Diagnostic accuracy of a new clinical test (the Thessaly test) for early detection of meniscal tears

Meniscus Injuries in Soccer

Soccer is considered the most popular sport in the world. The game involves frequent agile maneuvers, such as rapid accelerations/decelerations and pivoting, and carries an inherent risk of high-speed collisions, which can lead to lower extremity injury. Knee and meniscus injuries can cause significant pain and disability, precluding participation in the sport. Understanding the diagnosis and management of meniscal injuries in soccer players is essential to the care of these athletes. This paper reviews meniscal anatomy, biomechanics, and mechanisms of injury; discusses the work-up, diagnosis, and management of meniscus injuries; and reports on rehabilitation, return to sport, and outcomes after meniscal injuries in soccer players.

Is there a relationship between knee crepitus with quadriceps muscle thickness and strength in individuals with patellofemoral pain? A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the relationship between knee crepitus, quadriceps muscle thickness and isometric strength in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals with PFP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants with PFP underwent assessments for presence, frequency and severity of knee crepitus. Real-time ultrasound images of the quadriceps muscles (rectus femoris, vastus medialis and lateralis) at rest and during contraction were obtained, muscle thickness was measured in both conditions. Maximal voluntary isometric contraction tests were performed to measure knee extensor strength. The relationship between knee crepitus and quadriceps muscle thickness and knee extensor strength was explored using logistic and linear regressions.

RESULTS

Sixty individuals with PFP were included (age: 24; 60% women; 38% with crepitus). Knee crepitus severity was related to rectus femoris and vastus medialis thickness during rest (R2 = 0.19 and 0.09, respectively) and contraction (R2 = 0.16 and 0.07, respectively) and with vastus lateralis during contraction (R2 = 0.08). Isometric knee extensor strength was not related to knee crepitus presence, frequency, or severity.

CONCLUSION

Higher severity of knee crepitus is related to lower quadriceps muscle thickness in individuals with PFP. There is no relationship between the presence and frequency of knee crepitus with quadriceps muscle thickness or knee extensor strength.

Using a combination of three clinical tests for detecting meniscal tears increases the accuracy of the clinical examination

BACKGROUND

Recent studies indicate that using combination of two or more clinical tests for detecting meniscal tear gets a higher sensitivity and specificity than any clinical test performed individually.

METHODS

The study involved 84 participants who were divided into two groups: the "OP group" consisting of participants diagnosed with a meniscal tear and who consequently underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy, and the "CN group" comprising of healthy participants with no history of knee injury. Two independent observers (orthopedic surgeons) recorded the results of six clinical tests: Thessaly Test, joint line tenderness, McMurray Test, Ege Test, Steinmann I Test, and atrophy of the thigh muscles. The tests were grouped into two combinations of three tests each. The first combination included Thessaly Test, joint line tenderness and McMurray Test, while the second combination comprised of remaining three tests. Cochran's Q Test was used to calculate interobserver variability for both combinations of clinical tests and for each test performed individually.

RESULTS

First combination of three clinical tests when considering the combination positive if two tests are positive had high sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 90.9%, and an overall accuracy of 92.9%. Furthermore, when compared to clinical tests performed individually, the combination demonstrated superior results.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that using a combination of three clinical tests for detection of meniscal tear (Thessaly Test, joint line tenderness, McMurray Test), when considering the combination positive if two tests are positive, has greater accuracy than six clinical tests performed individually. There were no statistically significant differences between observers.

Comprehensive Clinical Examination of ACL Injuries

A comprehensive clinical examination of the potentially anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee should proceed as follows: inspection; palpation; range of motion; varus and valgus stress; neurovascular status; and finally provocative maneuvers. The Lachman, anterior drawer, Lever, and pivot shift tests are all greater than 90% specific for ACL pathology. Due to the relatively high coincidence of ACL injuries and those to the posterior cruciate ligament, posterolateral corner , posteromedial corner , and menisci, it is critical that the examiner perform provocative maneuvers to evaluate the integrity of these structures as well.

The locked knee

The acute locked knee is an orthopaedic emergency requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment. It can be classified as acute or chronic. The term 'locked knee' refers to a knee that demonstrates fixed flexion or which has a 'block' to complete extension. Some degree of active or passive extension may be achievable, but not full extension. The most frequent causes of a locked knee are a meniscal tear, rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament or loose bodies. Magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard in diagnostic imaging. Knee arthroscopy is considered the gold standard in management. This article gives an overview of the presentation, assessment and management of the locked knee for core surgical, acute care common stem and emergency medicine trainees.

Non-operative Management of Acute Knee Injuries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute knee injuries are commonly encountered in both the clinical and sideline setting and may be treated operatively or non-operatively. This article describes an evidence-based approach to non-operative acute knee injury. This includes history, physical exam, imaging, and initial management. In addition, the non-operative management of three such injuries-ligament injury, meniscus injury, and patellar dislocation injury-will be discussed via a case-based practical approach.

RECENT FINDINGS

Aside from grade III ACL tears, most acute knee ligament injuries, especially in the absence of other concurrent injuries, can be treated non-operatively. There is new evidence that acute traumatic meniscus tears in those younger than 40 can be successfully treated non-operatively and can do equally, as well as those that undergo surgery, at 1 year out from injury. Based on the current literature, a short period of knee bracing in extension with progression to weightbearing to tolerance is recommended after initial patellar dislocation. Many of the most common acute knee injuries, including MCL tears, meniscus tears, and patellar dislocations, can be managed non-operatively. A detailed systemic approach to initial evaluation, including pertinent history, physical exam, and appropriate imaging, is essential and complementary to the subsequent non-operative treatment algorithm.

Meniscal extrusion in knees with and without osteoarticular pathology: A systematic review of normative values and cut-offs for diagnostic criteria

BACKGROUND

Meniscus extrusion is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of meniscal injury, but the literature on this topic has not yet been systematized. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare diagnostic methods and summarize the data of medial and lateral meniscal extrusion in knees with and without osteoarticular pathology.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. Searches were conducted on PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases to identify studies that measured meniscal extrusion using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound (US). Meniscal extrusion data was summarized as weighted mean for medial and lateral meniscus, and stratified according to the method of measurement (MRI or US) and presence of knee osteoarticular pathology.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies were included in this review. Weighted mean values of meniscal extrusion were always higher for the medial than the lateral meniscus, regardless of the method of measurement. The medial meniscus extrusion was always higher in knees with osteoarticular pathology than those without. For the lateral meniscus extrusion, the mean values were higher in those knees without osteoarticular pathology. When classifying pathological meniscal extrusion with pre-defined cut-off values, the higher the cut-off used, the lower the percentage of knees classified as pathological meniscal extrusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The medial meniscus presents on mean higher extrusion and extrusion is higher in knees with osteoarticular pathology. Based on summary data, the most suitable cut-offs for pathological meniscal extrusion for both MRI and US seem to fall within >2 and >3 mm.

Concentric Isokinetic Strengthening Program's Impact on Knee Biomechanical Parameters, Physical Performance and Quality of Life in Overweight/Obese Women with Chronic Meniscal Lesions

Meniscal injuries are one of the most common intra-articular knee injuries. Different treatments are presented depending on the symptoms and duration of meniscus tears, such as arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, physiotherapy, or even pharmacological treatment. The purpose was to investigate the effect of a concentric isokinetic knee muscle strengthening program on strength, joint range of motion, physical performance, quality of life and pain tolerance in overweight/obese women with chronic meniscal lesions. Twenty-four overweight/obese women were randomized into two groups. A control group (CG) performed a usual rehabilitation program plus isokinetic muscle strengthening (IMS) in the continuous passive motion mode and measured with an isokinetic dynamometer. An experimental group (EG) performed the same program in combination with IMS in the isokinetic active mode. The peak torque of the knee extensors (PTE) and flexors (PTF), sit-to-stand test, stair climb test, joint amplitude, heel-to-buttock distance, Thessaly test, KOOS questionnaire of pain and quality of life were measured pre- and post-protocol. After the intervention, the sit-stand number for both groups was significantly higher (p < 0.001) and the time to climb stairs was significantly reduced for the EG (p < 0.001). A significant improvement in joint range of motion, life quality (p < 0.001), relief in knee pain (p < 0.001) and in the post-program evaluation at the EG (p < 0.05) was noted. There was no significant difference in PTE and PTF between groups at 60°/s and 180°/s. The IMS in the active mode could be an effective therapeutic modality in managing middle-aged patients suffering from a degenerative meniscal tear.

