic modulus to human bone, high strength, excellent wear resistance, radiolucency, and biocompatibility. Since the 1990s, PEEK has increasingly been used in orthopedics. Yet, the widespread application of PEEK is limited by its bio-inertness, hydrophobicity, and susceptibility to microbial infections. Further enhancing the osteogenic properties of PEEK-based implants remains a difficult task. This article reviews some modification methods of PEEK in the last five years, including surface modification of PEEK or incorporating materials into the PEEK matrix. For surface modification, PEEK can be modified by chemical treatment, physical treatment, or surface coating with bioactive substances. For PEEK composite material, adding bioactive filler into PEEK through the melting blending method or 3D printing technology can increase the biological activity of PEEK. In addition, some modification methods such as sulfonation treatment of PEEK or grafting antibacterial substances on PEEK can enhance the antibacterial performance of PEEK. These strategies aim to improve the bioactive and antibacterial properties of the modified PEEK. The researchers believe that these modifications could provide valuable guidance on the future design of PEEK orthopedic implants.

Extra-articular migration of PEEK interference screw after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a report of two cases

Background

The interference screw is the most popular device that fixes the graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, reducing the incidence of windshield effect and bungee effect. For the screw, either metallic, “bioresorbable,” or polyetheretherketone (PEEK) material is available. PEEK is popular and extensively used due to its stability, biocompatibility, radiolucency, and elastic modulus. Rare relevant complications were reported, but here, we report two cases of extra-articular migrations of PEEK interference screw from the tibial tunnel after anterior cruciate reconstruction.

Case report

An 18-year-old boy and a 56-year-old woman underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a PEEK interference screw to fix the graft in the tibial tunnel. They suffered from screw extrusion from the tibial tunnel after 40 days and six months, respectively, with an incision rupture or palpable subcutaneous mass. They underwent a second operation and recovered well.

Conclusions

The exact incidence of extra-articular migrations of PEEK interference screws is unknown, but it seems to be quite low; despite this and its uncertain cause, the negative effects caused by the PEEK material need to be considered.