Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium for transplant immunosuppression

Tacrolimus- and Mycophenolate-Mediated Toxicity: Clinical Considerations and Options in Management of Post-Transplant Patients

Tacrolimus and mycophenolate are important immunosuppressive agents used to prevent organ rejection in post-transplant patients. While highly effective, their use is associated with significant toxicity, requiring careful management. Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor, is linked to nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, metabolic disturbances such as diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular complications such as hypertension and arrhythmias. Mycophenolate, a reversible inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, frequently causes gastrointestinal disturbances, including diarrhea and colitis, as well as hematologic side effects like anemia and leukopenia, which increase infection risk. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and pharmacogenomics have emerged as essential strategies for mitigating these toxicities. TDM ensures tacrolimus trough levels are maintained within a therapeutic range, minimizing the risks of nephrotoxicity and rejection. Pharmacogenomic insights, such as CYP3A5 polymorphisms, allow for personalized tacrolimus dosing based on individual metabolic profiles. For mycophenolate, monitoring inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase activity provides a pharmacodynamic approach to dose optimization, reducing gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities. Emerging tools, including dried blood spot sampling and pharmacokinetic modeling, offer innovative methods to simplify monitoring and enhance precision in outpatient settings. Despite their utility, the toxicity profiles of these drugs, including those of early immunosuppressants such as cyclosporine and azathioprine, necessitate further consideration of alternative immunosuppressants like sirolimus, everolimus, and belatacept. Although promising, these newer agents require careful patient selection and further research. Future directions in immunosuppressive therapy include integrating individual pharmacogenetic data to refine dosing, minimize side effects, and improve long-term graft outcomes. This narrative review underscores the importance of personalized medicine and advanced monitoring in optimizing post-transplant care.

Sites of gastrointestinal lesion induced by mycophenolate mofetil: a comparison with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in rats

Background

Immunosuppressant drugs for renal transplant mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) cause gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. The specific site of GI tract targeted by MMF and EC-MPS remains unclear.

Methods

In this study, we investigated the effects of MMF and EC-MPS on stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, colon and rectum using a rat model. Rats were randomized into five groups: control, MMF (100 mg/kg·d), mofetil (30 mg/kg·d), EC-MPS (72 mg/Kg·d), mofetil + EC-MPS. Each group was treated with drugs once a day for 7 days through intra-gastric gavage. Diarrhea grade of each rat were measured every day, as well as the body weight. Blood was collected by tail nick and Seven days later, the rats were sacrificed, GI tissues were collected for Histological research.

Results

The results showed that diarrhea grade and weight loss were significantly higher in MMF group than other groups. The pathological score of MMF group was significantly higher than EC-MPS group and EC-MPS + mofetil group in jejunum and ileum tissues, but not other segments of GI tract. Absorption of EC-MPS is delayed, compared to that of MMF. MPAG concentration in duodenum, jejunum and ileum tissues of MMF group is higher than EC-MPS group. Mofetil may increase the magnitude of MPA absorption.

Conclusions

Our data suggested that MMF might target jejunum and ileum and induce GI injury. EC-MPS causes less injury in GI tract than MMF, probably due to its kinetic property.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Mycophenolic Acid

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an immunosuppressant requiring therapeutic drug monitoring. Although immunoassays are commercially available, there is significant positive bias using this approach when compared to high-performance liquid chromatography or LC combined with mass spectrometry (LC/MS) or tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Positive bias is due to variable cross-reactivity of MPA acyl glucuronide with antibodies traditionally used in immunoassay formats. As can be expected, the magnitude of bias varies considerably. MPA strongly binds albumin and, as a result, disproportionate increases in free MPA occur in patients with uremia, hypoalbuminemia, and hepatic dysfunction. As such, monitoring free MPA poses additional challenges. Because MPA inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, monitoring this enzyme may provide an alternative approach.

Pharmacokinetics of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in stable liver transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is one of the major immunosuppressive agents used in liver transplantation recipients. In an attempt to mitigate one of the most common side effects of MMF (gastrointestinal symptoms), enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) was developed. In this study, we report the pharmacokinetic profile of EC-MPS in stable liver transplantation recipients administered a single 720 mg dose.

METHODS

Liver transplantation recipients more than one yr after transplantation were administered a single dose of 720 mg EC-MPS after which blood levels of MPA were measured at frequent intervals using a specific and validated LC-MS/MS assay.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the 21 patients studied were: mean age was 55.9 yr, 13 were female, eight had hepatitis C, and 14 were on tacrolimus. The mean apparent half-life of MPA was 5.3 +/- 4.3 h, (1.0-15.7). Mean t(max) was 2.4 +/- 1.1 h (1.0-5.0). The mean area-under-curve was 45.3 +/- 23.1 microg-h/mL (17.3-90.0). Trough level concentrations (C(12 h)) showed large inter-individual variability (0-9.2 microg/mL). There was no difference in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters relative to: gender, HCV, administration of tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine or type of biliary anastomosis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide variation in pharmacokinetic parameters in stable, long-term liver transplantation recipients receiving a single dose of EC-MPS. These data suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring with EC-MPS may have limited utility in liver transplantation recipients.