Medial Meniscal Posterior Horn Suturing Influences Tibial Internal-External Rotation in ACL-Reconstructed Knees

Background

The role of meniscal lesions and repair in combination with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction has not been extensively investigated in vivo and under weightbearing conditions.

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to (1) compare the in vivo knee kinematics between patients with ACL tear and those with combined ACL and medial meniscal tears and (2) investigate kinematic differences between isolated ACL reconstruction and ACL reconstruction plus medial meniscal repair (MR). It was hypothesized that concomitant posterior horn medial meniscal tear and ACL deficiency would affect knee internal-external rotation and anterior-posterior translation but MR would restore these parameters.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

Nineteen patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were included: 10 had intact menisci (IM group) and 9 had a medial meniscal injury that was repaired during ACL reconstruction using an all-inside technique (MR group). Preoperatively and 18 months postoperatively, active knee kinematics under weightbearing conditions was evaluated during a single-leg squat using a dynamic biplane x-ray imaging system. The general linear model was used to investigate the differences between group (IM vs MR) and time (preoperative vs follow-up) and their interactions.

Results

Tibial internal rotation was higher in the MR group than the IM group both before and after surgery (P = .007). Knee valgus rotation was higher in the MR group preoperatively (P < .001), while no differences were found postoperatively because of an increase of valgus rotation in the IM group, which was significant in the descendant phase (P < .001). Preoperatively, the IM group showed a more medial tibial translation compared with the MR group in the descendant phase (P = .006).

Conclusion

When performing a single-leg squat, patients with ACL-deficient knees and a medial meniscal tear demonstrated a more valgus rotation, tibial internal rotation, and lateral tibial translation versus those with intact menisci. After ACL reconstruction and MR, these patients demonstrated significantly higher tibial internal rotation when compared with patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction.

Clinical Relevance

Surgeons should be aware that MR does not fully restore knee kinematics in vivo and under weightbearing conditions in the context of ACL reconstruction.

Overweight and obesity in young adults with patellofemoral pain: Impact on functional capacity and strength

PURPOSE

This study aimed to (a) investigate the proportion of overweight/obesity in a cohort of young adults with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and (b) explore the association of body mass index (BMI), body fat, and lean mass with functional capacity and hip and knee strength in people with PFP.

METHODS

We included a mixed-sex sample of young adults (18-35 years old) with PFP (n = 100). Measurements for BMI, percentage of body fat, and lean mass (assessed by bioelectrical impedance) were obtained. Functional capacity was assessed by the Anterior Knee Pain Scale, plank test, and single-leg hop test. Strength of the knee extensors, knee flexors, and hip abductors was evaluated isometrically using an isokinetic dynamometer. The proportion of overweight/obesity was calculated based on BMI. The association between BMI, body fat, and lean mass and functional capacity and strength was investigated using partial correlations, followed by hierarchical regression analysis, adjusted for covariates (sex, bilateral pain, and current pain level).

RESULTS

A total of 38% of our cohort had their BMI categorized as overweight/obese. Higher BMI was associated with poor functional capacity (ΔR² = 0.06-0.12, p ≤ 0.001) and with knee flexion strength only (ΔR² = 0.04, p = 0.030). Higher body fat was associated with poor functional capacity (ΔR² = 0.05-0.15, p ≤ 0.015) and reduced strength (ΔR² = 0.15-0.23, p < 0.001). Lower lean mass was associated with poor functional capacity (ΔR² = 0.04-0.13, p ≤ 0.032) and reduced strength (ΔR² = 0.29- 0.31, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

BMI, body fat, and lean mass should be considered in the assessment and management of young people with PFP because it may be detrimental to function and strength.

Two Novel Clinical Tests for the Diagnosis of Hip Labral Tears

BACKGROUND

There are few well-studied clinical tests for the diagnosis of hip labral tears. As the differential diagnosis for hip pain is broad, accurate clinical examination is important in guiding advanced imaging and identifying patients who may benefit from surgical management.

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of 2 novel clinical tests for the diagnosis of hip labral tears.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Clinical examination findings including the Arlington, twist, and flexion-adduction-internal rotation (FADIR)/impingement tests as performed by a fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon specializing in hip arthroscopy were obtained from retrospective chart review. The Arlington test ranges the hip from flexion-abduction-external rotation to FADIR while applying subtle internal rotation and external rotation motion. The twist test involves internal rotation and external rotation of the hip while weightbearing. Diagnostic accuracy statistics for each of the tests were calculated using magnetic resonance arthrography as the reference standard.

RESULTS

A total of 283 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 40.7 years (range, 13-77 years) and 66.4% were women. The Arlington test was found to have a sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96), specificity of 0.33 (95% CI, 0.16-0.56), positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.26 (95% CI, 0.13-0.46). The twist test was found to have a sensitivity of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62-0.73), specificity of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.49-0.88), PPV of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99), and NPV of 0.13 (95% CI, 0.08-0.21). The FADIR/impingement test was found to have a sensitivity of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.37-0.49), specificity of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.34-0.75), PPV of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.97), and NPV of 0.06 (95% CI, 0.03-0.11). The Arlington test was significantly more sensitive than both the twist and FADIR/impingement tests (P < .05), while the twist test was significantly more specific than the Arlington test (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The Arlington test is more sensitive than the traditional FADIR/impingement test, while the twist test is more specific than the FADIR/impingement test in diagnosing hip labral tears in the hands of an experienced orthopaedic surgeon.

Are Physical Function and Fear of Movement Risk Factors for Patellofemoral Pain? A 2-Year Prospective Study

CONTEXT

To determine (1) whether physical function and fear of movement are prospectively associated with the risk of females developing patellofemoral pain (PFP) and (2) whether they change following development of PFP.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

A total of 114 asymptomatic females (18-22 y old) completed assessment of physical function (forward step-down test and single-leg hop for distance) and fear of movement using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Presence of symptoms of PFP was monitored bimonthly.

RESULTS

Ninety participants (retention rate = 79%) completed the 2-year follow-up assessment, with 27 (24% of the cohort) developing PFP. Physical function, including forward step-down test (P = .659) and single-leg hop for distance (P = .825), and fear of movement (P = .479) were not associated with the risk of developing PFP. Females who developed PFP presented with reduced forward step-down repetitions (mean difference = 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 5.3) and single-leg hop for distance (10.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.7 to 17.7 cm) at 2-year follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference between those who did and did not develop PFP for fear of movement (-3.4; 95% confidence interval, -7.0 to 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Physical function and fear of movement were not associated with the risk of developing PFP in young females. However, the change over time in the step-down and single-leg hop for distance tests may suggest that, even in the early stages of PFP, young females present impaired physical function compared with females who did not develop symptoms. Fear of movement may develop due to persistent PFP, and does not appear to be a risk factor or key feature in females with PFP of short symptoms duration.

Body fat and skeletal muscle mass, but not body mass index, are associated with pressure hyperalgesia in young adults with patellofemoral pain

BACKGROUND

Young adults with patellofemoral pain (PFP) have a high prevalence of being overweight or obese, which is associated with impaired lower limb function and muscle weakness. However, the impact of being overweight or obese on pain sensitivity has not been explored.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the association between body fat, skeletal muscle mass, and body mass index (BMI) with pressure hyperalgesia and self-reported pain in young adults with PFP.

METHODS

114 adults with PFP (24 ± 5 years old, 62% women) were recruited. Demographics and self-reported pain (current and worst knee pain intensity in the previous month - 0-100 mm visual analog scale) were recorded. Body fat and skeletal muscle mass were measured using bioelectrical impedance. Pressure hyperalgesia was measured using a handheld algometer (pressure pain threshold) at three sites: center of patella of the painful knee, ipsilateral tibialis anterior, and contralateral upper limb. The association between body fat, skeletal muscle mass, and BMI with pressure hyperalgesia and self-reported pain were investigated using partial correlations and hierarchical regression models (adjusted for sex, bilateral pain, and symptoms duration).

RESULTS

Higher body fat and lower skeletal muscle mass were associated with local, spread, and widespread pressure hyperalgesia (ΔR²=0.09 to 0.17, p ≤ 0.001; ΔR²=0.14 to 0.26, p<0.001, respectively), and higher current self-reported pain (ΔR²=0.10, p<0.001; ΔR²=0.06, p = 0.007, respectively). Higher BMI was associated with higher current self-reported pain (ΔR²=0.10, p = 0.001), but not with any measures of pressure hyperalgesia (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Higher body fat and lower skeletal muscle mass help to explain local, spread, and widespread pressure hyperalgesia, and self-reported pain in people with PFP. BMI only helps to explain self-reported pain. These factors should be considered when assessing people with PFP and developing their management plan, but caution should be taken as the strength of association was generally low.

