Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty

Femoral cartilage thickness measured on MRI varies among individuals: Time to deepen one of the principles of kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A systematic review

PURPOSE

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA), as a pure resurfacing procedure, is based on matching implant thickness with bone cut and kerf thickness, plus cartilage wear. However, the assumption of a consistent 2 mm femoral cartilage thickness remains unproven. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature concerning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of femoral cartilage thickness in non-arthritic patients. Our hypothesis was that cartilage thickness values would vary significantly among individuals, thereby challenging the established KA paradigm of 'one-cartilage-fits-all'.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches (Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane Library) followed PRISMA guidelines. English-language studies assessing distal and posterior femoral cartilage thickness using MRI in non-arthritic adults were included. Studies lacking numerical cartilage thickness data, involving post-operative MRI, considering total femoro-tibial cartilage thickness, or failing to specify the compartment of the knee being studied were excluded.

RESULTS

Overall, 27 studies comprising 8170 MRIs were analysed. Weighted mean femoral cartilage thicknesses were: 2.05 ± 0.62 mm (mean range 1.06-2.6) for the distal medial condyle, 1.95 ± 0.4 mm (mean range 1.15-2.5) for the distal lateral condyle, 2.44 ± 0.5 mm (mean range 1.37-2.6) for the posterior medial condyle and 2.27 ± 0.38 mm (mean range 1.48-2.5) for the posterior lateral condyle.

DISCUSSION

Femoral cartilage thickness varies significantly across patients. In KA TKA, relying on a fixed thickness of 2 mm may jeopardize the accurate restoration of individual anatomy, leading to errors in implant coronal and rotational alignment. An intraoperative assessment of cartilage thickness may be advisable to express the KA philosophy at its full potential.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Small deviations between planned and performed bone cuts using a CT-based robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty system

PURPOSE

Computed tomography (CT)-based robotic system for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has shown improved accuracy compared to conventional. This study was designed to (1) confirm the accuracy of the robotic system in achieving the plan and (2) establish the alignment and positioning deviation between final components and planning, by measuring the discrepancy between final implant alignment and the corresponding planned cut.

METHODS

Ninety-six cementless robotic-arm assisted (RA) TKAs were assessed. Bone resections were performed using the haptically controlled robotic arm. Alignment in the coronal and sagittal plane and resection depth of the distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts were recorded with a navigation planar probe. After final components were impacted, the probe was positioned on each implant surface to determine its alignment and positioning.

RESULTS

The mean tibial resections and implanted tibial component's positioning were 0.4 mm (standard deviation, SD: 0.6) and 0.9 mm (SD: 0.8), respectively, higher than planned (p < 0.01). The tibial sagittal cut had 19/96 cases (19.8%) of ±1° outliers from plan. In 40/96 cases (41.7%), the tibial component was more prominent than planned of more than 1 mm. The mean femoral resections and impacted femoral component's positioning was 0.1 mm (SD: 0.8) and 0.2 mm (SD: 0.7), respectively, higher than planned. In 23/96 cases (24.0%), the femoral sagittal cut and femoral component coronal alignment deviated more than ±1° from plan.

CONCLUSIONS

The computed tomography-based robotic-assisted TKA system showed good accuracy regarding bone preparation and component's positioning relative to the planning. Cementless tibial component impaction resulted in the most deviation from plan, with a large proportion of cases resulting in being more prominent than planned.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Simultaneous Evaluation of Bone Cut and Implant Placement Accuracy in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of bone cuts and implant placements, simultaneously, for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed using a system with an active robotic arm. Methods: Two experienced orthopaedic surgeons performed TKA on ten cadaveric legs. Computed tomography scans were performed to compare the bone cuts and implant placements with the preoperative planning. The differences between the planned and actual bone cuts and implant placements were assessed using positional and angular errors in the three anatomical planes. Additionally, the cut-implant deviations were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed to detect systematic errors in the bone cuts and implant placements and to quantify the correlations between these errors. Results: The root-mean-square (RMS) errors of the bone cuts (with respect to the planning) were between 0.7-1.5 mm and 0.6-1.7°. The RMS implant placement errors (with respect to the planning) varied between 0.6-1.6 mm and 0.4-1.5°, except for the femur and tibia in the sagittal plane (2.9°). Systematic errors in the bone cuts and implant placements were observed, respectively, in three and two degrees of freedom. For cut-implant deviations, the RMS values ranged between 0.3-2.0 mm and 0.6-1.9°. The bone cut and implant placement errors were significantly correlated in eight degrees-of-freedom (ρ ≥ 0.67, p < 0.05). Conclusions: With most of the errors below 2 mm or 2°, this study supported the value of active robotic TKA in achieving accurate bone cuts and implant placements. The findings also highlighted the need for both accurate bone cuts and proper implantation technique to achieve accurate implant placements.

Accuracy of Patient-Specific Instrument for Cylindrical Axis Implementation in Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

In kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA), the cylindrical axis (CA) is very important in restoring the native joint line and kinematics of the pre-arthritic knee. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of patient-specific instrument (PSI) for restoring the CA for femoral bone resection in KA-TKA.

Methods

Thirty KA-TKAs were performed using a computed tomography (CT)-based PSI system. Data from preoperative CT were reconstructed into three-dimensional (3D) models using 3D-planning software. The CA was created by connecting the centers of each virtual sphere to the medial and lateral femoral condyles using computer software. Femoral bone resection of the distal and posterior condyles was performed parallel to the sagittal planes of the CA. The thickness of the CA-referenced bone resection was determined based on the thickness necessary for the respective regions of the femoral component. The PSI was manufactured to locate the guide pin for a conventional cutting block. The accuracy of PSI for KA-TKA was evaluated as the absolute error between the preoperatively predicted thickness and the intraoperative measurements in each of the four regions, as well as the difference in error between distal-medial (DM) and posterior-medial (PM) and between distal-lateral (DL) and posterior-lateral (PL).

Results

The differences in thickness of bone cut in the DM, DL, PM, and PL were 0.79 ± 0.39 mm (range, -1.20 to 1.50), 0.70 ± 0.42 mm (range, -1.50 to 1.50), 0.80 ± 0.46 mm (range, -0.80 to 1.50), and 0.75 ± 0.47 mm (range, -2.10 to 1.40), respectively. There was no significant difference in the thickness error between DM and PM (p = 0.959) and between DL and PL (p = 0.812).

Conclusions

In KA-TKA, PSI was effective for accurate femoral bone resection based on virtually planned thickness.

The Use of Navigation or Robotic-Assisted Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Reduce Postoperative Pain

The use of intraoperative technology (IT), such as computer-assisted navigation (CAN) and robot-assisted surgery (RA), in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasingly popular due to its ability to enhance surgical precision and reduce radiographic outliers. There is disputing evidence as to whether IT leads to better clinical outcomes and reduced postoperative pain. The purpose of this study was to determine if use of CAN or RA in TKA improves pain outcomes. This is a retrospective review of a multicenter randomized control trial of 327 primary TKAs. Demographics, surgical time, IT use (CAN/RA), length of stay (LOS), and opioid consumption (in morphine milligram equivalents) were collected. Analysis was done by comparing IT (n = 110) to a conventional TKA cohort (n = 217). When accounting for demographic differences and the use of a tourniquet, the IT cohort had shorter surgical time (88.77 ± 18.57 vs. 98.12 ± 22.53 minutes; p = 0.005). While postoperative day 1 pain scores were similar (p = 0.316), the IT cohort has less opioid consumption at 2 weeks (p = 0.006) and 1 month (p = 0.005) postoperatively, but not at 3 months (p = 0.058). When comparing different types of IT, CAN, and RA, we found that they had similar surgical times (p = 0.610) and pain scores (p = 0.813). Both cohorts had similar opioid consumption at 2 weeks (p = 0.092), 1 month (p = 0.058), and 3 months (p = 0.064) postoperatively. The use of IT in TKA does not yield a clinically significant reduction in pain outcomes. There was also no difference in pain or perioperative outcomes between CAN and RA technology used in TKA.

