Critical and non-critical coronavirus disease 2019 patients: which is the most predictive biomarker for disease severity and outcome?: A multicentre prospective cohort study comparing mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, inflammatory and immunological patterns

BACKGROUND

Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients leads to a wide range of clinical manifestations. The evaluation of mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) as a prognostic biomarker in noncritical wards (NON-ICU) and intensive care units (ICU), may have a potential in predicting disease severity and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the difference in the prognostic power of MR-proADM in NON-ICU wards and in ICUs in a prospective multicentre cohort study.

DESIGN

From January to July 2021, all adult COVID-19 patients requiring admission for more than 48 h.

SETTING

One primary centre and two secondary centre hospitals.

PATIENTS

One hundred and twenty-three ICU and 77 NON-ICU patients.

INTERVENTION

MR-proADM, lymphocyte subpopulations and immunoglobulins were measured within 48 h and on days 3 and 7. A Log-rank test was used to compare survival curves, using a MR-proADM cut-off value of 1.5 nmol l-1. The predictive ability for mortality was compared using the area under the curve and 95% confidence interval (CI) of different receiver-operating characteristic curves.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The first 48 h MR-proADM values were significantly higher in the ICU group (median value 1.10 [IQR, 0.80 to 1.73] pg ml-1 vs. 0.90 [0.70 to 1.20] pg ml-1, P = 0.020), and statistically significant changes were observed over time for MR-proADM, CD3+, CD4+ and CD56+. In univariate analysis, MR-proADM was the only biomarker that significantly predicted mortality (P = 0.006). The logistic regression model showed an odds ratio for mortality equal to 1.83 (95% CI, 1.08 to 3.37) P = 0.035 for MR-proADM, 1.37 (1.15 to 1.68) P = 0.001 for MuLBSTA and 1.11 (1.05 to 1.18) P less than 0.001 for SAPS II.

CONCLUSION

MR-proADM admission values and trends over time appear to be a suitable marker of illness severity and a patient's risk of mortality in both ICU and NON-ICU settings. Lymphocyte subpopulation dysfunction seems to play a role in defining the severity of COVID-19 but is limited to ICU setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

on clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04873388 registered on March 2020.

Early Changes in Clinical and Laboratory Parameters in Patients Died of COVID-19

261,435,768 COVID-19 infections were detected worldwide, of them 5,207,634 deaths were registered. Identifying markers of the patient severity early in the course of the disease can facilitate the assessment of the risk of adverse outcome.

The objective: To compare values of laboratory parameters and their changes during treatment of patients with a complicated course of COVID-19 infection.

Subjects and Methods. 56 patients were included in the study, all of them were hospitalized to COVID Hospital of the Clinic of Bashkir State Medical University, Russian Ministry of Health, from September 30, 2021 to November 15, 2021, and their complicated course of the disease necessitated transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU). The laboratory evaluation included the following: a general blood and urine counts, blood chemistry including urea and creatinine, liver transaminases, and blood coagulogram (prothrombin time (PTT), prothrombin index (PTI), thrombin time, fibrinogen, and blood clotting time).

Results. In the group of patients with a fatal outcome on the day of transfer to ICU, lymphocytopenia, eosinopenia, elevated values of creatinine, total bilirubin, transaminases, C-reactive protein, D-dimer, and ferritin were noted. Also on this day, microscopic hematuria, proteinuria and cylindruria were detected in the urine tests of most patients in this group during treatment.

Conclusion. Critical deviations in the results of hematological and biochemical tests were revealed. Particular attention should be paid to such parameters as the level of erythrocytes, lymphocytes, eosinophils, glucose, urea, creatinine, total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, creatine kinase, C-reactive protein, D-dimer, and ferritin.

Proadrenomedullin in the Management of COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Evidence and Uncertainties in Existing Literature

Mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) is a new biomarker of endothelial damage and its clinical use is increasing in sepsis and respiratory infections and recently in SARS-CoV-2 infection. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the use of MR-proADM in severe COVID-19 disease. After Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus search, registries, and gray literature, deduplication, and selection of full-texts, we found 21 studies addressing the use of proadrenomedullin in COVID-19. All the studies were published between 2020 and 2022 from European countries. A total of 9 studies enrolled Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, 4 were conducted in the Emergency Department, and 8 had mixed populations. Regarding the ICU critically ill patients, 4 studies evaluating survival as primary outcome were available, of which 3 reported completed data. Combining the selected studies in a meta-analysis, a total of 252 patients were enrolled; of these, 182 were survivors and 70 were non-survivors. At the admission to the ICU, the average MR-proADM level in survivor patients was 1.01 versus 1.64 in non-survivor patients. The mean differences of MR-proADM values in survivors vs. non-survivors was −0.96 (95% CI from −1.26, to −0.65). Test for overall effect: Z = 6.19 (p < 0.00001) and heterogeneity was I2 = 0%. MR-proADM ICU admission levels seem to predict mortality among the critical COVID-19 population. Further, prospective studies, focused on critically ill patients and investigating a reliable MR-proADM cut-off, are needed to provide adequate guidance to its use in severe COVID-19.