Use of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: Where are we going?

Biological therapy in arthritis patients with hepatitis B or C infection: a multicenter retrospective case series

OBJECTIVE

Reactivation of viral hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) has been reported in various case reports of patients with arthritis on biological therapy. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of arthritis patients with HBV or HCV treated with biological therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective case series including all patients above 13 years of age with arthritis patients from four centers in Saudi Arabia with concurrent chronic viral hepatitis infection (HBV or HCV) who received biological agents in the rheumatology clinics during their course of their disease from duration of the disease onset until last outpatient visit up to November 2015. Demographic information, full details about the hepatitis status of each patient, rheumatic disease diagnosis and different therapies used were reviewed.

RESULTS

We identified 10 cases each with HBV and HCV on biological therapy. The mean age in the HBV group was 51 (34-85) years and 80% were females. Eight patients had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), one patient had RA/systemic lupus erythematosus, and one had human immunodeficiency virus related-arthritis. Seven were chronic inactive HBsAg carriers and three had chronic active HBV. Nine HBV patients received prophylactic antiviral therapy. Two cases with chronic HBV had reactivation with no elevation of the transaminases.The mean age in the HCV group was 54 (23-79) years and all were female RA patients. Three had detectable hepatitis C virus-ribonuecleic acid (HCV-RNA) before the start of biological therapy. Nine HCV patients received antiviral treatment and seven had a sustained virologic response (SVR) before start of biological treatment. Three patients had detectable HCV-RNA during the course of biological therapy. One of the three was a non-responder and two were relapsers. One of the patients with HCV relapse was started on sofosbuvir plus ribavirin and achieved SVR on follow-up.

CONCLUSION

We report the successful use of biological therapy in arthritis patients with hepatitis B infection with antiviral therapy with no detoriation of their viral status. Due to the lack of sufficient prospective studies demonstrating the rate of HCV flare on biological therapy, caution should be exercised and careful monitoring with liver enzymes and viral load is mandated in vulnerable HCV RNA patients. Treatment should be individualized by the rheumatologist in collaboration with the hepatologist to minimize complications.

The Burden of Rheumatic Diseases: An Analysis of an Italian Administrative Database

INTRODUCTION

Chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (RDs) trigger high costs for healthcare systems and society due to the disability and comorbidity associated with these disease entities. The aim of this study was to analyze patients with RD, assess the use of conventional synthetic and biologic therapies, and estimate the overall cost of treatment in Italy.

METHODS

Administrative healthcare claims from the Piedmont region in Northwest Italy were reviewed to identify patients who received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) between 2007 and 2010. Confirmation of RD was based on: (1) diagnosis-specific exemption code; (2) hospitalization or emergency care events characterized by disease-specific ICD9 codes; (3) inclusion in the regional registry of biologic drugs. The follow-up period was 3 years.

RESULTS

A total of 9560 subjects, of whom the majority were women (58.1%), were entered into the study; the average age of the study population was 55.3 years. On the index date 12.9% of patients were receiving a biologic DMARD, with adalimumab the most frequently prescribed biologic DMARD (4.7%), followed by etanercept (4.4%). The average total healthcare expenditure was €377.98 per patient per month (patient-month). In the subgroup analysis of healthcare costs according to use of biologics, the total expenditure was €1037.97/€230.86 patient-month for those receiving/not receiving at least one biologic DMARD. In the subgroup analysis of healthcare costs according to type of biologic used, the total expenditure ranged from €657.61 (golimumab) to €1384.15 (rituximab) patient-month.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial difference in the total costs according to treatment/no treatment with a biologic and the specific biologic DMARD prescribed was identified. However, this result should be interpreted with caution as a bias in terms of patient selection was most likely present. The results of this study shed some light on RD in an relevant sample of Italian patients. The preliminary conclusions need to be confirmed by further analysis.

Direct medical expenditure associated with rheumatoid arthritis in a nationally representative sample from the medical expenditure panel survey

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the incremental direct medical expenditure associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the US population from a payer's perspective.

