Comparison of nerve transfers and nerve grafting for traumatic upper plexus palsy: a systematic review and analysis

Anterior vs. posterior approach for spinal accessory nerve transfer to suprascapular nerve in brachial plexus injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

Spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer is an effective surgical option for traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) when nerve grafting is not applicable. It is performed via two approaches: anterior and posterior. Despite the theoretical advantages of the posterior approach, clinical trials have yielded variable outcomes. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of anterior and posterior approaches for SAN to SSN transfer in restoring the Range of motion (ROM) and strength of shoulder abduction and external rotation in BPIs. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies comparing anterior and posterior approaches for SAN to SSN transfer. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. via RevMan 5.4, meta-analyses were conducted. We identified eight comparative studies with 311 patients (n = 140 for posterior transfer, n = 171 for anterior transfer). Both approaches showed comparable outcomes with statistically significant advantages to the posterior approach by a modest but meaningful difference in shoulder abduction ROM (MD: 8.98°, 95% CI: 1.19 to 16.78, P = 0.02, I² = 0%) and in the Modified Medical Research Council (MRC), The posterior approach was associated with 4.78 times higher odds of achieving a grade ≥ M3 on the MRC scale (OR: 4.78, 95% CI: 1.43 to 15.96, P = 0.01, I² = 0%). We suggest that when functional gains are a priority, surgeons consider the posterior approach while still accounting for patient/surgeon specific factors and injury details.

Functional outcomes following nerve transfers for shoulder and elbow reanimation in brachial plexus injuries: a 10-year retrospective study

Brachial plexus injuries are rare but highly disabling, with major implications for upper limb function and quality of life. Nerve transfers have emerged as a key reconstructive technique, particularly valuable in cases where primary repair or grafting is unfeasible or delayed. This retrospective study analysed functional outcomes following nerve transfers in 37 patients with brachial plexus injury. Motor recovery was assessed using the Medical Research Council scale. Patients were stratified by age, timing of surgery, injury severity, and type of nerve transfer performed. The majority of our cohort consisted of male adults, predominantly injured in motorcycle accidents, while pediatric cases were mostly due to obstetrical trauma. For shoulder reanimation, all patients received spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer, with a subset also undergoing medial triceps branch of the radial nerve to axillary nerve transfer. These techniques resulted in 85.3% of patients achieving shoulder function recovery with M3 or M4 muscle strength, with combined procedures leading exclusively to M3 or M4 muscle strength. For elbow flexion restoration, surgical approaches included intercostal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer, ulnar and median fascicles to musculocutaneous nerve transfer, contralateral C7 to musculocutaneous nerve transfer with ulnar graft, and spinal accessory to musculocutaneous nerve transfer with sural nerve graft. Root grafting procedures using sural nerve grafts or nerve conduits were employed in three pediatric patients. Overall, 84.38% of patients achieved elbow flexion recovery with M3 or M4 muscle strength. These findings reinforce the utility of nerve transfers as a cornerstone in the surgical management of brachial plexus injury.

Indications and Outcomes of Nerve Reconstructions After Resection of Extremity Tumors: A Systematic Review

Objective: Peripheral nerve injuries resulting from tumor resection are unusual, but occasionally unavoidable. It can result in serious morbidity in motor deficits, sensory deficits, and even chronic pain. Nerve reconstruction after tumor resection is possible and seems to have positive recovery outcomes. However, nerve reconstructions are rarely performed and clear outcomes of nerve reconstructions after tumor resection are missing. This review aims to create an overview of the indications and outcomes in these patients. Methods: A systematic review was performed in May 2024 in PubMed and Embase databases according to the PRISMA guidelines. Search terms related to "tumor" and "nerve reconstruction" were used. Studies evaluating nerve reconstructions (nerve graft, transfer or coaptation) after tumor resection were included. Tumors not located in the extremities were excluded. A qualitative synthesis was performed on all studies. Where possible, motor, and sensory grades were recalculated according to the Medical Research Council (MRC)-scale. Results: Fifty-nine articles were included for quality synthesis after full-text screening. A total of 90 patients were described of which 44 after resection of malignant tumors. Most patients improved in motor and sensory function after nerve reconstruction. In both benign and malignant tumors, 77% demonstrated functional recovery on the MRC scale of ≥3. Most of the patients, >80%, recovered to a protective sensation of S2 or higher. Conclusion: Nerve reconstruction after tumor resection can help recover both sensory and motor function and may avoid chronic nerve pain. Nerve reconstructions should therefore be considered in tumor surgery.

The recovery and independence of elbow flexion and forearm supination after Oberlin II transfer in brachial plexus injuries: a long term follows up study

PURPOSE

The Oberlin II double fascicular nerve transfer has been evaluated extensively for objective outcomes for elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries (BPI). However, there is limited information available on the recovery pattern of supination and patient-reported activity in the long-term. Our study aimed to assess the functional results with a minimum of five years of follow-up.

METHODS

We evaluated patients with a minimum of five years after the Oberlin II procedure for post-traumatic BPI. They were evaluated using MRC grading, range of active movements, QuickDASH score and activity to check elbow flexion and forearm supination independent of finger and wrist flexion.

RESULTS

18 out of 26 patients responded with a mean follow-up of 79.4 months (range: 61-98). 16 (88.9%) (p < 0.000) patients recovered to achieve active elbow flexion and forearm supination of either MRC grade 3 power or more. The average range of active elbow flexion was 113.9° (range: 0-140°) and active supination was 67.8° (0-90°). Patients who achieved grade 3 flexion or higher were found to regain supination after a delay. The recovery continues even after two years of surgery. The mean QuickDASH score was 21.8 (range: 2.3-63.6). There's a significant inverse correlation between QuickDASH with both flexion and supination (p < .001 and < 0.05). 15 patients (83.3%) could demonstrate a dissociation of elbow and forearm movements from digital and wrist movements.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated reliable functional results with independent elbow flexion, forearm supination and acceptable patient-reported outcomes for Oberlin II procedure in BPI.

Research trends and hotspots in the surgical treatment of peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb from 2000 to 2024: a bibliometric visualization study

Purpose

Surgical treatment plays a crucial role in the management of peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb, but little bibliometric analysis has been conducted on it. This study was aimed to examine the global trends and hotspots in the field of Peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb.

Methods

Publications on the surgical treatment of peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb in the Web of Science database were collected between 2000 to 2024. CiteSpace and VOSviewer software was applied to visualize and analyze publications, countries, institutions, journals, authors, references, and keywords.

Results

A total of 751 articles were collected, the most active countries in this field were the United States and China. The authors with the most publications were Mackinnon, Susan E from the United States, and Xu WD and Gu YD from China. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY AMERICAN VOLUME was the journal with the most published. Based on keywords, the current research hotspots primarily revolved around nerve transfer, brachial plexus and reconstruction.

Conclusion

The results of this bibliometric study provide clinical trends and hotspots in the surgical treatment of peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb over the past 24 years, which may help researchers to identify clinical trends and explore new treatment in the field of peripheral nerve injuries.

Outcomes of Oberlin Transfer in Elderly Patients: A Case Series

OBJECTIVE

A case series analysis was performed of upper brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) from low-impact trauma in patients ≥60 years old to assess the effectiveness of nerve transfers, particularly the Oberlin technique, in restoring elbow flexion and to refine clinical decision making for managing traumatic BPIs in this age group.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2024, 11 patients aged 60-72 with traumatic upper BPIs underwent Oberlin technique for elbow flexion; all were evaluated with consistent postsurgical criteria.

