1
|
Lee SH, Seo J, Jeong D, Hwang JS, Jang JW, Cho YE, Lee DG, Park CK. Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With a Comparison to Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy. Neurospine 2024; 21:807-819. [PMID: 39363460 PMCID: PMC11456926 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448430.215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (UBE-PCF) has been recently adopted for unilateral radiating arm pain due to cervical herniated intervertebral disc or foraminal stenosis. We systematically meta-analyzed clinical outcomes and complications of the UBE-PCF and compared them with those of full-endoscopic PCF (FE-PCF). METHODS We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until February 29, 2024. Clinical outcomes and complications of the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF were collected and analyzed using the fixed-effect or random-effects model. Clinical outcomes of the UBE-PCF were compared with minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following PCF to evaluate the efficacy of UBE-PCF. RESULTS Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the random-effects meta-analysis, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analogue scale (VAS) neck, and VAS arm were significantly decreased after the UBE-PCF (p<0.001). The improvement of NDI, VAS neck, and VAS arm were significantly higher than MCID (p<0.05). The improvement of NDI, VAS neck, and VAS arm were not significantly different between the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF (p>0.05). Overall incidence of complications of the UBE-PCF was 6.2% (24 of 390). The most common complication was dura tear (2.1%, 8 of 390). The incidence in overall complications was not significantly different between the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF (p=0.813). CONCLUSION We found that the UBE-PCF significantly improved clinical outcomes. Regarding clinical outcomes and complications, the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF were not significantly different. Therefore, the UBE-PCF would be an advantageous surgical option comparable to FE-PCF for unilateral radiating arm pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Hyub Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - Junghan Seo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - Dain Jeong
- College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jin Seop Hwang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - Jae-Won Jang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - Yong Eun Cho
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - Dong-Geun Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - Choon Keun Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Krishnan A, Murugan C, Panthackel M, Anil A, Degulmadi D, Mayi S, Rai RR, Dave MB, Narvekar M, Killekar R, Krishnan PA, Dave BR. Transforaminal Endoscopic Ventral Stenosis Decompression in Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Long Term Outcome in 79 Patients. World Neurosurg 2024; 186:e191-e205. [PMID: 38531475 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.03.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Calcified lumbar disc herniations (CLDH) causing calcified ventral stenosis pose a therapeutic challenge to the treating surgeon due to their neural adhesions, location, and hardness. METHODS This retrospective study analyzed all the cases of CLDH/calcified ventral stenosis managed by transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The preoperative images were analyzed for the level, migration; and grade (Lee's migration zones), and location (Michigan State University classification). Detailed surgical technique and intraoperative parameters including the duration of surgery and complications have been recorded. The clinical parameters including visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), length of stay in hospital, days of return to basic work, and patient satisfaction index were analyzed. Postoperatively the images were analyzed for the adequacy of decompression. RESULTS The mean VAS for back pain and leg pain was 4.7 ± 2.6 (0-9), and 7.45 ± 2.2 (1-10), respectively. The mean preoperative ODI was 78.2 ± 13.2 (63.2-95.6). Nineteen patients (24%) had neurological deficits preoperatively. The mean duration of surgery was 90.5 ± 15.8 (58-131) minutes. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging revealed adequate decompression in 97.5% (n = 77). The mean duration of hospital stay was 1.05 ± 0.22 (1-2) days, and the postoperative back and leg pain VAS was 1.14 ± 1.2 (0-3) (P < 0.05) and 1.7 ± 0.5 (0-6) (P < 0.05), respectively. The ODI at final follow-up was 6.5 ± 3.7 (2.2-18) (P < 0.05). Neurological recovery occurred in 17 (89.5%) patients and they returned to basic work/jobs in 19.5 ± 3.3 (14-26) days. The mean patient satisfaction index was 1.18 ± 0.47 (1-2) at a mean follow-up of 5.52 ± 2.91 (2-12.75) years. CONCLUSIONS Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy is a complete, safe, and efficacious procedure in patients with CLDH with earlier recovery considering the surgery is performed with the patient being awake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Krishnan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute, Nr Nagari Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India; Department of Spine Surgery, Bhavnagar Institute of Medical Science, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India.
| | - Chandhan Murugan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute, Nr Nagari Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Mikeson Panthackel
- Department of Spine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute, Nr Nagari Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Abhijith Anil
- Department of Spine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute, Nr Nagari Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Devanand Degulmadi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute, Nr Nagari Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Shivanand Mayi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute, Nr Nagari Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Ravi Ranjan Rai
- Department of Spine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute, Nr Nagari Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Mirant B Dave
- Department of Spine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute, Nr Nagari Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Mrugank Narvekar
- Department of Spine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute, Nr Nagari Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Rohan Killekar
- Department of Spine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute, Nr Nagari Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Preety Ajay Krishnan
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute, Nr Nagari Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Bharat R Dave
- Department of Spine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute, Nr Nagari Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India; Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| |
Collapse
|