Diagnostics of Articular Cartilage Damage Based on Generated Acoustic Signals Using ANN-Part II: Patellofemoral Joint

Cartilage loss due to osteoarthritis (OA) in the patellofemoral joint provokes pain, stiffness, and restriction of joint motion, which strongly reduces quality of life. Early diagnosis is essential for prolonging painless joint function. Vibroarthrography (VAG) has been proposed in the literature as a safe, noninvasive, and reproducible tool for cartilage evaluation. Until now, however, there have been no strict protocols for VAG acquisition especially in regard to differences between the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joints. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the proposed examination and acquisition protocol for the patellofemoral joint, as well as to determine the optimal examination protocol to obtain the best diagnostic results. Thirty-four patients scheduled for knee surgery due to cartilage lesions were enrolled in the study and compared with 33 healthy individuals in the control group. VAG acquisition was performed prior to surgery, and cartilage status was evaluated during the surgery as a reference point. Both closed (CKC) and open (OKC) kinetic chains were assessed during VAG. The selection of the optimal signal measures was performed using a neighborhood component analysis (NCA) algorithm. The classification was performed using multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basis function (RBF) neural networks. The classification using artificial neural networks was performed for three variants: I. open kinetic chain, II. closed kinetic chain, and III. open and closed kinetic chain. The highest diagnostic accuracy was obtained for variants I and II for the RBF 9-35-2 and MLP 10-16-2 networks, respectively, achieving a classification accuracy of 98.53, a sensitivity of 0.958, and a specificity of 1. For variant III, a diagnostic accuracy of 97.79 was obtained with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.978 for MLP 8-3-2. This indicates a possible simplification of the examination protocol to single kinetic chain analyses.

Diagnostics of Articular Cartilage Damage Based on Generated Acoustic Signals Using ANN-Part I: Femoral-Tibial Joint

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, progressive disease which has over 300 million cases each year. Some of the main symptoms of OA are pain, restriction of joint motion and stiffness of the joint. Early diagnosis and treatment can prolong painless joint function. Vibroarthrography (VAG) is a cheap, reproducible, non-invasive and easy-to-use tool which can be implemented in the diagnostic route. The aim of this study was to establish diagnostic accuracy and to identify the most accurate signal processing method for the detection of OA in knee joints. In this study, we have enrolled a total of 67 patients, 34 in a study group and 33 in a control group. All patients in the study group were referred for surgical treatment due to intraarticular lesions, and the control group consisted of healthy individuals without knee symptoms. Cartilage status was assessed during surgery according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) and vibroarthrography was performed one day prior to surgery in the study group. Vibroarthrography was performed in an open and closed kinematic chain for the involved knees in the study and control group. Signals were acquired by two sensors placed on the medial and lateral joint line. Using the neighbourhood component analysis (NCA) algorithm, the selection of optimal signal measures was performed. Classification using artificial neural networks was performed for three variants: I—open kinetic chain, II—closed kinetic chain, and III—open and closed kinetic chain. Vibroarthrography showed high diagnostic accuracy in determining healthy cartilage from cartilage lesions, and the number of repetitions during examination can be reduced only to closed kinematic chain.

Sonographic evaluation of the degree of medial meniscal extrusion during Thessaly test in healthy knees

OBJECTIVE

The Thessaly test is a commonly used orthopedic test for meniscus tear evaluation. The study's objective is to evaluate the degree of medial meniscal extrusion during different loading phases of the Thessaly test.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 60 healthy knees (35 participants) was examined and the data sets were collected from October 8, 2018 through February 8, 2019. Sonographic measurement of the degree of physiologic extrusion of the medial meniscus deep to the medial collateral ligament was taken by two examiners at six different loading phases: supine, standing, 5° knee-flexion with internal (IR)/external (ER) rotation and 20° knee-flexion with IR/ER. The difference in meniscal extrusion by knee position was compared with ANOVA. Interexaminer reproducibility assessment was analyzed using limits of agreement.

RESULTS

The mean meniscal extrusion for each position was-supine: 2.3 ± 0.5 mm, standing: 2.8 ± 0.8 mm, 5° IR: 2.3 ± 0.9 mm, 5° ER: 2.4 ± 0.7 mm, 20° IR: 1.9 ± 0.8 mm, and 20° ER: 2.3 ± 0.7 mm. Significant increase in extrusion was observed from supine to standing (p < 0.05) and from 20° IR to 20° ER (p = 0.015). Significant decreased measurement was observed from standing to 5° IR (p < 0.05), 5° ER (p < 0.05), 20° IR (p < 0.05) and 20° ER (p < 0.05). There is no significant change between 5° IR and 5° ER (p = 1.0). Agreement parameters revealed that the differences between examiner measurements were minimal; 75% of both examiners' meniscal extrusion measurements were within 1.0 mm with 97% of measurements falling within 2.0 mm.

CONCLUSION

Our study's novel findings showed various degrees of physiological extrusion of the medial meniscus in asymptomatic knees during the loading phases involved in the Thessaly test. Physiological MME does exist and should not be defaulted to pathologic meniscus as previously described. Agreement parameters suggest that measurement of meniscal extrusion during the Thessaly test is reproducible between different examiners.

A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics

PURPOSE

Until now, the use of telemedical applications in orthopedics was limited to sparsely populated countries. However, due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, interest in orthopedics in these procedures has increased significantly. The aim of this systematic review was to find out to what extent there is scientific evidence for the use of telemedicine in the orthopedic field.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out in various databases on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on telemedical applications in orthopedics.

RESULTS

Altogether, 14 articles were identified that reported about a total of eight RCTs of telemedical applications in orthopedics. Two RCTs were about a patient-to-doctor video consultation and six RCTs were about telerehabilitation after knee and hip arthroplasty (4 × knee arthroplasty, one hip and knee arthroplasty, one hip arthroplasty). For the majority of outcome parameters evaluated, there were no significant differences between the study groups. The cost effectiveness of videoconsultations depended on the workload (number of patient consultations) as well as the effectiveness of telerehabilitation on the distance of the patient's home to the health care center (30 km round-trip).

CONCLUSION

There is sufficient evidence to recommend the use of telemedical methods in orthopedics. However, more research is necessary to further expand the possibilities of telemedical methods with regard to physical examination.

Comparison of Thessaly Test with Joint Line Tenderness and McMurray Test in the Diagnosis of Meniscal Tears

Introduction:

Meniscus injuries are the most frequent problem of the knee. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the Thessaly test and comparing it with those of McMurray and Joint-line tenderness tests for diagnosing meniscal tears.

Materials and methods: This study was designed as a prospective observational one done in an outpatient clinic at a university hospital. 106 patients with knee pain and 82 age-matched control were included during study period (from February 2014 to January 2015). Each patient was clinically examined with McMurray, Thessaly, and joint line tenderness tests. Then, the findings were matched by MRI and arthroscopic findings. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated as main outcomes.

Results:

Based on MRI, Thessaly was the most sensitive for medial meniscus tears (56.2%), while McMurray and joint-line tenderness were more specific (89.1% and 88.0%, respectively). For lateral meniscus tears, McMurray was the most sensitive (56.2%) and all were specific (McMurray 89.6%, Thessaly 88.4%, joint-line tenderness 90.2%). With arthroscopy, Thessaly was the most sensitive for medial meniscus (76.6%), while McMurray and joint-line tenderness were more specific (81.0%, and 81.0%). Agreement with arthroscopy was the highest with McMurray (for medial meniscus kappa=0.40, p<0.001, and for lateral meniscus kappa=0.38, p=0.002).

Conclusion:

The Thessaly can be used to screen for medial meniscus tears. McMurray and joint-line tenderness should be used for suspected medial meniscus tears. For lateral meniscus, McMurray is appropriate for screening and all the tests are useful in clinic.

Discoid meniscus: current concepts

Discoid meniscus is the most frequent congenital malformation of the menisci, and primarily affects the lateral meniscus; it is highly prevalent in the Asian population.The anatomic, vascular, and ultrastructural features of the discoid meniscus make it susceptible to complex tears.Discoid meniscus anomalies are described according to their shape; however, there is consensus that peripheral stability of the meniscus should also be defined.Initial workup includes plain X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging, while arthroscopic evaluation confirms shape and stability of the meniscus.Clinical presentation is highly variable, depending on shape, associated hypermobility, and concomitant meniscal tears.Treatment seeks to re-establish typical anatomy using saucerization, tear reparation, and stable fixation of the meniscus. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:371-379. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190023.