RESULTS

Trauma mechanisms included falls (55%), direct trauma (27%), knife wounds (9%), and stretching (9%), with no high-impact trauma cases. Injuries predominantly affected the right side (55%). Elbow flexion strength was assessed using the British Medical Research Council scale. Positive Tinel sign was present in 73% of patients, all reporting pain ranging from mild to severe. At 1 year postsurgery, 64% achieved M4 elbow flexion, 27% achieved M3, and 9% achieved M1 after 4 months. Patients >65 who received surgery within 6 months of injury showed better outcomes except for 1 case. No ulnar nerve deficits were observed. Following surgery, 36% experienced no pain, whereas 64% reported mild pain. Additionally, 64% underwent further nerve transfers to restore shoulder function (spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve), and 18% underwent the Somsakprocedure for deltoid function.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive outcomes were achieved with the Oberlin technique in patients >60 with upper BPIs from low-energy trauma. However, delayed surgery, significant atrophy, and low testosterone levels may affect results. Evaluation of each patient's medical history is crucial before performing this procedure.

The Clinical Outcomes of Spinal Accessory to Suprascapular Nerve Transfer Through a Posterior Approach

BACKGROUND

Spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer can restore function to the rotator cuff following brachial plexus injuries. The traditional anterior approach using the lateral branch of the SAN causes denervation of the lateral trapezius limiting shoulder elevation. Suprascapular nerve pathology at the suprascapular notch may be missed resulting in poor reinnervation of the rotator cuff. The posterior approach uses the medial SAN and allows decompression and visualization of the SSN at the notch and nerve transfer coaptation closer to the target muscles with a shorter reinnervation distance.

METHODS

This is a review of 28 patients from 2014 to February 2020 who underwent SAN to SSN nerve transfer via a posterior approach. Patients were evaluated for SSN pathology, external rotation power, and range of motion. Data were evaluated for high-energy trauma (HET) and low-energy trauma/nontraumatic etiology subsets.

RESULTS

A total of 8 HET (40%) patients had pathology identified at the suprascapular notch during the posterior approach, including SSN scarring, ruptures, neuromata-in-continuity, and ossification of ligaments. British Medical Research Council grade greater than or equal to 4 shoulder external rotation was achieved in 75% patients with median range of motion 137.5°.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal accessory nerve to SSN transfer using a posterior approach allows visualization of pathology involving the SSN and coaptation of a medial SAN transfer close to the target muscles. Following HET, 8 cases (40%) had posterior pathology identified. Spinal accessory nerve to SSN transfer through a posterior approach shows improved external rotation power and range of motion.

Nerve Transfers in the Management of Femoral Nerve Palsy: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

The primary objective of this systematic review is to describe the effectiveness of nerve transfers for restoring quadriceps motor function in patients with femoral nerve palsy. MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from their inception to June 2023 for any English language, primary literature investigating nerve transfers for femoral nerve palsy. Data were extracted for study and intervention characteristics, as well as clinical outcomes, including preoperative and postoperative knee extension strength, electrodiagnostic studies, functional outcomes, adverse events, and donor site morbidity. The primary outcome was defined as return of knee extension equivalent to or greater than a grade 4-on the Medical Research Council scale. Eighteen studies with a total of 40 patients were included. The most common nerve donor was the obturator nerve in 17 studies with 37 patients, followed by the nerve to sartorius in two studies (10 patients). Significant variations in procedures and outcomes reported were observed. There were no studies that reported an effect on ambulation due to donor weakness. Based on the available literature, nerve transfer appears to be an effective treatment for restoring quadriceps function in this population, with 79% of patients in our study achieving at minimum 4-/5 Medical Research Council grade power.

The failed adult traumatic brachial plexus reconstruction

Traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries typically cause immediate loss of upper limb function. Timely multidisciplinary treatment in specialized centres often results in a useful helper arm. Both the patient and the surgical team can benefit from an open discussion to set realistic expectations. Surgical reconstruction is customized for each patient, considering their injury factors and functional objectives. Optimizing pain control, adherence to procedure indications and using meticulous surgical techniques help minimize the risk of failing to meet the patient's goals. The need for potential alternative treatment(s) if the desired result is not achieved should be detailed before the initial reconstruction. This review discusses late treatment options, including tendon transfers, joint fusions, free functioning muscle transfers and prosthetics, for managing the failed primary reconstruction of the traumatic adult brachial plexus.

Injury and Biological Factors Impact Shoulder Function following Autogenous Grafting of Spinal Nerves for Pan-Brachial Plexus Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Shoulder function after spinal nerve grafting in pan-brachial plexus injuries (pan-BPI) is not well described. The authors evaluated shoulder abduction (ABD) and external rotation (ER) after spinal nerve grafting to the suprascapular nerve, axillary nerve, or posterior division of the upper trunk and determined patient characteristics, injury severity and characteristics, and nerve graft factors that influenced outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 362 patients undergoing pan-BPI reconstruction and spinal nerve grafting for shoulder reanimation in a single institution between 2001 and 2018 were reviewed. Patient demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), graft characteristics, strength, range of motion for shoulder ABD and ER, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on recovery of shoulder function: no return, ABD only, and ABD and ER.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients underwent spinal nerve grafting, with 41 meeting inclusion criteria. Seventeen (41.5%) had no return of shoulder function, 14 (34.1%) had ABD alone, and 10 (24.4%) had ABD and ER. Patients with recovery of both ABD and ER were significantly younger (18.6 ± 5.56 years), had lower body mass index (22.4 ± 4.0), and had a lower ISS (10.5 ± 6.24; P = 0.003). Multivariable analysis found that with increasing age (OR, 0.786; 95% CI, 0.576, 0.941) and ISS (OR, 0.820; 95% CI, 0.606, 0.979), odds for return of ABD and ER decreased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

In pan-BPI, 24.4% of patients demonstrated return of both ABD and ER after spinal nerve grafting to suprascapular nerve and either axillary nerve or posterior division of the upper trunk. Age, body mass index, and ISS were associated with poorer recovery of shoulder function. Careful patient selection and consideration of age, body mass index, and ISS may improve outcomes of spinal nerve grafting for shoulder reanimation.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Following a Surgical Paradigm Shift Through the Adoption of Nerve Transfers Among Board-Eligible and Practicing Plastic Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Nerve transfers represent a new paradigm in the treatment of nerve injuries. Their current level of adoption among surgeons is unknown. This study evaluates the incidence of nerve transfers on case logs of board-eligible plastic surgeons over the past 14 years and surveys practicing nerve surgeons regarding their use of this technique.

METHODS

We queried the American Board of Plastic Surgery case log database for all nerve reconstruction Current Procedural Terminology codes from 2008 to 2021 and assessed trends and relationships between geographic region, examination year, and nerve transfer use. We surveyed nerve surgery professional societies to assess trends in practice, compared with a 2017 survey.

RESULTS

A total of 1959 nerve reconstruction cases were logged by 738 candidates from 2008 to 2021. Twelve percent of cases included nerve transfers. The proportion of nerve transfer codes (Z = -11.57; P < .0001) and the proportion of candidates performing nerve transfers (Z = -9.21, P < .0001) increased over the study period. Nerve transfers were associated with geographic region (χ2 = 25.826, P = .0002), with most cases performed in the Midwest (26.4%). A higher proportion of practicing nerve surgeons reported performing nerve transfers in this survey than in our 2017 survey (χ2 = 16.7, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

There has been an increase in nerve transfers logged in the past 14 years by board-eligible plastic surgeons, as well as increased use among currently practicing nerve surgeons. Although nerve transfer use is increasing among both plastic and orthopedic surgeons, a greater proportion of nerve reconstructions include nerve transfers in the plastic surgery cohort.