Femoral bowing affects varus femoral alignment but not patient satisfaction in mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study evaluated whether patients with particular lower limb morphological factors have femoral and tibial component malpositioning during mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and lower postoperative satisfaction.

METHODS

This study included 146 knees in 117 Asian patients undergoing TKA for medial osteoarthritis. Preoperative bony morphological factors such as the angle between the femoral mechanical and anatomical axes (MA-AA angle), angle between the anatomical axes of the proximal and distal femur (lateral bowing femoral angle, LBFA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, and % anatomical axis of the tibia were evaluated, as well as preoperative and 1-year postoperative 2011 Knee Society scores (KSSs).

RESULTS

MA-AA angle and LBFA were significantly larger in knees with varus femoral component alignment versus neutral alignment. Preoperative MA-AA angle was underestimated in patients with larger MA-AA angle or LBFA, especially by inexperienced surgeons. Tibial morphological factors did not affect tibial component alignment. Changes in 2011 KSSs were similar among groups by lower limb alignment or femoral and tibial component alignment.

CONCLUSION

Femoral bowing affects varus femoral component alignment by obscuring preoperative planning, but it had little impact on patient satisfaction when mechanical alignment is targeted during TKA.

Navigated Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Different Perspective

Backgroud

Anteromedial osteoarthritis is a recognized indication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Favorable postoperative outcomes largely depend on proper patient selection, correct implant positioning, and limb alignment. Computer navigation has a proven value over conventional systems in reducing mechanical errors in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the lack of strong evidence impedes the universal use of computer navigation technology in UKA. Therefore, this study was proposed to investigate the accuracy of component positioning and limb alignment in computer navigated UKA and to observe the role of navigation in proper patient selection.

Methods

A total of 50 knees (38 patients) underwent computer navigated UKA between 2016 and 2018. All operations were performed by the senior surgeon using the same navigation system and implant type. The navigation system was used as a tool to aid patient selection: knees with preoperative residual varus > 5° on valgus stress and hyperextension > 10° were switched to navigated TKA. We measured the accuracy of component placement in sagittal and coronal planes on postoperative radiographs. Functional outcomes were also evaluated at the final follow-up (a minimum of 16 months).

Results

Nine patients had tibia vara and 14 patients had preoperative hyperextension deformity. We observed coronal outliers for the tibial component in 12% knees and for the femoral component in 10% knees. We also observed sagittal outliers for the tibial component in 14% knees and for the femoral component in 6% knees. There was a significant improvement in the functional score at the final follow-up. On multiple linear regression, no difference was found in functional scores of knees with or without tibia vara (p = 0.16) and with or without hyperextension (p = 0.25).

Conclusions

Our study further validates the role of computer navigation in desirable implant positioning and limb alignment. We encourage use of computer-assisted navigation as a tool for patient selection, as it allows intraoperative dynamic goniometry and provides real-time kinematic behavior of the knee to obviate pitfalls such as significant residual varus angulation and hyperextension that predispose early failure of UKA.

The use of imageless navigation to quantify cutting error in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves implant alignment by providing feedback on resection parameters based on femoral and tibial cutting guide positions. However, saw blade thickness, deflection, and cutting guide motion may lead to final bone cuts differing from planned resections, potentially contributing to suboptimal component alignment. We used an imageless navigation device to intraoperatively quantify the magnitude of error between planned and actual resections, hypothesizing final bone cuts will differ from planned alignment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study including 60 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA using a novel imageless navigation device was conducted. Device measurements of resection parameters were obtained via attachment of optical trackers to femoral and tibial cutting guides prior to resection. Following resection, optical trackers were placed directly on the bone cut surface and measurements were recorded. Cutting guide and bone resection measurements of both femoral and tibial varus/valgus, femoral flexion, tibial slope angles, and both femoral and tibial medial and lateral resection depths were compared using a Student's t-test.

RESULTS

Femoral cutting guide position differed from the actual cut by an average 0.6 ± 0.5° (p = 0.85) in the varus/valgus angle and 1.0 ± 1.0° (p = 0.003) in the flexion/extension angle. The difference between planned and actual cut measurements for medial and lateral femoral resection depth was 1.1 ± 1.1 mm (p = 0.32) and 1.2 ± 1.0 mm (p = 0.067), respectively. Planned cut measurements based on tibial guide position differed from the actual cut by an average of 0.9 ± 0.8° (p = 0.63) in the varus/valgus angle and 1.1 ± 1.0° (p = 0.95) in slope angle. Measurement of medial and lateral tibial resection depth differed by an average of 0.1 ± 1.8 mm (p = 0.78) and 0.2 ± 2.1 mm (p = 0.85), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant discrepancies between planned and actual femoral bone resection were demonstrated for flexion/extension angle, likely the result of cutting error. Our data highlights the importance of cut verification postresection to confirm planned resections are achieved, and suggests imageless navigation may be a source of feedback that would allow surgeons to intraoperatively adjust resections to achieve optimal implant alignment.

Appropriate determination of the surgical transepicondylar axis can be achieved following distal femur resection in navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Background

Many surgeons have determined the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) after distal femur resection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, in most navigation systems, the registration of the sTEA precedes the distal femur resection. This sequential difference can influence the accuracy of intraoperative determination for sTEA when considering the proximal location of the anatomical references for sTEA and the arthritic environment. We compared the accuracy and precision in determinations of the sTEA between before and after distal femur resection during navigation-assisted TKA.

Methods

Ninety TKAs with Attune posterior-stabilized prostheses were performed under imageless navigation. The sTEA was registered before distal femur resection, then reassessed and adjusted after distal resection. The femoral component was implanted finally according to the sTEA determined after distal femur resection. Computed tomography (CT) was performed postoperatively to analyze the true sTEA (the line connecting the tip of the lateral femoral epicondyle to the lowest point of the medial femoral epicondylar sulcus on axial CT images) and femoral component rotation (FCR) axis. The FCR angle after distal femur resection (FCRA-aR) was defined as the angle between the FCR axis and true sTEA on CT images. The FCR angle before distal resection (FCRA-bR) could be presumed to be the value of FCRA-aR minus the difference between the intraoperatively determined sTEAs before and after distal resection as indicated by the navigation system. It was considered that the FCRA-bR or FCRA-aR represented the differences between the sTEA determined before or after distal femur resection and the true sTEA, respectively.

Results

The FCRA-bR was −1.3 ± 2.4° and FCRA-aR was 0.3 ± 1.7° (p < 0.001). The range of FCRA-bR was from −6.6° to 4.1° and that of FCRA-aR was from −2.7° to 3.3°. The proportion of appropriate FCRA (≤ ±3°) was significantly higher after distal femur resection than that before resection (91.1% versus 70%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The FCR was more appropriate when the sTEA was determined after distal femur resection than before resection in navigation-assisted TKA. The reassessment and adjusted registration of sTEA after distal femur resection could improve the rotational alignment of the femoral component in navigation-assisted TKA.

Level of evidence

IV.

False malalignment after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although computer navigation has improved component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), radiographic outliers are reported with a wide range in literature even using this technique. We hypothesized that the postoperative malalignment after computer-navigated TKA was partially derived from the inherent problems with two-dimensional (2D) measurement such as inaccuracies in measurement due to the knee position during the radiographic examination and the direction of the X-ray beam. We therefore conducted this study to determine how often knees with malalignment on 2D imaging were truly mal-aligned on three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed imaging.

METHODS

Sixty-two computer-navigated primary TKAs performed in 47 patients were included in this study. In all cases, a weight-bearing long-leg radiograph was obtained after TKA. 3D measurements were performed for outliers 2° or more in coronal alignment of the femoral or tibial component.

RESULTS

For the 18 femoral mal-aligned components on 2D imaging, eight (44.4%) were not truly mal-aligned on 3D imaging (P = 0.0014). For the eight tibial mal-aligned components on 2D imaging, all knees (100%) were not truly mal-aligned on 3D imaging (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable number of the false malalignments were included on 2D measurement. Postoperative component alignment in the computer-navigated TKA might be much better than previously reported.

