Socioeconomic Deprivation and Its Adverse Association with Adolescent Fracture Care Compliance

Paediatric open fractures presenting to a level 1 trauma centre: a 10 year epidemiological study

PURPOSE

The epidemiology of paediatric fractures has been previously described, however there is limited data available on open fractures in this population. The purpose of this study was to investigate trends, mechanism of injury (MOI) and severity of paediatric open fractures and undertake an epidemiological study.

METHODS

All children ≤ 16.0 years presenting with open fractures were identified between 01/04/2013 and 01/04/2023. Those with craniofacial, thoracic and distal phalangeal fractures were excluded. Incidence was calculated based on those presenting within the local geographical region. Social deprivation was measured using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD).

RESULTS

There were 208 open fractures with a median age of 11.0(q1 7.4-q3 13.4) years, and 153(74.6%) were in males. The MOIs were road traffic collisions 73(35.1%), sports/play 45(21.6%), fall > 2m 29(13.9%), simple fall 25(12.0%), crush 16(7.7%), bites 8(3.8%), assault 6(2.9%), and other 6(2.9%). Nineteen children (9.1%) presented with polytrauma. Gustilo-Anderson grade for long bone fractures were I-61(29.3%), II-24(11.5%), IIIa-36(17.3%), IIIb-30(14.4%) and IIIc-7(3.4%). There were 129 children presenting within the local geographical region providing an annual incidence of 8.0/100,000. Radius and ulna were the most frequently injured 49(38.0%) followed by tibia and fibula 44(34.1%). There were 69(53.5%) children presenting from an IMD quintile 1 with open fractures.

CONCLUSION

Paediatric open fractures are commonly seen in the adolescent male and affect those who are from a more socially deprived background. These injuries account for 3.2% of fractures admitted to a MTC. Data suggests children principally sustain open fractures through two distinct injury patterns and ten-year trends suggests that there is a gradual decline in the annual incidence.

A Nationwide Analysis of the Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Complications and Health Care Utilizations After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Area Deprivation Index: Consideration of the Disadvantaged Patient

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic status has been demonstrated to be an important prognostic risk factor among patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. We evaluated patients living near neighborhoods with higher socioeconomic risk undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and if they were associated with differences in the following: (1) medical complications; (2) emergency department (ED) utilizations; (3) readmissions; and (4) costs of care.

METHODS

A query of a national database from 2010 to 2020 was performed for primary TKAs. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a weighted index comprised of 17 census-based markers of material deprivation and poverty. Higher numbers indicate a greater disadvantage. Patients undergoing TKA in zip codes associated with high ADI (90%+) were 1:1 propensity-matched to a comparison group by age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. This yielded 225,038 total patients, evenly matched between cohorts. Outcomes studied included complications, ED utilizations, readmission rates, and 90-day costs. Logistic regression models computed the odds ratios (OR) of ADI on the dependent variables. P values less than .003 were significant.

RESULTS

High ADI led to higher rates and odds of any medical complications (11.7 versus 11.0%; OR: 1.05, P = .0006), respiratory failures (0.4 versus 0.3%; OR: 1.28, P = .001), and acute kidney injuries (1.7 versus 1.5%; OR: 1.15, P < .0001). Despite lower readmission rates (2.9 versus 3.5%), high ADI patients had greater 90-day ED visits (4.2 versus 4.0%; OR: 1.07, P = .0008). The 90-day expenditures ($15,066 versus $12,459; P < .0001) were higher in patients who have a high ADI.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients have increased complications and ED utilizations. Neighborhood disadvantage may inform health care policy and improve postdischarge care. The socioeconomic status metrics, including ADI (which captures community effects), should be used to adequately risk-adjust or risk-stratify patients so that access to care for deprived regions and patients is not lost.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Neighborhood Disadvantage and Clinical Outcome Following Concussion in Adolescents