Management of "Long" Nerve Gaps

Long-gap nerve injuries offer unique physiological and logistical treatment challenges to the reconstructive surgeon. Options include nerve autograft, processed nerve allograft, nerve transfers, and tendon transfers. This review provides an evidence-framed discussion regarding the pros and cons of these diverse approaches.

Clinical Practice Guideline: The Treatment of Peripheral Nerve Injuries

BACKGROUND

Nerve lesions often heal incompletely, leading to lifelong functional impairment and high costs for the health care system. The updated German clinical practice guideline is intended to promote the early recognition of nerve lesions and the timely initiation of proper treatment for optimal restoration of function.

METHODS

The recommendations are based on an assessment of all the evidence revealed by a systematic search of the literature, as well as on the expertise of the multiprofessional guideline group.

RESULTS

Only a few publications contain high-quality evidence. This version of the guideline contains a more detailed discussion of war injuries, iatrogenic injuries, MR neurography, and specific treatments than the previous version. As for the different methods of nerve replacement, a comparison of autologous transplantation versus the use of conduits and tubes revealed no significant difference between these two methods on the mBMRC scale, and minimal superiority of autologous transplantation with respect to two-point discrimination. As for the use of nerve transfers when nerve reconstruction is not feasible or unlikely to succeed, nerve transfer yielded slightly better results than proximal reconstruction for elbow flexion, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (mBMRC ≥ 3: RR 1.16, 95% confidence interval [1.02; 1.32]). The treatment of neuromas with targeted muscle reinnervation was superior to the classic approach in decreasing both stump pain (MD 2.0 +/- 2.8) and phantom limb pain (MD 3.4 +/- 4.03).

CONCLUSION

The delayed or improper treatment of peripheral nerve lesions can lead to severe impairment. Timely diagnosis, the use of appropriate treatments in conformity with the guidelines, and interdisciplinary collaboration among specialists are all essential for optimizing the outcome.

Contemporary Approaches to Peripheral Nerve Surgery

"State of the Art" Learning Objectives: This manuscript serves to provide the reader with a general overview of the contemporary approaches to peripheral nerve reconstruction as the field has undergone considerable advancement over the last 3 decades. The learning objectives are as follows: To provide the reader with a brief history of peripheral nerve surgery and some of the landmark developments that allow for current peripheral nerve care practices.To outline the considerations and management options for the care of patients with brachial plexopathy, spinal cord injury, and lower extremity peripheral nerve injury.Highlight contemporary surgical techniques to address terminal neuroma and phantom limb pain.Review progressive and future procedures in peripheral nerve care, such as supercharge end-to-side nerve transfers.Discuss rehabilitation techniques for peripheral nerve care.

Clinical Predictors of C5 Spinal Nerve Viability in Pan-Brachial Plexus Injuries

BACKGROUND

In pan-brachial plexus injury, distinguishing between preganglionic and postganglionic injuries is crucial to reconstructive planning. This study aimed to identify preoperative factors that would accurately predict a reconstructible C5 spinal nerve.

METHODS

Patients with pan-brachial plexus injury from a single institution between 2001 and 2018 were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical examination, diagnostic imaging, and electrodiagnostic results were recorded. C5 viability was determined based on supraclavicular exploration and intraoperative electrophysiologic testing. Univariate analysis identified significant factors for regression analysis. A multivariable parsimonious model was created using stepwise high-performance logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 311 patients (mean age, 29.9 years; 46 women and 265 men; mean Injury Severity Score, 17.2) were included. A total of 134 patients (43%) had a viable C5 nerve, and 50 patients (12%) had a viable C6 nerve. Intact C5 spinal nerve on computed tomographic (CT) myelogram (OR, 5.4), positive Tinel test (OR, 2.6), muscle strength greater than or equal to 4 (according to the modified British Medical Research Council scale) for the rhomboid (OR, 1.3) or greater than or equal to 4 for the serratus anterior (OR, 1.4), and rhomboid needle electromyography (OR, 1.8) were predictive of having a viable C5 spinal nerve. The multivariable parsimonious stepwise model (area under the curve, 0.77) included four factors: positive Tinel test, intact C5 spinal nerve on CT myelogram, hemidiaphragmatic elevation, and midcervical paraspinal fibrillations.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of pan-brachial plexus patients with major polytrauma, there was a 43% incidence of viable C5 spinal nerve. A positive Tinel test (OR, 2.1) and intact C5 spinal nerve on CT myelogram (OR, 4.9) predicted a viable C5 nerve. In contrast, hemidiaphragmatic elevation (OR, 3.1) and midcervical paraspinal fibrillations (OR, 2.92) predicted root avulsion.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries: advances and current updates

Nerve grafting, tendon transfer and joint fusion are routinely used to improve the upper limb function in patients with brachial plexus palsies. Newer techniques have been developed that provide additional options for reconstruction. Nerve transfer is a tool for restoring upper limb function in total root avulsions where nerve grafting is not possible. In partial brachial plexus injuries, nerve transfers can greatly improve shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand function. Intraoperative electrical stimulation can be used to diagnose precisely which nerve is injured and to choose which nerve fascicles should be transferred. Finally, measuring the postoperative outcome can improve the evaluation of our techniques. The aim of this article was to present the current techniques used to treat patients with brachial plexus injury.

Current perspectives on peripheral nerve repair and management of the nerve gap

From the first surgical repair of a nerve in the 6th century, progress in the field of peripheral nerve surgery has marched on; at first slowly but today at great pace. Whether performing primary neurorrhaphy or managing multiple large nerve defects, the modern nerve surgeon has an extensive range of tools, techniques and choices available to them. Continuous innovation in surgical equipment and technique has enabled the maturation of autografting as a gold standard for reconstruction and welcomed the era of nerve transfer techniques all while bioengineers have continued to add to our armamentarium with implantable devices, such as conduits and acellular allografts. We provide the reader a concise and up-to-date summary of the techniques available to them, and the evidence base for their use when managing nerve transection including current use and applicability of nerve transfer procedures.

Validation of the Root Analysis Score for C5 Viability in Patients With Pan-Brachial Plexus Injury

PURPOSE

Pan-brachial plexus injury patients present a reconstructive challenge. The root analysis score, developed from parsimonious multivariable modeling of 311 pan-brachial plexus injury patients, determines the probability of having a viable C5 nerve based on four categories: positive C5 Tinel test, intact C5 nerve on computed tomography myelogram, lack of hemidiaphragmatic elevation, and absence of midcervical paraspinal fibrillations.

METHODS

Root analysis scores were calculated for a separate cohort of patients with pan-brachial plexus injuries. Scores were validated by the presence or absence of a graftable C5 root, based on supraclavicular exploration and intraoperative electrophysiologic testing. Receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, and concordance statistic of the scores were calculated. Patients were divided into three root analysis score cohorts: less than 50 (low), 50-75 (average), and 75-100 points (high) based on dividing the score into quartiles and combining the lowest two. The probability, sensitivity, and specificity of each cohort having an available C5 nerve were based on the intraoperative assessment.

