Increased use of intramedullary nails for intertrochanteric proximal femoral fractures in veterans affairs hospitals: a comparative effectiveness study

Numerical comparison of the intramedullary nail for the fixation of different proximal femoral fractures

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the mechanical responses, including the stability and implant stress, of different proximal femoral fractures stabilized with an intramedullary system by finite element simulation. Furthermore, the effect of number of the lag screws, including one and two screws, was also investigated.

METHODS

A numerical hip model was created first, and then four different types of proximal femoral fractures-namely femoral neck, intertrochanteric, reverse intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric fractures-were employed in this study. An intramedullary nail system was used to fix the four fracture types. Furthermore, two different number of lag screws, either one bigger or two smaller, was also compared. The peak loading of the femur in level walking was used for comparison.

FINDINGS

The results showed that both the peak displacement and the gap opening distance in the reversed intertrochanteric fracture were obviously higher than in the other fractures. Additionally, the peak equivalent stress of the intramedullary nail in the reversed intertrochanteric fracture was the highest among all the fractures. The stress on the nail in cases of reversed intertrochanteric fracture was 4.6 times (ranging from 132.9 to 616.8 MPa) and 4.4 times (ranging from 126 to 556 MPa) higher than in intertrochanteric fractures with one and two lag screws, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

The intramedullary nail is a mechanically effective device for the fixation of proximal femoral fractures. However, to avoid the nail breakage the postoperative rehabilitation process for reversed intertrochanteric fracture should be slower compared to the neck, intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures.

The increasing complexity of femoral fragility fractures: incidence, fracture patterns and management over a 10-year period

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there have been changes in the numbers and complexity of femoral fragility fractures presenting to our department over a period of 10 years.

METHODS

Patients >60 years presenting with femoral fragility fractures to our institution in 2018-2019 (397 fractures) were compared with respect to demographic data, incidence rates, fracture classification and surgical management with a historical cohort from 2009-2010 (335 fractures). Pathological and high velocity fractures were excluded.

RESULTS

The gender proportion and average age (83.1 vs. 82.7 years) was unchanged. The number of femoral fractures increased by 19% but the overall incidence in people >60 years fell by 6% (p = 0.41). The proportion of unstable trochanteric fractures (31A2 and A3) increased from 22% to 55% (p < 0.001). The proportion of displaced intracapsular fractures increased from 53% to 72% (p < 0.001). The incidence of stable trochanteric fractures fell from 12.4 to 7.3/10,000 patients>60 years (p = 0.0006) while the incidence of unstable trochanteric fractures (31A2 and 31A3) increased from 3.5 to 8.9/10,000 patients >60 years (p < 0.0001). The proportion of trochanteric fractures treated with an intramedullary (IM) nail increased from 9% to 35% (p = 0.0001). The number of shaft and distal femoral fractures increased by 41% although the incidence did not change significantly. Periprosthetic fractures comprised 70% of femoral shaft fractures in both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing number and complexity of femoral fragility fractures, especially unstable trochanteric fractures and periprosthetic fractures, is likely to have an impact on implant use, theatre time and cost.

A Prospective Randomized Trial: Does Full Weight Bearing Improve Functional Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Proximal Intramedullary Nailing After an Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture?

Introduction This study aimed to compare the functional outcomes and degree of independence in activities of daily living in patients aged >65 years who were treated with a proximal femoral nail (PFN) after an intertrochanteric femur fracture (ITFF) and underwent full and partial load-bearing in the early stage. Methods Overall, 133 patients who were hospitalized for ITFF and treated with PFN between August 2018 and March 2021 were randomly assigned to two groups. During the follow-up period, 45 patients who underwent partial load bearing (Group 1) and 40 patients who underwent full load bearing (Group 2) were prospectively evaluated. The Harris hip score was used for functional evaluation, and the Barthel index was used to evaluate the degree of independence in activities of daily living. Results The mean age of the patients included in the study was 76.67 ± 8.62 years. Regarding the comparison among groups in terms of age, sex, direction of fracture, reduction quality, fracture type, tip-apex distance, and surgical risk, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p ≥ 0.05). Moreover, regarding the comparison in terms of calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, vitamin D, and keratin levels, which affect bone metabolism, no statistical difference was observed (p ≥ 0.05). We found that the mean Harris hip score was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (Group 1: 76.82 ± 12.48; Group 2: 67.80 ± 15.34; p = 0.004). Moreover, 73.3% (n=33) and 42.5% (n=17) of patients in Groups 1 and 2 were fully independent or mildly dependent, respectively. We also found that the independence status was significantly better in Group 1 (p = 0.004). Conclusion Mobilization of older patients treated with PFN after ITFF using partial load-bearing protocols in the early postoperative period positively impacts hip function and the ability to perform activities of daily living independently.

Outcome of buttress plate-nail construct used for reconstruction of broken lateral wall in intertrochanteric fractures

PURPOSE

Intramedullary implants are well accepted fixation of all types of intertrochanteric (IT) fractures, both stable and unstable types. Intramedullary nails have an ability to effectively support the posteromedial part, but fail to buttress the broken lateral wall requiring lateral augmentation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of proximal femoral nail augmented with trochanteric buttress plate for broken lateral wall with IT fractures, which was fixed to the femur through hip screw and anti-rotation screw nail.

METHODS

Of 30 patients, 20 had Jensen-Evan type III and 10 had type V fractures. Patients with IT fracture of broken lateral wall and aged more than 18 years, in whom satisfactory reduction was achieved by closed methods, were included in the study. Patients with pathologic or open fractures, polytrauma, prior hip surgery, non-ambulatory prior to surgery, and those who refused to participate were excluded from the study. The operative time, blood loss, radiation exposure, quality of reduction, functional outcome and union time were evaluated. All data were coded and recorded in Microsoft Excel spread sheet program. SPSS 20.0 was used for data analysis and normality of the continuous data was checked using Kolmogorv Smirnov test.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients in the study was 60.3 years. The mean duration of surgery (min), mean intra-operative blood loss (mL) and mean number of exposures were 91.86 ± 12.8 (range 70 - 122), 144.8 ± 3.6 (range 116 - 208), and 56.6 (range 38 - 112), respectively. The mean union time was 11.6 weeks and the mean Harris hip score was 94.1.

CONCLUSION

Lateral trochanteric wall in IT fractures is significantly important, and needs to be reconstructed adequately. Nail-plate construct of trochanteric buttress plate fixed with hip screw and anti-rotation screw of proximal femoral nail can be successfully used to augment, fix or buttress the lateral trochanteric wall giving excellent to good results of early union and reduction.

Mortality in patients with trochanteric hip fractures (AO/OTA 31-A) treated with sliding hip screw versus intramedullary nail: A retrospective national registry study of 9547 patients from the Danish Fracture Database

BACKGROUND

Whether trochanteric hip fractures (AO/OTA 31-A) should be treated with an intramedullary nail (IMN) or sliding hip screw (SHS) is debated. Recent studies suggest an association between IMN and excess mortality rates compared to SHS, but higher quality studies fail to show this association. Furthermore, there is an increased usage of IMN with sparse evidence supporting this rise. Our aim was to compare mortality rates between IMN and SHS in patients with AO/OTA 31-A fractures. Secondarily, to investigate choice of implant in relation to fracture subtype.

