Applying antimicrobial pharmacodynamics to resistant gram-negative pathogens

A Simulated Application of the Hartford Hospital Aminoglycoside Dosing Nomogram for Plazomicin Dosing Interval Selection in Patients With Serious Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales

PURPOSE

In the Phase III Study of Plazomicin Compared With Colistin in Patients With Infection Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CARE), plazomicin was studied for the treatment of critically ill patients with infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Initial plazomicin dosing was guided by creatinine clearance (CrCl) and subsequent doses adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring to achieve AUC_0-24 exposures within a target range (210-315 mg∙h/L). We applied the Hartford nomogram to evaluate whether this clinical tool could reduce plazomicin troughs levels and increase the proportion of patients within the target AUC range.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients enrolled in cohorts 1 or 2 of CARE were eligible for analyses. Observed 10-hour concentrations after the initial dose were plotted on the Hartford nomogram to determine an eligible dosing interval group (q24h, q36h or q48h). On the basis of baseline CrCl, a 15- or 10-mg/kg dose was simulated with the nomogram-recommended dosing interval. The proportion of patients in each dosing interval group with a trough ≥3 mg/L (trough threshold associated with serum creatinine increases ≥0.5 mg/dL in product label) was quantified. Simulated interval-normalized AUC_0-24 was compared with the target AUC range.

FINDINGS

Among the 28 patients with a CrCl ≥60 mL/min, the nomogram recommended every-24-hour dosing in 61% and an extended-interval (q36h or q48h) in 39% of patients. For patients with a CrCl ≥30-59 mL/min (n = 9), the nomogram recommended every-24-hour dosing and an extended-interval in 22% and 78% of patients, respectively. Among both renal function cohorts, exposure simulation with the nomogram significantly reduced the proportion of patients with trough concentrations ≥3 mg/L (CrCl ≥60 mL/min cohort: 91% vs 9%, P < 0.001; CrCl ≥30-59 mL/min cohort, 100% vs 0%, P < 0.001). Relative to the observed mean (SD) AUC_0-24 of 309 mg∙h/mL (96 mg∙h/mL), simulation of extended intervals resulted in a mean interval-normalized AUC_0-24 of 210 mg∙h/mL (40 mg∙h/mL) in all patients eligible for an extended interval, resulting in a similar proportion (49% vs 54%) of patients within the target AUC_0-24 range after the first dose.

IMPLICATIONS

Application of the Hartford nomogram successfully reduced the likelihood of elevated plazomicin trough concentrations while improving AUC exposures in these patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections.

Usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring of piperacillin and meropenem in routine clinical practice: a prospective cohort study in critically ill patients

Background

Beta-lactam anti-infective levels after standard dosing have been shown to be subtherapeutic when renal clearance is augmented.

Objective

To determine if piperacillin and meropenem are found to be in their therapeutic range in infected critically ill patients when administered by continuous intravenous infusion (CII) assisted by a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) report issued by the pharmacy service.

Methods

This prospective non-controlled intervention study evaluated septic patients in an intensive care unit. Patients received a loading dose of meropenem or piperacillin-tazobactam and the antibiotics were afterwards administered by CII. Blood concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography assays. The adequacy of β-lactam therapy in the cohort subjected to intervention was assessed by determining whether plasma levels during CII were >4 times the informed minimum inhibitory concentration during the first 96 hours of treatment.

Results

A total of 124 patients were subject to TDM during antibiotic treatment but, for the analysis of the fulfilment of pharmacodynamic requirements, data from 31/124 (25%) were excluded. Of the whole cohort of treatment courses, 57/93 (61.3%) reached the target level. Plasma levels were adequate in 41/70 (58.6%) and 16/23 (69.6%) of the patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem, respectively. Globally, recommendations based on TDM results were followed in 35/93 (37.6%) of the treatment courses.

Conclusions

The results of the study show that, in critically ill patients with sepsis, there is a significant proportion of treatment courses where target levels are not reached even if the antibiotics are administered by CII and TDM support is provided by the pharmacy service. This TDM support should be offered on a real-time basis to be really useful.