RESULTS

Eighty patients (mean age, 33.1 years; 15 women and 65 men) were included. Thirty-one patients (39%) had a viable C5 nerve. The root analysis calculator had an overall accuracy of 82.5%, a receiver operating characteristic of 0.87, and a concordance statistic of 0.87, demonstrating high overall predictive value; 6.5% of patients with a score of less than 50 (94% sensitivity and 43% specificity), 16.1% of patients with a score of 50-75 (94% sensitivity and 67% specificity), and 77.4% of patients with a score of 75-100 (77% sensitivity and 90% specificity) had a graftable C5 nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

The root analysis score demonstrated high accuracy and predictive power for a viable C5 nerve. In patients with a score of less than 50, the necessity of supraclavicular root exploration should balance patient factors, presentation timing, and concomitant injuries.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnosis II.

The 2-by-2 Inch "Key Window" in the Upper Extremity: An Anatomical Appraisal of the Accessibility and Proximity of the Major Nerves and Vessels

BACKGROUND

The brachial plexus is a network of nerves located between the neck and axilla, which receives input from C5-T1. Distally, the nerves and blood vessels that supply the arm and forearm form a medial neurovascular bundle. The purpose of this study was to illustrate that a peripheral nerve dissection via a 2 × 2 inch window would allow for identification and isolation of the major nerves and blood vessels that supply the arm and forearm.

METHODS

A right side formalin-fixed latex-injected cadaveric arm was transected at the proximal part of the axillary fold and included the scapular attachments. Step-by-step anatomical dissection was carried out and documented with three-dimensional digital imaging.

RESULTS

A 2 × 2 inch window centered 2 inches distal to the axillary fold on the medial surface of the arm enabled access to the major neurovascular structures of the arm and forearm: the median nerve, ulnar nerve, medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, radial nerve and triceps motor branches, musculocutaneous nerve and its biceps and brachialis branches and lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, basilic vein and brachial artery and vein, and profunda brachii artery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the majority of the neurovascular supply in the arm and forearm can be accessed through a 2 × 2 inch area in the medial arm. Although this "key window" may not be entirely utilized in the operative setting, our comprehensive didactic description of peripheral nerve dissection in the cadaver laboratory can help in safer identification of complex anatomy encountered during surgical procedures.

Advancements in autologous peripheral nerve transplantation care: a review of strategies and practices to facilitate recovery

Autologous peripheral nerve transplantation, a pioneering technique in nerve injury treatment, has demonstrated remarkable progress. We examine recent nursing strategies and methodologies tailored to various anatomical sites, highlighting their role in postoperative recovery enhancement. Encompassing brachial plexus, upper limb, and lower limb nerve transplantation care, this discussion underscores the importance of personalized rehabilitation plans, interdisciplinary collaboration, and innovative approaches like nerve electrical stimulation and nerve growth factor therapy. Moreover, the exploration extends to effective complication management and prevention strategies, encompassing infection control and pain management. Ultimately, the review concludes by emphasizing the advances achieved in autologous peripheral nerve transplantation care, showcasing the potential to optimize postoperative recovery through tailored and advanced practices.

Intercostal Nerve Transfer for Biceps Reinnervation in Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Palsy: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Individual Patient Data Systematic Review using Individualized Fusion and Comparison to Supraclavicular Exploration and Nerve Grafting

Introduction

The objective of this study was to search existing literature on nerve reconstruction surgery in patients with obstetric brachial plexus palsy to determine whether treatment with supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting produced better elbow flexion outcomes compared to intercostal nerve transfer.

Methods

This study was a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Individual Patient Data guidelines. A systematic search was conducted using multiple databases. An ordinal regression model was used to analyze the effect of using supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting or intercostal nerve on elbow flexion with the two scores measured: elbow flexion Medical Research Council scores and Toronto active movements scale scores for elbow flexion.

Results

A final patient database from 6 published articles consisted of 83 supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting patients (73 patients with Medical Research Council and 10 patients with Toronto score) and 7 published articles which consisted of 131 intercostal nerve patients (84 patients with Medical Research Council and 47 patients with Toronto scores). Patients who underwent supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting presented with an average Medical Research Council score of 3.9 ± 0.72 and an average Toronto score of 6.2 ± 2.2. Patients who underwent intercostal nerve transfer presented with an average Medical Research Council score of 3.9 ± 0.71 and an average Toronto score of 6.4 ± 1.2. There was no statistical difference between supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting and intercostal nerve transfer when utilizing Medical Research Council elbow flexion scores (ordinal regression: 0.3821, standard error: 0.4590, p = 0.2551) or Toronto Active Movement Scale score for elbow flexion (ordinal regression: 0.7154, standard error: 0.8487, p = 0.2188).

Conclusion

Regardless of surgical intervention utilized (supraclavicular exploration and nerve grafting or intercostal nerve transfers), patients had excellent outcomes for elbow flexion following obstetric brachial plexus palsy when utilizing Medical Research Council or Toronto scores for elbow flexion. The difference between these scores was not statistically significant.

Type of study/Level of evidence

Therapeutic Study: Investigating the Result of Treatment/level III.

Surgery for mononeuropathies

Advancement in microsurgical techniques and innovative approaches including greater use of nerve and tendon transfers have resulted in better peripheral nerve injury (PNI) surgical outcomes. Clinical evaluation of the patient and their injury factors along with a shift toward earlier time frame for intervention remain key. A better understanding of the pathophysiology and biology involved in PNI and specifically mononeuropathies along with advances in ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging allow us, nowadays, to provide our patients with a logical and sophisticated approach. While functional outcomes are constantly being refined through different surgical techniques, basic scientific concepts are being advanced and translated to clinical practice on a continuous basis. Finally, a combination of nerve transfers and technological advances in nerve/brain and machine interfaces are expanding the scope of nerve surgery to help patients with amputations, spinal cord, and brain lesions.

Sciatic and tibial neuropathies

The sciatic nerve is the body's largest peripheral nerve. Along with their two terminal divisions (tibial and fibular), their anatomic location makes them particularly vulnerable to trauma and iatrogenic injuries. A thorough understanding of the functional anatomy is required to adequately localize lesions in this lengthy neural pathway. Proximal disorders of the nerve can be challenging to precisely localize among a range of possibilities including lumbosacral pathology, radiculopathy, or piriformis syndrome. A correct diagnosis is based upon a thorough history and physical examination, which will then appropriately direct adjunctive investigations such as imaging and electrodiagnostic testing. Disorders of the sciatic nerve and its terminal branches are disabling for patients, and expert assessment by rehabilitation professionals is important in limiting their impact. Applying techniques established in the upper extremity, surgical reconstruction of lower extremity nerve dysfunction is rapidly improving and evolving. These new techniques, such as nerve transfers, require electrodiagnostic assessment of both the injured nerve(s) as well as healthy, potential donor nerves as part of a complete neurophysiological examination.