The accelerometer-based navigation system demonstrated superior radiological outcomes in restoring mechanical alignment and component sagittal positioning in total knee arthroplasty

Background

This study aimed to determine whether the accelerometer-based navigation (ABN) could improve the accuracy of restoring mechanical axis (MA), component positioning, and clinical outcomes compared to conventional (CON) total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

A total of 301 consecutive patients (ABN: 27, CON: 274) were included. A 1:4 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the two groups according to preoperative demographic and clinical parameters. The postoperative MA, femoral coronal angle (FCA), femoral sagittal angle (FSA), tibial coronal angle (TCA) and tibial sagittal angle (TSA) were compared. Absolute deviations of aforementioned angles were calculated as the absolute value of difference between the exact and ideal value and defined as norms if within 3°, otherwise regarded as outliers. Additional clinical parameters, including the Knee Society knee and function scores (KSKS and KSFS) and range of motion (ROM), were assessed at final follow-up (FU) (mean FU was 21.88 and 21.56 months respectively for ABN and CON group). A secondary subgroup analysis and comparison on clinical outcomes were conducted between norms and outliers in different radiological parameters.

Results

A total of 98 patients/102 knees were analyzed after the PSM (ABN: 21 patients/24 knees, CON: 77 patients/78 knees). In the ABN group, the mean MA, FCA and TSA were significantly improved (p = 0.019, 0.006, < 0.001, respectively). Proportions of TKAs within a ± 3°deviation were significantly improved in all the postoperative radiological variables except for TCA (p = 0.003, 0.021, 0.042, 0.013, respectively for MA, FCA, FSA, and TSA). The absolute deviations of FSA and TSA were also significantly lower in the ABN group (p = 0.020, 0.048, respectively). No significant differences were found in either mean value, absolute deviation or outlier ratio of TCA between two groups. On clinical outcomes, there were no significant differences between two groups, although KSKS, KSFS and ROM (p < 0.01, respectively) dramatically improved compared to baseline. The subgroup analysis also demonstrated no statistical difference on clinical outcomes between the outliers and norms in varied radiological parameters.

Conclusions

The ABN could improve the accuracy and precision of mechanical alignment and component positioning without significant improvement of clinical outcomes. Further high quality studies with long term FU are warranted to comprehensively evaluate the value of the ABN.

Reliability of Imageless Computer-Assisted Navigation for Femoral Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the femoral component rotation on intra-operative data recorded in a computer-assisted navigation system (CAN-FRA) compared with the post-operative femoral component rotation observed on computed tomography (CT-FRA).

Material and method:

Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or primary osteoarthritis of the knee was performed in 51 knees in 36 patients with a mean age of 69.51 years. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon using the same implant design. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare the intra-operative CAN-FRA with the post-operative CT-FRA. The angle between the anatomical epicondylar axis and the posterior condylar axis of the implant (CT-FRA) was measured at two separate timepoints by three observers who were blinded to the intra-operative CAN-FRA. Internal rotation was defined as rotation in the negative direction, while external rotation was defined as positive.

Results:

The mean intra-operative CAN-FRA was 0.1° ± 2.8° (range -5.0° to 5.5°). The mean post-operative CT-FRA was -1.3° ± 2.1° (range -4.6° to 4.4°). The mean difference between the CAN-FRA and the CT-FRA was -1.3° ± 2.2° (range -7.9° to 2.4°). The respective ICC values for the three observers were 0.92, 0.94, and 0.93, while the respective intra-observer coefficients were 0.91, 0.85, and 0.90. The ICC for the intra-operative CAN-FRA versus the post-operative CT-FRA was 0.71.

Conclusion:

This study shows that using a computer-assisted navigation system in TKA achieves reliable results and helps to achieve optimal positioning of the femoral component and rotation alignment correction.

Deviations in femoral joint lines using calipered kinematically aligned TKA from virtually planned joint lines are small and do not affect clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA) strives to restore the native distal and posterior joint lines of the femur. Because the joint lines of a virtually planned femoral component on the native femur can serve as surrogates of those of the native femur, the present study determined position and orientation deviations of the femoral joint lines following calipered KA TKA from virtually planned joint lines and whether these alignment deviations affect clinical outcomes. Our hypotheses were that the alignment deviations for most knees would be less than 2 mm and/or 2° and that larger alignment deviations would not be associated with lower clinical outcome scores.

METHODS

A review of lower extremity CT scanograms and CT scans of the knee identified 36 patients treated with calipered KA TKA in one limb and no other skeletal deformities in either limb. 3D models of the operated femur with the implanted femoral component and the native femur were created. The articular surfaces of a 3D model of the implanted femoral component in the TKA knee were shape-matched to the condyles of the native femur to create a virtual plan. The shape-matched femoral component served as a reference from which to determine alignment deviations of the femoral component implanted in the ipsilateral femur. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were obtained at an average of 20 months.

RESULTS

For proximal-distal and anterior-posterior positions and varus-valgus and internal-external orientations of the femoral component, the root mean square deviations from the planned joint lines ranged from 1.4 to 1.5 (mm or degrees). The mean differences ranged from - 0.1 to 0.2 (mm or degrees) indicating an absence of systematic alignment deviations. The proportion of knees with joint lines within ± 2 mm and ± 2° of the joint lines of virtually planned knees ranged from 83 to 92%. For the FJS and OKS, the median values were 79 (out of 100) and 45 (out of 48), respectively, and there were no significant correlations between deviations in the positions and orientations and either the FJS or the OKS.

CONCLUSION

Alignment deviations were bounded by 2 mm and 2° for most knees, which previous biomechanical studies have shown reduce the risks of stiffness, loss of extension, loss of flexion, and tibial compartment forces higher than those of the native knee. Moreover, because median FJS and OKS were relatively high, and because larger alignment deviations did not correlate with lower outcome scores, deviations did not affect clinical outcomes. These results validate calipered KA TKA as a surgical technique which closely restores the distal and posterior femoral joint lines to those planned and achieves concomitant high patient-reported outcome scores. Thus, surgeons can use the calipered KA TKA technique with confidence that the surgical alignment goal will be satisfied with sufficient accuracy that high patient-reported outcomes are achieved.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Accuracy of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective computed tomography-based study

INTRODUCTION

Evidence now exists advocating the use of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite the introduction of new navigation systems into clinical practice no evidence currently exists showing independent verification of their accuracy. The aim of this study was to validate the in vivo accuracy of the Exactech Guided Personalised Surgery (GPS) computer navigation system using a validated computed tomography (CT) measurement of alignment.

METHOD

Consecutive patients who underwent TKA using the GPS Navigation System at our institution were prospectively recruited. Intraoperative parameters of 3D alignment as measured by the GPS navigation system were recorded and compared against the postoperative measurements of alignment measured using the Perth CT Protocol to assess the accuracy of the GPS navigation system.

RESULTS

29 consecutive patients (13 male, 16 female) who underwent TKA were prospectively recruited. Overall, for all measures of 3D alignment the mean difference between intraoperatively recorded and postoperative CT-measured alignment was 1.55° ± 0.22° (95% confidence interval). Individual measurement differences in the femoral prosthesis were: coronal alignment 1.64° ± 0.52°; flexion 2.07° ± 0.55°; rotation 1.38° ± 0.33° Differences in the tibial prosthesis were: coronal alignment 2.03° ± 0.53°; slope 1.14° ± 0.39° The whole limb coronal alignment difference was 2.34° ± 0.83° CONCLUSION: The Exactech GPS Navigation system is very accurate with a high concordance between intraoperative and postoperative measures of alignment and prosthesis positioning. We therefore confidently validate the system and support its continued use in clinical practice. Other navigation systems should undergo a similar validation process.

