Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage

Femoral cartilage thickness measured on MRI varies among individuals: Time to deepen one of the principles of kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A systematic review

PURPOSE

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA), as a pure resurfacing procedure, is based on matching implant thickness with bone cut and kerf thickness, plus cartilage wear. However, the assumption of a consistent 2 mm femoral cartilage thickness remains unproven. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature concerning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of femoral cartilage thickness in non-arthritic patients. Our hypothesis was that cartilage thickness values would vary significantly among individuals, thereby challenging the established KA paradigm of 'one-cartilage-fits-all'.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches (Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane Library) followed PRISMA guidelines. English-language studies assessing distal and posterior femoral cartilage thickness using MRI in non-arthritic adults were included. Studies lacking numerical cartilage thickness data, involving post-operative MRI, considering total femoro-tibial cartilage thickness, or failing to specify the compartment of the knee being studied were excluded.

RESULTS

Overall, 27 studies comprising 8170 MRIs were analysed. Weighted mean femoral cartilage thicknesses were: 2.05 ± 0.62 mm (mean range 1.06-2.6) for the distal medial condyle, 1.95 ± 0.4 mm (mean range 1.15-2.5) for the distal lateral condyle, 2.44 ± 0.5 mm (mean range 1.37-2.6) for the posterior medial condyle and 2.27 ± 0.38 mm (mean range 1.48-2.5) for the posterior lateral condyle.

DISCUSSION

Femoral cartilage thickness varies significantly across patients. In KA TKA, relying on a fixed thickness of 2 mm may jeopardize the accurate restoration of individual anatomy, leading to errors in implant coronal and rotational alignment. An intraoperative assessment of cartilage thickness may be advisable to express the KA philosophy at its full potential.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Cartilage thickness can be accurately measured intraoperatively in total knee arthroplasty: A step further in calipered kinematic alignment

Introduction

Kinematic alignment (KA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is by definition a pure femoral resurfacing procedure aiming to restore the individual prearthritic anatomy. However, when a 2 mm compensation is systematically used on the worn side, the variability in cartilage thickness in the unworn compartment might alter the accuracy of the technique. This study aimed to validate two intraoperative femoral cartilage thickness measurement techniques by comparing them to the photographic method, which measures cartilage thickness through pixel analysis of bone-cut images. The study hypothesized that the two intraoperative methods are comparable and similarly accurate within 0.5 mm of the photographic method.

Methods

Seventy cartilage thickness measurements from seventy patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis were prospectively collected. Two intraoperative techniques were evaluated: the electrocautery tip method (Method A) and the ruler method (Method B), performed before and after distal femoral bone resections, respectively. The postoperative photographic analysis (Method C) served as the reference method. Measurements were rounded to the nearest 0.5 mm for consistency. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Spearman's rank correlation, percentage of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results

No significant differences were observed between Method A and Method B in measuring femoral cartilage thickness. Agreement with Method C was 100% for Method B and 85% for Method A. In the 15% of discordant cases, Method A overestimated the measurements by one category of 0.5 mm compared to Method C. Correlation coefficients between the methods were high (ρ = 0.88-1.0). Intra- and interobserver reliability was high for all methods (ICCs 0.91-0.95).

Discussion

Both intraoperative methods are reliable and comparable to the photographic method when rounded to the closest 0.5 mm, with no significant differences among them. The electrocautery method has the added advantage of measuring cartilage thickness before bone cuts are performed.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Trans-Posterior Cruciate Ligament All-Inside Root Repair Versus Partial Meniscectomy for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: Comparison of Semiquantitative and Quantitative MRI Outcomes in Cartilage Degeneration and Osteoarthritic Progression

OBJECTIVE

To perform conventional, morphological, and T2 mapping compositional MRI imaging to assess the cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritic progression in patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) who underwent trans-posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) all-inside repair or partial meniscectomy.

DESIGN

Patients with MMPRTs after trans-PCL all-inside repair (group AR) or partial meniscectomy (group PM) between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Preoperative and postoperative conventional MRI were collected to assess medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and the whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS). Postoperative morphological MRI and T2 mapping compositional MRI were collected to evaluate the quantitative cartilage thickness/volume and cartilage composition.

RESULTS

The final cohort consisted of 21 patients in group AR and 22 patients in group PM, with no differences in demographic data and baseline patient characteristics between the 2 groups. Group AR demonstrated less progression of articular cartilage wear (P < 0.05) and decreased meniscal extrusion (P = 0.008) than group PM at the final follow-up. In addition, group AR demonstrated less extracellular matrix degeneration in the cartilage subregion of the medial compartment (P < 0.05) than group PM with lower T2 relaxation times in the superficial layer of the articular cartilage.

CONCLUSION

Trans-PCL all-inside repair of MMPRTs could delay the initial cartilage deterioration and morphological cartilage degeneration compared with partial meniscectomy. However, the amount of residual meniscal extrusion is clinically important, and an improved root repair fixation method should be investigated.

Hindfoot Alignment Change After Total Ankle Arthroplasty for Varus Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

In patients with end-stage varus ankle osteoarthritis (OA), hindfoot varus malalignment resulting from the varus deformity of the ankle joint is common. Although total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) performed to correct varus deformity of the ankle joint has the effect of correcting hindfoot alignment, no reports to date have described how much hindfoot alignment correction can be achieved. The purpose of this study was to identify correlation between ankle deformity correction and hindfoot alignment change after performing TAA in patients with end-stage varus ankle OA.

METHODS

A total of 61 cases that underwent TAA for end-stage varus ankle OA and followed up for at least 1 year were enrolled for this study. Correlation between changes of tibial-ankle surface angle (TAS), talar tilt (TT), and tibiotalar surface angle (TTS) and changes of hindfoot alignment angle (HA), hindfoot alignment ratio (HR), and hindfoot alignment distance (HD) measured preoperatively and at postoperative year 1 was analyzed.

RESULTS

TAS, TT, and TTS changed from 83.9 ± 4.1 degrees, 5.8 ± 5.0 degrees, and 78.1 ± 5.9 degrees, respectively, before operation to 89.2 ± 2.1 degrees, 0.4 ± 0.5 degrees, and 88.7 ± 2.3 degrees, respectively, after operation. HA, HR, and HD also changed from -9.2 ± 4.6 degrees, 0.66 ± 0.18, and -11.2 ± 6.9 mm to -3.7 ± 4.1 degrees, 0.48 ± 0.14, and -5.0 ± 5.3 mm. All the changes were statistically significant (P < .001, respectively). The regression slope of correlation was 0.390 (R² = 0.654) between TTS and HA; 0.017 (R² = 0.617) between TTS and HR; and 0.560 (R² = 0.703) between TTS and HD.

CONCLUSION

In patients with end-stage varus ankle OA, changes of hindfoot alignment could be predicted based on degree of ankle deformity corrected with TAA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Knee Pain and Mobility Impairments: Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Lesions Revision 2018

The Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) has an ongoing effort to create evidence-based practice guidelines for orthopaedic physical therapy management of patients with musculoskeletal impairments described in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The purpose of these revised clinical practice guidelines is to review recent peer-reviewed literature and make recommendations related to meniscus and articular cartilage lesions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(2):A1-A50. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.0301.