Comparison of Accuracy in Expert Clinical Examination versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopic Exam in Diagnosis of Meniscal Tear

Background

Many clinical tests and diagnostic studies have been developed to increase the clinician's ability to accurately diagnose disorders of the knee. Torn menisci or ligamentous structures within the knee cause significant pain and disability and thus require expeditious management. This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of clinical examination in comparison with MRI examination and with the help of arthroscopic examination as the gold standard in the diagnosis of meniscal tears.

Method

All of the arthroscopic surgery candidates, presenting symptoms of meniscal or cruciate ligament lesions, referring to Namazi and Chamran hospitals, Shiraz, Iran, were included in this study. Clinical examination (including McMurray test, Apley test, and 20 Thessaly test) was performed before the arthroscopy, and the results were recorded in special forms. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results were also added. Then, arthroscopy was performed, declaring the definite diagnosis, and the results were compared to the results obtained from both tests and MRI. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.

Results

86 patients with a mean age of 27 years old, including 63 (73%) male and 23 (27%) female, were studied. 57 (66%), 19 (22%), and 10 (12%) injuries were caused by sports, twisting, or trauma, respectively. Arthroscopic results showed 32 meniscal tears, of which 28 (87%) and 4 (13%) were in medial and lateral menisci, respectively, including 10 bucket handle, 17 longitudinal, and 5 of other types (transverse, oblique, radial) of injuries. Comparing MRI results to arthroscopic results, we had 2 false-positive and 2 false-negative cases. 62 cases of McMurray test results were accurate; 15 and 9 cases were reported false positive and false negative, respectively. 60 cases of Apley test results were accurate; 16 and 10 cases were reported false positive and false negative, respectively. 78 cases of Thessaly test results were accurate; 5 and 3 cases were reported false positive and false negative, respectively. Comparing Thessaly test results to McMurray and Apley showed statistical significance (P < 0.05). Comparing Thessaly test results to MRI showed no statistical significance (P = 0.151), while comparing McMurray and Apley test results to MRI showed statistical significance (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Clinical examination, performed by an experienced examiner, can have equal or even more diagnostic accuracy compared to MRI to evaluate meniscal lesions. In this study, the Thessaly test has been approved as a reliable clinical test in the diagnosis of meniscal tears.

The double ACL sign: An aberrant bucket-handle tear of lateral meniscus

Introduction

Meniscal injuries are one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries around the knee affecting patients of different genders, ages and activity levels. These injuries could be acute or chronic tears that cause pain and mechanical symptoms based on the injury severity and whether it is displaced and entrapped in an abnormal location within the knee or not. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allowed us to have a better understanding of multiple bucket handle meniscal tear patterns with its specific MRI signs which have been reported in the literature.

Case presentation

This report presents a rare case of a 16-year-old boy with atypical bucket-handle tear of lateral meniscus and MRI showed a bucket-handle tear of lateral meniscus with a fragment entrapped behind and parallel to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) appearing as another ACL in sagittal views. Meniscus was repaired arthroscopically.

Conclusion

In our case, the unique and infrequent mechanism led to a bucket-handle tear involving lateral meniscus with a meniscal fragment entrapped in an unusual place intra-articularly behind ACL giving the appearance of a rare MRI sign “double ACL sign”. However, double ACL sign secondary to lateral meniscal tear has been reported only once previously up to the authors’ knowledge.

•

Radiologically, meniscal tears have multiple pathognomatic signs.

•

Double acl sign was reported twice only, one from medial meniscus and the other from lateral meniscus.

•

Double acl sign indicates huge bucket handle tear which displaced into the intercondylar notch.

Management of traumatic meniscus tears: the 2019 ESSKA meniscus consensus

PURPOSE

The importance of meniscus integrity in the prevention of early osteoarthritis is well known, and preservation is accepted as the primary goal. The purpose of the ESSKA (European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy) European consensus on traumatic meniscus tears was to provide recommendations for the treatment of meniscus tears based on both scientific evidence and the clinical experience of knee experts.

METHODS

Three groups of surgeons and scientists elaborated and ratified the so-called formal consensus process to define the recommendations for the management of traumatic meniscus tears. A traumatic meniscus tear was defined as a tear with an acute onset of symptoms caused by a sufficient trauma. The expert groups included a steering group of eight European surgeons and scientists, a rating group of another nineteen European surgeons, and a peer review group. The steering group prepared twenty-seven question and answer sets based on the scientific literature. The quality of the answers received grades of A (a high level of scientific support), B (scientific presumption), C (a low level of scientific support) or D (expert opinion). These question and answer sets were then submitted to and evaluated by the rating group. All answers were scored from 1 (= totally inappropriate) to 9 (= totally appropriate) points. Thereafter, the comments of the members of the rating group were incorporated by the steering group and the consensus was submitted to the rating group a second time. Once a general consensus was reached between the steering and rating groups, the finalized question and answer sets were submitted for final review by the peer review group composed of representatives of the ESSKA-affiliated national societies. Eighteen representatives replied.

RESULTS

The review of the literature revealed a rather low scientific quality of studies examining the treatment of traumatic meniscus tears. Of the 27 questions, only one question received a grade of A (a high level of scientific support), and another received a grade of B (scientific presumption). The remaining questions received grades of C and D. The mean rating of all questions by the rating group was 8.2 (95% confidence interval 8.1-8.4). A general agreement that MRI should be performed on a systematic basis was not achieved. However, MRI was recommended when arthroscopy would be considered to identify concomitant pathologies. In this case, the indication for MRI should be determined by a musculoskeletal specialist. Based on our data, stable left in situ lateral meniscus tears appear to show a better prognosis than medial tears. When repair is required, surgery should be performed as early as possible. Evidence that biological enhancement such as needling or the application of platelet-rich plasma would improve healing was not identified. Preservation of the meniscus should be considered as the first line of treatment because of an inferior clinical and radiological long-term outcome after partial meniscectomy compared to meniscus repair.

DISCUSSION

The consensus was generated to present the best possible recommendations for the treatment of traumatic meniscus tears and provides some groundwork for a clinical decision-making process regarding the treatment of meniscus tears. Preservation of the meniscus should be the first line of treatment when possible, because the clinical and radiological long-term outcomes are worse after partial meniscectomy than after meniscus preservation. The consensus clearly states that numerous meniscus tears that were considered irreparable should be repaired, e.g., older tears, tears in obese patients, long tears, etc. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Mountain ultramarathon results in temporary meniscus extrusion in healthy athletes

PURPOSE

In recent literature medial meniscus extrusion (MME) was demonstrated as an age, BMI and load dependent physiological phenomenon in healthy knees. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of mountain ultramarathon running on the medial meniscus extrusion (MME) in healthy athletes.

METHODS

Healthy athletes of the 2017 Gore-Tex® Transalpine run (seven stages with in total 270.5 km and 16453 m altitude) with asymptomatic knee, and no history of knee injuries or surgeries were included. All athletes underwent standard knee examination, MRI to exclude further knee pathologies and ultrasound imaging (USI) for measurement of MME before the competition. Extrusion in USI was determined in supine position (unloaded) and in standing position with full weight bearing and 20° of flexion (loaded). After the 1st, 3rd, and 7th stage ultrasound measurements were repeated directly after the competition. For evaluation of recovery, ultrasound measurement of MME was repeated 2 weeks after the race. Difference between ultrasound measurements of MME was assessed by unpaired t-test with significance set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Eighteen athletes (mean age 37.4 ± 8.3 years, 5 females, 13 males) were included in the study. The mean USI MME before the race was 1.9 mm ± 0.3 mm in supine position and 2.4 mm ± 0.4 mm under full weight bearing. During the race the mean MME increased significantly compared to baseline measurements. After 7th stage the mean MME in supine position was 2.7 mm ± 0.7 mm and 3.1 mm ± 0.6 mm under full weight bearing. After 2 weeks of recovery medial meniscus demonstrated a complete reversibility of the extrusion to normal (N.S).

CONCLUSION

Medial meniscus extrusion observed under extreme loads generated by a mountain ultramarathon is a temporary and reversible phenomenon in healthy athletes. This suggests, that the meniscus has viscoelastic capacities showing short-term adaptions to high loads, which are completely reversible over time. For clinical practice assessment of the MME by ultrasound might be favorable compared to MRI due to the ability of dynamic evaluation and the easy access. Furthermore, load should be taken in account when assessing the MME and the current cut-off value of 3 mm for meniscus pathologies should be reconsidered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Higher order thinking about differential diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Differential diagnosis is a systematic process used to identify the proper diagnosis from a set of possible competing diagnoses.

