Diagnosis of Suspected Scaphoid Fractures

Treatment Options, Return to Play, and Functional Performance after Operatively and Non-operatively Managed Acute Scaphoid Fractures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Scaphoid fractures are commonly encountered injuries in the athletic population. Conservative management is pursued for incomplete fractures and those involving the distal pole. Operative management is indicated for displaced fractures, unstable fractures, and those involving the proximal pole. Complete non-displaced scaphoid waist fractures can be treated operatively or non-operatively based on patient and surgeon preference. The purpose of this article is to discuss the treatment, rehabilitation, and return to play guidelines for scaphoid injuries.

RECENT FINDINGS

CT scan is critically important to determine fracture displacement (which influences treatment choices) and healing (which influences return to activity determination). Nondisplaced scaphoid waist fractures can be treated with casting with 99.4% healing rate. Surgical treatment can hasten return to activities; newer surgical constructs have been suggested including dual screw fixation, plating, and staples. Outcomes of scaphoid fractures are generally favorable, as long as the selected treatment achieves a united, well-aligned scaphoid. In the athletic population specifically, there are high return to play rates and functional performances seen after these injuries. Each athlete is unique with regard to chosen sport, level of play, fracture type, and timing of the injury. Treatment options and return-to-play must be determined in a case-by-case manner to ensure an optimal clinical outcome.

Update on Management of Scaphoid Fractures

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Accurately diagnose scaphoid fractures through examination and appropriate imaging selection. 2. Recognize those fractures that can be treated with nonoperative management. 3. Outline the different surgical approaches for scaphoid fractures. 4. Appreciate the surgical options for management of scaphoid nonunion.

SUMMARY

This article includes the most up-to-date information on the diagnosis, work-up, and treatment of scaphoid fractures.

Scaphoid Fractures and Nonunion: A Survey-based Review of Hand Surgeon's Practice and the Evidence

Purpose

The Evidence-Based Practice Committee of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand set out to assess the membership's practice patterns (PPs) and familiarity with evidence-based principles for scaphoid fracture and nonunion management.

Methods

Using a consensus-generated 25-item online survey, all the American Society for Surgery of the Hand members were invited to participate via email in September 2023. Two question types were used including evidence-based practice (EBP) and PPs. The survey was divided into the following subtopics: minimally displaced scaphoid fracture, operative options for scaphoid fixation, and treatment of scaphoid nonunion.

Results

Of 9 EBP questions, only one was answered with the preferred response by >80% of surgeons. The remaining seven EBP questions had greater frequencies of less preferred responses. These questions concerned the current evidence for initial imaging options, optimal nonsurgical immobilization, percutaneous management, and the identification and treatment of nonunion. Of the PP questions, there were substantial differences of opinion on the choice of bone graft for nonunion, revisions, and patients with avascular necrosis. Nearly unanimous agreement was found for the use of headless compression screws for scaphoid fixation; however, the choice of approach for waist fixation was split between dorsal and volar percutaneous techniques and an open dorsal approach.

Conclusions

Scaphoid fracture and nonunion management continues to be an area of expanding evidence. There remain opportunities for our community to improve knowledge and familiarization with current evidence-based data. Many PPs areas demonstrated substantial agreement among the membership; however, there are areas of differences particularly graft choice, optimal approach for waist fixation, and postfixation protocols. Knowledge and familiarity with peer practices may help develop future areas of research and help to optimize patient care through a critically review and interpretation of the evidence.

Type of study/level of evidence

Economic/decision analyses V.

Modern low-field MRI

This narrative review explores recent advancements and applications of modern low-field (≤ 1 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in musculoskeletal radiology. Historically, high-field MRI systems (1.5 T and 3 T) have been the standard in clinical practice due to superior image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio. However, recent technological advancements in low-field MRI offer promising avenues for musculoskeletal imaging. General principles of low-field MRI systems are being introduced, highlighting their strengths and limitations compared to high-field counterparts. Emphasis is placed on advancements in hardware design, including novel magnet configurations, gradient systems, and radiofrequency coils, which have improved image quality and reduced susceptibility artifacts particularly in musculoskeletal imaging. Different clinical applications of modern low-field MRI in musculoskeletal radiology are being discussed. The diagnostic performance of low-field MRI in diagnosing various musculoskeletal pathologies, such as ligament and tendon injuries, osteoarthritis, and cartilage lesions, is being presented. Moreover, the discussion encompasses the cost-effectiveness and accessibility of low-field MRI systems, making them viable options for imaging centers with limited resources or specific patient populations. From a scientific standpoint, the amount of available data regarding musculoskeletal imaging at low-field strengths is limited and often several decades old. This review will give an insight to the existing literature and summarize our own experiences with a modern low-field MRI system over the last 3 years. In conclusion, the narrative review highlights the potential clinical utility, challenges, and future directions of modern low-field MRI, offering valuable insights for radiologists and healthcare professionals seeking to leverage these advancements in their practice.