METHODS

This national registry study is based on data from the Danish Fracture Database (DFDB). Data were retrieved on patients aged ≥65 years treated for a non-pathological AO/OTA type 31-A fracture with IMN or SHS from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018. Data from DFDB were merged with data from the Danish Civil Registration System (CRS) for time of death. Mortality rates were recorded at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year and presented as crude mortality and adjusted for age, gender, ASA-class, and AO/OTA-subtype.

RESULTS

A total of 9,547 patients were included. The mean age was 83 years, 69% were female, and 55% were ASA-class 3-5. We found higher mortality rates for IMN-patients at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year. The crude relative mortality risk for IMN was also significantly higher at both 30 days (1.20) and 90 days (1.11). Adjusted relative mortality risk for IMN was 1.12 [0.96; 1.31] at 30-days, 1.03 [0.91; 1.17] at 90-days, and 1.01 [0.92; 1.11] at 1 year. Most patients suffered a 31-A2 fracture (56%) and, overall, 74% of patients were treated with IMN.

CONCLUSION

We found significantly increased crude relative mortality risk at 30 days and 90 days in patients treated with IMN. However, when adjusting for confounders the two groups had similar mortality risks. In total, 74% of all patients in this cohort were treated with IMN.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This study has level of evidence: III.

A comparative analysis of distal locked and unlocked long proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-II) in the fixation of stable intertrochanteric fractures

PURPOSE

Long proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA-II) is a preferred implant in recent years for fixation of pertrochanteric fractures, especially in osteoporotic patients. The purpose of this study is to prospectively investigate the effect of distal locking in long PFNA-II fixation of stable intertrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

A total of 58 patients with isolated stable intertrochanteric fractures and treated in our hospital during the study period of 2017-2019 by distal locked or unlocked long PFNA-II fixation were included in this study. Patients who had multiple injuries or open fractures were excluded. There were 40 female and 18 male patients, with 33 affecting the left side and 25 the right side. Of them, 31 belonged to the distal locked group (group A) and 27 to the unlocked group (group B). Surgical procedures and implants used in both groups were similar except for the distal locking of the nails. General data (age, gender, fracture side, etc.) showed no significant difference between two groups (all p > 0.05). The intraoperative parameters like operative time, radiation exposure and follow-up parameters like functional and radiological outcomes were recorded and compared. Statistical tests like the independent samples t-test Fischer's exact and Chi-square test were used to analyze association.

RESULTS

The distribution of the fractures according to AO/OTA classification and 31A1.2 type of intertrochanteric fractures were most common in our study. All the included fractures united and the average functional outcome in both groups were good and comparable at the end of one year. The operative time (mL, 107.1 ± 12.6 vs. 77.0 ± 12.0, p < 0.001) and radiation exposure (s, 78.6 ± 11.0 vs. 40.3 ± 9.3, p < 0.001) were significantly less among the patients in group B. Fracture consolidation, three months after the operative procedures, was seen in a significantly greater proportion of patients in group B (92.6% vs. 67.7%, p = 0.025). Hardware irritation because of distal locking bolt was exclusively seen in group A, however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.241).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that, in fixation of stable intertrochanteric fractures by long PFNA-II nail, distal locking not only increases the operative time and radiation exposure but also delays the fracture consolidation and increases the chances of hardware irritation, and hence is not required.

Does augmentation of intramedullary nails by a buttress plate effectively restore lateral wall integrity in intertrochanteric fractures

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have proved the importance of intact lateral trochanteric wall, thus buttressing/fixing the broken lateral trochanteric wall irrespective of the implant, is likely to improve the alignment and outcome. We compared the outcome of lateral wall buttressing by trochanteric buttress plate (TBP) supplemented to proximal femoral nailing versus proximal femoral nailing alone in patients of broken lateral wall intertrochanteric fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Sixty patients of intertrochanteric factures (IT) of femur with broken lateral wall were randomized into group A or B and were treated with either proximal femoral nail (PFN) alone or proximal femoral nail augmented with trochanteric buttress plate (PFN + TBP), respectively. The TBP plate used was primarily fixed to proximal femur via 8 mm hip screw and 6.4 mm antirotation screw of the PFN. Operative time, blood loss, radiation exposure, quality of reduction, functional outcome, union time, and complications were compared.

RESULT

The mean age was 60.03 + 7.60 (range 42 to 70 years), with male to female ratio of 4:1 and left to right ratio of approximately 1:1. The mean follow up in the series was 16.2 months (range 13 to 36 months). Mean duration of surgery, mean intra-operative blood loss, and mean number of exposures in group A (PFN alone) were 64.88 + 12.24 min (48 to 88), 93 + 1.18 ml (60 to 120), and 32.13 (24 to 46) and in group B (PFN with TBP plate) were 91.86 + 12.78 min (70 to 122 min), 144.8 + 3.6 ml (116 to 208 ml), and 56.6 (38 to 112), respectively. Twenty-five patients and 28 patients in groups A and B respectively achieved score of 4 Chang quality reduction. Mean union time was 13.4 weeks in group A whereas in group B was 11.6 weeks. Mean HHS score in group A was 87.86 with 90% patients in comparison to 94.13 and 97% cases having excellent to good results in group B. In group A, 24 patients, while 29 patients in group B, had excellent to good results. Four patients had hip pain, four had impingement of screws, two had screw migration, three had Z/reverse effect, and four patients had shortening of more than 1 cm in group A. In group B, only one patient had impingement and none of the patient had hip pain, infection, implant failure, Z effect, or shortening.

CONCLUSION

The lateral trochanteric wall in IT fractures is significantly important, and when the lateral wall is broken, it can lead to poor results. TBP plate which is applied laterally on femur along with nail and fixing the plate with hip screw and antirotational screw provides faster union, early weight bearing, better reduction, and so better hip functions. TBP can be used successfully to augment, fix, or buttress the lateral trochanteric wall giving excellent to good results but at the cost of surgical time, blood loss, and radiation exposure.

A Simple Method to Improve Detection of Femoral Nail Abutment in the Distal Femur: A Computer Modeling Study

BACKGROUND

Proximal femur fractures are more frequently treated with long femoral nails. Lateral radiographs are used to assess the nail position in the distal femur. However, because of the asymmetric shape of the distal femur, standard lateral radiographs alone are suboptimal for assessing anteriorly positioned nails in the distal femur. Consequently, instances of nail abutment or even perforation might be missed intraoperatively.

QUESTION/PURPOSE

Using a three-dimensional (3D) modelling approach, we asked: When the nail is in the anterior fifth of the canal, will rotating the femur to align the simulated x-ray beam with the anterior femoral condyles instead of the posterior femoral condyles increase the diagnostic accuracy of detecting nail perforation of the anterior cortex?