Technical and surgical causes of outliers after computer navigated total knee arthroplasty

Background

Navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves implant and limb alignment but outliers continue to exist. This study aimed to determine the technical and surgical causes of outliers.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 208 patients who had undergone navigated TKA. Limb and implant alignment indices were measured on post-operative CT scans: mechanical femoro-tibial angle (MFTA); coronal femoral angle (CFA); coronal tibial angle (CTA); sagittal femoral angle (SFA); and sagittal tibial angle (STA). Values outside 0°±3° for MFTA and SFA, 90°±3° for CFA, CTA and STA were considered outliers. Intra-operative navigation data and CT scans were evaluated to categorize the causes of sagittal and coronal plane outliers into hip centre error; ankle centre error; heterogeneous tibial cement mantle; malalignment accepted by surgeon; suboptimal knee balance; and no obvious explanation.

Results

Of the 1040 measurements (five per TKA), the overall incidence of outliers was 10.4% (n = 108). Femoral component outliers (CFA + SFA, n = 51) were all attributable to hip centre error. Tibial component outliers (CTA + STA, n = 43) were attributable to ankle centre error (n = 6), heterogeneous cement mantle (n = 20), malalignment accepted by the surgeon (n = 6) and no obvious cause (n = 11). MFTA outliers were attributable to hip centre error (n = 4) or suboptimal knee balance (n = 10).

Conclusions

Surgeon related errors can be minimized by a meticulous operative technique. These results indicate scope for additional technical improvement, especially in hip centre acquisition, which may further reduce the incidence of outliers.

Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures. During the past decade, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been commercially introduced in order to simplify and make TKA surgery more effective, precise and efficient than conventional mechanical instrumentation (CI) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS). Nevertheless, there are critical arguments against PSI for routine use. The aim of the current manuscript is to describe advantages and limitations of PSI for primary TKA.

AREAS COVERED

By means of a description of the available literature different aspects are discussed (accuracy, clinical and functional outcomes, operative time, blood loss, efficiency and costs).

EXPERT OPINION

Most publications do not claim a significant increase in PSI accuracy over CI, but they also do not postulate PSIs accuracy is worse either. Regarding clinical aspects, PSI did not appear to give any advantage over standard techniques although, equally, it did not appear to show any disadvantages. PSI seems to reduce operative time, could reduce perioperative blood loss and provides logistical benefits in the operation room. Further studies will be required to more thoroughly assess all the advantages and disadvantages of this promising technology as an alternative to CI and CAS.

Conventional versus Smart Wireless Navigation in Total Knee Replacement: Similar Outcomes in a Randomized Prospective Study

Purpose  The development of new computer-assisted navigation technologies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has attracted great interest; however, the debate remains open as to the real reliability of these systems. We compared conventional TKA with last generation computer-navigated TKA to find out if navigation can reach better radiographic and clinical outcomes.

Methods  Twenty patients with tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis were prospectively selected for conventional TKA ( n  = 10) or last generation computer-navigated TKA ( n  = 10). Data regarding age, gender, operated side, and previous surgery were collected. All 20 patients received the same cemented posterior-stabilized TKA. The same surgical instrumentation, including alignment and cutting guides, was used for both the techniques. A single radiologist assessed mechanical alignment and tibial slope before and after surgery. A single orthopaedic surgeon performed clinical evaluation at 1 year after the surgery. Wilcoxon's test was used to compare the outcomes of the two groups. Statistical significance was set at p  < 0.05.

Results  No significant differences in mechanical axis or tibial slope was found between the two groups. The clinical outcome was equally good with both techniques. At a mean follow-up of 15.5 months (range, 13–25 months), all patients from both groups were generally satisfied with a full return to daily activities and without a significance difference between them.

Conclusion  Our data showed that clinical and radiological outcomes of TKA were not improved by the use of computer-assisted instruments, and that the elevated costs of the system are not warranted.

Level of Evidence  This is a Level II, randomized clinical trial.

Does final component alignment correlate with alignment of the bone resection surfaces in cemented total knee arthroplasty?

PURPOSE

To examine, with a navigation, whether the final component alignments correlate with alignment of the bone resection surfaces in cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to evaluate the factors affecting alignment deviation.

METHODS

A total of 222 patients (276 knees) who underwent navigation-assisted TKA between September 2012 and January 2014 due to osteoarthritis were retrospectively reviewed. The deviation between the alignment of bone resection surfaces and the final alignment of femoral and tibial components was measured. Factors associated with alignment deviation of greater than 2° (outliers) were evaluated. These included age, sex, body mass index, bone mineral density (T score), preoperative and postoperative mechanical femorotibial angle, preoperative and postoperative flexion contractures, and the difference between medial and lateral gaps in knee extension or flexion.

RESULTS

Outliers consisted of 24 cases (8.6%) on the femoral coronal plane, 4 cases (1.4%) on the tibial coronal plane, and 48 cases (17.4%) on the tibial sagittal plane. In the coronal plane (femur and tibia), the outliers were associated with preoperative [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR) 0.774; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.672-0.891] and postoperative (p < 0.001; OR 0.240; 95% CI 0.123-0.468) flexion contractures; a difference of 3 mm or more between the medial and lateral gaps in knee extension (p < 0.041; OR 5.805; 95% CI 1.075-31.343); and a T score of less than -2.5(p < 0.024; OR 5.899; 95% CI 1.258-27.664). In the sagittal plane of the tibia, the outliers were associated with preoperative (p < 0.001; OR 0.886; 95% CI 0.829-0.946) and postoperative (p < 0.031; OR 0.803; 95% CI 0.659-0.980) flexion contractures.

CONCLUSION

There was a deviation between the alignments of the bone resection surfaces and the final alignments of components. With larger preoperative and postoperative flexion contractures in the coronal and sagittal planes, there were more outlier risks. The outliers in the coronal plane were associated with a difference of 3 mm or more between the medial and lateral gaps in knee extension and poor bone quality. Awareness of such alignment deviation and related factors can help diminish the outliers after TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Assessment of patient-specific instrumentation precision through bone resection measurements

PURPOSE

In the present study, the precision of two patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) systems for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was evaluated by comparing bony resection thicknesses of the pre-operative PSI planning and intra-operative measurements by a vernier calliper. It was hypothesized that the data provided by pre-operative planning were accurate within ±2 mm of the bone resection thickness measured intra-operatively.

METHODS

Forty-one patient-specific TKAs were examined: 25 performed with Visionaire^® technology and 16 with OtisMed^® system. PSI accuracy was analysed comparing the resected bone thicknesses in the femoral and tibial cuts with pre-operatively planned resections. To determine pre-operative planning precision, the thickness values reported by the PSI planning were subtracted from the values reported intra-operatively by the calliper.

RESULTS

The mean absolute differences between pre-operatively planned resections and corresponding intra-operative thickness measurements ranged from a minimum of 2.6 mm (SD 0.8) to a maximum of 3.6 mm (SD 1.3) in all three anatomical planes in both groups. In every plane, the mean absolute discrepancies between planned resections and measured cuts differed significantly from zero (p < 0.0001). The proportion of differences within ±2 mm between intra-operative measured resections and planned PSI cuts occurred in more than 90 % of the cohort for femoral distal resections. Less precision was reported for the femoral posterior medial cuts (70.7 % within ±2 mm) and the tibial cuts (70.7 % on the medial, 75.6 % on the lateral side). Prosthetic component alignment on the coronal and transverse planes resulted in considerable deviations from the pre-operative planning.

CONCLUSION

The two examined PSI technologies were accurate in femoral distal cuts, determining acceptable femoral component placement on the coronal plane. Posterior femoral and tibial cuts were less precise. Deviations from the pre-operative resection planning were reported in every plane. Inaccuracy was explained by ambiguous custom-made jigs placement on the bony surface.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

CT- versus MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To determine whether computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more suitable for the patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) systems for total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 2016 for prospective comparative trials that compared CT- versus MRI-based PSI systems for TKA. Our predefined primary outcome was the outliers incidence of coronal overall limb alignment.