METHODS

The goal of this masterclass is to discuss the higher order thinking components of differential diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

For healthcare providers, diagnosis is one of many necessary components during the clinical decision making process and it is hallmarked by differentiation of competing structures for a definitive understanding of the underlying condition. The diagnostic process involves identifying or determining the etiology of a disease or condition through evaluation of patient history, physical examination, and review of laboratory data or diagnostic imaging; and the subsequent descriptive title of that finding. Whereas differential diagnosis is a varied skill set among all healthcare providers, the concept of a diagnosis is equally germane, regardless of one's background. In theory, a diagnosis improves the use of classification tools, improves clarity and communication, provides a trajectory of treatment, improves understanding of a person's prognosis, and in some cases, may be useful for preventative treatments. To achieve these improvements, one must have an understanding of relation of the clinical utility of tests and measures with diagnosis, and how to best implement these findings in clinical practice. This requires a deeper understanding (higher order thinking) of the role of diagnosis in the management of patients.

Innovative treatment of clinically diagnosed meniscal tears: a randomized sham-controlled trial of the Mulligan concept 'squeeze' technique

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of the Mulligan Concept (MC) 'squeeze' technique compared to a sham technique in participants with a clinically diagnosed meniscal tear.

Methods: A multi-site randomized sham-controlled trial of participants (n = 23), aged 24.91 ± 12.09 years, with a clinically diagnosed meniscal tear were equally and randomly divided into two groups. Groups received a maximum of six treatments over 14 days. Patient outcomes included the numeric pain rating scale (NRS), patient-specific functional scale (PSFS), the disablement in the physically active (DPA) scale and the knee injury osteoarthritis outcome score. Data were analysed using univariate ANOVA, univariate ANCOVA, and descriptive statistics.

Results: All participants in the MC 'squeeze' group met the discharge criteria of ≤2 points on the NRS, ≥9 points on the PSFS, and ≤34 points or ≤23 on the DPA Scale for chronic or acute injuries, respectively within the treatment intervention timeframe. A significant difference was found in favor of the MC 'squeeze' technique in PSFS scores (F(1, 21) = 4.40, p = .048, partial eta squared = .17, observed power = .52) and in DPA Scale scores (F(1, 21) = 7.46, p = .013, partial eta squared = .27, observed power = .74).

Discussion: The results indicate the MC 'squeeze' technique had positive effects on patient function and health-related quality of life over a period of 14 days and was clinically and statistically superior to the sham treatment. Further investigation of the MC 'squeeze' technique is warranted.

Medial meniscus extrusion increases with age and BMI and is depending on different loading conditions

PURPOSE

Meniscus extrusion has always been described as an indirect sign of meniscus pathology and is associated with a loss of function of the affected meniscus. The current cut-off value of 3 mm displacement is indicated as abnormal and has been determined on magnetic resonance images (MRI) and ultrasound (US). However, it has to be considered that there is no description of the physiological meniscus extrusion in healthy knees depending on age or different weight-bearing conditions. It was hypothesized that in healthy knees there is a physiological age and BMI dependent meniscal extrusion, and meniscus extrusion depends on different loading conditions.

METHODS

Healthy volunteers with non-symptomatic knee, and no history of knee injuries or operations were included in this prospective cross-sectional study. Exclusion criteria were age < 18years, subjective or objective instability, malalignment and positive medial meniscus test. Secondary exclusion criteria were osteoarthritis ICRS grade 3-4 or signs of meniscus tear on MRI. Every patient underwent standard knee examination following measurement of medial meniscus extrusion (MME) using US. In US extrusion was determined in supine position (unloaded) and in standing position with full weight-bearing and 20° of flexion (loaded). MRI was performed in a neutral knee position to compare ultrasound measurements with the current gold standard. Based on the power calculation of preliminary results a minimum of 70 volunteers was needed.

RESULTS

75 patients were enrolled to this study. The mean US MME was 1.1 mm ± 0.5 mm in supine position and 1.9 mm ± 0.9 mm under full weight-bearing. The mean US Δ-extrusion was 0.8 mm ± 0.6 mm. With rising age, a significant increased MME in US and MRI could be demonstrated (p < 0.001). Furthermore, elevated BMI was significantly correlated to increased US MME under full weight-bearing (p = 0.002) and to US Δ-extrusion (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, medial meniscus extrusion is an age-depending phenomenon in healthy knees and depends on various load-bearing conditions. Ultrasound examination of the MME might be favorable compared to MRI due to the ability of dynamic evaluation. As a consequence, the current cut-off value of 3 mm for meniscus pathologies should be reconsidered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Preoperative Diagnosis and Treatment Outcomes of Incarcerated Inferiorly Displaced Flap Tear of the Medial Meniscus: Comparison between Flap Tears with and without Incarcerated Fragment

The purpose of this study was to compare preoperative variables and postoperative outcomes between flap tears with and without incarceration of inferiorly displaced fragments of medial meniscus and find distinct features of incarcerated flap tear of medial meniscus to improve preoperative diagnosis. 79 patients who underwent partial meniscectomy for flap tear of medial meniscus were classified into two groups: group U, usual flap tear without incarcerated fragment; group I, flap tear with incarcerated inferiorly displaced fragment. Patient characteristics and preoperative variables including duration of symptom aggravation were investigated. A comprehensive physical examination including joint line tenderness was performed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination was carried out on all patients. Clinical assessments were performed with functional scores including visual analogue scale (VAS), and radiologic evaluation was conducted. Preoperative values and postoperative outcomes measured at the minimum follow-up duration of 2 years were compared between the groups. The groups did not differ significantly regarding postoperative outcomes by functional and radiological evaluations (p > 0.05). In making preoperative diagnosis, sensitivity of diagnosis based solely on MR images was significantly lower in group I (68.8%) than that in group U (90.5%) (p = 0.040). The following clinical features differed significantly between the groups: Patients in group I had higher scores in preoperative VAS (group U = 6.6; group I = 7.7) (p = 0.011) and shorter duration of symptom aggravation (group U = 13.8 weeks; group I = 3.9 weeks) (p < 0.001). Joint line tenderness was positive more distinctly in group I (100%) than in group U (74.6%). If displaced flap tear was properly resected, improved outcomes did not differ regardless of incarceration of flap tear. In diagnosing incarcerated inferiorly displaced flap tear, sensitivity of diagnosis based solely on MR images could be low. Distinguishing clinical findings would be helpful in obtaining a more appropriate diagnosis.

Risk factors, diagnosis and non-surgical treatment for meniscal tears: evidence and recommendations: a statement paper commissioned by the Danish Society of Sports Physical Therapy (DSSF)

This statement aimed at summarising and appraising the available evidence for risk factors, diagnostic tools and non-surgical treatments for patients with meniscal tears. We systematically searched electronic databases using a pragmatic search strategy approach. Included studies were synthesised quantitatively or qualitatively, as appropriate. Strength of evidence was determined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation framework. Low-quality evidence suggested that overweight (degenerative tears, k=3), male sex (k=4), contact and pivoting sports (k=2), and frequent occupational kneeling/squatting (k=3) were risk factors for meniscal tears. There was low to moderate quality evidence for low to high positive and negative predictive values, depending on the underlying prevalence of meniscal tears for four common diagnostic tests (k=15, n=2474). Seven trials investigated exercise versus surgery (k=2) or the effect of surgery in addition to exercise (k=5) for degenerative meniscal tears. There was moderate level of evidence for exercise improving self-reported pain (Effect Size (ES)-0.51, 95% CI -1.16 to 0.13) and function (ES -0.06, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.11) to the same extent as surgery, and improving muscle strength to a greater extent than surgery (ES -0.45, 95% CI -0.62 to -0.29). High-quality evidence showed no clinically relevant effect of surgery in addition to exercise on pain (ES 0.18, 95% 0.05 to 0.32) and function (ES, 0.13 95% CI -0.03 to 0.28) for patients with degenerative meniscal tears. No randomised trials comparing non-surgical treatments with surgery in patients younger than 40 years of age or patients with traumatic meniscal tears were identified. Diagnosis of meniscal tears is challenging as all clinical diagnostic tests have high risk of misclassification. Exercise therapy should be recommended as the treatment of choice for middle-aged and older patients with degenerative meniscal lesions. Evidence on the best treatment for young patients and patients with traumatic meniscal tears is lacking.