METHODS

3D models of 42 unilateral femora from a population sample representative of patients with hip fractures (mean age of 76 ± 7 years, 10 males and 32 females, and 16 left and 26 right femora) were used. The patients had a mean height of 158 ± 9 cm; 27 femora were from Asians and 15 were from Caucasians. Clinically appropriately sized nails had already been virtually implanted previously as part of a quantitative nail fit assessment study. In a preliminary step, the mean angles of inclination of the distal anterior supracondylar region were quantified using four axial sections of the distal femur. For the femora with the nail tip in the anterior fifth of the canal, projections representing a lateral radiograph were generated along with rotated projections at mean angle (5°, 8°) rotations, with the anterior femoral condyles aligned, and anterior femoral condyle alignment followed by internal and external rotation to detect maximum nail perforation. The distance from the nail to the distal anterior cortex was measured for each rotational projection and used to detect anterior nail perforation. The accuracy of detection was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Rotating the 3D models by aligning the x-ray beam with the anterior femoral condyles improves the diagnostic ability of detecting anterior nail perforation compared with standard lateral radiographs. The AUC increased with rotation from 0.50 (95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.50) on the lateral projection to 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.88, difference = -0.23; p = 0.004) at 5° of rotation, 0.77 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.93, difference = -0.27; p = 0.001) at both 8° of rotation and with the anterior femoral condyles aligned, and to 0.82 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.97, difference = -0.32; p < 0.001) with internal/external rotations past the anterior femoral condyles. There were no differences in accuracy between the four methods of rotation.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that rotating the femur to align the anterior femoral condyles on a lateral radiograph and then internally/externally rotating it, improves the accuracy assessed via the AUC of detecting anterior perforation when long nails are positioned in the anterior fifth of the distal femur.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This approach can easily be used in a clinical setting. Intraoperatively, the image intensifier can be rotated around the leg to produce an image with the anterior femoral condyle aligned, providing surgeons with an opportunity to identify and improve the nail's position or exchange the nail while the patient is still under anesthesia.

Potential pitfalls of lateral radiographic assessment of the nail position in the distal femur

INTRODUCTION

Antegrade nailing of proximal femur fractures is a widely accepted treatment that relies on lateral radiographs to assess distal nail positioning. However, the distal femur is trapezoidal in cross section, consequently standard lateral radiographs may be insufficient. This study aimed to utilise 3D modelling to virtually assess the accuracy of lateral radiographs in defining the position of a femoral nail in the distal femur, specifically considering distal cortical encroachment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional models of a commonly used nail, were positioned in 3D models of 63 femora, generated from CT scans. Lateral projections, representative of lateral radiographs, were generated and measurements of the closest point distance between the distal nail and anterior inner cortex were recorded. Axial slices through the model at the same distal position were produced for any nails located in the canal's anterior 1/5th and used to quantify the shortest nail to anterior cortex distance.

RESULTS

A significant (p = 0.000) difference exists between the positions of the nail in the lateral projection (- 1.7 ± 1.24 mm) compared with axial position (- 0.23 ± 1.41 mm) with reference to the inner cortical surface. In the lateral projection, 30 nails were located in the canal's anterior 1/5th, of these, 14 nails were identified in the axial position as perforating the inner cortex, with four also perforating the outer cortex surface.

CONCLUSION

Femoral nails are often anteriorly located in the distal femur and reviewed using lateral radiographs. However, this research demonstrates that owing to the geometry of the distal femur, a lateral radiograph may be inadequate for determining the true position of a femoral nail within the distal femur. Accurately assessing the position of femoral nails may help to address and prevent thigh pain, and iatrogenic fracture or perforation which have been associated with anterior positioning.

Analysis of risk factor for nail breakage in patients with mechanical failures after proximal femoral nail antirotation in intertrochanteric fractures

Breakage of the intramedullary nail is a rare complication after proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in intertrochanteric fracture treatment. The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate the frequency of nail breakage among the patients who were treated for mechanical failure after PFNA for intertrochanteric/pertrochanteric fracture, and (2) to determine the risk factors for nail breakage in PFNA treatment of intertrochanteric fracture.To identify mechanical failure after internal fixation using PFNA, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 35 patients (35 hips) who required reoperation after PFNA with a helical blade for intertrochanteric/pertrochanteric fracture between June 2005 and June 2018.We evaluated the frequency of breakage of PFNA and compared the demographic and radiologic parameters between the breakage and control (non-breakage) groups. We also compared the lever arm for the load of stress from the fulcrum according to the centrum-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle of blade by using reverse design technique.Among the 25 patients with mechanical failure after PFNA except 10 patients with peri-implant infection and osteonecrosis, 7 (28.0%) showed breakage of PFNA at average of 8 months (range, 5-13 months) after index surgery. A larger horizontal offset (the horizontal distance from the lateral surface of the IM nail and the medial tip of helical blade) was associated with an increased risk of nail breakage. A CCD angle of 130° has a shorter lever arm for the load of stress from the fulcrum, meaning a higher stress for nail breakage, although there was no association between CCD angle and breakage of the nail.Our study suggested that higher horizontal offset and a higher CCD angle can increase the risk of breakage of the PFNA nail at the aperture for the helical blade.

Tips and tricks to avoid implant failure in proximal femur fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails: a review of the literature

Objective:

To describe the surgical aspects potentially contributing to hardware failure of cephalomedullary nails.

Data Sources:

A search of the Embase, PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and the Cochrane library for reports of hardware failures after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures. Issues of cut out and cut through phenomena related to technique were excluded. Expert opinion of 3 surgeons, each trained on several fixation systems at Level | trauma centers is reported.

Data Extraction:

Three authors extracted data using a predesigned form. Implant type, reported failure mechanism, and associated factors with implant failure were recorded as well as potential bias.

Results:

Of 2182 search results screened, 64 articles were deemed relevant for our research question and were included. The authors identified factors associated with implant failure: preoperative patient and fracture characteristics, intraoperative reduction, implant handling, and postoperative nonunion. Issues were identified as independent modifiable intraoperative risk factors: inadequate fracture reduction, varus position of femoral neck, direct damage of the cephalomedullary nail aperture by eccentric drilling related to guide sleeve handling, and implant design mechanism failures.

Conclusions:

Multiple factors associated with intraoperative handling can influence the healing of proximal femur fractures. Although many of these have been well described and are taught in fracture courses, surgeons should be aware of subtle intraoperative complications reported in the literature that can weaken implants and add to the likelihood of early failure.

Level of Evidence: IV

Comparison of Short, Intermediate, and Long Cephalomedullary Nail Length Outcomes in Elderly Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

Cephalomedullary nail (CMN) length for intertrochanteric femur fractures without subtrochanteric extension has been an ongoing debate. The authors hypothesize that increasing nail length would result in increasing surgical time, greater incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), postoperative anemia, and blood loss requiring transfusion due to increased intramedullary reaming and pressurization of the canal with nail insertion.

Intraoperative fractures in cephalomedullary nailing for trochanteric fractures

INTRODUCTION

Cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) is the standard treatment for internal fixation of trochanteric fractures. Complications related to CMN include intraoperative fracture (IF), which is difficult to detect using only plain radiographs. However, analyses of IFs using plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) with a large sample size of clinical cases are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to report the incidence of IFs diagnosed by CT, the risk factors for IFs, and a comparison of clinical outcomes between patients with and without IFs.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 638 patients who underwent CMN fixation for trochanteric fractures. We evaluated IF using pre-and postoperative plain radiographs and CT. The primary outcome was reoperation and the secondary outcome was the proportion of patients who regained independent mobility at 3 months postoperatively. Furthermore, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the association between risk factors and IFs.

