Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture

Mortality and functional outcomes in elderly adults treated surgically by hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures

Background

Despite multiple studies, less recent literature and data regarding the mortality associated with hip fractures in the elderly population are available.

Objectives

To assess the mortality data and functional outcomes of patients who underwent cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures. To evaluate if preoperative (minimum 2 months) calcium and vitamin D supplement intake in patients affects postoperative mobilization with or without walker support.

Methods

All patients aged 65 and above who underwent hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in our tertiary care center were included. Postoperative functional outcomes were determined using the Modified Harris Hip score and Oxford Hip score at 3, 6, and 12 months. The mortality of the procedures was assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Individuals who took both calcium and vitamin D supplements for at least 2 months before surgery were divided into two groups: those who did not take supplements and those who did.

Results

We studied 110 patients above the age of 65 years. The postoperative mortality rate at 3, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively was found to be 3.6%, 4.7%, and 15.5% respectively. Functional outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively using modified Harris Hip score and Oxford Hip score and were found to be identical in both cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty groups. Patients who took calcium and vitamin D supplements preoperatively (minimum 2 months) could walk without support at the end of 1-year post-surgery.

Conclusion

Early surgery and early mobilization should be the main aim of treatment for femoral neck fractures.

Comparison of Early Postoperative Stress Distribution around Short and Tapered Wedge Stems in Femurs with Different Femoral Marrow Cavity Geometries Using Finite Element Analysis

Backgroud

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the ideal stem length remains uncertain; different stem lengths are used in different cases or institutions. We aimed to compare the stress distributions of cementless tapered wedges and short stems in femurs with different femoral marrow geometries and determine the appropriate fit.

Methods

Finite element models were created and analyzed using HyperMesh and LS-DYNA R11.1, respectively. The 3-dimensional shape data of the femurs were extracted from computed tomography images using the RETOMO software. Femurs were divided into 3 groups based on the Dorr classification. The computer-aided design data of cementless tapered wedge-type and short stems were used to select the appropriate size. In the finite element analysis, the loading condition of the femur was assumed to be walking. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were placed within the femur model at the internal and external contact points of the stem based on Gruen zones. The average stresses and strain energy density (SED) of the elements included in each VOI were obtained from the preoperative and postoperative models.

Results

The von Mises stress and SED distributions of the cementless tapered wedge and short stems were similar in their respective Dorr classifications. In both stems, the von Mises stress and SED after THA were lower than before THA. The von Mises stress and SED of the cementless tapered wedge stem were higher than those of short stems. Cementless tapered wedge-type stems tended to have lower rates of change than short stems; however, Dorr C exhibited the opposite trend. In the Dorr classification comparison, the von Mises stress and SED were greater for both stems in the order of Dorr C > Dorr B > Dorr A, from Zone 2 to Zone 6.

Conclusions

In Dorr A and B, the short stem exhibited a natural stress distribution closer to the preoperative femur than the tapered wedge stem; however, in Dorr C, the short stem may have a greater effect on stress distribution, suggesting that it may cause greater effects, such as fracture in the early postoperative period, than other Dorr types.

Reduced mortality associated to cementless total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fracture

Mortality related to femoral neck fractures remains a challenging health issue, with a high mortality rate at 1 year of follow-up. Three modifiable factors appear to be under control of the surgeon: the choice of the implant, the use of cement and the timing before surgery. The aim of this research project was to study the impact on mortality each of these risk factors play during the management of femoral neck fractures. A large retrospective epidemiological study was performed using a national database of the public healthcare system. The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent joint replacement surgery after femoral neck fracture during the years 2015 to 2017. All data points were available for at least 2 years after the fracture. The primary outcome was mortality within 2 years following the surgery. We evaluated the association between mortality and the type of the implant hemiarthroplasty (HA) versus total hip arthroplasty (THA), cemented versus non cemented femoral stem as well as the timing from fracture to surgical procedure. A multivariate analysis was performed including age, gender, comorbidities/autonomy scores, social category, and obesity. We identified 96,184 patients who matched the inclusion criteria between 2015 and 2017. 64,106 (66%) patients underwent HA and 32,078 (33.4%) underwent THA. After multivariate analysis including age and comorbidities, patients who underwent surgery after 72 h intra-hospital had a higher risk of mortality: Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.119 (1.056-1.185) p = 0.0001 compared to the group who underwent surgery within 24 h. THA was found to be a protective factor HR = 0.762 (0.731-0.795) p < 0.0001. The use of cement was correlated with higher mortality rate: HR = 1.107 (1.067-1.149) p < 0.0001. Three key points are highlighted by our study in the reduction of mortality related to femoral neck fracture: the use of hemiarthroplasty a surgery performed after 48 h and the use of cement for femoral stem fixation adversely affect mortality risk.