Whether social determinants of health are associated with clinical outcome following concussion among adolescents is not well established. The present study examined whether neighborhood-level determinants are associated with clinical recovery time following concussion in adolescents. Participants included adolescent student athletes (n = 130; mean age = 16.6, standard deviation = 1.2; 60.8% boys, 39.2% girls) who attended one of nine selected high schools in Maine, USA. The Area of Deprivation Index (ADI), an indicator of neighborhood disadvantage was used to group high schools as either high or low in neighborhood disadvantage. Athletic trainers entered injury and recovery dates into an online surveillance application between September 2014 and January 2020. Chi-squared analyses and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to compare the groups on two clinical outcomes: days to return to school and days to return to sports. Results of chi-squared tests did not reveal between-group differences in return to school at 21 or 28 days. However, groups differed in the percentage of adolescents who had returned to sports by 21 days (greater neighborhood disadvantage, 62.5%, lesser neighborhood disadvantage 82.0%, χ2 = 4.96, p = 0.03, odds ratio [OR] = 2.73, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-6.74) and 28 days (greater neighborhood disadvantage, 78.6%, lesser neighborhood disadvantage 94.0%, χ2 = 5.18, p = 0.02, OR = 4.27, 95% CI, 1.13-16.16) following concussion. A larger proportion of adolescents attending schools located in areas of greater neighborhood disadvantage took more than 21 and 28 days to return to sports. These results indicate an association between a multi-faceted proxy indicator of neighborhood disadvantage and clinical outcome following concussion. Further research is needed to better characterize factors underlying group differences in time to return to sports and the interactions between neighborhood disadvantage and other correlates of clinical recovery following concussion.

Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Curve Severity

INTRODUCTION

Social determinants of health have been shown to influence the health and outcomes of pediatric patients. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) may be particularly sensitive to such factors as early diagnosis and treatment can obviate the need for surgical intervention. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect that social determinants of health have on the severity of AIS at presentation and at the time of surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted for consecutive patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion for AIS from 2020 to 2022. Demographic data was collected, while insurance status (private vs. public) and childhood opportunity index (COI) categories (LOW vs. HIGH) were used as a proxy for socioeconomic status. Curve magnitude at the initial presentation and at the latest preoperative visit were recorded with a threshold of 25 to 40 degrees considered within the bracing range. Univariate and multivariate analysis was done to compare differences between subgroups as appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 180 patients with mean initial and preoperative major curve angles of 48 and 60 degrees were included. Statistically significant differences in race and insurance types were appreciated, with the LOW COI group having a higher proportion of underrepresented minority and publicly insured patients than the HIGH COI group ( P <0.001). Patients within the LOW COI group presented with an initial curve that was, on average, 6 degrees more severe than those within the HIGH group ( P =0.009) and a preoperative curve that was 4 degrees larger than those within the HIGH group ( P =0.015). Similarly, only 13% of patients within the LOW COI group presented with curves within the bracing threshold, compared with 31% in the HIGH COI group ( P =0.009).

CONCLUSION

Socioeconomic status plays a significant role in the severity of AIS. Specifically, patients with lower COI tend to present with curve magnitudes beyond what is responsive to nonsurgical treatment, leading to larger curves at the time of surgery. Future work should focus on addressing social inequalities to optimize the treatment and outcomes of AIS patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III- Retrospective Comparative Study.

Missed Short-term Follow-up After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery: Analysis of Surgical and Demographic Factors

INTRODUCTION

Few current studies have examined loss to follow-up after rotator cuff-related shoulder arthroscopy. Understanding the demographic and surgical factors for missed follow-up would help identify patients most at risk and potentially mitigate the onset of complications while maximizing clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive rotator cuff arthroscopic procedures with a minimum of 12-month follow-up done by a single, fellowship-trained surgeon was undertaken from February 2016 through January 2022. Demographic patient and surgical data, including age, sex, marital status, self-identified race, and body mass index, were collected. Follow-up at ≤3, 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months was determined. Patient-related and surgical predictors for missed short-term follow-up, defined as nonattendance at the 6 and 12-month postoperative visits, were identified.