RESULTS

Seventy-five (11.8%) patients had IFs, including 53 patients with occult IFs (8.3%). The most common location of IF was at the interference with the lag screw entry (45.3%). The nail insertion procedure (17.3%) was the most common reason for IF. In the assessment of clinical outcomes, patients with IFs had no reoperations and independent mobility at postoperative 3 months was lower (69.6% vs. 79.1%). Regarding regaining independent walking in the IF group, IF distal to lag screw entry and obvious IF diagnosed with plain radiographs were poor factors. The multivariable analysis showed that only inadequate reduction on the anteroposterior view based on the plain radiograph was significantly associated with the incidence of IFs (odds ratio 3.91; 95% CI, 1.28-11.94; p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter study indicated that the incidence of IFs detected by CT in CMN treatment for trochanteric fractures was 11.8%. An inadequate reduction in the anteroposterior view based on plain radiographs was the only independent risk factor of IFs. In the assessment of clinical outcomes, patients with IF had no incidences of reoperation. However, patients with IFs tended not to regain independent mobility compared with those without IFs.

Increased mortality after intramedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures: a comparison of sliding hip screws with nails in 19,935 patients

Background and purpose - Intramedullary nails (IMN) have become increasingly common as treatment for trochanteric hip fractures (THF) although they are costlier, and without proven superiority compared with sliding hip screws (SHS). We investigated whether the 2 methods differ in terms of short-term mortality when used in fractures where both methods are suitable. Patients and methods - We extracted data from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) on 19,935 patients ≥ 60 years with trochanteric fractures AO type 31-A1 or -A2 who had been treated with either SHS or IMN. We assessed absolute mortality rates and the relative risks (RR) of death after 7, 30, 90, and 365 days using generalized linear models, adjusting for age, sex, and fracture type. We performed a sensitivity analysis on a subgroup of 3,673 patients with information on comorbidity to address this potential confounder. Results - 69% of the patients were women and mean age was 84 years (60-107). IMN was used in 35% of A1 and in 71% of A2 fractures. The use of IMN was associated with a slightly increased adjusted risk of death within 30 days compared with SHS (RR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2) with no difference at any other time point. Interpretation - The slightly increased risk of death up to 30 days postoperatively does not support the use of IMN instead of SHS in stable THF.

Geographical variation in surgical care and mortality following hip fracture in England: a cohort study using the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD)

We describe variation across geographical regions of England in operations undertaken following presentation of hip fracture and in 30-day mortality. Some significant geographic variation in 30-day mortality was observed particularly for patients with trochanteric hip fractures and warrants further investigation of other aspects of post-hip fracture care INTRODUCTION: Mortality after hip fracture has improved considerably in the UK over recent decades. Our aim here was to describe geographical variation in type of operation performed and 30-day mortality amongst patients in England with hip fracture.

METHODS

The National Hip Fracture Database was used to carry out a prospective cohort study of nearly all over-60 year olds with hip fracture in England. These data were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), allowing us to explore regional variation in the operations performed for three fracture types (intracapsular, trochanteric and subtrochanteric), and use logistic regression models adjusted for demographic and clinical factors to describe associated 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

NHFD recorded data for 64,211 patients who underwent surgery in England during 2017. Most had an intracapsular (59%) or trochanteric fracture (35%), and we found significant geographical variation across regions of England in use of total hip replacement (THR) (ranging from 10.1 to 17.4%) for intracapsular fracture and in intermedullary nailing (ranging from 14.9 to 27.0%) of trochanteric fracture. Some geographical variation in mortality amongst intracapsular fracture patients was found, with slightly higher mortality in the East of England (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.02-1.46). Trochanteric fractures showed slightly more variation, with higher 30-day mortality (aOR: 1.40, 95%CI: 1.05-1.88) in the East of England and significantly lower mortality in the North East (aOR: 0.65, 95%CI: 0.46-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified regional differences in operation type and 30-day mortality amongst hip fracture patients in England. The relationship between surgical approach and mortality has been explored, but the extent to which differential mortality reflects variation in approach to medical assessment, anaesthesia and other aspects of care warrants further investigation.

The influence of proximal femur canal size on reduction of intertrochanteric fracture with cephalomedullary nail

BACKGROUND

Malalignment is the most important risk factor for fixation failure after intertrochanteric fracture treated with a cephalomedullay nail (CMN). Malalignment continues to occur despite advances in surgical techniques.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that small femur canal size causes intra-operative reduction loss during cephalomedullary nail insertion.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed from 2014 to 2017. Patients with acute intertrochanteric fracture implanted with the same sized CMN (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA, diameter: 10mm, length: 170mm, degree 130) were included. Evaluated radiographic parameters included femoral canal size, corrected neck-shaft angle, and calcar reduction.

RESULTS

The study totally included and analyzed the data from 108 patients. Patients with smaller femoral canal size tended to have increased calcar distance according to Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis (r(106)=-0.805, p<0.001). Patients with calcar mal-reduction had higher corrected neck-shaft angle post-operatively. This observed correction tended to be lost during follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

Small femoral canal size resulted in poorer reduction quality. Reduction loss during nail insertion may be due to the whole proximal fragment instead of the superolateral femoral neck. Reaming the isthmus before nail insertion or choosing a smaller sized CMN is indicated in this patient population to prevent intra- or post-operative loss of reduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective study.

External fixation via the anterior inferior iliac spine for proximal femoral fractures in young patients

Background and aim

Acute treatment of young patients with proximal femoral fracture (PFF) remains a challenge for trauma surgeons due to major fracture displacement and heavy pain in clinical practice. Traditional methods have a variety of intrinsic defaults and cannot successfully manage the requirements of young patients. Benefiting from our anatomic research, we explored a new method of external fixation for this specific trauma and evaluated its feasibility and clinical outcomes.

Material and methods

Twenty-three young multiple-trauma patients with PFF were included in this study. Surgical treatment was applied using an external fixator via the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS). Electronic patient records, surgical characteristics, clinical outcomes, and complications were reviewed for each patient.

Results

The mean surgical time was 30.3 ± 7.3 min. The mean blood loss was 25.3 ± 10.8 mL. No iatrogenic nerve palsy, pin tract infection, failure of external fixation, or bedsores were observed. The postoperative visual analog scale score was significantly lower than the preoperative score (P < 0.01). The mean fracture reduction rate of the femur was 58.1 ± 17.0%, and the mean degree of reduction was 13.5 ± 6.9°. The mean external fixation time was 7.6 ± 4.0 days and intramedullary nailing was performed. The mean hospital, follow-up, and healing times were 28.7 ± 8.7 days, 23.5 ± 7.9 months, and 22.8 ± 5.7 weeks, respectively. The Harris Hip Score indicated excellent or good results in 20 patients.

Conclusion

Collectively, the results of this study revealed that external fixation via the AIIS is a safe, rapid, and effective method for acute treatment of PFF in young patients.