Assessment, patient selection, and rehabilitation of nerve transfers

Peripheral nerve injuries are common and can have a devastating effect on physical, psychological, and socioeconomic wellbeing. Peripheral nerve transfers have become the standard of care for many types of peripheral nerve injury due to their superior outcomes relative to conventional techniques. As the indications for, and use of, nerve transfers expand, the importance of pre-operative assessment and post-operative optimization increases. There are two principal advantages of nerve transfers: (1) their ability to shorten the time to reinnervation of muscles undergoing denervation because of peripheral nerve injury; and (2) their specificity in ensuring proximal motor and sensory axons are directed towards appropriate motor and sensory targets. Compared to conventional nerve grafting, nerve transfers offer opportunities to reinnervate muscles affected by cervical spinal cord injury and to augment natural reinnervation potential for very proximal injuries. This article provides a narrative review of the current scientific knowledge and clinical understanding of nerve transfers including peripheral nerve injury assessment and pre- and post-operative electrodiagnostic testing, adjuvant therapies, and post-operative rehabilitation for optimizing nerve transfer outcomes.

A Surgical Framework for the Management of Incomplete Axillary Nerve Injuries

BACKGROUND

 Axillary nerve injury is the most common nerve injury affecting shoulder function. Nerve repair, grafting, and/or end-to-end nerve transfers are used to reconstruct complete neurotmetic axillary nerve injuries. While many incomplete axillary nerve injuries self-resolve, axonotmetic injuries are unpredictable, and incomplete recovery occurs. Similarly, recovery may be further inhibited by superimposed compression neuropathy at the quadrangular space. The current framework for managing incomplete axillary injuries typically does not include surgery.

METHODS

 This study is a retrospective analysis of 23 consecutive patients with incomplete axillary nerve palsy who underwent quadrangular space decompression with additional selective medial triceps to axillary end-to-side nerve transfers in 7 patients between 2015 and 2019. Primary outcome variables included the proportion of patients with shoulder abduction M3 or greater as measured on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, and shoulder pain measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcome variables included pre- and postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) scores.

RESULTS

 A total of 23 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent nerve surgery a mean 10.7 months after injury. Nineteen (83%) patients achieved MRC grade 3 shoulder abduction or greater after intervention, compared with only 4 (17%) patients preoperatively (p = 0.001). There was a significant decrease in VAS shoulder pain scores of 4.2 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 1.9 ± 2.4 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The DASH scores also decreased significantly from 48.8 ± 19.0 preoperatively to 30.7 ± 20.4 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Total follow-up was 17.3 ± 4.3 months.

CONCLUSION

 A surgical framework is presented for the appropriate diagnosis and surgical management of incomplete axillary nerve injury. Quadrangular space decompression with or without selective medial triceps to axillary end-to-side nerve transfers is associated with improvement in shoulder abduction strength, pain, and DASH scores in patients with incomplete axillary nerve palsy.

Linking assessment instruments for brachial plexus injury to the international classification of functioning, disability and health

BACKGROUND

Brachial plexus injuries (BPI) affect not only body structure and function, but also several aspects of individual's well-being. Considering the crescent need for assessing such patients through a biopsychosocial perspective, linking meaningful concepts of BPI instruments to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provides a useful overview of how the ICF components are contemplated on the current measurements available.

PURPOSE

To identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) specifically designed for BPI assessment and link the content with the ICF.

STUDY DESIGN

Content Analysis through ICF linking.

METHODS

The study was conducted in two steps: the first one encompassed a literature review to identify questionnaires specifically designed for assessing patients with BPI, where two PROMs were eligible: the Brachial Assessment Tool (BrAT) and the Impact of Brachial Plexus Injury Questionnaire (IBPIQ); in the second phase, the items of such instruments were linked to the ICF by two independent reviewers, in accordance to the methodology proposed by Cieza et al.

RESULTS

54 different significant concepts were identified from the 74 questionnaire items and linked to 49 distinct ICF categories. The categories were mostly related to the activities and participation component (56.9%, n = 29), followed by body functions (27.45%, n = 14), body structures (9.8%, n = 5) and environmental factors component (1.96%, n = 1).

CONCLUSION

The questionnaires developed for adults with BPI were BrAT and IBPIQ. Although both instruments presented with a diverse coverage of ICF components, their content had a major focus on activities and participation domain and poorly or did not addressed environmental factors. Thus, other instruments could be considered in a complementary way for clinical assessment.

Natural polysaccharides and their derivatives as potential medical materials and drug delivery systems for the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries

Peripheral nerve repair following injury is one of the most serious problems in neurosurgery. Clinical outcomes are often unsatisfactory and associated with a huge socioeconomic burden. Several studies have revealed the great potential of biodegradable polysaccharides for improving nerve regeneration. We review here the promising therapeutic strategies involving different types of polysaccharides and their bio-active composites for promoting nerve regeneration. Within this context, polysaccharide materials widely used for nerve repair in different forms are highlighted, including nerve guidance conduits, hydrogels, nanofibers and films. While nerve guidance conduits and hydrogels were used as main structural scaffolds, the other forms including nanofibers and films were generally used as additional supporting materials. We also discuss the issues of ease of therapeutic implementation, drug release properties and therapeutic outcomes, together with potential future directions of research.

The Philadelphia Shriners Hospital Approach to Brachial Plexus Birth Injury

The care of children with brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBI) is a complex multidisciplinary endeavor. At the Shriners Hospital for Children in Philadelphia, we have sought to elevate the quality of care delivered to patients through outcomes research and collaboration with colleagues around the world. Our approach to the management of this challenging pathology has evolved time and again. Here, we describe our current approach to patient assessment and operative management in patients with BPBI and its many sequelae.

Is there any difference between anterior and posterior approach for the spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dual nerve transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve (SAN-SSN) and the radial nerve to the axillary nerve is considered to be the most feasible method of restoration of shoulder abduction in brachial plexus injuries. Supraspinatus muscle plays an important role in the initiation of abduction and its functional restoration is crucial for shoulder movements. There are two possible approaches for the SAN-SSN transfer: the more conventional anterior approach and the posterior approach in the area of scapular spine, which allows more distal neurotization. Although the dual nerve transfer is a widely used method, it is unclear which approach for the SAN-SSN transfer results in better outcomes. We conducted a search of English literature from January 2001 to December 2021 using the PRISMA guidelines. Twelve studies with a total 142 patients met our inclusion criteria. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the approach used: Group A included patients who underwent the anterior approach, and Group B included patients who underwent the posterior approach. Abduction strength using the Medical Research Scale (MRC) and range of motion (ROM) were assessed. The average MRC grade was 3.57 ± 1.08 in Group A and 4.0 ± 0.65 (p = 0.65) in Group B. The average ROM was 114.6 ± 36.7 degrees in Group A and 103.4 ± 37.2 degrees in Group B (p = 0.247). In conclusion, we did not find statistically significant differences between SAN-SSN transfers performed from the anterior or posterior approach in patients undergoing dual neurotization technique for restoration of shoulder abduction.

Nerve Transfers for Brachial Plexus Reconstruction in Patients over 60 Years

Negative expectations regarding nerve reconstruction in the elderly prevail in the literature, but little is known about the effectiveness of nerve transfers in patients with brachial plexus injuries aged over 60 years. We present a series of five patients (1 female, 4 male) aged between 60 and 81 years (median 62.0 years) who underwent nerve reconstruction using multiple nerve transfers in brachial plexopathies. The etiology of brachial plexus injury was trauma (n = 2), or iatrogenic, secondary to spinal surgical laminectomy, tumor excision and radiation for breast cancer (n = 3). All but one patient underwent a one-stage reconstruction including neurolysis and extra-anatomical nerve transfer alone (n = 2) or combined with anatomical reconstruction by sural nerve grafts (n = 2). One patient underwent a two-stage reconstruction, which involved a first stage anatomical brachial plexus reconstruction followed by a second stage nerve transfer. Neurotizations were performed as double (n = 3), triple (n = 1) or quadruple (n = 1) nerve or fascicular transfers. Overall, at least one year postoperatively, successful results, characterized by a muscle strength of M3 or more, were restored in all cases, two patients even achieving M4 grading in the elbow flexion. This patient series challenges the widely held dogma that brachial plexus reconstruction in older patients will produce poor outcomes. Distal nerve transfers are advantageous as they shorten the reinnervation distance. Healthy, more elderly patients should be judiciously offered the whole spectrum of reconstructive methods and postoperative rehabilitation concepts to regain useful arm and hand function and thus preserve independence after a traumatic or nontraumatic brachial plexus injury.