RESULTS

There were 449 cases included, of which 248 (55%) were women. The median age was 57 years (interquartile range [IQR], 51 to 62). Patients with commercial insurance (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.64; P < 0.001) or workers' compensation (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.43; P < 0.001) were less likely to miss the 6-month follow-up compared with patients with Medicare, whereas increased socioeconomic deprivation (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97, P = 0.015) was associated with decreased odds of missing that visit. Patients who missed the ≤3 weeks (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.74, P = 0.010) and 3-month (OR, 8.55; 95% CI, 4.33 to 16.86; P < 0.001) follow-ups were more likely to miss the 6-month follow-up. Use of a patient contact system (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.87, P = 0.01) and increased number of preoperative visits (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.99, P = 0.033) were associated with decreased odds of missing the 12-month follow-up. Patients who missed the 6-month follow-up were more likely to miss the 12-month follow-up (OR, 5.38; 95% CI, 3.45 to 8.40; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Implementing an electronic patient contact system while increasing focus on patients with few preoperative visits and who miss the 6-month follow-up can reduce the risk of missed follow-up at 12 months after shoulder arthroscopy.

Poor socioeconomic status is associated with delayed femoral fracture fixation in adolescent patients

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare disparities continue to exist in pediatric orthopedic care. Femur fractures are the most common diaphyseal fracture and the leading cause of pediatric orthopedic hospitalization. Prompt time to surgical fixation of femur fractures is associated with improved outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate associations between socioeconomic status and timing of femoral fixation in adolescents on a nationwide level.

METHODS

The 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried using International Classification of Disease, 10th edition (ICD-10) codes for repair of femur fractures. Patients between the ages of 10 and 19 years of age with a principal diagnosis of femur fracture were selected. Patients transferred from outside hospitals were excluded. Baseline demographics and characteristics were described. Patients were categorized as poor socioeconomic status (PSES) if they were classified in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) lowest 50th percentile median income household categories and on Medicaid insurance. The primary outcome studied was timing to femur fixation. Delayed fixation was defined as fixation occurring after 24 h of admission. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

From 2016-2020, 10,715 adolescent patients underwent femur fracture repair throughout the United States. Of those, 765 (7.1 %) underwent late fixation. PSES and non-white race were consistently associated with late fixation, even when controlling for injury severity. Late fixation was associated with decreased rate of routine discharge (p < 0.01), increased LOS (p < 0.01) and increased total charges (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Patients of PSES or non-white race were more likely to experience delayed femoral fracture fixation. Delayed fixation led to worse outcomes and increased healthcare resource utilization. Research studying healthcare disparities may provide insight for improved provider education, implicit bias training, and comprehensive standardization of care.

Socioeconomic Deprivation and its Associations With Follow-up Compliance After In Situ Pinning of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

BACKGROUND

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a common cause of hip pain in adolescents and is most often treated by in situ screw fixation. Orthopaedic follow-up is critical after treatment for SCFE due to risks of complications and subsequent contralateral slip. Recent studies have shown that socioeconomic deprivation is associated with decreased fracture care compliance, but no studies have explored this relationship with SCFEs. The study aims to determine the relationship between socioeconomic deprivation and SCFE follow-up care compliance.

METHODS

This study included pediatric patients treated with in situ pinning of SCFE between 2011 and 2019 at a single tertiary-care urban children's hospital. Demographic and clinical information were obtained from electronic medical records. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to quantify the socioeconomic deprivation of each. Outcome variables included patient age and status of physeal closure at the most recent appointment, in addition to the length of follow-up (mo). Statistical relationships were evaluated using nonparametric bivariate analysis and correlation.

RESULTS

We identified 247 evaluable patients; 57.1% were male, and the median age was 12.4 years. Most slips were stable (95.1%) and treated with isolated unilateral pinning (55.9%). Median length of follow-up was 11.9 months (interquartile range, 4.95 to 23.1) with median patient age at final visit of 13.6 years (interquartile range, 12.4 to 15.1). Only 37.2% of patients were followed until physeal closure. The mean ADI spread in this sample was similar to the national distribution. However, patients in the most deprived quartile were lost to follow-up significantly earlier (median, 6.5 mo) than those in the least deprived quartile (median, 12.5 mo; P <0.001). Throughout the entire cohort, there was a significant, inverse relationship between deprivation and follow-up length ( rs (238) = -0.3; P <0.001), with this relationship most pronounced in the most deprived quartile.