Does the Helical Blade Lead to Higher Rates of Fixation Failure as Compared to Lag Screw in the Cephalomedullary Nailing Treatment of Hip Fractures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Recently, several studies have suggested that blade-type cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) have a higher risk of fixation failure than that of lag screws, but no clinical consensus exists. This study compared fixation failure between helical blade-type and lag screw-type CMNs with cut-out and cut-through rates as primary outcomes and degree of sliding length, time to union, and nonunion rate as secondary outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published before March 4, 2020, using the PRISMA guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they directly compared helical blade and lag screw for treating hip fractures. Data could be extracted for CMN alone to avoid mixing CMN and extramedullary plate devices, such as the dynamic hip screw.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two board-certified orthopaedic surgeons specializing in hip surgery independently extracted data from the selected studies, and the data collected were compared to verify agreement.

DATA SYNTHESIS

All data were pooled using a random-effects model. For all comparisons, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as dichotomous data, whereas continuous data were analyzed using mean differences with 95% CIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Fixation failure (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.09-3.23, P = 0.02), especially cut-through (OR = 5.33; 95% CI, 2.09-13.56; P < 0.01), was more common with helical blades than with lag screws, although the cut-out rate was not significantly different between both the 2 groups (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.38-1.96, P = 0.73). Surgeons should carefully select a blade-type CMN when treating hip fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Factors associated with one year mortality in ill patients with proximal femoral fractures treated non operatively

INTRODUCTION

Non-operative treatment is an exceptional indication for the treatment of proximal femur fracture. The aim of the study was to analyze the mortality rate in one year and associated factors in severely ill patients submitted to non-operative treatment.

METHODS

It was included 28 patients treated from August 2014 to September 2019. Eighteen (64.3%) patients were female and 10 (35.7%) were male. The mean age was 78.7 ± 11.9 years old. The main outcome evaluated was the mortality rate in one year. It was also evaluated the correlation with gender, age, personal habits, number of comorbidities and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).

RESULTS

The functional result was assessed with WOMAC score via telephone call. The mortality rate in one year was 42.8% without statistical positive correlation with any of the studied parameters. Patients with three or more comorbidities didn't have a higher mortality rate comparing to survived patients (83.3% vs 81.3%). The CCI also didn't show any correlation with high mortality (6.9 vs 7.1). The functional result of the survived patients was poor (78.2 points WOMAC).

CONCLUSION

The conclusion is that the mortality rate in one year of ill patients with hip fractures treated non-operatively is 42.8% without correlation with age, gender of number of comorbidities, and the functional result of the survived patients is poor.

Intramedullary Nail Breakage and Mechanical Displacement in Patients with Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Claims Database Analysis

Objective

This study evaluated the rates and patterns of intramedullary nail (IMN) breakage and mechanical displacement for proximal femur fractures and the factors associated with their occurrence.

Patients and Methods

Patients with subtrochanteric, intertrochanteric, or basicervical femoral neck fractures treated with IMN from 2016 to 2019 were identified from commercial and Medicare supplemental claims databases and were followed for up to two years. Kaplan–Meier analysis estimated the cumulative incidence of and patterns of breakage/mechanical displacement. Multivariable Cox regression models evaluated the factors associated with breakage/mechanical displacement.

Results

A total of 11,128 patients had IMN fixation for subtrochanteric, intertrochanteric, or basicervical femoral neck fractures: (mean SD) age 75.6 (16.4) years, 66.2% female, 74.3% Medicare supplemental vs 26.7% commercial insurance. Comorbidities included hypertension (62.9%), osteoporosis (27.3%), cardiac arrhythmia (23.1%), diabetes (30.7%), and chronic pulmonary disease (16.3%). Most fractures were closed (97.2%), intertrochanteric or basicervical femoral neck (80.1%), and not pathological (91.0%). The cumulative incidence of nail breakage over two years was 0.66% overall, 1.44% for combination fractures, 1.16% for subtrochanteric fractures, and 0.49% for intertrochanteric or basicervical fractures. The cumulative incidence of mechanical displacement was 0.37% overall, 0.43% for subtrochanteric fractures, 0.42% for combination fractures, and 0.36% for intertrochanteric or basicervical femoral neck fractures. Half of the breakages occurred within five months after surgery and half of the mechanical displacements occurred within 75 days. Age 50–64 (vs 75+) and subtrochanteric or pathological fracture were more commonly associated with nail breakage. Complicated hypertension was more commonly associated with mechanical displacement.

Conclusion

The incidence of IMN breakage and mechanical displacement in US commercial and Medicare supplemental patients with proximal femur fractures from 2016 to 2019 was low (0.66% and 0.37%, respectively up to two years). Age 50–64 (vs 75+) and subtrochanteric or pathological fracture were more commonly associated with breakage. Complicated hypertension was associated with mechanical displacement.

Long bone fractures: treatment patterns and factors contributing to use of intramedullary nailing

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated treatment patterns for long bone fractures and factors that contribute to use of intramedullary nails (IMN).

METHODS

Patients from IBM MarketScan® Research Commercial and Medicare Databases with femoral/tibial/humeral fractures during inpatient admission between January 2016-July 2019 were identified. Patients were categorized by treatment (i.e., non-surgical/internal fixation [extramedullary internal fixation/plating]/IMN/external fixation). Four-year rates of IMN were reported by fracture type. Logistic regression evaluated factors contributing to IMN use.

RESULTS

14,961 femoral, 14,101 tibial, and 7,059 humeral fracture patients were identified (mean[SD] age was 45.3[18.9], 42.0[16.3], and 39.8[21.6] years and % female 50.8%, 47.7%, and 55.3%, respectively). Mean(SD) lengths of stay were 6.7(9.2), 5.9(7.0), and 5.8(10.3) days, rates of surgical treatment were 74.3%, 84.0%, and 62.7%, and rates of IMN among surgical patients were 46.6%, 27.1%, and 6.7% for femoral, tibial, and humeral fractures, respectively. IMN was the predominant treatment for femoral fractures over the past 4 years. Factors contributing to IMN use included open/closed diaphyseal fractures, pathological fractures, diagnoses of cancer or AIDS/HIV, and alcohol abuse.

CONCLUSIONS

IMN was the predominant treatment for femoral fractures and use slightly increased for tibial/humeral fractures. Open/closed diaphyseal fractures, pathological fractures, cancer or AIDS/HIV, and alcohol abuse contributed to IMN use.

Does Implant Choice Affect the Episode Cost of Pertrochanteric Hip Fracture for US Veterans?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate an association between a surgeon's choice of a cephalomedullary nail (CMN) or sliding hip screw (SHS) with the cost of treating a pertrochanteric hip fracture.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

US Veterans Health Administration Sierra Pacific Network.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred ninety-four consecutive US veterans admitted for a principal diagnosis of an OTA/AO 31A-type pertrochanteric hip fracture of a native hip from 2000 to 2015.

INTERVENTION

Internal fixation using a CMN or an SHS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Veterans Administration Health Economic Resource Center average national cost estimate of combined acute and postacute care episode cost, excluding implant cost, normalized to 2015 US dollars by the Consumer Price Index.