Elevated Body Mass Index Negatively Impacts Recovery of Shoulder Abduction Strength in Triceps Motor Branch to Axillary Nerve Transfers

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this work was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of triceps motor branch to axillary nerve transfers and to identify prognostic factors which may influence these outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort included all patients who underwent a triceps motor branch to axillary nerve transfer (2010-2019) with at least 12 months of follow-up. The primary outcome measure was shoulder abduction strength assessed with British Medical Research Council (MRC) grade.

RESULTS

Ten patients were included with a mean follow-up of 19.1 (SD 5.9) months. Compared with preoperative MRC shoulder abduction strength (0.2 SD 0.4), patients significantly improved postoperatively (2.8 SD 1.6; P = .005). Increased body mass index (BMI) was significantly associated with worse postoperative MRC (P = .014).

CONCLUSION

Triceps motor branch to axillary nerve transfer is a beneficial procedure for restoring shoulder function in patients presenting with either isolated axillary nerve or brachial plexus pathology. Patients with elevated BMI may not have as robust strength recovery and should be counseled carefully regarding prognosis.

Trends in Brachial Plexus Surgery: Characterizing Contemporary Practices for Exploration of Supraclavicular Plexus

BACKGROUND

There is variability in treatment strategies for patients with brachial plexus injury (BPI). We used qualitative research methods to better understand surgeons' rationale for treatment approaches. We hypothesized that distal nerve transfers would be preferred over exploration and nerve grafting of the brachial plexus.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with BPI surgeons to discuss 3 case vignettes: pan-plexus injury, upper trunk injury, and lower trunk injury. The interview guide included questions regarding overall treatment strategy, indications and utility of brachial plexus exploration, and the role of nerve grafting and/or nerve transfers. Interview transcripts were coded by 2 researchers. We performed inductive thematic analysis to collate these codes into themes, focusing on the role of brachial plexus exploration in the treatment of BPI.

RESULTS

Most surgeons routinely explore the supraclavicular brachial plexus in situations of pan-plexus and upper trunk injuries. Reasons to explore included the importance of obtaining a definitive root level diagnosis, perceived availability of donor nerve roots, timing of anticipated recovery, plans for distal reconstruction, and the potential for neurolysis. Very few explore lower trunk injuries, citing concern with technical difficulty and unfavorable risk-benefit profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that supraclavicular exploration remains a foundational component of surgical management of BPI, despite increasing utilization of distal nerve transfers. Availability of abundant donor axons and establishing an accurate diagnosis were cited as primary reasons in support of exploration. This analysis of surgeon interviews characterizes contemporary practices regarding the role of brachial plexus exploration in the treatment of BPI.

Quantifying Donor Deficits Following Nerve Transfer Surgery in Tetraplegia

PURPOSE

Nerve transfer (NT) surgery can improve function in people with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the impact of donor nerve deficits remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to quantify donor deficits experienced by individuals with cervical SCI following NT.

METHODS

This prospective single-arm, comparative study included people with SCI undergoing upper extremity NTs. Myometry was used to assess muscle strength at baseline and follow-up. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure was used to measure the ability to perform activities of daily living.

RESULTS

Ten individuals underwent 20 NTs to restore elbow extension (donor, posterior deltoid; n = 2), hand opening (donor, supinator; n = 7), and hand closing (donor, brachialis; n = 11). Shoulder abduction strength decreased (-5.6% at early and -4.5% late follow-up) in the elbow extension NT. Wrist extension strength decreased at early (-46.9% ± 30.3) and increased by late (76.4% ± 154.0) follow-up in the hand opening NT. No statistically significant change in elbow flexion strength was noted in the hand closing NT. Spinal Cord Independence Measure scores did not change significantly between baseline and early postoperative follow-up; they improved at late follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of expendable donor nerves with redundant function to perform NT surgery has relatively little impact on strength or capacity to perform activities of daily living, even in the unique and highly vulnerable SCI population. Early, temporary loss in wrist extension strength can be seen after the supinator to posterior interosseous nerve transfer. This study offers quantitative data about possible diminution of donor function after NT, enabling hand surgeons to better counsel individuals contemplating upper extremity reconstruction.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic I.

Nerve Transfers for Elbow Reconstruction in Upper and Extended Upper-Type Brachial Plexus Injuries: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Nerve transfers for elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries have been used with increasing frequency because of the higher rate of success and acceptable morbidity. This is especially true in upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries.

OBJECTIVE

To present the clinical outcomes of nerve transfers for elbow flexion in patients with upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review was done on all patients with upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries from 2006 to 2017, who underwent nerve transfers for the restoration of elbow flexion. Outcome variables include Filipino version of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (FIL-DASH) score, elbow flexion strength and range of motion, and pain. All statistical significance was set at P &lt; .05.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients with nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion were included. There was a significant improvement in FIL-DASH scores in 28 patients after the nerve transfer procedure. Patients with C56 nerve root injuries and those with more than 2 years' follow-up have a higher percentage of regaining ≥M4 elbow flexion strength. Those with double nerve transfers had a higher percentage of ≥M4 elbow flexion strength, greater range of elbow flexion, and better FIL-DASH scores compared with single nerve transfers, but this did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Nerve transfer procedures improve FIL-DASH scores in upper and upper-type brachial plexus injuries. After nerve transfer, stronger elbow flexion can be expected in patients with C56 injuries, and those with longer follow-up.

Factors Associated with Poorer Outcomes from Triceps Motor Branch to Anterior Axillary Nerve Transfer: A Case-Control Study

INTRODUCTION

We sought to identify predictors of failed triceps motor branch transfer to the anterior division of the axillary nerve (AN) for shoulder abduction reconstruction after a brachial plexus injury (BPI).

METHODS

A case-control study of adult AN or brachial plexus patients treated with a triceps motor branch transfer to the anterior division of the AN with a minimum 18 months of follow-up was performed. The failure group (case group) was defined as modified British Medical Research Council muscle scale (mBMRC) postoperative deltoid grade ≤2 and was compared to the successful outcome group (control group), defined as mBMRC postoperative deltoid grade ≥3. Clinical variables, injury mechanism, time from injury to surgery, root avulsion status, electrodiagnostic studies, rotator cuff injuries, scapula fracture, Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand scores, and preoperative triceps strength were analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with isolated AN injuries and those with BPI.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria, of whom 23 regained ≥M3 deltoid muscle strength and 52° ± 69° of shoulder abduction (successful outcome group) and 46 regained ≤M2 deltoid muscle strength and 27° ± 30° of shoulder abduction (failure group). Preoperative triceps weakness (M ≤4) was significantly more common in the failure group (63% vs. 30%, P = 0.032); preoperative triceps muscle fibrillations were significantly more common in the failure group (61% vs. 30%, P = 0.02). Isolated AN injuries presented better preoperative motion and postoperative outcomes results compared to BPI.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of triceps motor branch associated with fibrillations or weakness resulted in statistically poorer outcomes compared to the use of a normal triceps motor branch in the restoration of anterior AN function after nerve transfer.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes following nerve transfer surgery for brachial plexus injury

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of nerve transfer surgery for brachial plexus injury (BPI) on patient-reported outcomes.