Application of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Diagnosing Scaphoid Fractures: A Systematic Review

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has sparked interest in its potential to revolutionize medical diagnostics. This systematic review explores the application of AI and machine learning (ML) techniques in diagnosing scaphoid fractures, which account for a significant percentage of carpal bone fractures and have important implications for wrist function. Scaphoid fractures, common in young and active individuals, require an early and accurate diagnosis for effective treatment. AI has the potential to automate and improve the accuracy of scaphoid fracture detection on radiography, aiding in early diagnosis and reducing unnecessary clinical examinations. This systematic review discusses the methods used to identify relevant studies, including search criteria and quality assessment tools, and presents the results of the selected studies. The findings indicate that AI-driven methods can improve diagnostic accuracy, reducing the risk of missed fractures and complications. AI assistance can also alleviate the workload of medical professionals, improving diagnostic efficiency and reducing observer fatigue. However, challenges such as algorithm limitations and the need for continuous refinement must be addressed to ensure reliable fracture identification. This review underscores the clinical significance of AI-assisted diagnostics, especially in cases where fractures may be subtle or occult. It emphasizes the importance of integrating AI into medical education and training and calls for robust data collection and collaboration between AI developers and medical practitioners. Future research should focus on larger datasets, algorithm improvement, cost-effectiveness assessment, and international partnerships to fully harness the potential of AI in diagnosing scaphoid fractures.

Which clinical features best predict occult scaphoid fractures? A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies

BACKGROUND

Plain radiographs cannot identify all scaphoid fractures; thus ED patients with a clinical suspicion of scaphoid injury often undergo immobilisation despite normal imaging. This study determined (1) the prevalence of scaphoid fracture among patients with a clinical suspicion of scaphoid injury with normal radiographs and (2) whether clinical features can identify patients that do not require immobilisation and further imaging.

METHODS

This systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies included all study designs that evaluated predictors of scaphoid fracture among patients with normal initial radiographs. Quality assessment was undertaken using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Meta-analyses included all studies.

RESULTS

Eight studies reported data on 1685 wrist injuries. The prevalence of scaphoid fracture despite normal radiographs was 9.0%. Most studies were at overall low risk of bias but two were at unclear risk; all eight were at low risk for applicability concerns. The most accurate clinical predictors of occult scaphoid fracture were pain when the examiner moved the wrist from a pronated to a supinated position against resistance (sensitivity 100%, specificity 97.9%, LR+ 45.0, 95% CI 6.5 to 312.5), supination strength <10% of contralateral side (sensitivity 84.6%, specificity 76.9%, LR+ 3.7, 95% CI 2.2 to 6.1), pain on ulnar deviation (sensitivity 55.2%, specificity 76.4%, LR+ 2.3, 95% CI 1.8 to 3.0) and pronation strength <10% of contralateral side (sensitivity 69.2%, specificity 64.6%, LR+ 2.0, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.2). Absence of anatomical snuffbox tenderness significantly reduced the likelihood of an occult scaphoid fracture (sensitivity 92.1%, specificity 48.4%, LR- 0.2, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.7).

CONCLUSION

No single feature satisfactorily excludes an occult scaphoid fracture. Further work should explore whether a combination of clinical features, possibly in conjunction with injury characteristics (such as mechanism) and a normal initial radiograph might exclude fracture. Pain on supination against resistance would benefit from external validation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021290224.

Morphological risk factors for scaphoid fracture: a case-control study

PURPOSE

Most patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture and normal initial radiograph are unnecessarily treated. Previously developed prediction rules using demographic and clinical risk are unable to accurately predict occult fractures. Adding other risk factors could enhance this. Therefore, we aim to explore if there are morphological risk factors of the wrist for sustaining a scaphoid fracture.