RESULTS

Median episode cost was $8223 lower with a CMN than an SHS (95% confidence interval, $5700-$10,746, P < 0.001) after matching on a propensity score for treatment with a CMN based on age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, fracture characteristics, study site, and admission year. A subgroup propensity-matched analysis excluding reverse obliquity pertrochanteric fractures was not sufficiently powered to detect a difference in episode cost (β = 0.76, P = 0.311).

CONCLUSIONS

Implant choice significantly affected the episode cost of care of hip fracture at Veterans Health Administration facilities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A meta-analysis comparing intramedullary with extramedullary fixations for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures

PURPOSE

To find out whether the intramedullary fixations are superior to the extramedullary fixations in treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures (UFIFs).

METHODS

The meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases to evaluate functional scores, surgical outcomes, and adverse events in adult patients receiving intramedullary fixations in comparison to extramedullary fixations. Risk ratio (RR) or weighted mean difference (WMD)/standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as effect sizes.

RESULTS

A total of 18 RCTs, comprising 2414 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. Primary efficacy outcome: Parker scores [weighted mean difference, 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64-1.55; P < .0001] and Harris hip scores [risk ratio, 1.24, 95%CI, 1.09 -1.41; P = .0008] were higher in the intramedullary fixation group. Moreover, blood loss, operative time, length of incision, hospital stay, and implant failure were superior in the intramedullary fixation group. Other secondary efficacy outcome: No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of fluoroscopy time, mortality, cut-out, nonunion, superficial wound infection, later fracture, and reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggested that intramedullary fixation is more effective and safer than extramedullary fixation in treating UFIFs. Furthermore, blood loss, operative time, length of incision, hospital stay, and implant failure were superior in the intramedullary fixation group.

Higher 30-day mortality associated with the use of intramedullary nails compared with sliding hip screws for the treatment of trochanteric hip fractures: a prospective national registry study

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the type of operation used to treat a trochanteric fracture of the hip and 30-day mortality.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data on 82 990 patients from the National Hip Fracture Database were analyzed using generalized linear models with incremental case-mix adjustment for patient, non-surgical and surgical characteristics, and socioeconomic factors.

RESULTS

The use of short and long intramedullary nails was associated with an increase in 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.125, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.040 to 1.218; p = 0.004) compared with the use of sliding hip screws (12.5% increase). If this were causative, it would represent 98 excess deaths over the four-year period of the study and one excess death would be caused by treating 112 patients with an intramedullary nail rather than a sliding hip screw.

CONCLUSION

There is a 12.5% increase in the risk of 30-day mortality associated with the use of an intramedullary nail compared with a sliding hip screw in the treatment of a trochanteric fractures of the hip.

Preventing Wedge Deformities When Treating Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures With Intramedullary Devices: A Technical Tip

Intertrochanteric femur fractures are common injuries associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality and high societal costs. Although intramedullary devices have shown promises for treating a wide range of intertrochanteric femur fractures, improper technique can lead to malalignment, fracture displacement, and/or iatrogenic fractures. In particular, a "wedge effect" has been described, in which the passage of conical reamers and the intramedullary nail itself results in the distraction of intertrochanteric fragments with lateralization of the shaft from the femoral neck and varus malalignment. Here, we describe the mechanism by which this deformity is generated and describe techniques for preventing it, including the use of a modified starting point and an alternative to the conical opening reamers.

Pseudoaneurysm of the deep femoral artery caused by a guide wire following femur intertrochanteric fracture with a hip nail: A case report

An 85-year-old woman developed severe swelling and pain in the proximal thigh after internal fixation of an intertrochanteric fracture of the femur with a hip nail. In order to identify the causes and determine the effective treatment, angiography was performed. The results of the angiography revealed a pseudoaneurysm of a branch of deep femoral artery. Endovascular embolization was used to treat the pseudoaneurysm. After reviewing all possible causes, we found a mistake in insertion of a guide wire for hip nail. Using intraoperative fluoroscopic images, we found the mal-positioned guide wire located posterior to trochanter on lateral view of hip. This case study reminds us that pseudoaneurysm can occur in a guide wire during hip nailing. Surgeons can avoid this complication with confirmation of lateral and anteroposterior view of hip.

Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus dynamic hip screw fixation for treatment of osteoporotic type 31-A1 intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients

Objective To evaluate long-term radiographic and functional outcomes between dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) fixation for treatment of osteoporotic type 31-A1 intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFFs) among elderly patients Methods A retrospective comparative study was carried out. Follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively and yearly thereafter. The primary outcome was the radiographic outcome, and the secondary outcome was the functional outcome. Results A significant difference in radiographic complications was observed between the DHS group (n = 45, 40.2%) and PFNA group (n = 15, 13.6%). The risk of femoral shaft fracture after implant removal at the 1-year follow-up was increased by 0.9% (n = 1) and 6.3% (n = 7) in the PFNA and DHS groups, respectively. This difference persisted with rates of 3.6% (n = 4) and 12.5% (n = 14) at the final follow-up. Additionally, significant differences were present in the Harris hip score at each visit. Conclusion Our results indicate that PFNA yields better outcomes than DHS fixation among elderly patients with osteoporotic type 31-A1 IFFs.

Trends in the management of intertrochanteric femur fractures in the United States 2005-2011

OBJECTIVES

In the last 2 decades, surgical treatment of intertrochanteric (IT) femur fractures has shown a continuing trend towards the increased use of intramedullary nails (IMN) and decreased use of sliding hip screws (SHS). Recent trends in the United States regarding the use of these implants, including charges and reimbursement, have not been investigated.

METHODS

A national database of Medicare patients (PearlDiver, Inc.) was queried using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for patients with surgical dates from 2005-2011.

RESULTS

A total of 34,759 SHS or IMN procedures for intertrochanteric femur fractures were identified from 2005-2011. There was a significant increase in the percentage of IMN compared to SHS, from 46.9% IMN in 2005 to 79.1% in 2011. The average charges for IMN and SHS increased. Statistically higher rates of PE (p&lt;0.001), DVT (p&lt;0.001), MI (p&lt;0.001), respiratory failure (p&lt;0.001), UTI (p&lt;0.001), pneumonia (p&lt;0.001), CVA (p&lt;0.001) and blood transfusion (p&lt;0.001) were noted in the IMN group. The SHS group had higher 1 year (4.3% vs 3.8%, p = 0.012) and 2 year (5.8% vs 5.0%, p = 0.002) mortality rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The previously recognised trend of increasing use of IMN for IT femur fractures has continued. The overall incidence of operative IT femur fractures is not increasing at this time. The cost of IMN remains higher than SHS.

The long and short of cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fracture

INTRODUCTION

Pertrochanteric fractures after low-energy trauma are common among osteoporotic patients. Although the use of intramedullary devices to treat such fractures is becoming increasingly popular, there is a paucity of data comparing the outcomes of the use of short cephalomedullary nails (SCN) with the use of long cephalomedullary nails (LCN). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of treatment using LCN with treatment using SCN for patients with osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 64 patients with osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures who were treated with either LCN or SCN and had a minimum follow-up of one year was performed. Primary outcome measures include complications, revision surgeries and union rates. Secondary outcome measures include duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and ambulatory and mortality status at one year.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the clinical and functional outcomes of the patients who were treated with LCN and those who were treated with SCN. However, there was a higher incidence of heterotopic ossification in the latter group, and a slightly greater average estimated blood loss and duration of surgery in the former group. Patients treated with LCN tended to be more osteoporotic.