CONCLUSIONS

In this sample, ADI spread was representative of national trends, and the incidence of SCFE was distributed evenly across deprivation quartiles. However, follow-up length does not mirror this relationship; increased socioeconomic deprivation is associated with an earlier loss to follow-up (often well before physeal closure).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-retrospective prognostic study.

Endocrine Health and Health Care Disparities in the Pediatric and Sexual and Gender Minority Populations: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement

Endocrine care of pediatric and adult patients continues to be plagued by health and health care disparities that are perpetuated by the basic structures of our health systems and research modalities, as well as policies that impact access to care and social determinants of health. This scientific statement expands the Society's 2012 statement by focusing on endocrine disease disparities in the pediatric population and sexual and gender minority populations. These include pediatric and adult lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and asexual (LGBTQIA) persons. The writing group focused on highly prevalent conditions-growth disorders, puberty, metabolic bone disease, type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) diabetes mellitus, prediabetes, and obesity. Several important findings emerged. Compared with females and non-White children, non-Hispanic White males are more likely to come to medical attention for short stature. Racially and ethnically diverse populations and males are underrepresented in studies of pubertal development and attainment of peak bone mass, with current norms based on European populations. Like adults, racial and ethnic minority youth suffer a higher burden of disease from obesity, T1D and T2D, and have less access to diabetes treatment technologies and bariatric surgery. LGBTQIA youth and adults also face discrimination and multiple barriers to endocrine care due to pathologizing sexual orientation and gender identity, lack of culturally competent care providers, and policies. Multilevel interventions to address these disparities are required. Inclusion of racial, ethnic, and LGBTQIA populations in longitudinal life course studies is needed to assess growth, puberty, and attainment of peak bone mass. Growth and development charts may need to be adapted to non-European populations. In addition, extension of these studies will be required to understand the clinical and physiologic consequences of interventions to address abnormal development in these populations. Health policies should be recrafted to remove barriers in care for children with obesity and/or diabetes and for LGBTQIA children and adults to facilitate comprehensive access to care, therapeutics, and technological advances. Public health interventions encompassing collection of accurate demographic and social needs data, including the intersection of social determinants of health with health outcomes, and enactment of population health level interventions will be essential tools.

Predictors of radiographic outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease

PURPOSE

Treatment outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) have been shown to be conditioned by a number of factors that may vary across different populations. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate factors affecting radiographically assessed treatment outcomes in patients treated surgically or conservatively for LCPD at Faculty Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic, between the years 2006 and 2019.

METHODS

Data of forty-seven children comprising 52 hips were analysed. Treatment outcomes were evaluated according to Stulberg classification. Predictors included the initial stage of fragmentation of the hip joint according to Herring classification, type of treatment (conservative or surgical), age at the time of diagnosis and sex.

RESULTS

Older age and severity of LCPD according to Herring classification but not the type of treatment were the strongest factors determining treatment outcomes. Treatment outcomes were comparable in patients treated conservatively or surgically both across the whole cohort of patients and a group of young children < six years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Results strengthen the roles of severity of the LCPD at onset of treatment and age of the patient in predicting treatment outcomes in patients with LCPD. Conservative and surgical treatments appear to yield similar treatment outcomes irrespective of age of patients.

Impact of social disadvantage among total knee arthroplasty places of service on procedural volume: a nationwide Medicare analysis

INTRODUCTION

As recent analyses have indicated that low-volume hospitals experience higher rates of complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), it remains important to evaluate how area deprivation index (ADI) of hospitals impacts the quantity of TKA performed. Our analysis sought to evaluate how the ADI of orthopedic surgeon's place of service influences TKA utilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data Public Use File (MPUP-PUF) was queried to identify claims between 2013 and 2019 associated with Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code 27447 (TKA). The MPUP-PUF file was linked with publicly available ADI information as well as information regarding each provider's practice location. The Mann-Kendall trend test was used to analyze significant differences in TKA volume between ADI quintiles and differences in TKA volume overall between the years 2013 and 2019. An adjusted multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to evaluate how ADI, and practice-specific characteristics, influenced TKA utilization volume.