RESULTS

Six studies with a total of 336 knees meeting the eligibility criteria, and four trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with MRI-based PSI systems, CT-based PSI systems were associated with a higher outliers incidence of coronal overall limb alignment (risk ratio: 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-2.72; P = 0.04), more angular errors of coronal overall limb alignment (mean difference (MD): 1.01°; 95% CI: 0.47-1.56; P = 0.0003), and longer operation time (MD: 5.02 min; 95% CI: 1.26-8.79; P = 0.009). While no significant differences in the coronal/sagittal alignment of the femoral/tibial component outliers, the angular errors of coronal overall limb alignment, the angular errors of the femoral/tibial component in coronal plane, or incidence of change of implant size of the femoral/tibial component were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The current limited evidence suggests that MRI-based PSI systems exhibit higher accuracy for TKA regarding the coronal limb axis than CT-based PSI systems. However, well-designed studies comparing CT-versus MRI-based PSI systems for TKA are warrant to confirm these results before widespread use of this technique can be recommended.

Effects of Cementing on Ligament Balance During Total Knee Arthroplasty

Complications related to joint imbalance may contribute to some of the most predominant modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These complications include instability, aseptic loosening, asymmetric component wear, and idiopathic pain. Fixation may represent a step that introduces unchecked variability into the procedure and may contribute to the incidence of joint imbalance-related complications. The ability to quantify in vivo loading in the medial and lateral compartments would allow for the ability to confirm balance after fixation and prior to wound closure. This retrospective study sought to capture any variability and imbalance associated with cementing technique. A total of 93 patients underwent sensor-assisted TKA. All patients were confirmed to have quantifiably balanced joints prior to cementation. After cementing and final component placement, the sensor was reinserted into the joint to capture any cementation-induced changes in loading. Imbalance was observed in 44% of patients after cementation. There was no difference in the proportion of imbalance due to surgeon experience (P=.456), cement type (P=.429), or knee system (P=.792). A majority of knees exhibited loading increase in the medial compartment. It was concluded that cementation technique contributes to a significant amount of balance-related variability at the fixation stage of the procedure. The use of the sensor in this study allowed for the correction of all instances of imbalance prior to closure. More objective methods of balance verification may be important for ensuring optimal surgical outcomes. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(3):e455-e459.].

Patient-specific positioning guides for total knee arthroplasty: no significant difference between final component alignment and pre-operative digital plan except for tibial rotation

PURPOSE

To assess whether there is a significant difference between the alignment of the individual femoral and tibial components (in the frontal, sagittal and horizontal planes) as calculated pre-operatively (digital plan) and the actually achieved alignment in vivo obtained with the use of patient-specific positioning guides (PSPGs) for TKA. It was hypothesised that there would be no difference between post-op implant position and pre-op digital plan.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients were included in this non-inferiority trial. Software permitted matching of the pre-operative MRI scan (and therefore calculated prosthesis position) to a pre-operative CT scan and then to a post-operative full-leg CT scan to determine deviations from pre-op planning in all three anatomical planes.

RESULTS

For the femoral component, mean absolute deviations from planning were 1.8° (SD 1.3), 2.5° (SD 1.6) and 1.6° (SD 1.4) in the frontal, sagittal and transverse planes, respectively. For the tibial component, mean absolute deviations from planning were 1.7° (SD 1.2), 1.7° (SD 1.5) and 3.2° (SD 3.6) in the frontal, sagittal and transverse planes, respectively. Absolute mean deviation from planned mechanical axis was 1.9°. The a priori specified null hypothesis for equivalence testing: the difference from planning is >3 or <-3 was rejected for all comparisons except for the tibial transverse plane.

CONCLUSION

PSPG was able to adequately reproduce the pre-op plan in all planes, except for the tibial rotation in the transverse plane. Possible explanations for outliers are discussed and highlight the importance for adequate training surgeons before they start using PSPG in their day-by-day practise.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Three-dimensional measurement technique to assess implant position and orientation after total knee arthroplasty

The performance of implant placement technologies are often evaluated based on their achieved post-operative implant alignment. Therefore accurate assessment techniques are necessary to compare pre-operatively planned implant positions with the corresponding post-operatively placed implant positions in total knee arthroplasty. This paper describes a CT based 3D measurement method for evaluation of implant positioning accuracy comparing post-operative implant position to the corresponding pre-operative planned implant position using 3D virtual models. TKAs were carried out on three phantoms and processed three times to investigate the accuracy of the method. The measurements were then assessed against measurements taken through an optical scan. The results indicate that an average measurement error less than 1 ° and 0.5mm can be obtained except in the proximal-distal direction where the error was up to 1.34mm. The accuracy of this 3D measurement technique is sufficiently reliable to enable reporting on implant position and orientation in the same coordinate system as pre-operatively defined independently of the planning system or the surgical implant placement technology (patient-specific guides, robotics, and navigation).

Individualised distal femoral cut improves femoral component placement and limb alignment during total knee replacement in knees with moderate and severe varus deformity

AIM

Our aim was to determine the variation in valgus correction angle and the influence of individualised distal femoral cut on femoral component placement and limb alignment during total knee replacement (TKR) in knees with varus deformity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was done prospectively in two stages. In the first stage, the valgus correction angle (VCA) was calculated in long-limb radiographs of 227 patients and correlated with pre-operative parameters of femoral bowing, neck-shaft angle and hip-knee-ankle angle. In the second part comprising of 240 knees with varus deformity, 140 (group 1) had the distal femoral cut individualised according to the calculated VCA, while the remaining 100 knees (group 1) were operated with a fixed distal femoral cut of 5°. The outcome of surgery was studied by grouping the knees as varus <10°, 10-15° and >15°.

RESULTS

Of the 227 limbs analysed in stage I, 70 knees (31 %) had a VCA angle outside 5-7°. Coronal bowing (p < 0.001), neck-shaft angle (p < 0.001) and preoperative deformity (p < 0.001) significantly influenced VCA. Results of the second phase of the study showed a significant improvement in both femoral component placement and postoperative alignment when VCA was individualised in the groups of knees with varus 10-15° (p 0.002) and varus >15° (p 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Valgus correction angle is highly variable and is influenced by femoral bowing, neck-shaft angle and pre-operative deformity. Individualisation of VCA is preferable in patients with moderate and severe varus deformity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2.

Twice cutting method reduces tibial cutting error in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Bone cutting error can be one of the causes of malalignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The amount of cutting error in total knee arthroplasty has been reported. However, none have investigated cutting error in UKA. The purpose of this study was to reveal the amount of cutting error in UKA when open cutting guide was used and clarify whether cutting the tibia horizontally twice using the same cutting guide reduced the cutting errors in UKA.

METHODS

We measured the alignment of the tibial cutting guides, the first-cut cutting surfaces and the second cut cutting surfaces using the navigation system in 50 UKAs. Cutting error was defined as the angular difference between the cutting guide and cutting surface.

RESULTS

The mean absolute first-cut cutting error was 1.9° (1.1° varus) in the coronal plane and 1.1° (0.6° anterior slope) in the sagittal plane, whereas the mean absolute second-cut cutting error was 1.1° (0.6° varus) in the coronal plane and 1.1° (0.4° anterior slope) in the sagittal plane. Cutting the tibia horizontally twice reduced the cutting errors in the coronal plane significantly (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that in UKA, cutting the tibia horizontally twice using the same cutting guide reduced cutting error in the coronal plane.

Lack of agreement between computer navigation and post-operative 2-dimensional computed tomography (CT) measurements for component and limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the degree of mismatch between intraoperative navigation data using imageless computer navigation and post-operative CT scan measurements with respect to bone cuts, component and limb alignment during TKA.

METHODS

Intraoperative navigation data including bone cut verification and overall limb alignment during TKA was compared to postoperative CT measurements of component and limb alignment according to the Perth protocol. The proportion of cases with mismatch between navigation and CT measurements at two and three degree thresholds was identified.

RESULTS

In a total sample of 50 primary TKAs, 20% of cases showed a mismatch of more than two degrees between navigation and CT obtained measurements for coronal femoral alignment, 42% for femoral rotation, 16% for tibial component coronal alignment and 32% for overall limb alignment.

CONCLUSION

Mismatch between intraoperative navigation data and postoperative CT measurements suggests that postoperative CT scan alignment data should be interpreted with caution. A surgeon should consider a multitude of factors when analysing component and limb alignment postoperatively.