CONCLUSION

Our study found no significant difference in terms of complications, revision surgeries, union rates and ambulatory status between the patients who were treated with LCN and those who were treated with SCN. Both LCN and SCN provided safe and reliable outcomes in the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures.

Wedge effect following intramedullary hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric proximal femur fracture

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the current study was to determine whether application of an intramedullary hip screw for definitive management of intertrochanteric fracture was associated with post-operative deformity. Specifically this study investigated whether nail insertion would cause a "wedge effect" of the intertrochanteric fracture manifesting as lateralization of the femoral shaft and varus malalignment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The trauma database at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center was investigated to identify all intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31A) over the past 3 years treated with an IMHS. Fractures eligible for inclusion were performed under the supervision of a fellowship trained orthopedic trauma surgeon. All fractures were reduced in optimal alignment using percutaneous or mini-open strategies during the reaming process and nail insertion. The entry portal was over-reamed by at least 1.5 mm. Cases selected for review of the "wedge effect" had optimal post-operative imaging allowing for assessment of discrepancy between the operative and normal hip.

RESULTS

Forty six patients with an average age of 77 years were included for study. Fifty percent were classified as unstable patterns. Shaft lateralization following IMHS fixation of the fractured hip was found to be an average of 7 mm greater than the contralateral intact hip (p < 0.001) (range 0-30 mm). The neck-shaft angle of the operative hips was 129° as compared to 133° on the intact side (p = 0.009). The stability of the fracture pattern was not predictive for post-operative lateralization of the femoral shaft or varus angulation (p > 0.05) (Table 2). There was no difference in post-operative deformity among techniques used for maintenance of reduction during reaming and nail insertion (p > 0.05). Despite deformity, all cases demonstrated radiographic radiographic fracture union.

CONCLUSION

Despite attention to detail, the application of an intramedullary hip screw for intertrochanteric fracture has the tendency to lateralize the shaft relative to the head/neck segment (The "wedge effect").

Comparing Survival Following Hip Fracture Repair in VHA and Non-VHA Facilities

INTRODUCTION

Although postsurgical outcomes are similar between Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and non-VHA hospitals for many procedures, no studies have compared 30-day and 1-year survival following hip fracture repair. Therefore, this study compared survival of veterans aged 65 years and older treated in VHA hospitals with a propensity-matched cohort of Medicare beneficiaries in non-VHA hospitals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 1894 hip fracture repair patients in VHA or non-VHA hospitals between 2003 and 2005. Current Procedural Terminology codes identified 3542 male patients aged >65 years who had hip fracture repair between 2003 and 2005 in the Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The Medicare comparison sample was drawn from 2003 to 2005 Medicare Part A inpatient hospital claims files. To create comparable VHA and Medicare cohorts, patients were propensity score matched on age, admission source (community vs. nursing home), repair type, comorbidity index, race, year, and region. Thirty-day and 1-year survival after surgery were compared between cohorts after further adjustment for selected comorbidities, year of surgery, and pre- and postsurgical length of hospital stay using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Odds of survival were significantly better in the Medicare than the VHA cohort at 30 days (1.68, 95% CI 1.15-2.44) and 1 year (1.35, 95% CI 1.08-1.69).

CONCLUSION

Medicare beneficiaries with hip fracture repair in non-VHA hospitals had better survival than veterans in VHA hospitals. Whether this is driven by unobserved patient characteristics or systematic care differences is unknown.

Distal locked and unlocked nailing for perthrochanteric fractures--a prospective comparative randomized study

PURPOSE

Intramedullary nailing is widely used in the treatment of stable pertrochanteric fractures. However, it remains controversial whether the distal locking with intramedullary nailing is necessary.

METHOD

In this study, 70 patients over the age of 65 with pertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A1 and A2) were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups for treatment by intramedullary nails either with or without distal locking. Intra-operative variables such as operation time, volume of blood loss, total fluoroscopy time, total length of incision, postoperative complications and clinical outcomes were recorded and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients in the locking group and 30 patients in the unlocking group completed one year of follow up. Operation time (39.2 ± 7.6 min), blood loss (158.6 ± 63.6 ml), fluoroscopy time (53.7 ± 3.9 s), and total length of incision (13.1 ± 2.1 cm) in the unlocking group were significantly decreased compared with the locking group (48.5 ± 9.0 min; 194.3 ± 61.6 ml; 57.8 ± 4.3 s; 10.9 ± 1.7 cm) (p < 0.05). No significant differences in postoperative complications and fracture union were identified between the two groups. Most patients in the locking group (80.0 %) and the unlocking group (77.1 %) recovered to their pre-injury activity levels.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that intramedullary nails without distal locking may be a reliable and acceptable option for treating stable pertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A1 and A2) in elderly people. Distal unlocked nails showed subtle advantages in reducing blood loss, operation time, fluoroscopy exposure time, and size of the incision.

Biomechanical comparison of long, short, and extended-short nail construct for femoral intertrochanteric fractures

OBJECTIVES

Short and long cephalomedullary (CM) nails are commonly used construct for fixation of intertrochanteric (IT) fractures. Each of these constructs has its advantages and its shortcomings. The extended-short (ES) CM nail offers a hybrid between long and short nail design that aims to combine their respective benefits. The goals of this study were to (1) biomechanically evaluate and compare construct stiffness for the long, short and ES constructs in the fixation of IT fractures, and to (2) investigate the nature of periprosthetic fractures of constructs implanted with these various designs.

METHODS

Eighteen synthetic femora were used to evaluate three types of fracture fixation constructs. Axial compression, bending, and torsional stiffness were reported for both stable and comminuted IT fracture models. All comminuted fracture constructs were loaded to failure in axial compression to measure failure loads and evaluate periprosthetic fracture patterns.

RESULTS

Stiffness were similar among constructs with few exceptions. Axial stiffness was significantly higher for the short nail compared to the long nail for the comminuted model (p= 0.020). ES nail constructs exhibited a significantly higher failure load than short nail constructs (p = 0.039). Periprosthetic fractures occurred around the distal interlocking screw in all constructs.

CONCLUSIONS

Nail length and position of interlocking screw did not alter the biomechanical properties of the fixation construct in the presented IT fracture model. Periprosthetic fractures generated in this study had similar patterns to those seen clinically. This study also suggests that if a periprosthetic fracture is to occur, there is an increased probability of it happening around the site of the interlocking screw, regardless of nail design.