Quantitative Analysis of Gentamicin Exposure in Neonates and Infants Calls into Question Its Current Dosing Recommendations

Optimal dosing of gentamicin in neonates is still a matter of debate despite its common use. We identified gentamicin dosing regimens from eight international guidelines and seven Swiss neonatal intensive care units. The dose per administration, the dosing interval, the total daily dose, and the demographic characteristics between guidelines were compared. There was considerable variability with respect to dose (4 to 6 mg/kg), dosing interval (24 h to 48 h), total daily dose (2.5 to 6 mg/kg/day), and patient demographic characteristics that were used to calculate individualized dosing regimens. A model-based simulation study in 1071 neonates was performed to determine the achievement of efficacious peak gentamicin concentrations according to predefined MICs (Cmax/MIC ≥ 10) and safe trough concentrations (Cmin ≤ 2 mg/liter) with recommended dosing regimens. MIC targets of 0.5 and 1 mg/liter were used. Dosing optimization was performed giving priority to the first day of treatment and with the goal of simplifying dosing. Current gentamicin neonatal guidelines allow to achieve effective peak concentrations for MICs ≤ 0.5 mg/liter but not higher. Model-based simulations indicate that to attain peak gentamicin concentrations of ≥10 mg/liter, a dose of 7.5 mg/kg should be administered using an extended dosing interval regimen. Trough concentrations of ≤2 mg/liter can be maintained with a dosing interval of 36 to 48 h in neonates according to gestational and postnatal age. For treatment beyond 3 days, therapeutic drug monitoring is advised to maintain adequate serum concentrations.

The Use of Colistin in Multidrug-Resistant Infections

This feature examines the recent rise of colistin use in multidrug-resistant infections and puts it in perspective of its historical use in terms of its safety and tolerability profile. In addition, limitations of using colistin as a first-line agent due to risk of colistin resistance and cases of pandrug resistance are discussed.

Convergence of Minds: For Better Patient Outcome in Intensive Care Unit Infections

BACKGROUND

There is emergence of resistance to the last-line antibiotics such as carbapenems in Intensive Care Units (ICUs), leaving little effective therapeutic options. Since there are no more newer antibiotics in the armamentarium in the near future, it has become imperative that we harness the interdisciplinary knowledge for the best clinical outcome of the patient.

AIMS

The aim of the conference was to utilize the synergies between the clinical microbiologists and critical care specialists for better patient care and clinical outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A combined continuing medical education program (CME) under the aegis of the Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists - Delhi Chapter and the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, Delhi and national capital region was organized to share their expertise on the various topics covering epidemiology, diagnosis, management, and prevention of hospital-acquired infections in ICUs.

RESULTS

It was agreed that synergy between the clinical microbiologists and critical care medicine is required in understanding the scope of laboratory tests, investigative pathway testing, hospital epidemiology, and optimum use of antibiotics. A consensus on the use of rapid diagnostics such as point-of-care tests, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, and molecular tests for the early diagnosis of infectious disease was made. It was agreed that stewardship activities along with hospital infection control practices should be further strengthened for better utilization of the antibiotics. Through this CME, we identified the barriers and actionables for appropriate antimicrobial usage in Indian ICUs.

CONCLUSIONS

A close coordination between clinical microbiology and critical care medicine opens up avenues to improve antimicrobial prescription practices.

Serum Piperacillin/Tazobactam Pharmacokinetics in a Morbidly Obese Individual

Objective:

To report pharmacokinetic alterations and optimal dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam in an obese patient.

Case Summary:

A 39-year-old morbidly obese (weight 167 kg, body mass index 50 kg/m2) man was treated with piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g every 4 hours for recurrent cellulitis. The wound culture grew Groups A and B Streptococcus and rare Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Blood samples were obtained at steady-state from a peripheral venous catheter at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours after the start of the infusion. Population pharmacokinetics were generated from a previously published data set. The serum concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam obtained in the patient were compared with the 95% confidence interval from the representative population. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximal serum concentration, minimal serum concentration, average steady-state concentration, half-life, elimination rate constant, volume of distribution (Vd), clearance, area under the curve at steady-state, and percent of time greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration (%t>MIC) were calculated and qualitatively compared between the sample and the population.