RESULTS

When isolating by ADI quintiles, no significant changes in TKA volume were demonstrated for Quintile 4 (Kendall's τ = 0.524; p = 0.13) and Quintile 5 (Kendall's τ = 0.524; p = 0.13) between 2013 and 2019. However, a significant increase in TKA volume over the study period was observed in Quintile 1 (Kendall's τ = 0.714 p = 0.034), Quintile 2 (Kendall's τ = 0.714 p = 0.034), and Quintile 3 (Kendall's τ = 0.905 p = 0.007). The adjusted multivariable linear regression model demonstrated that each increase in ADI quintile was associated with significantly lower TKA utilization (β-estimate - 1.16; 95% CI - 2.04 to - 0.29; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that resource deprivation contributes to disparities in TKA utilization. With the ongoing recognition of how social and neighborhood-level deprivation may influence access to end-stage osteoarthritis care and related perioperative outcomes, the present study serves to encourage continued efforts at ensuring equity in orthopedic care.

Tibial Tuberosity Fracture: A Highly Selective Injury

BACKGROUND

Tibial tuberosity fracture (TTF) is an uncommon injury occurring mostly in adolescents. The association between race and TTF has not been investigated. We aimed to determine whether there is an association between race and hospital admission for pediatric TTF and to evaluate previously determined risk factors for TTF using a large sample.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional analysis of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project 2016 Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). We compared admissions for TTF to admissions for all other diagnoses. Because forearm fracture has not been found to be associated with race, univariate and multivariate analyses comparing admissions for TTF to admissions for forearm fracture were also performed. Sample weights were used to preserve national estimates.

RESULTS

Of 692 patients admitted for TTF in 2016, 93.2% were male. Factors associated with TTF admission compared with other admission diagnoses on multivariate analysis included male sex (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 17.67, confidence interval (CI) 12.25-25.47), age 13 to15 (aOR 10.33, CI 5.67-18.82, reference: age 8-12), and black (aOR 8.04, CI 3.91-16.49) and Hispanic (aOR 2.69, 95% CI 1.30-5.55) races/ethnicities (reference: Caucasian). Compared with forearm fracture admission, black race had an aOR of 22.05 (CI 10.08-48.21) for TTF admission on multivariate analysis. The effect of race on TTF admission also varied significantly with age, with 12 years carrying the strongest association of black race with TTF admission.

CONCLUSION

Black race is a previously unreported, strong independent risk factor for TTF. Male sex and age 13 to 15 are also strong risk factors for TTF, making this a highly selective fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III.

What's New in Pediatric Orthopaedic Health Care Disparities?

BACKGROUND

Health care disparities are prevalent within pediatric orthopaedics in the United States. Social determinants of health, such as income, race, social deprivation, place of residence, and parental involvement, all play a role in unequal access to care and disparate outcomes. Although there has been some effort to promote health equity both within pediatric orthopaedics and the US health care system altogether, disparities persist. In this review, we aim to identify major sources of inequality and propose solutions to achieve equitable care in the future.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database for papers addressing disparities in pediatric orthopaedics published between 2016 and 2021, yielding 283 papers.

RESULTS

A total of 36 papers were selected for review based upon new findings. Insurance status, race, and social deprivation are directly linked to poorer access to care, often resulting in a delay in presentation, time to diagnostic imaging, and surgery. Although these disparities pervade various conditions within pediatric orthopaedics, they have most frequently been described in anterior cruciate ligament/meniscal repairs, tibial spine fractures, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and upper extremity conditions. Treatment outcomes also differ based on insurance status and socioeconomic status. Several studies demonstrated longer hospital stays and higher complication rates in Black patients versus White patients. Patients with public insurance were also found to have worse pain and function scores, longer recoveries, and lower post-treatment follow-up rates. These disparate outcomes are, in part, a response to delayed access to care.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater attention paid to health care disparities over the past several years has enabled progress toward achieving equitable pediatric orthopaedic care. However, delays in access to pediatric orthopaedic care among uninsured/publicly insured, and/or socially deprived individuals remain and consequently, so do differences in post-treatment outcomes. Reducing barriers to care, such as insurance status, transportation and health literacy, and promoting education among patients and parents, could help health care access become more equitable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-narrative review.