Fibula allograft with cannulated screw fixation versus ordinary cannulated screw fixation for femoral neck fractures: a 10-year retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

For femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients, both fibula allograft with cannulated screw fixation and ordinary cannulated screw fixation are clinically effective treatments. However, for unstable femoral neck fractures, ordinary cannulated screw fixation is characterized by a high risk of postoperative complications and a high rate of mechanical failure after internal fixation. For this study, we systematically compared the long-term efficacy and postoperative complications of these two procedures.

METHODS

A total of 156 subjects diagnosed as femoral neck fractures participated in our study. Subjects in the combination group underwent fibula allograft with cannulated screw fixation (n = 76), and those in the control group were treated with ordinary cannulated screw fixation (n = 80). Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, Harris hip score (HHS) and EuroQoL five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D); and the incidence of postoperative and bone healing complications in the two groups were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time was more than 10 years. Intra-operative blood loss significantly increased in the combination group compared with the control group (P < 0.05). There were significantly improved performances in healing time, the time course of recovery of full-weight-bearing stepping, HHS and EQ-5D scores in the combination group compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Besides, the incidence rates of femoral head necrosis, nonunion, femoral neck shortening and total hip replacement were significantly lower in the combination group than those in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Fibula allograft with cannulated screw fixation shows a better long-term therapeutic effect than ordinary cannulated screw fixation for femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients. Patients receiving the combination strategy have faster and high-quality functional recovery after femoral neck fractures and a lower incidence rate of postoperative complications.

Effect analysis of medial bracing plate combined with cannulated screw in unstable femoral neck fracture assisted by surgical hip dislocation: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Unstable femoral neck fractures have a high likelihood of causing severe disruption to the blood supply. This study aimed to assess the therapeutic effect of surgical hip dislocation using a medial support plate combined with cannulated screw fixation for the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged adults.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 68 young adults who underwent internal fixation of unstable femoral neck fractures. The observation group included 32 patients who had received medial support plate and cannulated screw fixation by the surgical hip dislocation method and 36 patients who had undergone anti-rotation screw composite compression system fixation comprised the comparison group. The amount of intraoperative bleeding, surgery duration, fracture recovery time and complications were recorded. The degree of femoral neck shortening and Garden index were assessed using the Zlowodzki method. Additionally, hip functionality was evaluated using the Harris score at 3 and 6 months and at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

All 68 patients in both groups were followed up for 12-42 months (mean, 22.4 months). The postoperative incision was well-aligned and no inflation was observed. The intraoperative blood loss and surgery duration in the comparison group were longer than those in the observation. Additionally, the observation group had a significantly shorter fracture recovery time and a higher Garden index than the comparison at 6 months postoperatively; however, there was no significant statistical discrepancy between the two groups at the remaining time points. The observation group had higher Harris scores than the comparison at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Surgical hip dislocation applied to the medial support plate combined with cannulated screw fixation has clinical application value in restoring the stability of femoral neck fractures while facilitating the maintenance of blood flow to the femoral head and neck.

A comparison between the femoral neck system and other implants for elderly patients with femoral neck fracture: A preliminary report of a newly developed implant

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck system (FNS) is an implant for patients with femoral neck fracture. It has superior angular and rotatory stability; it is less invasive because of its established locking plate system. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies yet concerning the clinical outcomes of elderly patients with femoral neck fracture who have been treated using the FNS.

METHODS

Data of patients with femoral neck fracture aged >65 years and who had undergone internal fixation with the FNS and other implants were retrospectively analyzed in this study. The follow-up period was a minimum of six months between January 2006 and November 2020. In total, 52 patients were included in the clinical evaluations, using the FNS (group F) was 25 and using other implants (group O) was 27. Outcome measurements were surgical time, the amount of blood loss, union rate and the cases that underwent reoperation.

RESULTS

The average surgical time in the group F was 42 ± 13 min (range: 26-83 min) and was shorter than that in the group O (53 ± 21 min, range: 13-111 min, P = 0.032). The average blood loss in the group F was calculated to 36 ± 25 g (range: 0-91 g), while it was 41 ± 40 g (range: 0-169 g) in group O. No significant difference among the groups. The union rate of the group F was 100%, and the reoperation rate of the group F was significantly less than that of the group O (0% vs 22%, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

Internal fixation using the FNS can be an alternative option with shorter surgical time and lower reoperation rate for elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.