LITERATURE SURVEY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched and screened in duplicate for relevant studies on September 25, 2019 and repeated June 24, 2020.

METHODOLOGY

The patient population included male and female patients who received nerve transfer surgery for BPI. Further inclusion criteria were: (1) all levels of evidence; (2) published in English; (3) conducted in humans; and (4) report of patient-reported outcome. Two reviewers independently abstracted data regarding injury type, surgical technique, surgical timing, follow-up duration, strength, and patient-reported outcome measures. Quality was assessed in duplicate using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria.

SYNTHESIS

Twenty-one studies involving 464 participants were included in analyses. The mean age ± SD was 32.4 ± 1.8 (range: 5-77) and 89.2% of included participants were male. The mean time to surgery was 5.6 ± 0.6 months and the mean follow-up time was 48.1 ± 8.4 months. The most used patient-reported outcome was the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), where scores variably improved postoperatively, although the degree of disability remained high. Return to work was reported in five studies, with 66.0% of participants returning to work. Patient satisfaction was assessed in four studies with an overall satisfaction proportion of 64.0%. Pain was assessed in 12 studies using various measures. In studies reporting pain intensity postoperatively, 29.3% of patients were "pain-free" or had "no pain."

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-reported outcomes following nerve transfer for BPI are infrequently reported in the literature. Although patient-reported outcomes demonstrate variable postoperative improvement, there is evidence of ongoing limitations and postoperative DASH scores report a high degree of ongoing disability. Future studies with greater reporting as well as validation of patient-reported outcomes within BPI are warranted.

Clinical Assessment of Functional Recovery Following Nerve Transfer for Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries

Surgical reconstruction and postoperative rehabilitation are both important for restoring function in patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs). The current study aimed to understand variations in recovery progression among patients with different injury levels after receiving the nerve transfer methods. A total of 26 patients with BPIs participated in a rehabilitation training program over 6 months after nerve reconstruction. The differences between the first and second evaluations and between C5-C6 and C5-C7 BPIs were compared. Results showed significant improvements in elbow flexion range (p = 0.001), British Medical Research Council's score of shoulder flexion (p = 0.046), shoulder abduction (p = 0.013), shoulder external rotation (p = 0.020), quantitative muscle strength, and grip strength at the second evaluation for both groups. C5-C6 BPIs patients showed a larger shoulder flexion range (p = 0.022) and greater strength of the shoulder rotator (p = 0.004), elbow flexor (p = 0.028), elbow extensor (p = 0.041), wrist extensor (p = 0.001), and grip force (p = 0.045) than C5-C7 BPIs patients at the second evaluation. Our results indicated different improvements among patients according to injury levels, with quantitative values assisting in establishing goals for interventions.

Surgical Treatment of Parsonage Turner Syndrome With Primary Nerve Transfers: A Case Series and Cadaver Dissection

ABSTRACT

Parsonage Turner syndrome (PTS) is the development of severe, spontaneous pain with subsequent nerve palsy. Unfortunately, many patients never achieve full functional recovery, and many have chronic pain. The use of nerve transfers in PTS has not been reported in the literature. We present 4 cases of PTS treated surgically with primary nerve transfer and neurolysis of the affected nerve following the absence of clinical and electrodiagnostic recovery at 5 months from onset. In addition, we present a cadaver dissection demonstrating an interfascicular dissection of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) into its components to enable a fascicular transfer in partial AIN neuropathy. Two patients with complete axillary neuropathy underwent a neurorrhaphy between the nerve branch to the lateral head of the triceps and the anterior/middle deltoid nerve branch of the axillary nerve. Two patients with partial AIN neuropathy involving the FDP to the index finger (FDP2) underwent a neurorrhaphy between an extensor carpi radialis brevis nerve branch and the FDP2 nerve branch. All patients had neurolysis of the affected nerves. All subjects recovered at least M4 motor strength. The cadaver dissection demonstrates 3 separate nerve fascicles of the AIN into FPL, FDP2, and pronator quadratus that can be individually selected for reinnervation with a fascicular nerve transfer. Functional recovery for patients with PTS with neurolysis alone is variable. Surgical treatment with neurolysis and a nerve transfer to improve functional recovery when no recovery is seen by 5 months is an option.

The innervation of the biceps brachii and brachialis muscles in specimens with a high incidence of an accessory biceps head

We describe the patterns of motor branches to the elbow flexors in 106 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities from 53 donors of the Latin American mestizo race. We identified a 20% incidence of an accessory biceps head. The innervation patterns to this accessory head were specifically described and added to the Yang classification as Type IV for the biceps and Type III for the brachialis. The patterns arising from the musculocutaneous nerve to the biceps brachii were of Type I in 69%, Type II in 9%, Type III in 7% and Type IV in 11%, and to the brachialis of Type I in 77%, Type II in 11% and Type III in 9%. In 4%, the branches did not originate from the musculocutaneous nerve. We hypothesize that the branch to the accessory biceps head might be considered as a donor for nerve transfer in selected brachial plexus injuries.

The Demography of Traumatic Brachial Plexus Avulsion Injuries

Background and objective

Brachial plexus injuries more commonly affect the younger generation who constitute the productive workforce. The patients who sustain avulsion injuries of the brachial plexus are more often involved in high-velocity accidents. The avulsion injuries are surgically managed by nerve transfers. This study aimed to evaluate the demography of brachial plexus avulsion injuries.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study was conducted in January 2013 and included 21 patients treated from January 2007 to December 2011.

Results

Of the 21 patients, 20 were male and the most commonly affected patients were in the age group of 21-30 years. The mean age of the affected patients was 27.24 years. Six of the patients had pan palsy (C5-8 and T1), nine had C5-7 injury, and six had C5-6 injury. Twenty patients underwent spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer, nine patients underwent ulnar nerve fascicle to nerve to biceps branch transfer, and one patient underwent intercostal nerve to musculocutaneous nerve transfer. Of note, 40% of the patients regained more than M3 power for abduction and external rotation of the shoulder, and 30% of the patients regained more than M3 power for elbow function.

Conclusions

Road traffic accidents are the most common cause of brachial plexus injuries. Nerve transfers for shoulder and elbow function play a significant role in improving the function of the upper extremity.

Team Approach: Management of Brachial Plexus Injuries

»

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries are relatively rare but potentially devastating injuries with substantial functional, psychological, and economic consequences.

»

Prompt referral (ideally within 6 weeks of injury) to a center with a team of experts experienced in the diagnosis and management of these injuries is helpful to achieving optimal outcomes.

»

Preoperative and intraoperative decision-making to diagnose and plan reconstructive procedures is complex and must take into account a number of factors, including the time from injury, concomitant injuries, preservation of cervical nerve roots, and the availability of intraplexal and extraplexal donor nerves for nerve transfer.

»

A team approach is essential to ensure accurate localization of the pathology before surgery and to maximize rehabilitation after surgery, necessitating close contact between the surgical team, physiatrists, radiologists, and therapists.

