Firearm-Related Injuries-Wound Management, Stabilization, and Associated Injuries: A Critical Analysis Review

Extra-capsular proximal femoral fractures: a cohort comparison of union and complication rates after ballistic versus blunt trauma

PURPOSE

This study seeks to (1) describe the management of civilian ballistic extra-capsular proximal femur fractures (2) assess the rate of nonunion and complications and (3) compare the time to union of ballistic and blunt pertrochanteric femur fractures. Given the enhanced and widened extensive inflammatory response with ballistic trauma, we hypothesized that hip fractures from ballistic mechanisms would have faster times to union.

METHODS

Patients were included if they were skeletally mature with extra-capsular pertrochanteric femur fractures and radiographic and clinical follow-up of at least 6 months. Additional exclusion criteria included prior femur fractures and pathologic fractures. Orthopedic Trauma Association classification of all fractures was included. Union rate, time to union and complications were measured. Clinical union was defined as absence of pain with ambulation at the fracture site. Radiographic union was defined as mRUST ≥ 11. mRUST was measured at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Patients were included if they met study end points of a minimum of 6 months of follow-up, achieved union, or underwent revision surgery for nonunion.

RESULTS

52 fractures (23 ballistic, 29 blunt fractures) matched by age, BMI, sex, diabetes, and current smoking status were included in the study. 95.7% of the ballistic (22/23) and 100% of the blunt (29/29) fractures united. Average time to union was 90.5 days for the ballistic cohort and 114.9 days for the blunt cohort (p = 0.03). There were six additional complications: three broken interlocks, one varus malalignment, one superficial infection, and one infection requiring an antibiotic spacer.

CONCLUSION

In our series, we found the average time to union for ballistic pertrochanteric femur fractures was significantly less than that for blunt pertrochanteric femur fractures. There was no significant difference in complications or total nonunion. Overall, our study shows both subgroups achieved union in 3 months, which is less than previously reported. The time to union may be increased in the ballistic fractures by the enhanced and widened extensive inflammatory response or the blast effect may inoculate osteogenic material in to the soft tissues that enhances the healing process. This study demonstrates unique characteristics of ballistic fracture healing.

Ballistic talus fractures: a retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Ballistic talus fractures are difficult to treat and there is a paucity of literature regarding the subject. The goal of the current study is to outline our experience and epidemiological findings from a single center with a large case series of ballistic talus fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for a retrospective review of skeletally mature patients with ballistic talus fractures from August 2019 to June 2023. Fracture morphology of the talus, the presence of displacement, and the talar declination angle (TDA) were all characterized. Demographic variables were obtained. All complications were recorded.

RESULTS

21 tali were included in this cohort (average age = 26, SD = 9.5). 11 (52%) talus fractures were displaced at initial injury and 17 (81%) had additional fractures of the ipsilateral foot and ankle. 29% (6/21) of tali were treated operatively with fixation: 2 talar body, 2 talar neck, and 2 talar head. TDA improved in patients treated operatively (21.8° pre-operatively, 19.6° post-operatively) but not in those treated non-operatively (24.5° pre-operatively, 25.5° at final follow-up). The overall complication rate was 29% (6/21) including 2 minor complications (superficial wound dehiscence) and 4 major complications: 3 patients with early signs of avascular necrosis (AVN)/collapse and 1 infected non-union. Although we had 3 patients with signs of AVN, one of which was converted to an ankle fusion, all patients were sucessfully treated with limb salvage.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study offers a unique and previously unreported cohort of gunshot related talar fractures. Our deep infection rate of 4.8% was similar to other studies of closed talus fractures. We found an improvement in the average TDA for the operatively treated fractures, which may represent improvements in fracture reduction with operative fixation. Further studies with longer follow-up are necessary improve our limited understanding of these injuries and to enhance treatment.

Femoral neck fractures: a cohort comparison of nonunion and complication rates after ballistic versus blunt mechanism fractures

PURPOSE

This study aims to review complications and union rates of ballistic femoral neck fractures when compared to their blunt counterparts. We hypothesize that gunshot injuries to the femoral neck may have higher rates of complications (nonunion, avascular necrosis [AVN], and implant failure) as a result of increasing comminution and disruption to the already tenuous blood supply through the femoral neck.

METHODS

Following the Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review was performed identifying femoral neck fractures at a single level 1 trauma center from 2018 to 2023. Inclusion criteria were age 16-45 years old with intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Exclusion criteria were absence of radiographic and clinical follow-up beyond 6 weeks, prior femur fractures, pathologic fractures, or primary surgery of total hip arthroplasty. Garden classification and Pauwels angle were reported. Clinical union was defined as the absence of pain with ambulation in the absence of radiographic changes. Radiographic union was defined using the validated Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH) scoring system. Complication rates (deep and superficial infection, failure of fixation, and AVN) and subsequent surgery were recorded.

RESULTS

After exclusion, 12 ballistic and 16 blunt femoral neck fractures met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The ballistic cohort had significant more Garden I fractures than the blunt cohort (4 [33%] vs. 0 [0%]), and significantly fewer Garden IV fractures than the blunt cohort (2 [17%] vs. 9 [56%]). Despite different Garden classification types of fracture patterns, the Pauwels angle between the two cohorts was similar (51° ballistic vs. 60° blunt, p = 0.16). The overall nonunion rate was 24.1%. Nonunion rates were similar between the two cohorts (3, 25% ballistic vs. 4, 25% blunt, p = 0.99). The mean final RUSH score between the two cohorts was similar (20.1 ballistic vs. 23.4 blunt [p = 0.05]). The total complication rate was 31% (9/28) consisting of 7 nonunions and 2 malunions across both cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The current study found no difference in the union rates between blunt and ballistic femoral neck fractures. Although comparing these fractures using traditional classification systems (Garden and Pauwels) are difficult due to the inherent differences in mechanism and the applicability of these tools, both groups presented with high rates of nonunion and complications. We believe the similar RUSH scores and complication rates in both cohorts show these fractures fundamentally behave similarly and remain challenging injuries to manage with ORIF.