What Is the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Duck Walk Test in Detecting Meniscal Tears?

BACKGROUND

Clinical weightbearing provocation tests, like the duck walk test, may be of value in diagnosing or screening for medial meniscal tears. However, evidence of the diagnostic accuracy of the duck walk test is lacking.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the duck walk test in diagnosing medial meniscal tears. (2) To determine whether tear location, tear cause (traumatic versus degenerative), and ACL insufficiency were associated with differences in the sensitivity and specificity of the test.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 136 patients of all ages was retrospectively analyzed by evaluating the outpatient knee clinic appointment list of one orthopaedic surgeon for patients with a broad range of knee injuries who had a prior MRI before (24%) or after (76%) physical examination and had a duck walk test stated in their patient records. Of 230 patients with MRI requested by one orthopaedic surgeon attributable to knee complaints, 136 (59%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 70 (52%) patients were male and 66 (49%) were female, with a mean age of 42 (± SD 14) years. The duck walk test was performed in case of suspected meniscal injury, based on mechanism of injury, general joint line pain, and/or mechanical complaints (ie, locking, giving away). The test is performed by squatting and "waddling" before rising and is positive in case of general joint line pain or painful "clicking". Interobserver repeatability was not evaluated, but the test is well defined and leaves little room for difference in interpretation. Diagnostic accuracy measures were evaluated. Since the convenience sample in this study consisted of patients who had a duck walk test and MRI, and a positive result of the duck walk test almost certainly increased the probability that MRI would be ordered in the majority (76%) of the patients, the test properties calculated here-especially sensitivity-should be considered inflated.

RESULTS

The calculated sensitivity of the duck walk test was 71% (95% CI, 59%-81%) and there was low specificity of 39% (95% CI, 27%-52%). We found no difference in sensitivity between medial (67%; 95% CI, 51%-80%) and lateral (76%; 95% CI, 50%-92%; p = 0.492) meniscal tears. With the numbers available, we compared these patients with patients without a history of trauma and with an intact ACL. We found no difference among patients with traumatic tears (79%; 95% CI, 59%-91%; p = 0.253) and in patients with ACL tears (77%; 95% CI, 46%-94%; p = 0.742).

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the issue of verification bias, the actual sensitivity of this test in practice is likely much lower than the calculated sensitivity we observed. In addition, the test did not seem to perform better in patients with trauma or ACL insufficiency, nor was it more effective in detecting medial than lateral tears, although the numbers on some of those comparisons were rather small. Based on these results, we conclude that used alone, the duck walk test likely has little value in practice as a screening test. However, it is conceivable that it could be used in combination with other provocative tests for screening purposes. Future studies might consider using it as a means to best identify which patients should undergo MRI for the possibility of a meniscal tear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Evaluation of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging for knee meniscal injuries: correlation with video arthroscopy

Objective

To determine the specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, likelihood, and correlation of the findings of meniscal tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to knee video arthroscopy.

Methods

A cross-sectional study, conducted between June and December 2015, which evaluated 84 patients with meniscal tears (MT) selected for video arthroscopy. Two orthopedic trainees and a resident performed a physical examination with specific tests. The results and reports from MRI were compared with arthroscopy findings. The data were analyzed in the statistical program R.

Results

The Steinmann I test was the most specific, with specificity of 86% and 91% for medial meniscus tears (MMT) and lateral meniscus tears (LMT), respectively. With regard to accuracy, the pain test on palpation of the joint interline (PPJI) showed values of 67% and 73% for detection of MMT and LMT, respectively. The PPJI test showed higher sensitivity, with a 77% chance of detecting MMT. Analysis of the set of three tests (McMurray, PPJI, and Steinmann I) compared to arthroscopy showed 85% sensitivity for MMT and 70% sensitivity for LMT. MRI showed a greater specificity for the diagnosis of MMT and LMT; the values were 82% and 91%, respectively.

Conclusion

The combination of the three tests shows better results compared to the isolated tests and thus can be associated to the MRI to make an effective diagnosis. However, further studies assisting in the development of a protocol to standardize diagnostic evaluation are required.

Diagnostic Validity of Combining History Elements and Physical Examination Tests for Traumatic and Degenerative Symptomatic Meniscal Tears

BACKGROUND

The current approach to the clinical diagnosis of traumatic and degenerative symptomatic meniscal tears (SMTs) proposes combining history elements and physical examination tests without systematic prescription of imaging investigations, yet the evidence to support this diagnostic approach is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the validity of diagnostic clusters combining history elements and physical examination tests to diagnose or exclude traumatic and degenerative SMT compared with other knee disorders.

DESIGN

Prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

SETTINGS

Patients were recruited from 2 orthopedic clinics, 2 family medicine clinics, and from a university community.

PATIENTS

A total of 279 consecutive patients who underwent consultation for a new knee complaint.

METHODS

Each patient was assessed independently by 2 evaluators. History elements and standardized physical examination tests performed by a physiotherapist were compared with the reference standard: an expert physicians' composite diagnosis including a clinical examination and confirmatory magnetic resonance imaging. Participating expert physicians were orthopedic surgeons (n = 3) or sport medicine physicians (n = 2). Penalized logistic regression (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) was used to identify history elements and physical examination tests associated with the diagnosis of SMT and recursive partitioning was used to develop diagnostic clusters.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+/-) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Eighty patients had a diagnosis of SMT (28.7%), including 35 traumatic tears and 45 degenerative tears. The combination a history of trauma during a pivot, medial knee pain location, and a positive medial joint line tenderness test was able to diagnose (LR+ = 8.9; 95% CI 6.1-13.1) or exclude (LR- = 0.10; 95% CI 0.03-0.28) a traumatic SMT. Combining a history of progressive onset of pain, medial knee pain location, pain while pivoting, absence of valgus or varus knee misalignment, or full passive knee flexion was able to moderately diagnose (LR+ = 6.4; 95% CI 4.0-10.4) or exclude (LR- = 0.10; 95% CI 0.03-0.31) a degenerative SMT. Internal validation estimates were slightly lower for all clusters but demonstrated positive LR superior to 5 and negative LR inferior to 0.2 indicating moderate shift in posttest probability.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic clusters combining history elements and physical examination tests can support the differential diagnosis of SMT. These results represent the initial derivation of the clusters and external validation is mandatory.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Physical Examination of the Knee: Meniscus, Cartilage, and Patellofemoral Conditions

The knee is one of the most commonly injured joints in the body. Its superficial anatomy enables diagnosis of the injury through a thorough history and physical examination. Examination techniques for the knee described decades ago are still useful, as are more recently developed tests. Proper use of these techniques requires understanding of the anatomy and biomechanical principles of the knee as well as the pathophysiology of the injuries, including tears to the menisci and extensor mechanism, patellofemoral conditions, and osteochondritis dissecans. Nevertheless, the clinical validity and accuracy of the diagnostic tests vary. Advanced imaging studies may be useful adjuncts.

McMurray's Test and Joint Line Tenderness for Medial Meniscus Tear: Are They Accurate?

Background

Meniscus tears are the most common injury of the knee. The McMurray's test and Joint line tenderness for diagnosing meniscus tear have been widely tested, but results reported by different authors vary. The wide variations reported have an impact on clinical decision concerning whether to go for other diagnostic tests before going for diagnostic arthroscopy, which is considered as the gold standard.The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of Joint line tenderness and McMurray's test, as clinical signs, to diagnose underlying medial meniscus tears.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study done in Tribhuwan University Teaching Hospital. Patients undergoing knee arthroscopy were included in the study period of one year (from February 2011 to January 2012). Each patient was clinically examined with McMurray's test and joint line tenderness. The findings were then matched by the arthroscopic findings. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were then calculated.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value , negative predictive value and accuracy for medial joint line tenderness in diagnosing medial meniscus tear were 50%, 61.7%, 51.8%, 60% and 56.45% respectively. The result was insignificant (p value=0.352). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for McMurray's test for diagnosing medial meniscus tear were 54%, 79%, 68% , 67.50% and 67.74% respectively. The result was significant (p value=0.007).

Conclusion

Clinical tests like McMurray and joint line tenderness have low diagnostic value when applied individually. They may be useful when combined together with the background of clinical history. The decision to scope the knee should not be solely taken on the results of clinical tests.

Diagnostic accuracy of the Thessaly test, standardised clinical history and other clinical examination tests (Apley's, McMurray's and joint line tenderness) for meniscal tears in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Reliable non-invasive diagnosis of meniscal tears is difficult. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used but is expensive and incidental findings are problematic. There are a number of physical examination tests for the diagnosis of meniscal tears that are simple, cheap and non-invasive.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Thessaly test and to determine if the Thessaly test (alone or in combination with other physical tests) can obviate the need for further investigation by MRI or arthroscopy for patients with a suspected meniscal tear.