Telemedicine and Socioeconomics in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic

INTRODUCTION

Socioeconomic factors may introduce barriers to telemedicine care access. This study examines changes in clinic absenteeism for orthopaedic trauma patients after the introduction of a telemedicine postoperative follow-up option during the COVID-19 pandemic with attention to patient socioeconomic status (SES).

METHODS

Patients (n = 1,060) undergoing surgical treatment of pelvic and extremity trauma were retrospectively assigned to preintervention and postintervention cohorts using a quasi-experimental design. The intervention is the April 2020 introduction of a telemedicine follow-up option for postoperative trauma care. The primary outcome was the missed visit rate (MVR) for postoperative appointments. We used Poisson regression models to estimate the relative change in MVR adjusting for patient age and sex. SES-based subgroup analysis was based on the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) according to home address.

RESULTS

The pre-telemedicine group included 635 patients; the post-telemedicine group included 425 patients. The median MVR in the pre-telemedicine group was 28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 45%) and 24% (95% CI, 6% to 43%) in the post-telemedicine group. Low SES was associated with a 40% relative increase in MVR (95% CI, 17% to 67%, P < 0.001) compared with patients with high SES. Relative MVR changes between pre-telemedicine and post-telemedicine groups did not reach statistical significance in any socioeconomic strata (low ADI, -6%; 95% CI, -25% to 17%; P = 0.56; medium ADI, -18%; 95% CI, -35% to 2%; P = 0.07; high ADI, -12%; 95% CI, -28% to 7%; P = 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Low SES was associated with a higher MVR both before and after the introduction of a telemedicine option. However, no evidence in this cohort demonstrated a change in absenteeism based on SES after the introduction of the telemedicine option. Clinicians should be reassured that there is no evidence that telemedicine introduces additional socioeconomic bias in postoperative orthopaedic trauma care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Social and environmental determinants of health among children with long-term movement impairment

The healthcare research community increasingly recognizes the need to address social (SDOH) and environmental determinants of health (EDOH) to optimize health and healthcare. This is particularly relevant to disability and functioning and to those with child onset conditions that impair mobility and impact functioning and participation. Using the World Health Organization (WHO)'s International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) as a comprehensive framework, this paper aims to discuss our understanding of the relationships between social and EDOH and outcomes among people with impaired mobility that impacts functioning. This paper offers suggestions for future developments and guidance to use SDOH and EDOH in research and clinical practice.

Implicit Racial Bias in Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Racial and ethnic minority patients continue to experience disparities in health care. It is important to understand provider-level factors that may contribute to these inequities. This study aims to evaluate the presence of implicit racial bias among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons and determine the relationship between bias and clinical decision making.

METHODS

A web-based survey was distributed to 415 pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. One section measured for potential implicit racial bias using a child-race implicit association test (IAT). IAT scores were compared with US physicians and the US general population using publicly available data. Another section consisted of clinical vignettes with associated questions. For each vignette, surgeons were randomly assigned a single race-version, White or Black. Vignette questions were grouped into an opioid recommendation, management decision, or patient perception category for analysis based on subject tested. Vignette answers from surgeons with IAT scores that were concordant with their randomized vignette race-version (ie, surgeon with pro-White score assigned White vignette version) were compared with those that were discordant.

RESULTS

IAT results were obtained from 119 surveyed surgeons (29% response rate). Overall, respondents showed a minor pro-White implicit bias ( P <0.001). Implicit bias of any strength toward either race was present among 103/119 (87%) surgeons. The proportion of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons with a strong pro-White implicit bias (29%) was greater than that of US physicians overall (21%, P =0.032) and the US general population (19%, P =0.004). No differences were found in overall opioid recommendations, management decisions, or patient perceptions between concordant and discordant groups.

CONCLUSION

Most of the pediatric orthopaedic surgeons surveyed demonstrated implicit racial bias on IAT testing, with a large proportion demonstrating strong pro-White bias. Despite an association between implicit bias and clinical decision making in the literature, this study observed no evidence that implicit racial bias affected the management of pediatric fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.