Hip resection arthroplasty for acute femoral neck fractures in the non-ambulator

Objectives:

Hemiarthroplasty (HA) is the current standard of care for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in non-ambulators. Despite excellent outcomes, arthroplasty-specific risks remain, including dislocation, implant failure, periprosthetic fracture and infection, and fat embolization syndrome. To eliminate the possibility of these complications, should non-ambulatory patients with acute, native hip FNFs be treated with simple hip resection arthroplasty (HRA) instead of HA?

Design:

Retrospective case series.

Setting:

Large, urban level-1 trauma center.

Patients/Participants:

Five non-ambulatory patients (6 hips) with acute, native hip FNF underwent femoral head and neck resection. Also, the most recent 10 FNFs treated with HA were also identified for comparison purposes.

Intervention:

HRA was performed via a Smith-Peterson approach with an oscillating saw or osteotome to complete the fracture or perform a fresh neck cut.

Main Outcome Measurements:

Outcomes included postoperative vs preoperative VAS pain scores and narcotics usage, and return to baseline functional status (sit up in bed or a chair postoperatively). Procedure time for HRA was compared with the 10 most recent patients with FNF treated with HA.

Results:

HRA resulted in decreased postoperative vs preoperative VAS pain scores (7.7 vs 3.3, P = .002), and decreased operative times (59.2 minutes for HRA, 111.8 minutes for HA, P < .001). All HRA patients had immediate return of baseline function.

Conclusion:

HRA offers shorter operative times when compared with HA, decreased postoperative VAS pain scores, and immediate return to functional baseline status without possibility of arthroplasty-specific complications. HRA may be an acceptable treatment option for FNFs in the non-ambulator.

Level of evidence: IV

Similar recovery in mobility and quality of life after cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures

Summary: Patients who suffer hip fractures become immobile with reduced quality of life. Our study aims to assess which cemented or cementless hemiarthroplasty resulted in better mobility or quality-of-life scores. Our retrospective review showed that both have similar scores after matching for age, gender, body mass index and comorbidities. Introduction: Hip fractures have mortality rates of up to 10% at 1 month and 30% at 1 year, as well as significant morbidity. This paper seeks to compare mobility and quality-of-life scores of cemented against uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the displaced neck of femur fractures. Our hypothesis is that there is no difference between the mobility and quality of life of patients treated with cemented or uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Methods: A retrospective review of registry data on hemiarthroplasties performed in our institution between 2011 and 2019 was conducted. From this dataset, 70 cemented hemiarthroplasties and 238 uncemented hemiarthroplasties were identified. Patients were assessed pre- and post-operatively, at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months to determine functional recovery through mobility and quality-of-life scores. Results: On propensity score matching, both groups showed a reduction in Parker mobility score from 6.5 to 4 ( p = 0.91), SF-36 physical function scores from 52.5 (cemented) to 30 and 57.5 (uncemented) to 25 ( p = 0.79). Comparing the delta changes from pre-fall after matching, no significant differences were observed. From the analysis of the matched set of data, treatment of neck of femur using cemented or non-cemented bipolar hip prosthesis resulted in similar mobility and quality-of-life scores. Conclusion: In our analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in the mobility or quality-of-life scores of the patients undergoing cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the displaced neck of femur fractures.

Dynamic compression locking system versus multiple cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck fractures are one of the problems in clinical treatment. The prognosis is uncertain. Currently, No internal fixation method is superior to other internal fixation methods in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Therefore, the internal fixation system needs to be further explored. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of femoral neck dynamic compression locking system (DCLS) and multiple cannulated compression screws(MCCS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

A prospective analysis of 54 cases of femoral neck fractures treated with either a DCLS (n = 28) or MCCS (n = 26) was conducted between December 2015 and November 2017 in authors' hospitals. The perioperative and postoperative parameters of the two groups were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were followed up for 24-47 months. The etiology was caused by a fall. There was no significant difference in follow-up time, operation time, incision length, surgical blood loss, the incidence of perioperative and postoperative healing complications, and mobility in the two groups (all P > 0.05). The Harris score, fracture healing time, femoral neck shortening, partial weight-bearing time and complete weight-bearing time were significantly better in the DCLS group than in the MCCS group (all P < 0.05). The fracture healing rate in the DCLS group was higher than that in the MCCS group.

CONCLUSIONS

The DCLS and MCCS might be equally effective in terms of operation time, incision length, surgical blood loss, the incidence of perioperative and postoperative healing complications, and mobility in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. However, the DCLS is superior to the MCCS in Harris score, fracture healing time, femoral neck shortening, weight-bearing time and fracture healing rate. So, DCLS deserves further study.