A Retrospective Study of Ballistic Pelvic Fractures With Focus on Short-Term Clinical Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the orthopaedic management, associated injuries, and outcomes in patients treated for low-velocity ballistic pelvic fractures.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Single, urban, Level I trauma center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients 15 years or older treated for low-velocity ballistic pelvic (OTA/AO 61 and 62) fractures from May 2018 to August 2021.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Primary study measures included pelvic fracture location, concomitant associated injuries, surgical interventions, and antibiotic treatment. Postinjury sequelae evaluated include infection, neurologic deficit, and need for orthopaedic removal of foreign body. Risk factors of postinjury sequelae were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients with ballistic pelvic fractures were included. The cohort consisted of 135 (86.5%) male patients with a mean age of 29.8 years. One hundred ten (70.5%) patients sustained 2 or more gunshot wounds. Ninety-eight (62.8%) patients underwent an exploratory laparotomy with 79 (50.6%) having a confirmed concomitant intestinal injury. Additional associated injuries included nerve injury (13.5%), vascular injury requiring repair or embolization (10.9%), and bladder injury (10.3%). Nine (5.7%) patients underwent orthopaedic operative management-five (3.2%) patients for operative fixation and 4 (2.5%) patients for removal of intra-articular foreign bodies. Diabetes (odds ratio [OR]: 33.1, P = 0.025), neurologic deficit on presentation (OR: 525.2, P < 0.001), vascular injury requiring repair or embolization (OR: 8.7, P = 0.033), and orthopaedic pelvic fixation (OR: 163.5, P = 0.004) were positively associated with the defined postinjury sequelae at 30 and 90 days of follow-up. There was not a statistically significant association between infection and retained foreign body (OR: 3.95 [95% CI 0.3-58.7, P = 0.318]) or bowel contamination (OR: 6.91 [95% CI 0.4-58.7, P = 0.178]).

CONCLUSIONS

Ballistic fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum rarely required operative fixation (3.2%) or irrigation and debridement. Neither retained foreign body nor presumed bowel contamination of pelvic fractures had a statistically significant association with infection, which further supports conservative management of these injuries. Patients with diabetes, neurologic deficit on presentation, vascular injury necessitating intervention, and orthopaedic fixation of pelvic fracture are associated with increased risk of postinjury sequelae.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

AOA Critical Issues Symposium: Gun Violence as a Public Health Crisis

ABSTRACT

Gun violence is an epidemic throughout the United States and is increasing around the world-it is a public health crisis. The impact of gun violence is not limited to the victims (our patients); it also extends to the physicians and caregivers who are taking care of these patients every day. Even more broadly, gun violence affects those living and going to work in potentially dangerous environments. The "vicarious trauma" that is experienced in these situations can have long-term effects on physicians, nurses, and communities. Importantly, socioeconomic disparities and community deprivation strongly correlate with gun violence. Systemic factors that are deeply ingrained in our society can increase concerns for these underrepresented patient populations and cause increased stressors with substantial health consequences, including delayed fracture-healing and poorer overall health outcomes. It is incumbent on us as physicians to take an active role in speaking up for our patients. The importance of advocacy efforts to change policy (not politics) and continue to push for improvement in the increasingly challenging environments in which patients and physicians find themselves cannot be overstated. Multiple national organizations, including many orthopaedic and general surgery associations, have made statements advocating for change. The American College of Surgeons, in collaboration with many other medical organizations, has supported background checks, registration, licensure, firearm education and training, safe storage practices, red flag laws, addressing mental health issues, and more research to better inform an approach going forward and to address the root causes of violence. We encourage the orthopaedic surgery community to stand together to protect each other and our patients, both physically and mentally, with agreement on these principles.

The ballistic articular structure injury classification (BASIC) system: clarifying ballistic articular injuries

PURPOSE

This study aims to (1) devise a classification system to categorize and manage ballistic fractures of the knee, hip, and shoulder; (2) assess the reliability of this classification compared to current classification schemas; and (3) determine the association of this classification with surgical management.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected trauma database at an urban level 1 trauma centre. The study included 147 patients with 169 articular fractures caused by ballistic trauma to the knee, hip, and shoulder. Injuries were selected based on radiographic criteria from plain radiographs and CT scans. The AO/OTA classification system's reliability was compared to that of the novel ballistic articular injury classification system (BASIC), developed using a nominal group approach. The BASIC system's ability to guide surgical decision-making, aiming to achieve stable fixation and minimize post-traumatic arthritis, was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The BASIC system was created after analysing 73 knee, 62 hip, and 34 shoulder fractures. CT scans were used in 88% of cases, with 44% of patients receiving surgery. The BASIC classification comprises five subgroups, with a plus sign indicating the need for soft tissue intervention. Interrater reliability showed fair agreement for AO/OTA (k = 0.373) and moderate agreement for BASIC (k = 0.444). The BASIC system correlated strongly with surgical decisions, with an 83% concurrence in treatment choices based on chart reviews.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional classification systems provide limited guidance for ballistic articular injuries. The BASIC system offers a pragmatic and reproducible alternative, with potential to inform treatment decisions for knee, hip, and shoulder ballistic injuries. Further research is needed to validate this system and its correlation with patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Diagnostic Study.