Prognostic performance of pretreatment systemic immune-inflammation index in women with epithelial ovarian cancer

Bevacizumab as a mitigating factor for the impact of high systemic immune-inflammation index on chemorefractory in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Predicting chemorefractory disease in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains challenging. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological factors and hemogram data as predictive markers for chemorefractory EOC and to explore potential therapeutic approaches that may mitigate these unfavorable conditions.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced EOC treated with chemotherapy. Hemogram data and clinicopathological variables were collected. We employed logistic regression to assess factors associated with chemorefractory EOC and used the Kaplan-Meier method for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 191 patients analyzed, suboptimal surgery, lymphocyte count < 1440/mm3, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) ≥ 2350, and lack of bevacizumab therapy were independently associated with chemorefractory EOC (OR 19.30, 95% CI 7.01-53.12; OR 9.07, 95% CI 2.76-29.82; OR 12.45, 95% CI 3.87-40.07; OR 6.61, 95% CI 2.01-21.78, respectively). Elevated SII was also identified as a risk factor for poor progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Specifically, patients with high SII who did not receive bevacizumab had a significantly higher probability of chemorefractory EOC and poorer survival outcomes compared to those who received bevacizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that hemogram parameters and clinicopathological factors such as suboptimal surgery, lymphocyte count, SII, and bevacizumab therapy status are predictive markers for chemorefractory disease in advanced EOC. Elevated SII emerged as a predictor for poorer PFS and OS outcomes, particularly in the absence of bevacizumab therapy.

Impact of obesity on survival outcomes of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in Lagos, Nigeria: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a major contributor to cancer-related illness and death among women worldwide. Obesity, a prevalent condition in many populations, has been implicated as a risk factor for various malignancies including EOC.

Objectives

This study investigated the impact of obesity on survival outcomes among women with advanced EOC in Lagos, Nigeria.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient medical records from a major gynaecological cancer unit of a teaching hospital in Lagos, Southwest Nigeria, to examine the relationship between body mass index (BMI) 30 kg/m2 as a measure of obesity, and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We used Kaplan-Meier analysis stratified by patients' BMI categories (obese versus non-obese) and compared using the Log Rank test to estimate PFS and OS. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of the associations between the BMI categories and survival outcomes while adjusting for all confounding clinicopathologic variables. Hypothesis tests were conducted using a two-tailed approach with a significance level of 5%.

Results

Our study showed no statistically significant association between obesity and PFS (adjusted HR = 0.62, 95% confidence interval = 0.36-1.06, p = 0.282). However, a significant association was observed between obesity with or without ascites and OS (adjusted HR = 3.58, 95% confidence interval 1.28-10.02, p = 0.015).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that obesity negatively impacts OS in patients with EOC, thus highlighting the need to address obesity in the management of EOC by introducing comprehensive, multidisciplinary approaches incorporating weight management and personalized treatment strategies to enhance the prognosis of these patients.

Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Inflammation Markers on the Long-Term Outcomes in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer remains one of the most lethal gynaecological malignancies affecting women worldwide; therefore, attention has been focused on identifying new prognostic factors which might help the clinician to select cases who could benefit most from surgery versus cases in which neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by interval debulking surgery should be performed. The aim of the current paper is to identify whether preoperative inflammation could serve as a prognostic factor for advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Material and methods: The data of 57 patients who underwent to surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer between 2014 and 2020 at the Cantacuzino Clinical Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off value of different inflammatory markers for the overall survival analysis. The analysed parameters were the preoperative level of CA125, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and systemic inflammation index (SII). Results: Baseline CA125 > 780 µ/mL, NLR ≥ 2.7, MLR > 0.25, PLR > 200 and a systemic immune inflammation index (SII, defined as platelet × neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio) ≥ 84,1000 were associated with significantly worse disease-free and overall survival in a univariate analysis. In a multivariate analysis, MLR and SII were significantly associated with higher values of overall survival (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0124); meanwhile, preoperative values of CA125, PLR and MLR were not associated with the overall survival values (p = 0.5612, p = 0.6137 and p = 0.1982, respectively). In conclusion, patients presenting higher levels of MLR and SII preoperatively are expected to have a poorer outcome even if complete debulking surgery is performed and should be instead considered candidates for neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by interval surgery.

Survival outcomes following interval versus primary debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A retrospective cohort study in Lagos, Southwest Nigeria

Background

There is conflicting evidence regarding the survival benefit of interval debulking surgery (IDS) compared to conventional treatment with primary debulking surgery (PDS) in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Objectives

We compared the survivals following PDS followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) versus IDS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in women with advanced EOC at the gynaecological oncology unit of a tertiary referral centre in Lagos, Southwest Nigeria.

Methods

The data of 126 women with advanced EOC who had standard treatment with either PDS and ACT or NACT and IDS between January 2008 and December 2017 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) time stratified by the types of upfront debulking surgery were calculated and compared by employing the log-rank test statistics. Cox proportional hazard models were then used to estimate hazard ratios of the association between the type of surgical debulking and survivals while adjusting for all necessary covariates.

Results

We recorded no statistically significant differences in PFS (adjusted hazard ratio=1.28, 95% confidence interval 0.82-2.01, P=0.282) and OS (adjusted hazard ratio=1.23, 95% confidence interval 0.68-2.25, P=0.491) between IDS and PDS among women with advanced EOC.

Conclusions

There is a need for a larger prospective multicenter study to further compare the impact of upfront surgical debulking types on the survival of women with advanced EOC in our setting. In the meantime, giving interval debulking surgery after a few courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be an acceptable standard of care for women with advanced EOC.