Surgical Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty Affects the Organism Profile of Early Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Incision Closure for Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference in the Rate of Superficial Wound Complications With Suture Versus Staples?

Background Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty (DA-THA) has increased in popularity over recent decades. However, DA-THA has been reported to have a higher incidence of superficial wound complications, including infection and incisional dehiscence, compared to other surgical approaches to hip arthroplasty. While this indicates a need for optimal wound closure, little research exists on the preferred method of skin closure following DA-THA. This study aimed to determine if there was any difference in rates of superficial infection, wound dehiscence, or overall wound complications with skin closure using a running subcuticular 3-0 Monocryl® suture compared to surgical staples following DA-THA.  Methods Records of patients who underwent DA-THA at our institution between July 2017 to July 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Data were abstracted on patient demographics, comorbidities, skin closure method, and wound complications from the electronic medical record. Superficial infection and wound dehiscence were classified based on explicit diagnosis in post-operative records and incision photographs taken during follow-up visits. Overall wound complications were classified in patients who experienced either superficial infection, incisional dehiscence, or both complications following surgery. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared measures were obtained from post-operative patient data, and significance was set at p [Formula: see text] 0.05. Results A total of 365 DA-THAs were completed in 349 patients. A running subcuticular 3-0 Monocryl® suture closed 207 surgeries (56.7%), while surgical staples closed 158 surgeries (43.3%). There was no significant difference in independent rates of superficial infection (p = 0.076) or wound dehiscence (p = 0.118) between suture and staple cohorts; however, suture closure (10, 2.7%) was associated with a significantly higher rate of overall wound complications compared to staple closure (1, 0.3%) (p = 0.020). Conclusion DA-THA carries the risk of overall wound complications, including superficial infection and wound dehiscence. Our findings suggest superficial skin closure with staples may be preferred over sutures due to lower rates of overall wound complications. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal method of skin closure following DA-THA.

Clinical outcomes of DAA and related techniques in hip arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been one of the most successful surgical interventions in recent memory and is nicknamed by some the "Surgery of the Century". Over the past decade, there has been a drastic change in THA management with the rise of the direct anterior approach both globally and in the USA market. While many would remark that this has been driven by false marketing, it is clear that the direct anterior approach can be an effective and safe way to perform a THA.It is the goal of this review to highlight evidence of its outcomes and clinical advantages, in particular, how it can decrease dislocation, even in high-risk individuals, and result in faster recovery in the early postoperative period with decreased muscular inflammation. We will also highlight its major disadvantages, including but not limited to increased wound complications and risk for periprosthetic fracture. Hopefully, this review will provide up-to-date information on the current state of the direct anterior approach and provide recommendations on patients that would be optimal candidates for this technique.

Periprosthetic joint infection rates across primary total hip arthroplasty surgical approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 653,633 procedures

INTRODUCTION

Evidence demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes across the various surgical approaches to primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, high-quality contemporary data regarding periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) risk between direct anterior approach (DAA) and other (THA) approaches is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated PJI rates reported in the literature between the DAA and other approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five online databases were queried for all studies published from January 1st, 2000 through February 17th, 2021 that reported PJI rates between DAA and other surgical approaches. Studies reporting on primary THAs for osteoarthritis (OA) and that included PJI rates segregated by surgical approach were included. Articles reporting on revision THA, alternative THA etiologies, or minimally invasive techniques were excluded. Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) models were utilized to evaluate the pooled effect of surgical approach on infection rates. Validated risk of bias and methodological quality assessment tools were applied to each study. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of analyses.

RESULTS

28 articles reporting on 653,633 primary THAs were included. No differences were found between DAA cohorts and combined other approaches (OR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.74-1.21; p = 0.67) as well as segregated anterolateral approach cohorts (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.64-1.06; p = 0.13). However, DAA patients had a significantly reduced risk of infection compared to those undergoing posterior (OR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.58-0.74; p < 0.0001) and direct lateral (OR: 0.56, 95% CI 0.48-0.65; p < 0.00001) approaches.

CONCLUSION

The DAA to primary THA had comparable or lower PJI risk when compared to other contemporary approaches. The results of the most up-to-date evidence available serve to encourage adult reconstruction surgeons who have already adopted the DAA. Additionally, orthopaedic surgeons considering adoption or use of the direct anterior approach for other reasons should not be dissuaded over theoretical concern for a general increase in the risk of PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Anterior-Based Approaches to Total Hip Arthroplasty: Beyond the Learning Curve

BACKGROUND

Anterior-based approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have gained popularity over the last decade. At our institution, anterior-based approaches are preferentially utilized, including both anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) and direct anterior (DA) for primary THA. As there are higher complication rates during the transition to an anterior approach, we compared the outcomes and complications between ABMS and DA approaches beyond the learning curve.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all ABMS and DA primary THA patients performed at a single institution was performed, excluding the first 100 anterior cases done by any surgeon. In total, 813 DA and 378 ABMS THA cases were included. Demographics, complications, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS and HOOS) were obtained for each patient.

RESULTS

There was a 4.5% overall complication rate (4.1% in DA and 5.6% in ABMS, P = .248), with the most common complication being infection at 1.7% (1.5% vs 2.1%, P = .423). A revision was performed in 3.4% of cases overall (1.8% aseptic, 1.6% septic). There was no difference in complication rates between approaches. Length of surgery was shorter for ABMS (94.5 vs 116.0 minutes, P < .001). Both DA and ABMS had significant improvements in PROMIS and HOOS Jr. scores, without any significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior-based approaches for primary THA demonstrated excellent clinical results and low complication rates overall. Beyond the learning curve, excellent results can be obtained with either ABMS or DA approach for primary THA.