Pathological findings identified during the posterior approach to the spinal accessory nerve after high-energy trauma

The spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer is a key procedure for restoring shoulder function in upper brachial plexus injuries and is typically undertaken via an anterior approach. The anterior approach may miss injury to the suprascapular nerve about the suprascapular notch, which may explain why functional outcomes are often limited. In 2014 we adopted a posterior approach to enable better visualization of the suprascapular nerve at the notch. Over the next 6 years we have used this approach for 20 explorations after high-energy trauma. In 7/20 we identified abnormalities at the level of the suprascapular ligament, which we would not have identified with an anterior approach: there were two ruptures, two neuromas-in-continuity and three cases of scar encasement, necessitating neurolysis. Nerve transfer could be undertaken distal to the suprascapular notch, bypassing the site of injury. These pathological findings support the wider adoption of the posterior approach in cases of high-energy trauma.Level of evidence: IV.

Brachial Plexus Birth Injuries

Brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBIs) are typically traction type injuries to the newborn that occur during the delivery process. Although the incidence of these injuries has overall decreased from 1.5 to around 0.9 per 1000 live births in the United States over the past 2 decades, these injuries remain common, with incidence holding fairly steady from 2008 to 2014. Shoulder dystocia is the strongest identified risk factor, imparting a 100-fold greater risk. The newborn's shoulder is caught behind the mother's pubic bone, and traction performed on the child during delivery results in injury to the brachial plexus. Other risk factors associated with BPBI include macrosomia (birthweight > 4.5 kg), heavy for gestational age infants, birth hypoxia, gestational diabetes, and forceps or vacuum-assisted delivery. Breech presentation has also been described as a risk factor in the past, but there have been more recent data that challenge this association.

Quantifying long-term upper-limb activity using wearable motion sensors after nerve reconstruction for neonatal brachial plexus palsy

OBJECTIVE

Standard, physician-elicited clinical assessment tools for the evaluation of function after nerve reconstruction for neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) do not accurately reflect real-world arm function. Wearable activity monitors allow for the evaluation of patient-initiated, spontaneous arm movement during activities of daily living. In this pilot study, the authors demonstrate the feasibility of using body-worn sensor technology to quantify spontaneous arm movement in children with NBPP 10 years after nerve reconstruction and report the timing and magnitude of recovered arm movement.

METHODS

Eight children with NBPP who underwent brachial plexus reconstruction approximately 10 years prior were recruited to take part in this single-institution prospective pilot study. Per the treatment protocol of the authors' institution, operated patients had severe, nonrecovering nerve function at the time of surgery. The patients were fitted with an activity monitoring device on each of the affected and unaffected arms, which were worn for 7 consecutive days. The duration (VT) and power (VM) with which each arm moved during the patient's normal daily activities were extracted from the accelerometry data and ratios comparing the affected and unaffected arms were calculated. Demographic data and standard physician-elicited clinical measures of upper-extremity function were also collected.

RESULTS

Three children underwent nerve grafting and transfer and 5 children underwent graft repair only. The mean (± SD) active range of motion was 98° ± 53° for shoulder abduction, 130° ± 24° for elbow flexion, and 39° ± 34° for shoulder external rotation. The median Medical Research Council grade was at least 2.5 for all muscle groups. The median Mallet grade was at least 2 for all categories, and 13.5 total. The VT ratio was 0.82 ± 0.08 and the VM ratio was 0.53 ± 0.12.

CONCLUSIONS

Wearable activity monitors such as accelerometers can be used to quantify spontaneous arm movement in children who underwent nerve reconstruction for NBPP at long-term follow-up. These data more accurately reflect complex, goal-oriented movement needed to perform activities of daily living. Notably, despite severe, nonrecovering nerve function early in life, postsurgical NBPP patients use their affected arms more than 80% of the time that they use their unaffected arms, paralleling results in patients with NBPP who recovered spontaneously. These data represent the first long-term, real-world evidence to support brachial plexus reconstruction for patients with NBPP.

Transfer of a C7 Fascicle for the Pectoralis Major to the Suprascapular Nerve: A 3-Year Follow-Up Patient Series

BACKGROUND

In patients with C5-C6 brachial plexus injury, spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve is usually performed for the restoration of shoulder abduction. In order to minimize donor deficits, we transferred one fascicle of the ipsilateral C7 root, dedicated to the pectoralis major muscle, to the suprascapular nerve.

METHODS

Ten patients with a mean age of 33 years (range, 19 to 51 years) were operated on at a mean delay of 4 months after their trauma (range, 2 to 7 months). Patients had C5-C6 brachial plexus palsy with avulsed roots on spinal magnetic resonance imaging scan. In addition to the partial C7 transfer, patients sustained nerve transfers to the posterior branch of the axillary nerve and to the motor branches of the musculocutaneous nerve for the biceps and brachialis muscles.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 36 months (range, 29 to 42 months), mean shoulder abduction and external rotation ranges of motion were, respectively, 99 degrees (range, 60 to 120 degrees; p = 0.001) and 58 degrees (range, 0 to 80 degrees; p = 0.001). In nine patients, shoulder abduction strength was graded M4, according the British Medical Research Council grading scale, against 1.6 kg (range, 1 to 2 kg), and was graded M3 in one patient. External rotation strength was graded M4 in nine patients and M3 in one patient. Residual strength of the pectoralis major muscle was graded M4+ in every patient.

CONCLUSIONS

C7 partial transfer to the suprascapular nerve showed satisfactory results at long-term follow-up for active shoulder abduction and external rotation recovery in C5-C6 brachial plexus palsies. This technique replaced spinal accessory nerve transfer in the authors' practice.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

The Terminal Anatomy of Phrenic Nerve: a Deeper Look at Diaphragm Innervation Patterns

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries are devastating lesions and neurotization is an usually elected surgical therapy. The phrenic nerve has been harvested as motor fibers donor in brachial plexus neurotization, showing great results in terms of motor reinnervation. Unfortunately, these interventions lack solid evidence regarding long-term safety and possible late respiratory function sequelae, raising crescent concerns after the COVID-19 pandemic onset and possibly resulting in reduced propensity to use this technique. The study of the distal anatomy of the phrenic nerves may lead to a better understanding of their branching patterns, and thus the proposition of surgical approaches that better preserve patient respiratory function.

METHODS

Twenty-one phrenic nerves in ten formalized cadavers were scrutinized. Pre-diaphragmatic branching patterns were inspected through analysis of the distance between the piercing site of the nerve at the diaphragm and the cardiac structures, number of divisions, and length from the point where the main trunk emits its branches to the diaphragm.

RESULTS

The main trunk of the right phrenic nerve reaches the diaphragm near the inferior vena cava and branches into three major divisions. The left phrenic nerve reaches the diaphragm in variable locations near the heart, branching into two to five main trunks. Moreover, we noticed a specimen presenting two ipsilateral parallel phrenic nerves.

CONCLUSION

The right phrenic nerve presented greater consistency concerning insertion site, terminal branching point distance to this muscle, and number of rami than the left phrenic nerve.

Comparison of Outcomes of Spinal Accessory to Suprascapular Nerve Transfer Versus Nerve Grafting for Neonatal Brachial Plexus Injury

Neonatal brachial plexus injuries may cause critical limitations of upper extremity function. The optimal surgical approach to address neonatal brachial plexus injuries has not been defined. In this systematic review, we compare clinical results after spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer and nerve graft techniques among patients with neonatal brachial plexus injury. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(1):7-12.].