DESIGN

Single-centre prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

SETTING

Although the study was performed in a secondary care setting, it was designed to replicate the results that would have been achieved in a primary care setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Two cohorts of patients were recruited: patients with knee pathology (n = 292) and a control cohort with no knee pathology (n = 75).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of the Thessaly test in determining the presence of meniscal tears.

METHODS

Participants were assessed by both a primary care clinician and a musculoskeletal clinician. Both clinicians performed the Thessaly test, McMurray's test, Apley's test, joint line tenderness test and took a standardised clinical history from the patient.

RESULTS

The Thessaly test had a sensitivity of 0.66, a specificity of 0.39 and a diagnostic accuracy of 54% when utilised by primary care clinicians. This compared with a sensitivity of 0.62, a specificity of 0.55 and diagnostic accuracy of 59% when used by musculoskeletal clinicians. The diagnostics accuracy of the other tests when used by primary care clinicians was 54% for McMurray's test, 53% for Apley's test, 54% for the joint line tenderness test and 55% for clinical history. For primary care clinicians, age and past history of osteoarthritis were both significant predictors of MRI diagnosis of meniscal tears. For musculoskeletal clinicians age and a positive diagnosis of meniscal tears on clinical history taking were significant predictors of MRI diagnosis. No physical tests were significant predictors of MRI diagnosis in our multivariate models. The specificity of MRI diagnosis was tested in subgroup of patients who went on to have a knee arthroscopy and was found to be low [0.53 (95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.77)], although the sensitivity was 1.0.

CONCLUSIONS

The Thessaly test was no better at diagnosing meniscal tears than other established physical tests. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of all physical tests was too low to be of routine clinical value as an alternative to MRI. Caution needs to be exercised in the indiscriminate use of MRI scanning in the identification of meniscal tears in the diagnosis of the painful knee, due to the low specificity seen in the presence of concomitant knee pathology. Further research is required to determine the true diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of MRI for the detection of meniscal tears.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trial ISRCTN43527822.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Anterior cruciate ligament tears for the primary care sports physician: what to know on the field and in the office

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are relatively common and can lead to knee dysfunction. The classic presentation is a non-contact twisting injury with an audible pop and the rapid onset of swelling. Prompt evaluation and diagnosis of ACL injuries are important. Acute treatment consists of cessation of the sporting activity, ice, compression, and elevation with evaluation by a physician familiar with ACL injuries and their management. The diagnosis is made with the use of patient history and physical examination as well as imaging studies. Radiographs may show evidence of a bony injury. MRI confirms the diagnosis and evaluates the knee for concomitant injuries to the cartilage, menisci and other knee ligaments. For active patients, operative treatment is often recommended while less-active patients may not require surgery. The goal of this review is to discuss the diagnosis of an ACL injury and provide clear management strategies for the primary-care sports medicine physician.

Gender differences in the accuracy of joint line tenderness for arthroscopically confirmed meniscal tears

INTRODUCTION

The reliability of joint line tenderness was previously investigated among other clinical tests for the diagnosis of meniscal pathology with variable results. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of joint line tenderness as a clinical diagnosing test for arthroscopically confirmed meniscal tears between males and females.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For the purpose of preoperative joint line tenderness accuracy calculations, this study included male and female groups of patients who have had knee arthroscopy following preoperative diagnosis of meniscal tear. Overall, 195 patients were included in the study, 134 males and 61 females. The mean age was 43.4 (13-76) years.

RESULTS

In the male group, the diagnosis of meniscal tear by joint line tenderness was correct in 84 (62.7%) of 134 knees for the medial side and in 115 (85.8%) for the lateral side. In the female group, the diagnosis was correct in 35 (57.4%) of 61 knees for the medial side and in 57 (93.4%) for the lateral side. In order to refine the accuracy of medial joint line tenderness, the data were recalculated for patients with medial meniscal tears and no chondral lesion or cruciate ligament tears; however, the accuracy remained low.

CONCLUSIONS

The physical finding of joint line tenderness of the knee as a test for lateral meniscal tear was found reliable in both males and females. For medial meniscal tears, the test had low reliability and thus less useful if used alone, in both genders.

Detecting Meniscal Tears in Primary Care: Reproducibility and Accuracy of 2 Weight-Bearing Tests and 1 Non-Weight-Bearing Test

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostic accuracy study using a cross-sectional design.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the interexaminer reliability and the diagnostic accuracy in primary care of 1 existing weight-bearing meniscal test, the Thessaly test, 1 new weight-bearing test, the deep squat test, and 1 non-weight-bearing test, the joint-line tenderness test.

BACKGROUND

Meniscal tears are difficult to detect in primary care. Although valuable in secondary care, weight-bearing physical examination tests require validation in primary care in unselected patients.

METHODS

Between October 2009 and December 2013, 121 patients (age range, 18-65 years) seen in primary care and suspected of having internal derangement of the knee of less than 6 months in duration were included in the study. Diagnostic accuracy of the 3 meniscal tests was determined based on assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. The meniscal tests were performed by 3 trained physical therapists, who were not informed about the patient history and magnetic resonance imaging results. Each test was performed independently by 2 of the 3 trained physical therapists in alternating pairs.

RESULTS

The Thessaly test and the deep squat test had a moderate level of interexaminer reliability, with kappas of 0.54 and 0.46, respectively. The joint-line tenderness test had poor interexaminer reliability and was therefore not assessed for diagnostic accuracy. The following results are reported separately for both examiners. The Thessaly test had a sensitivity of 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 53.0%, 78.0%) and 51.2% (95% CI: 36.8%, 65.4%), a specificity of 37.9% (95% CI: 27.2%, 50.0%) and 43.5% (95% CI: 30.2%, 57.8%), a positive likelihood ratio of 1.07 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.41) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.33), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.54, 1.45) and 1.12 (95% CI: 0.72, 1.76). Similarly, the deep squat test had a sensitivity of 74.5% (95% CI: 61.1%, 84.5%) and 76.7% (95% CI: 62.3%, 86.9%), a specificity of 42.4% (95% CI: 31.2%, 54.4%) and 36.2% (95% CI: 24.0%, 50.5%), a positive likelihood ratio of 1.29 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.68) and 1.20 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.58), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.35, 1.04) and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.33, 1.25).

CONCLUSION

Although the Thessaly and deep squat tests have a moderate level of reliability, neither test is sufficiently accurate to help in the diagnosis of meniscal tears in primary care. Future research should focus on other relevant patient variables instead of on physical examination tests in the detection of meniscal tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnosis, level 3b.

The Trapped Medial Meniscus Tear: An Examination Maneuver Helps Predict Arthroscopic Findings

Background:

Numerous clinical examination maneuvers have been developed to identify meniscus tears of the knee. While meniscus injuries vary significantly in type and severity, no maneuvers have been developed that help to distinguish particular tear characteristics.

Purpose:

This nonconsecutive case series highlights a distinctive clinical finding that correlates with inferiorly displaced flap tears of the medial meniscus that become trapped in the medial gutter of the knee, as identified through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Eight patients with trapped medial meniscus tears were identified from a single surgeon’s academic orthopaedic sports medicine practice between January 2009 and January 2012. Each patient underwent clinical evaluation, MRI, and arthroscopic treatment for meniscus injury. Clinical notes, MRI images, radiology reports, and operative findings were reviewed and compared in a descriptive fashion.

Results:

Each patient displayed a positive clinical examination finding of medial knee pain inferior to the joint line with flexion and the application of valgus stress in the setting of a torn medial meniscus and intact medial collateral ligament (MCL). Preoperative MRI revealed a distinctive flap tear of the medial meniscus flipped inferiorly to lay trapped between the tibia and deep fibers of the MCL. On arthroscopy, flap tears were found displaced inferiorly and trapped in the medial gutter in 6 of the 8 patients. Displaced meniscal fragments in the remaining 2 patients were found within the medial compartment.

Conclusion:

Inferiorly displaced flap tears of the meniscus that have been displaced to the medial gutter can be localized through a careful examination technique.

Clinical Relevance:

Early identification of this injury pattern may help reduce the likelihood that the trapped fragment will be missed during arthroscopy.