METHODS

We retrospectively included adult patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture between 2013 and 2019 in our case-control study. There were 82 patients with a scaphoid fracture and 158 patients with a wrist contusion. Morphological risk factors were identified using statistical shape modelling (SSM) and linear measurements. Independent wrist shape variations on posteroanterior and lateral radiographs were captured in modes using SSM. Associations between outcomes and a scaphoid fracture were explored using logistic regression and the reliability was assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 15 posteroanterior modes and 8 lateral modes identified and linear measurements performed, 1 PA mode was associated with a scaphoid fracture (PA mode 4; OR 1.40, CI 1.04-1.93, p = 0.031). We described this mode as an ulna plus and narrower distal radius with more volar tilt and radial inclination. The reliability of the posteroanterior modes and linear measurements was mostly good/excellent and moderate/poor for the lateral modes.

CONCLUSION

There was one complex wrist shape significantly associated with a scaphoid fracture. Since the association was weak and the shape is difficult to identify radiographs, we believe this morphological risk factor would not enhance identifying occult scaphoid fractures in the future.

Clinical and Epidemiological Features of Scaphoid Fracture Nonunion: A Hospital-Based Study in Beijing, China

Objective

Studies exploring the epidemiological characteristics of scaphoid fracture nonunion are important to understand the causes and lead to effective prevention strategy. However, such knowledge is limited especially in China. This study aims to reveal the clinical and epidemiological features of scaphoid fracture nonunion in Chinese patients.

Methods

This was a retrospective study, which was based on patients with scaphoid fracture nonunion treated in a Chinese national orthopedic referral center from 1 August 2009 to 1 August 2020. The basic demographic and clinical characteristics, including gender, age at diagnosis of scaphoid fracture nonunion, dominant hand, the location of fracture, the side, the causes of the injury, age of the injury, age of the treatment for scaphoid fracture nonunion, and the delay period, were retrieved from the medical records. The patients were divided into a non‐delay group and a delay group based on whether they had visited the doctor within 1 month after the injury. Scaphoid fracture was classified into the proximal, waist, and distal fractures according to the location. The t‐test or Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the difference between groups when the dependent variable is continuous, while a chi‐square test was used when the dependent variable is categorical.

Results

A total of 363 patients were included in this study. The mean age at the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture nonunion was 32 (ranging from 14 to 78). Waist fracture nonunion (76.5%) was most common. Among the 169 patients who sought medical care within 1 month after the injury (non‐delay group), more than half (90 cases) were misdiagnosed. 23 cases could not recall the injury, so the time of delay could not be determined. Among the 171 patients who did not seek medical care for acute injury (delay group), the average time was 52 months between the initial injury and the treatment. The proportion of waist nonunions was higher among patients in the delay group than that in the non‐delay group.

Conclusions

Nonunion of scaphoid fracture is caused mainly by delayed treatment and misdiagnosis in China, suggesting that timely treatment and improved diagnosis could lower the prevalence. The fracture location may be a factor contributing to the delaying of seeking medical care.

[Imaging of the musculoskeletal system using low-field magnetic resonance imaging]

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a crucial role in musculoskeletal imaging. The high prevalence and pain-related suffering of patients pose a particular challenge concerning availability and turnover times, respectively. Low-field (≤ 1.0 T) MRI has the potential to fulfill these needs. However, during the past three decades, high field systems have increasingly replaced low field systems because of their limitations in image quality. Recent technological advancements in high-performance hard- and software promise musculoskeletal imaging with adequate quality at lower field strengths for several regions and indications.

OBJECTIVES

The goal is to provide insight into the advantages and disadvantages of low-field musculoskeletal imaging, discuss the current literature, and include our first experiences with a modern 0.55 T MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review is based on research in various literature databases and our own musculoskeletal imaging experiences with a modern 0.55 T scanner.

CONCLUSION

Most publications pertaining to musculoskeletal imaging at low-field strength MRI are outdated, and studies regarding the diagnostic performance of modern low-field MRI systems are needed. These new systems may complement existing high-field systems and make MRI more accessible, even in low-income countries. From our own experience, modern low-field MRI seems to be adequate in musculoskeletal imaging, especially in acute injuries.