Do manual cutting guides for total knee arthroplasty introduce systematic error?

INTRODUCTION

Conventional cutting guides in total knee arthroplasty can potentially cause unintentional deviation from the planned direction and depth of bone resection resulting in malaligned components. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate the accuracy of bone cutting jigs for both the femur and tibia using imageless navigation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 125 patients with a mean age of 66.7 ± 9.9 years underwent primary total knee arthroplasty with a Stryker Triathlon™ fixed bearing posterior cruciate retaining implant using imageless navigation. Coronal and sagittal position of the secured cutting jig was recorded and bone resection was checked with a rectangular probe attached to a navigation tracker.

RESULTS

There were significant within group differences for the femoral sagittal cut (mean δ = 0.9° [31 %]; p = 0.00001), femoral depth medial compartment (mean δ = 0.5 mm [5 %]; p = 0.001), femoral depth lateral compartment (mean δ = 0.7 mm [7 %]; p = 0.00001), proximal tibial cut (mean δ = 0.3 mm [25 %]; p = 0.001), tibial depth medial compartment (mean δ = 0.6 mm [10 %]; p = 0.0001) and tibia depth lateral cut (mean δ = 0.4 mm [5 %]; p = 0.002). Deviation of more than 2° was observed for the distal cut in the sagittal plane in 17 % and in 9.6 % for the proximal tibial cut in the sagittal plane of all patients.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrated significant differences between the dialed in cut and "actual" bone resection achieved for all planes for both the femur and tibia. The femur sagittal cut demonstrated a tendency for an extended cut and the tibia showed a tendency for varus.

Intra-operative deviation in limb alignment occurring at implantation in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival of knee replacement depends on accurate alignment. Despite improvements in cut accuracy mal-alignment of 3° or more is still seen. All methods share common implantation techniques. This study examines the effect of implantation on overall limb alignment relating it to cut alignment and trial alignment.

METHODS

A retrospective review of navigated primary knee replacements was undertaken (n=113). Overall coronal limb alignments for the aggregated cuts, trial and final implanted components were examined.

RESULTS

All 113 knees had coronal aggregated cut alignment within 2° of neutral (range: 2° varus to 2° valgus). With trial components 99 knees (88%) had an overall coronal limb alignment within 2° of neutral (range: 3° varus to 4° valgus). After final implantation 106 knees (94%) were within 2° of neutral (range: 4° varus to 4° valgus). Forty eight knees (42%) showed no alignment deviation occurring between trial and the final implanted prostheses and 16 knees (14%) shoed a deviation of 2° or more. There was a correlation of both aggregated cut (r=0.284, p=0.002) and trial (r=0.794, p<0.001) with final alignment. There was no significant difference between the final alignment and the aggregated cut alignment(mean difference=-0.15°, p=0.254) or trial alignment (mean difference -0.13°, p=0.155).

CONCLUSIONS

Even when the aggregated alignment produced by the bone cuts is accurate, inaccuracy in final alignment can result from the implantation process. It may be productive for surgeons to concentrate on the implantation process to improve alignment and reduce outliers.

The combined Whiteside's and posterior condylar line as a reliable reference to describe axial distal femoral anatomy in patient-specific instrument planning

PURPOSE

Aligning the femoral component in the axial plane parallel to the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) has been generally recommended. In this retrospective study on the axial anatomy of the distal femur, as determined by the patient-specific instruments (PSI) planning tool based on MRI and 3D reconstructions, the different rotational axes were compared. The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of posterior axial anatomy on anterior anatomy and to compare the different angles of rotation obtained by a PSI-planning engineer.

METHODS

The preoperative planning of 77 PSI patients with a mean (SD) age of 65.6 (9.6) years undergoing primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis was analysed for rotational anatomy of the distal femur. The angles between the posterior condylar line (PCL) and the SEA called posterior condylar angle (PCA), between Whiteside's line and the SEA and finally between Whiteside's line and the PCL, were retrieved from the PSI axial rotation planning screen.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) PCA was 3.2° (1.4°). The mean (SD) angle between Whiteside's line and the SEA was 91.4° (2.2°), and the mean (SD) angle between Whiteside's line and the PCL was 94.5° (2.3°). No significant difference for this last rotational parameter was found in between varus and valgus knees.

CONCLUSION

Patient-specific instrument's preoperative planning found consistent angles to describe the distal femoral anatomy as previously published in the literature. The angle between Whiteside's line and the PCL as measured on PSI planning is a mean angle of 94.5° (2.3°) for both varus and valgus knees. Setting a fixed PCA of 5° of external rotation referenced of the PCL makes this planning repeatable during conventional surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level III.

Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a literature review

During the past decade, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been markedly increased. Recently, patient-specific custom cutting guides have been commercially introduced in order to achieve an accurate component alignment during TKA. In fact, these cutting blocks are specific to a patient's knee anatomy and should help the surgeons to perform bone cuts, reducing the complexity of conventional alignment and sizing tools. Nevertheless, there are critical arguments against patient-specific cutting guides for routine use, such as poor evidence and higher costs. Additionally, there are still no mild and long-term results available that describe the clinical outcomes following patient-specific instrumentation of TKR, cost-effectiveness and lower revision rates. Aim of the current manuscript was to describe the recent improvements of the surgical technique and instrumentation of TKA, reviewing the recent literature concerning the PSI technology.

Effect of intraoperative weight-bearing simulation on the mechanical axis in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Successful outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) requires precise realignment of the mechanical axis. The intraoperative assessment of the mechanical axis is difficult. Intraoperatively, the effect of weight bearing on the lower limb mechanical axis is ignored. We developed a custom-made mechanical loading device to simulate weight-bearing conditions intraoperatively and analysed its effect on the mechanical axis during TKA.

METHODS

Measurements of the mechanical axis were obtained during 30 consecutive primary TKAs in osteoarthritic patients using image-free knee navigation system. Half body weight was applied intraoperatively using our device to quantify the effect of intraoperative load application on the mechanical axis, thus receiving indirect information about soft tissue balancing. Furthermore, the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of navigated mechanical axis measurement with and without load was determined.

RESULTS

Before TKA, mean mechanical axis was 4.0° ± 4.9° without load. Under loading conditions, the mean change of the mechanical axis was 2.1° ± 2.8°. Repetitive measurements of the senior surgeon and junior surgeon revealed a high intraobserver (ICC 0.997) and interobserver reliability (ICC 0.998). The registration of the mechanical axis without and with application of intraoperative loading demonstrated no significant differences during insertion of the trial components (SD 0.29 ± 0.29) and after the definitive component cementation (SD 0.63 ± 0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative quantification and analysis of the mechanical lower limb axis applying defined axial loading by our custom-made loading apparatus is reliable. Ligament stability was unbalanced before TKA and balanced after TKA. For TKA, intraoperative simulation of weight bearing may be helpful to quantify, control and correct knee stability and its influence of mechanical axis.

Intramedullary control of distal femoral resection results in precise coronal alignment in TKA

INTRODUCTION

There is still a relevant rate of outliers in coronal alignment >3° when the conventional technique is used, potentially accompanied by a poorer long-term clinical outcome and a reduced longevity of the implant. Intraoperative implementation of preoperative planning and above all checking of the bone resections carried out are decisive for reinstating a straight leg axis. Intramedullary control of femoral resection has not been described to date. The objective of this study was to present a new technique for the intramedullary control of femoral resection and the results obtained using this method.

METHODS

All patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty with the new intramedullary control of femoral resection were included in this retrospective study. The frequency of the need for correction of the saw cuts was documented. The radiological assessment included pre- and postoperative whole-leg standing radiographs. In the process, the whole-leg axis, AMA, entry point, LDFA and MPTA were evaluated preoperatively. On the postoperative radiographs, the whole-leg axis and the alignment of the femoral and tibial components were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-two total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were included in the study. The average age was 68.7 years. The preoperative malalignment was on the average 8.2° ± 4.7° (23.8° varus to 17.3° valgus). The postoperative whole-leg axis was on the average 1.3° ± 1.1° (5.5° varus to 4.3° valgus). The femoral component showed a deviation from the mechanical axis of 0.1° ± 1.2° (4.3° varus to 3.7° valgus) and the tibial component a deviation from the mechanical tibial axis of 0.3° ± 1.2° (4.2° varus to 2.5° valgus).