Special tests for assessing meniscal tears within the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal knee pain is a large and costly problem, and meniscal tears make up a large proportion of diagnoses. ‘Special tests’ to diagnose torn menisci are often used in the physical examination of the knee joint. A large number of publications within the literature have investigated the diagnostic accuracy of these tests, yet despite the wealth of research their diagnostic accuracy remains unclear.Aim To synthesise the most current literature on the diagnostic accuracy of special tests for meniscal tears of the knee in adults.

METHOD

An electronic search of MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allies Health Literature (CINAHL), The Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED) and SPORT Discus databases was carried out from inception to December 2014. Two authors independently selected studies and independently extracted data. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) 2 tool.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included (n=1234) and three special tests were included in the meta-analysis. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally poor. McMurray’s had a sensitivity of 61% (95% CI 45% to 74%) and a specificity of 84% (95% CI 69%to 92%). Joint line tenderness had a sensitivity of 83%(95% CI 73% to 90%) and a specificity of 83% (95% CI 61% to 94%). Thessaly 20° had a sensitivity of 75%(95% CI 53% to 89%) and a specificity of 87% (95% CI 65% to 96%).

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of the special tests to diagnose meniscal tears remains poor. However, these results should be used with caution, due to the poor quality and low numbers of included studies and high levels of heterogeneity.

Validity of the Thessaly test in evaluating meniscal tears compared with arthroscopy: a diagnostic accuracy study

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostic accuracy study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Thessaly test compared with an arthroscopic examination in patients with suspected meniscal tears.

BACKGROUND

The Thessaly test was introduced to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination in detecting meniscal tears. This test appears to be a valuable alternative to other meniscal clinical tests usually performed, but additional diagnostic accuracy data are required.

METHODS

Patients with suspected meniscal tears, referred to a hospital for arthroscopic surgery, were eligible. The Thessaly test alone and the combination of the Thessaly and McMurray tests were considered as index tests, and arthroscopy was used as the reference test. Experienced physical therapists performed the Thessaly test at 20° of flexion and the McMurray test for both knees. The physical therapist was blinded to patient information, the affected knee, and the results from possible earlier diagnostic imaging. An orthopaedic surgeon blinded to the clinical test results from the physical therapist performed the arthroscopic examination.

RESULTS

A total of 593 patients were included, of whom 493 (83%) had a meniscal tear, as determined by the arthroscopic examination. The Thessaly test had a sensitivity of 64% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 60%, 68%), specificity of 53% (95% CI: 43%, 63%), positive predictive value of 87% (95% CI: 83%, 90%), negative predictive value of 23% (95% CI: 18%, 29%), and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 1.37 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.70) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.78), respectively. The combination of positive Thessaly and McMurray tests showed a sensitivity of 53% and specificity of 62%.

CONCLUSION

The results of the Thessaly test alone or combined with the McMurray test do not seem useful to determine the presence or absence of meniscal tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnosis, level 2b.

Correlation of clinical examination, ultrasound sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings with arthroscopic findings in relation to acute and chronic lateral meniscus injuries

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether ultrasound sonography (USS) performed by orthopedic surgeons is a reliable method of investigating lateral meniscus (LM) knee lesions as compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and arthroscopy, which is the gold standard in clinical practice.

METHODS

In total, 107 patients were involved in this study. They were hospitalized for arthroscopy due to LM injury of the knee. Clinical examination (McMurray's, Apley's, and joint line tenderness tests), USS, and MRI were performed prior to arthroscopy. We compared the results of clinical examination, USS, and MRI with the arthroscopic findings for the knee, which were considered the reference values.

RESULTS

McMurray's clinical test, which is the most sensitive method of detecting lateral meniscus lesions, gave the same sensitivity rate for both acute and chronic LM injuries: 65%. USS was observed to be more sensitive and specific for chronic LM injuries (85 and 90%, respectively) than for acute LM injuries (71 and 87%). MRI also yielded higher values of sensitivity and specificity for chronic lateral meniscus injuries (75 and 95%, respectively) than for acute LM injuries (68 and 87%).

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of ultrasound examination is demonstrated by the high reliability of this method in the diagnosis of lateral meniscus lesions of the knee, and the evaluation performed in this study showed that ultrasound is a useful clinical tool for diagnosing knee pathology.

Meniscal repair

Historically, treatment of meniscus tears consisted of complete meniscectomy. Over the past few decades, however, the long-term morbidities of meniscal removal, namely the early development of knee osteoarthritis, have become apparent. Thus, management of meniscal tears has trended toward meniscal preservation. Recent technological advances have made repairs of the meniscus easier and stronger. In addition, adjunctive therapies used to enhance the healing process have advanced greatly in the past few years. Today, with increased understanding of the impact of meniscal loss and the principles of meniscal repair and healing, meniscal preservation is viewed as an increasingly realistic and important goal in the management of meniscus tears.

Validity of magnetic resonance imaging in knee injuries

INTRODUCTION

Knee injuries are common in athletes, recreationists, and other people in their everyday activities.

OBJECTIVE

The study is aimed at establishing the validity of clinical findings, MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy of the knee in ACL, PCL, medial or lateral ligament lesions.

METHODS

The prospective research involved 63 inpatients at the Traumatology Clinic in Banja Luka- Niš between 1 January 2011 and 1 June 2012.

RESULTS

When clinically examining the ACL and based on the calculated post-test probability amounting to (LR+) = 0.8017, we conclude that there is a considerable probability (80.17%) that a patient with an arthroscopically diagnosed ACL lesion will have the same lesion diagnosed by MRI. The post-test probability following the clinical examination of the medial meniscus and amounting to (LR+) = 0.6943 suggests that there is a considerable probability (69.43%) that an arthroscopically diagnosed lesion of the medial meniscus will also be diagnosed by MRI. On the basis of the clinical examination of the lateral meniscus in the examined sample and calculated post-test probability amounting to (LR+) = 0.6346, we conclude that there is a considerable difference (63.46%) between the diagnostic arthroscopy and MRI of lateral meniscus lesions.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic examination of the knee is a more valuable method than diagnosis by MRI and clinical examination for detecting lesions of the ACL, PCL, medial and lateral meniscus.

Clinical examination of the knee: know your tools for diagnosis of knee injuries

The clinical evaluation of the knee is a fundamental tool to correctly address diagnosis and treatment, and should never be replaced by the findings retrieved by the imaging studies carried on the patient.Every surgeon has his own series of exams with whom he is more confident and on whom he relies on for diagnosis. Usually, three sets of series are used: one for patello-femoral/extensor mechanism pathologies; one for meniscal and chondral (articular) lesions; and one for instability evaluation.This review analyses the most commonly used tests and signs for knee examination, outlining the correct way to perform the test, the correct interpretation of a positive test and the best management for evaluating an injured knee both in the acute and delayed timing.

The knee meniscus: structure-function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration

Extensive scientific investigations in recent decades have established the anatomical, biomechanical, and functional importance that the meniscus holds within the knee joint. As a vital part of the joint, it acts to prevent the deterioration and degeneration of articular cartilage, and the onset and development of osteoarthritis. For this reason, research into meniscus repair has been the recipient of particular interest from the orthopedic and bioengineering communities. Current repair techniques are only effective in treating lesions located in the peripheral vascularized region of the meniscus. Healing lesions found in the inner avascular region, which functions under a highly demanding mechanical environment, is considered to be a significant challenge. An adequate treatment approach has yet to be established, though many attempts have been undertaken. The current primary method for treatment is partial meniscectomy, which commonly results in the progressive development of osteoarthritis. This drawback has shifted research interest toward the fields of biomaterials and bioengineering, where it is hoped that meniscal deterioration can be tackled with the help of tissue engineering. So far, different approaches and strategies have contributed to the in vitro generation of meniscus constructs, which are capable of restoring meniscal lesions to some extent, both functionally as well as anatomically. The selection of the appropriate cell source (autologous, allogeneic, or xenogeneic cells, or stem cells) is undoubtedly regarded as key to successful meniscal tissue engineering. Furthermore, a large variation of scaffolds for tissue engineering have been proposed and produced in experimental and clinical studies, although a few problems with these (e.g., byproducts of degradation, stress shielding) have shifted research interest toward new strategies (e.g., scaffoldless approaches, self-assembly). A large number of different chemical (e.g., TGF-β1, C-ABC) and mechanical stimuli (e.g., direct compression, hydrostatic pressure) have also been investigated, both in terms of encouraging functional tissue formation, as well as in differentiating stem cells. Even though the problems accompanying meniscus tissue engineering research are considerable, we are undoubtedly in the dawn of a new era, whereby recent advances in biology, engineering, and medicine are leading to the successful treatment of meniscal lesions.