Discussion:

Substantial differences were noted in both the absolute values at the times of sample collection and the overall concentration-versus-time profile of both compounds. The morbidly obese individual compared with the population demonstrated a reduced average serum steady-state concentration: 39.8 mg/L versus 123.6 mg/L, an increased Vd: 54.3 L versus 12.7 L, and an increased half-life: 1.4 hours versus 0.6 hours, respectively. The %t>MIC of piperacillin for the patient, assuming MICs of 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 mg/L, was 100%. 100%, 90.9%, 55.4%. 19.9%, 0%, and 0%, respectively.

Conclusions:

Pathogens with elevated MICs may require altered dosing schemes with piperacillin/tazobactam. Future studies are warranted to assess increased dosages, more frequent dosing intervals, or continuous infusion dosing schemes for obese individuals with serious infections.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin in Mexican Children With Severe Malnutrition

BACKGROUND

To develop a population pharmacokinetic model of gentamicin in children with complicated severe malnutrition and to study the influence of covariates (weight and age) on pharmacokinetic indices. In addition, we use the model to perform Monte Carlo simulations to explore the efficacy of several dosage regimens.

METHODS

Twenty-six children with severe complicated malnutrition were studied. Ninety-six samples of gentamicin plasma concentrations, obtained from 0.5 to 8 hours after intravenous dosing, were analyzed. Population pharmacokinetic models were built using the program Monolix 4.2 (Lixoft, Antony, France). Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate optimal dosage regimens, using the final pharmacokinetic model, based on the probability of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment.

RESULTS

The concentration-time data were fitted best to 1-compartment model. The estimated population clearance was 1.1 L/h, and the volume of distribution was 2.23 L, with an interindividual variability of 47.2% and 35.6%, respectively. The final models for the clearance and volume of distribution were as follows: CL (L/h) = CL = 1.15 (age/median age) and V (L) = 2.33 (weight/median weight). In Monte Carlo simulations, gentamicin given in dosages of 7.5 to 15 mg/kg optical density was effective in achieving the pharmacodynamic target Cmax:minimal inhibitory concentration >10 for minimal inhibitory concentrations ≤2.5 mg/L, with a probability lower than 1% for Cmin >1 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, an intravenous dose of 7.5 to 15 mg/kg once daily in children with complicated severe malnutrition and normal renal function ensures high probability of efficacy and low risk of nephrotoxicity, which gives further support to the recommendations issued by the World Health Organization treatment for this patient population.

Extended-interval gentamicin: population pharmacokinetics in pediatric critical illness

OBJECTIVES

Once-daily gentamicin therapy is becoming increasingly common in pediatric practice; however, little is known about pharmacokinetics in critical illness. Gentamicin exhibits concentration dependant killing; thus, peak serum concentrations at least eight times higher than minimum inhibition concentration of the target organism have been recommended. We wanted to derive pharmacokinetic parameters for gentamicin in critical illness and to evaluate whether a dose of 8 mg/kg provides an adequate peak serum concentration (>16 mg/L).

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Population-based pharmacokinetic analyses were undertaken using therapeutic drug monitoring data collected prospectively in an intensive care unit over 6 months (n = 50 children). Monte Carlo simulations were used to estimate the probability of achieving 1) peak concentrations >16 mg/L; and 2) trough concentrations <2 mg/L at 24 and 36 hrs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The optimal pharmacokinetic model was of two-compartment disposition with zero order input and additive residual error. Weight was associated nonlinearly with clearance and linearly with volume, and age was a significant covariate for clearance. An 8-mg/kg dose provided near 100% probability of achieving adequate peak concentrations at all ages. However this probability decreased rapidly at doses <7 mg/kg with neonates being the most susceptible. Approximately 50% of nonpremature neonates within the first week of life, 25% of infants, and 10% of children are likely to need a dose interval >24 hrs.

CONCLUSIONS

A gentamicin dose of 8 mg/kg is highly likely to achieve peak concentrations >16 mg/L in critically ill children. A considerable proportion will require dose intervals >24 hrs; thus, therapeutic drug monitoring is essential.