CONCLUSIONS

The new technique of intramedullary control of distal femoral resection, together with preoperative planning, leads to a precise alignment of the femoral component in the coronal plane. Thus, for the first time, a simple and effective tool for checking distal femoral resection is available for standardized use.

Can TKA design affect the clinical outcome? Comparison between two guided-motion systems

PURPOSE

In a retrospective comparative analysis in patients undergoing primary guided-motion total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the authors have evaluated whether different TKA implant design would influence the clinical and functional outcomes.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2009, 227 computer-assisted primary TKAs were performed in 219 consecutive patients. Patients received one of the two different fixed-bearing guided-motion TKA designs assisted by navigation surgery: the Scorpio Non-Restrictive Geometry (NRG) knee system and the Journey Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS) knee systems.

RESULTS

Data were available for 180 patients (187 knees). No significant differences were observed between the two groups with respect to preoperative demographic characteristics, range of motion (ROM) and radiographic knee alignment. At a mean follow-up of 29 months, the Journey BCS group had higher mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in all subscales and a greater ROM than the Scorpio NRG group. This difference was statistically significant for the KOOS subscales of pain (p = 0.007) and knee-related quality of life (p = 0.045), as well as for postoperative ROM (p = 0.018). Considering the overall complications, 1 patient of Scorpio NRG group (0.5%) and 5 in Journey BCS (2.7%) had stiffness. Anterior knee pain was reported in 4 cases of Scorpio NRG group (2.1%). In the Journey BCS group were observed 2 cases (1.1%) of frontal plane instability and 1 case (0.5%) of synovitis pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The bearing geometry and kinematic pattern of different guided-motion prosthetic designs can affect the clinical-functional outcome and complications type in primary TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Clinical study, Level III.

Navigated total knee arthroplasty: is it error-free?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine whether errors do occur in navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKAs) and to study whether errors in bone resection or implantation contribute to these errors.

METHODS

A series of 20 TKAs was studied using computer navigation. The coronal and sagittal alignments of the femoral and tibial cutting guides, the coronal and sagittal alignments of the final tibial implant and the coronal alignment of the final femoral implant were compared with that of the respective bone resections. To determine the post-implantation mechanical alignment of the limb, the coronal alignment of the femoral and tibial implants was combined.

RESULTS

The median deviation between the femoral cutting guide and bone resection was 0° (range -0.5° to +0.5°) in the coronal plane and 1.0° (range -2.0° to +1.0°) in the sagittal plane. The median deviation between the tibial cutting guide and bone resection was 0.5° (range -1.0° to +1.5°) in the coronal plane and 1.0° (range -1.0° to +3.5°) in the sagittal plane. The median deviation between the femoral bone resection and the final implant was 0.25° (range -2.0° to 3.0°) in the coronal plane. The median deviation between the tibial bone resection and the final implant was 0.75° (range -3.0° to +1.5°) in the coronal plane and 1.75° (range -4.0° to +2.0°) in the sagittal plane. The median post-implantation mechanical alignment of the limb was 0.25° (range -3.0° to +2.0°).

CONCLUSIONS

When navigation is used only to guide the positioning of the cutting jig, errors may arise in the manual, non-navigated steps of the procedure. Our study showed increased cutting errors in the sagittal plane for both the femur and the tibia, and following implantation, the greatest error was seen in the sagittal alignment of the tibial component. Computer navigation should be used not only to guide the positioning of the cutting jig, but also to check the bone resection and implant position during TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Three-dimensional implant position and orientation after total knee replacement performed with patient-specific instrumentation systems

Patient-specific instrumentation systems are entering into clinical practice in total knee replacement, but validation tests have yet to determine the accuracy of replicating computer-based plans during surgery. We performed a fluoroscopic analysis to assess the final implant location with respect to the corresponding preoperative plan. Forty-four patients were analyzed after using a patient-specific system based on CT and MRI. Computer aided design implant models and models of the femur and tibia bone portions, as for the preoperative plans, were provided by the manufacturers. Two orthogonal fluoroscopic images of each knee were taken after surgery for pseudo-biplane imaging; 3D component locations with respect to the corresponding bones were estimated by a shape-matching technique. Assuming that the corresponding values at the preoperative plan were equal to zero, discrepancies were taken as an indication of accuracy for the systems. A repeatability test revealed that the technique was reliable within 1 mm and 1°. The maximum discrepancies for all the patients for the femoral component were 5.9 mm in a proximo-distal direction and 4.2° in flexion. Good matching was found between final implantations and preoperative plans with mean discrepancies smaller than 3.1 mm and 1.9°.

Intraoperative fluoroscopy improves surgical precision in conventional TKA

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess whether intraoperative fluoroscopy assists in the restoration of the coronal limb alignment target in conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

One hundred and six patients undergoing conventional cemented TKA were randomly assigned to be operated on with or without intraoperative fluoroscopy. The image intensifier, together with customized manual instrumentation, was used for separately measuring the frontal alignment of the femoral and tibial resection surfaces. The surgeon adjusted the resection surfaces when a mechanical axis deviation error angle of ≥ 0.5° was observed on the fluoroscopic image. Coronal alignment was measured on standing long-leg digital radiographs.

RESULTS

Patients operated with fluoroscopy assistance had (1) a lower risk of malalignment at the threshold of >3° (risk ratio, 0.7; 95 % CI, 0.13-1.2), (2) a mean fluoroscopic time of 3 s, and (3) a longer operative time (69 vs. 60 min, p < 0.001). The American Knee Society Score was not different between the two groups at 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This new surgical intervention appears to offer an effective means for improving the precision of TKA alignment in the coronal plane.

Easy identification of mechanical axis during total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

We devised an intraoperatively identifiable mechanical axis (IIMA) as a reference of alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2010 and January 2011, primary TKAs were consecutively performed on 672 patients (1007 knees) using an IIMA as a reference in the coronal plane.

RESULTS

The alignment of the lower extremity improved from a mean of 11.4±6.7° (-10.3-34.4°) of varus preop. to 0.7±3.5° (-5.2-8.6°) immediately after surgery. Mean alignment of the femoral component in the coronal plane was 89.3±2.3° (83.4-97.2°) postop. and mean alignment of the tibial component was 90.4±2.2° (85.1-94.2°) postop.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that IIMA could be of considerable value as a new guider of alignment that is easily accessible and highly effective during total knee arthroplasty.

Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) as assessed by the intraoperative use of knee navigation software during the surgical procedure.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with primary gonarthrosis were selected for unilateral total knee arthroplasty. The first three patients were excluded from this study, as they were considered to be a warm up to set-up the procedure. All patients were operated on with a cemented posterior-stabilised prosthesis cruciate ligament-sacrificing by the same surgeon using the patient matched cutting jigs. The size of the implant, level of resection, and alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes were evaluated. An unsatisfactory result was considered an error ≥2° in both planes for each component as a possible error of 4° could result in aggravation.

RESULTS

On the coronal plane the mean deviation of the tibial guide from the ideal alignment was 1.2 ± 1.5 (range 0-5°) and in the sagittal plane was 3.8 ± 2.4 (range 0-7.5°). On the coronal plane the mean deviation of the femoral guide from the ideal alignment was 1.2 ± 0.6 and in the sagittal was 3.7 ± 2.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of this preliminary experience the PSI system based only on data acquisition with A-P radiograms and RMN cannot be defined as accurate. In cases of the use of the custom made cutting jigs it is recommended to perform an accurate control of the alignment before making the cuts, for any step of the procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Joint line changes after primary total knee arthroplasty: navigated versus non-navigated

PURPOSE

Navigation has been introduced to achieve more accurate positioning of the implants after TKA. The scientific attention was mainly paid on limb alignment rather than restoration of the natural joint line. The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of the joint line restoration in primary TKA with and without navigation. We hypothesized that joint line reconstruction in navigated TKA is more accurate.