Expandable Proximal Femoral Nails (EPFNs) in Elderly Patients

PURPOSE

The purpose was to study the performance of expandable proximal femoral nails (EPFNs) for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-four patients were treated with a newly designed EPFN and followed up for one year.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was 50.1 ± 3.2 min and the mean blood loss was 112.3 ± 5.3 ml. Patients were treated with EPFNs of 220 mm (n = 24), 240 mm (n = 59), and 340 mm (n = 1) length. At six months postoperatively, the Harris Hip Score was 74.5 ± 5.3. At the end of follow up, 75% of patients completely recovered their preoperative function and resumed their normal activities. Seven patients died within one year postoperatively. During the operation, one patient experienced proximal femoral diaphyseal slight crack fracture. This crack fracture was treated by using a long EPFN (340 mm). Two patient developed screw cut-outs, which were solved by reoperation. And one developed deep infection resolved favorably by the appropriate antibiotic treatment. Implant failure, deep venous thrombosis, fat embolism, secondary fracture, and nonunion were not encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the results of the EPFNs were satisfactory in most elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture. However, during the inflation period, the pressure on the nail must be monitored carefully in order to prevent a crack fracture.

Functional recovery of elderly patients with surgically-treated intertrochanteric fractures: preliminary results of a randomised trial comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail techniques

INTRODUCTION

Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur are prevalent in the elderly, and leave patients with functional restrictions after surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the functional recovery at 1-year follow-up of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated surgically with the dynamic hip screw (DHS) or proximal femoral nail (PFN) fixation techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective, randomised, blinded trial included patients aged over 65 years with intertrochanteric fractures classified as AO group 31.A1 or 31.A2. The patients were allocated into one of two treatment groups: one treated with DHS and the other with PFN. Data on functional recovery were obtained using the Functional Recovery Score developed by Zuckerman for elderly patients with hip fracture. Variables were described as means and standard deviations, and the non-parametric Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to verify the normality of data distribution. Non-normally distributed variables were compared using the non-parametric Friedman and Mann-Whitney U tests. Data processing and analysis were carried out in SPSS 10.0. Results were deemed significant at the 5% level (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

There were no significant between-group differences in age (p=0.152), sex (p=0.363), or American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score (p=0.579). Functional recovery scores in the DHS group at 3 and 6 months after surgery were significantly reduced from preoperative baseline scores (p=0.007) compared with in the PFN group. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in functional recovery scores at baseline (p=0.346) or at 3 months (p=0.880), 6 months (p=0.699), and 12 months (p=0.468) after surgery. There was no between-group difference in mortality (p=0.140).

CONCLUSION

At 1-year follow-up, functional recovery scores were similar in elderly patients treated with the DHS and PFN techniques. However, DHS-treated patients exhibited significant loss of function in the first 6 months after surgery, which did not occur in the PFN-treated group.

Can the use of an evidence-based algorithm for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip maintain quality at a reduced cost?

In March 2012, an algorithm for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip was introduced in our academic department of Orthopaedic Surgery. It included the use of specified implants for particular patterns of fracture. In this cohort study, 102 consecutive patients presenting with an intertrochanteric fracture were followed prospectively (post-algorithm group). Another 117 consecutive patients who had been treated immediately prior to the implementation of the algorithm were identified retrospectively as a control group (pre-algorithm group). The total cost of the implants prior to implementation of the algorithm was $357 457 (mean: $3055 (1947 to 4133)); compared with $255 120 (mean: $2501 (1052 to 4133)) after its implementation. There was a trend toward fewer complications in patients who were treated using the algorithm (33% pre- versus 22.5% post-algorithm; p = 0.088). Application of the algorithm to the pre-algorithm group revealed a potential overall cost saving of $70 295. The implementation of an evidence-based algorithm for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures reduced costs while maintaining quality of care with a lower rate of complications and re-admissions.

Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2)

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare blood loss and operative times associated with long versus short intramedullary nails for intertrochanteric fracture fixation and rate of periprosthetic fracture.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

One hundred ninety-four patients with an intertrochanteric fracture (AO/OTA class 31-A1 and A2) and low-energy mechanism of injury treated by 1 of 4 fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists.

INTERVENTION

Short versus long intramedullary nail.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for age, gender, estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion rate, operative time, length of stay, and incidence of periprosthetic fracture. Variables were statistically compared between long and short intramedullary nails, with statistical significance at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The average EBL (135.5 ± 91.9 mL) and transfusion rate (57.1%) for long nails were found to be significantly greater (P = 0.002) than the EBL (92.6 ± 47.2 mL) and transfusion rate (40.2%) for short nails. Average operative time was also found to be significantly greater (P < 0.001) for long (56.8 ± 19.4 minutes) than for short (44.0 ± 10.7 minutes) intramedullary nail procedures. The overall incidence of periprosthetic fracture was 0.5%, one patient with initial treatment of a long intramedullary nail.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistically significant lower operative time, EBL, and transfusion rate were found in this study for short intramedullary nails. There were no differences seen in length of stay or periprosthetic fracture. The incidence of periprosthetic fracture was very low in both cohorts. Further study with greater statistical power is needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Surgical treatment of trochanteric and cervical hip fractures in the United States: 2000-2009

The objective of this study was to evaluate the most common treatments performed for hip fractures over the last decade in the United States. The leading treatment for trochanteric fractures was internal fixation, accounting for 96%-98% of surgical treatments each year. For cervical fractures, hemiarthroplasty (HA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), and internal fixation were performed nearly 61%, 5%, and 33% of the time, respectively, each year without any sign of change during the period assessed. The surgical choice for cervical fractures varied greatly by patient age. In 2009, two-thirds of patients younger than 60 years underwent internal fixation while two-thirds of patients 60 years or older underwent HA. Regardless of patient age, HA was performed more often than THA for cervical hip fractures.

Internal fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a clinical comparison of two implant designs

Objective. To compare two internal fixation devices clinically in stabilisation of intertrochanteric femur fractures. Methods. Eighty-seven patients were randomised upon their admission to the hospital using a sealed envelope method. Forty-five were treated with proximal femur nail antirotation (PFNA) and 42 with reverse less invasive stabilisation system (LISS). The perioperative data were recorded and compared in relation to fracture type. Results. In each type of fractures, no significant differences were found with respect to the blood loss, the quality of reduction, the time to bony healing, and the Harris hip score between the 2 groups. The mean duration of surgery was significantly longer in reverse LISS group than in PFNA group. Conclusion. Both the PFNA and the reversed LISS are effective in the treatment of different types of intertrochanteric femur fractures. PFNA is superior to reverse LISS in terms of surgical time, weight-bearing, and perhaps fluoroscopy time.

Extra- and intramedullary implants for the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures -- results from a Finnish National Database Study of 14,915 patients

We analysed registry-based data on 14,915 patients treated for pertrochanteric fracture obtained from the Finnish Health Care Register during the years 1999-2009. Data on the comorbidities, residential status and deaths of the cohort were extracted from several Finnish registries using patients' unique personal identification numbers. The use of intramedullary implants increased substantially during the study period. One-year mortality was slightly higher in the patients treated with intramedullary implant (26.6% vs. 24.9%; P=0.011). In the first year after the fracture, there were more new operations on hip and thigh in patients treated with an intramedullary implant (11.1% vs. 8.9%; P<0.0001). Similarly, there were more new subtrochanteric and diaphyseal fractures of the femur in patients treated with intramedullary implants (3.2% vs. 1.05%; P<0.0001). Our findings suggest that more expensive intramedullary implants do not lead to better clinical outcomes than extramedullary implants for the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures.