Utility of Postoperative Radiographs for Pediatric Scoliosis: Association Between History and Physical Examination Findings and Radiographic Findings

Predicting pediatric patient rehabilitation outcomes after spinal deformity surgery with artificial intelligence

BACKGROUND

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common type of scoliosis, affecting 1-4% of adolescents. The Scoliosis Research Society-22R (SRS-22R), a health-related quality-of-life instrument for AIS, has allowed orthopedists to measure subjective patient outcomes before and after corrective surgery beyond objective radiographic measurements. However, research has revealed that there is no significant correlation between the correction rate in major radiographic parameters and improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs), making it difficult to incorporate PROs into personalized surgical planning.

METHODS

The objective of this study is to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled surgical planning and counseling support system for post-operative patient rehabilitation outcomes prediction in order to facilitate personalized AIS patient care. A unique multi-site cohort of 455 pediatric patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery at two Shriners Children's hospitals from 2010 is investigated in our analysis. In total, 171 pre-operative clinical features are used to train six machine-learning models for post-operative outcomes prediction. We further employ explainability analysis to quantify the contribution of pre-operative radiographic and questionnaire parameters in predicting patient surgical outcomes. Moreover, we enable responsible AI by calibrating model confidence for human intervention and mitigating health disparities for algorithm fairness.

RESULTS

The best prediction model achieves an area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) performance of 0.86, 0.85, and 0.83 for individual SRS-22R question response prediction over three-time horizons from pre-operation to 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year post-operation, respectively. Additionally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed prediction method to predict other patient rehabilitation outcomes based on minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and correction rates across all three-time horizons.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the relationship analysis, we suggest additional attention to sagittal parameters (e.g., lordosis, sagittal vertical axis) and patient self-image beyond major Cobb angles to improve surgical decision-making for AIS patients. In the age of personalized medicine, the proposed responsible AI-enabled clinical decision-support system may facilitate pre-operative counseling and shared decision-making within real-world clinical settings.

Why X-rays? The importance of radiographs in spine surgery

Despite the advances made in high-resolution spinal imaging, plain films (radiographs or x-rays) remain a cornerstone of evaluating and caring for spine patients in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings. Although often undervalued when compared with more advanced imaging such as MRIs or CT scans, plain films provide surgeons invaluable information that other imaging modalities oftentimes cannot. In addition to their use during surgery for localization or evaluation of hardware placement, x-rays provide an overall image of a patient's spine, are useful in evaluating hardware complications, allow detailed assessment of alignment and stability and allow for repeated images in clinic during follow-up. Plain films continue to provide critical information that cannot be obtained with other imaging modalities, and they remain central to providing optimal care for spine patients.

No added value of 2-year radiographic follow-up of fusion surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

For fusion surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) consensus exists that a 2-year radiographic follow-up assessment is needed. This standard lacks empirical evidence. The purpose of this study was to investigate the radiographic follow-up after corrective surgery in AIS, from pre-until 2 years postoperative.

METHODS

In this historical cohort study, 63 patients surgically treated for AIS, age ≤ 25 years, with 2-year radiographic follow-up, were enrolled. The primary outcome measure was the major Cobb angle. Secondary outcomes were coronal and sagittal spino-pelvic parameters, including proximal junction kyphosis (PJK) and distal adding-on. Change over time was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA.

RESULTS

The major curve Cobb angle showed a statistically significant change for pre- to 1 year postoperative, but not for 1- to 2-year follow-up. Seven out of 63 patients did show a change exceeding the error of measurement (5°) from 1- to 2-year follow-up (range -8° to +7°), of whom 2 patients showed curve progression and 5 showed improvement. PJK or distal adding-on was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant changes in major curve Cobb angle were found during postsurgical follow-up, or in adjacent non-fused segments. The findings of this study are not supportive for routine radiographs 2 years after fusion surgery in AIS patients.

The utility of post-operative hip radiographs in patients treated with hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND

Patients treated with hip hemiarthroplasty for low energy femoral neck fractures routinely undergo hip radiographs at each postoperative clinic visit regardless of history and physical findings. No studies to date have evaluated the effectiveness of this accepted practice. The goal of this study was to identify the postoperative utility of both history and physical (H/P) and hip radiographs in the treatment course of patients treated with hip hemiarthroplasty for low energy femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on consecutive patients treated with hip hemiarthroplasty for low energy femoral neck fractures. An abnormal H/P and hip radiographs as well as a change in treatment course were recorded at each clinic or emergency department visit.

RESULTS

Five hundred and eighty-three patients met inclusion criteria, consisting of 1177 clinic and 50 emergency department (ED) visits. An abnormal radiograph in the presence of a normal H/P did not lead to a change in treatment course. An abnormal H/P alone changed treatment course in 28 (3%) clinic visits and 18 (36%) ED visits. An abnormal H/P and the presence of an abnormal hip radiograph changed the treatment course in 23 (2%) clinic visits and 18 (36%) ED visits. In only one case - 0.3% of abnormal radiographs or 0.08% of 1177 clinic visits - did an abnormal hip radiograph change treatment course in the setting of an abnormal H/P within 6 months from surgery. The average cost of a series of hip and pelvis radiographs was $242.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal radiographs do not change treatment course in the presence of a normal H/P. Hip radiographs obtained in clinic within 6 months of surgery rarely lead to a change in treatment course and thereby are a source of excess cost and radiation exposure to the patient.

What's New in Pediatric Orthopaedic Quality, Safety, and Value? A Systematic Review With Results of the 2016 POSNA Quality, Safety, and Value Initiative (QSVI) Challenge

BACKGROUND

Enhancing the safety, quality, and value of care provided is a point of emphasis for modern health care systems. We performed a review of recent literature to highlight those efforts relevant to pediatric musculoskeletal care.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database for all papers related to quality improvement, patient safety, and/or value in pediatric orthopaedics published from October 1, 2012 to October 31, 2017, yielding 193 papers.

RESULTS

A total of 36 papers were selected for review based upon new findings. Papers were selected based on significant contributions in the following categories: casting safety, antibiotic stewardship/infection prevention, perioperative care pathways, blood conservation, venous thromboembolic disease prevention, and imaging safety/appropriateness.

CONCLUSIONS

There have been numerous advances in safety, quality, and value in pediatric orthopaedic care. Quality improvement efforts emphasizing provider education and safety monitoring can lead to a decrease in cast-related complications. Perioperative care pathways and bundles are associated with a decrease risk of surgical site infection and decreased length of stay in pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Increased scrutiny has been placed on the value of routine follow-up radiographs in pediatric fracture and spinal deformity care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4-literature review.

Utility of Postoperative Imaging in Radial Shaft Fractures

BACKGROUND

Postoperatively, radial shaft fractures are often followed clinically with serial radiographs to assess for fracture healing. Currently, there is no standard of care regarding postoperative imaging for these injuries. The purpose of this study is to determine whether imaging influences management decisions.

METHODS

Patients who presented to a level I trauma center between 2009 and 2014 with an operatively treated radial shaft fracture were retrospectively screened for inclusion in our study. Patients with ipsilateral ulna or radius fractures, or with inadequate imaging or inadequate follow-up, were excluded. Four blinded, board-certified, orthopedic surgeons reviewed the postoperative films twice for each patient and stated whether the imaging would influence management decisions. Images were separated into 3 groups based on time from surgery: 0 to 4 weeks, 4 to 8 weeks, and greater than 8 weeks. The number of times imaging influenced these hypothetical management decisions was recorded. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were calculated using Fleiss's and Cohen's kappa coefficients, respectively.

RESULTS

One hundred eighteen patients underwent operative fixation for an isolated radial shaft fracture, of whom 38 met inclusion criteria. Imaging from 0 to 4 weeks, 4 to 8 weeks, and greater than 8 weeks postoperatively resulted in a change of management in 0%, 32%, and 16% of patients, respectively. After 4 weeks, changes were primarily for immobilization and activity-level modification. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement kappa coefficients were 0.761 and 0.563, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Films obtained within 4 weeks of surgery for radial shaft fractures are unlikely to change postoperative management and may not be warranted during routine postoperative follow-up.

Limited utility of routine early postoperative radiography after primary ACL reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Given the overall success of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and the infrequent occurrence of complications detectable on radiographs, the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of routine radiographs in the early postoperative setting is questionable.

METHODS

Nine hundred thirty-three consecutive adult patients undergoing uncomplicated ACL reconstruction at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed to determine whether a postoperative knee radiograph was obtained within the first three months postoperatively. Images, reports and clinical notes were reviewed to determine if any clinical management change occurred due to x-ray findings. Radiograph charges, including imaging, technical and professional charges were calculated.

RESULTS

Five hundred ninety-nine of 933 primary ACL reconstruction patients (64.8%) had postoperative knee radiography at an average of 6.3±3.5 weeks postoperatively. A musculoskeletal radiologist read 97.7% of x-rays as normal. In the associated visit note, 70.3% of x-ray results were documented. Only 14.1% of patients with a postoperative x-ray had subsequent imaging. There were no significant management changes based on the routine postoperative radiographs using the defined criteria. A total of $336,683 ($562 per patient) was billed to patients for postoperative radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine early postoperative radiography after primary ACL reconstruction is of questionable utility. The significant per-patient expense is not balanced by the low yield of clinically meaningful data, as nearly all radiographs in the present series were normal and none resulted in significant changes in postoperative clinical management. These results suggest that routine radiographs after uncomplicated ACL reconstruction may be unnecessary although larger, multicenter studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.