METHODS

A total of 493 primary TKAs operated in a single medical centre were consecutively selected and divided into two groups. 206 cases were performed computer assisted (BrainLab CI-System), whereas 287 knees were implanted conventionally. For both groups, the joint line position of the knee was determined on standardized calibrated standing pre- and postoperative digital radiographs in ap view by a modified method of Kawamura et al. A joint line shift of more than 8 mm was defined as outlier.

RESULTS

In the conventional group, the joint line shift averaged 0.7 mm (±4.4 mm), whereas the findings in the computer-assisted cases were in average 0.6 mm (±4.5 mm). The joint line was located above 8 mm in 6 % of non-navigated versus 6.8 % of navigated primary TKAs. There were no statistically significant differences of joint line shift between the different component types. A statistically significant relation was not found between joint line shift and leg alignment changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional surgical technique allows a precise joint line reconstruction in primary TKA. Navigation did not improve the joint line reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level III.

Accuracy of manual instrumentation of tibial cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of conventional instrumentation for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as assessed by a computer-based navigation system during each phase of the surgical procedure. The hypothesis is that conventional instrumentation fails to achieve optimal accuracy in final implant positioning, thus leading to surgical errors.

METHODS

Forty primary TKAs were performed. The resection guide was placed using an extramedullary guide. Accurate guide positioning was assessed by the navigation system prior to the osteotomy. The alignment measurement was repeated after resection and after component implantation in order to quantify the deviation caused by the manual positioning of the prosthetic components. A deviation ≥2° was considered unsatisfactory.

RESULTS

In the frontal plane, unsatisfactory results observed were as follows: 15 % with reference to manual positioning of the resection guide and 10 % with reference to definition of the resection plane with a tendency towards varus malalignment. In the sagittal plane, unsatisfactory results were as follows: 45 % with reference to manual positioning of the resection guide and 40 % with reference to definition of the resection plane with a trend of decreased tibial slope angle. The deviation between bone resection and subsequent implant placement was ≥2° in none of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms the hypothesis that conventional instrumentation fails to achieve optimal accuracy in the positioning of the tibial component. During each phase of the surgical procedure, a tendency towards varus malalignment and a decreased tibial slope angle were observed.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

II.

The role of navigation in total knee replacement surgery

Since the introduction of modern implants in the 1970s, total knee replacement surgery has been a great clinical and commercial success. Implants and techniques have continued to evolve, driven by the desire for improved function and longevity. However, inaccurate insertion of these implants may cause them to loosen and fail. Computer navigation has been introduced as a modification to existing surgical techniques to improve the accuracy with which the bones are cut prior to inserting the knee replacement implants. Research continues to see if this potentially costly and time consuming technique can contribute to improved longevity of knee replacements.

Computer-assisted surgery: a teacher of TKAs

INTRODUCTION

The hypothesis of this study is that computer-aided navigation experience could improve the ability to better place components in the coronal plane and to improve visual/spatial awareness based on the ability of navigation to provide instant feedback. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the educational role of the navigation system to obtain a better alignment of the prosthetic components with standard instrumentation after a computer-aided navigation experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty patients were operated by the same surgeon, with more than 5 years experience with TKA. They were equally divided in three groups: group A (operated with non-navigated technique by surgeon without computer-assisted experience); group B (operated with computer-assisted surgery by the same surgeon); group C (operated with non-navigated technique by the same surgeon after the computer-navigated experience). We evaluated by full-length weight-bearing radiographs the overall alignment of the lower limb in the coronal plane. The optimum placement of the components was considered when the angle was within the limits of ±3° varus/valgus on the coronal x-rays. Comparison between groups was done using one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Bonferroni test and Pearson chi-square statistics for proportions of optimum placement (P<0.05).

RESULTS

In the group A 34 patients (68%) had the optimum placement on the coronal x-rays; in the group B they were 46 (92%) and in the group 41 (82%). The difference is statistically significant in comparing group A and Group B (<0.001), group A and group C (P=0.04), but not for group B and C (P=0.2).

CONCLUSION

We believe that the navigation system has an educational role to improve the ability of surgeon of positioning prosthetic components precisely in the coronal plane.

Surgeon variability in total knee arthroplasty component alignment: a Monte Carlo analysis

Component mal-alignment in total knee arthroplasty has been associated with increased revision rates and poor clinical outcomes. A significant source of variability in traditional, jig-based total knee arthroplasty is the performance of the surgeon. The purpose of this study was to determine the most sensitive steps in the femoral and tibia arthroplasty procedures. A computational model of the total knee arthroplasty procedure was created, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed that included surgeon variability in each step of the procedure. The proportion of well-aligned components from the model agrees with clinical literature in most planes. When components must be aligned within ±3° in all planes, component alignment was most sensitive to the accuracy of identifying the lateral epicondyle for the femoral component, and to the precision of the transverse plane alignment of the extramedullary guide for the tibial component. This model can be used as a tool for evaluating different procedural approaches or sources of variability to improve the quality of the total knee arthroplasty procedure.

Which factors increase risk of malalignment of the hip-knee-ankle axis in TKA?

BACKGROUND

Computer navigation has improved accuracy and reduced the percentage of alignment outliers in TKA. However, the characteristics of outliers and the risk factors for limb malalignment after TKA are still unclear.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore addressed the following questions: (1) What is the incidence and characteristics of outliers for postoperative limb mechanical axis (hip-knee-ankle [HKA] angle outside the conventional 180° ± 3° range) and component alignment in TKA? And (2) what are the preoperative clinical or radiographic risk factors for limb mechanical axis malalignment in TKA?

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of 1500 computer-assisted TKAs to identify outliers for postoperative HKA axis and component alignment and determined risk factors for malalignment. Full-length hip-to-ankle and knee radiographs were used to measure preoperative HKA angle, femoral coronal bowing, joint divergence angle, tibial subluxation, and tibial bone loss and postoperative HKA angle and femoral and tibial component angle.

RESULTS

The incidence of outliers for postoperative limb mechanical axis, femoral component alignment, and tibial component alignment was 7% (112 of 1500 TKAs), 7%, and 8%, respectively, with 70% of limbs placed in excessive varus and 30% in excessive valgus. Preoperative varus deformity of more than 20° and femoral bowing of more than 5° were associated with increased risk of placing the limb mechanical axis outside the acceptable ± 3° range after computer-assisted TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of preoperative radiographic risk factors should alert the surgeon to increased chance of malalignment and every measure should be undertaken in such at-risk knees to ensure proper limb and component alignment and soft tissue balance.

The limits of precision in conventionally instrumented computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves the accuracy of component implantation. However, the final implant alignment may not match planned alignment. The hypothesis of this study is that although computer navigation improves alignment, imprecision may not be completely eliminated. The aim of the study was to establish the incidence and sources of imprecision during TKA using computer navigation to measure deviations from planned alignment.

METHODS

Computer navigation was used to quantify changes in planned alignment at four steps during 136 TKA's: application of cutting blocks, addition of definitive pin fixation, bone cuts and after prosthesis application. Mean changes in alignment deviation at each step in each plane were measured and the number of significant outliers (>3° from the planned resection plane) were assessed in each plane.

RESULTS

Overall changes in planned alignment were small and non-cumulative between steps but the incidence of outliers (cuts measured as >3° from planned alignment at each step) increased through the steps, with 21.3 % (n = 29) of final implants outlying in the tibial sagittal plane, which was the least precise plane. The highest number of outliers occurred after bone resection and the addition of pins to cutting blocks was also identified as a source of imprecision.

CONCLUSION

Despite improved accuracy of bone resection with computer-navigated TKA, the precision of bone cuts may be affected at several steps of the procedure. Cutting block application, bone resection and prosthesis application may all affect accuracy. Bone cuts should be made with meticulous care, whether navigated or not, and navigated cuts should be checked and corrected, particularly in the tibial sagittal plane.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.