METHODS

A probability-weighted sample of adult respondents from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2008) was used to identify a cohort of patients with RA and compared to a control cohort without RA. Annual expenditure outcomes, including total expenditure and subgroups related to pharmacy, office-based visits, emergency department visits, hospital inpatient stays, and residual expenditures were estimated. Differences between the RA and control cohort were adjusted for sociodemographic factors, employment status, insurance coverage, health behavior, and health status using a generalized linear model with log link and gamma distribution. Statistical inferences on difference in expenditures between RA and non-RA controls were based on nonparametric cluster bootstrapping using percentiles.

RESULTS

The adjusted average annual total expenditure of the RA cohort in 2008 US dollars (USD) was $13,012 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] $1,737-$47,081), while that of the control cohort was $4,950 (95% CI $567-$17,425). The incremental total expenditure of the RA patients as compared to non-RA controls was $2,085 (95% CI $250-$7,822). RA patients also had a significantly higher pharmacy expenditure of $5,825 (95% CI $446-$30,998) that was on average $1,380 (95% CI $94-$7,492) higher as compared to the controls. The summated total incremental expenditure of all RA patients in the US was $22.3 billion (2008 USD).

CONCLUSION

RA exerts considerable incremental economic burden on US health care, which is primarily driven by the incremental pharmacy expenditure.

Do rheumatoid arthritis patients have equal access to treatment with new medicines?: tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors use in four European countries

PURPOSE

To explore the use of the biological tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitors used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis as a measure of access to treatment with new medicines. In addition, characteristics both related to national health systems and spending will be assessed to explore possible differences in international utilisation.

METHODS

Data from four European countries were included: Ireland, The Netherlands, Norway and Portugal. Annual utilisation rates of TNFalpha inhibitors (2003-2007) were expressed as defined daily doses (DDDs)/1000 inhabitants/day. Qualitative data such as country characteristics, national health policy characteristics, guidelines were obtained from the literature. In addition, interviews were held with leading rheumatologists of each country to put obtained results into (cultural) context.

RESULTS

Utilisation of TNFalpha inhibitors varied widely from 0.32 (Portugal) to 1.89 (Norway) DDDs/1000 inhabitants/day (2007). A major driver for the utilisation of TNFalpha inhibitors seemed to be the country's total health expenditure (R(2)=0.81). When the use of TNFalpha inhibitors became more established, the association seemed stronger. Differences in health expenditure were nevertheless not the only determinant of usage. Cultural aspects such as difference in recognition of guidelines also come into play when looking at differences in TNFalpha utilisation between countries.

CONCLUSIONS

The prospects of patients receiving TNFalpha inhibitor treatment depend on the country where they are living. In case uniformity of management and treatment would be considered to provide health benefits, the extent and the causes of variation should feature prominently on future public health agendas.

Immunomodulator agent-related lymphoproliferative disorders

The recent development of inhibitors of key immune response proteins has revolutionized the therapy of autoimmune diseases; these immunomodulator agents include monoclonal antibodies and receptor antagonists. However, as with all therapies, these new agents are not without side effects and complications. In particular, anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) agents have been reported to be associated with an increased incidence of lymphoproliferative disorders, infections, and vasculitis. We evaluated the clinicopathological features of 18 cases of immunomodulator agent-related lymphoproliferative disorders (IAR-LPD) from several institutions. These included 6 cases of B-cell lymphoma, 2 cases of T-cell lymphoma, 3 cases of classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and 7 atypical lymphoid proliferations that did not fulfill diagnostic criteria for lymphoma; two of the latter regressed after discontinuation of the immunomodulator agent therapy. All eight lymphoma patients with available information had also received prior chemotherapy (methotrexate or 6-mercaptopurine). EBV was strongly associated with the B-cell and classical Hodgkin lymphomas. This case series illustrates that a broad range of lymphoid proliferations can occur after immunomodulator agent therapy and that these immunomodulator agent-related lymphoproliferative disorders have considerable overlap with other well-defined lymphoproliferative diseases associated with iatrogenic immunosuppression. Further study is warranted to evaluate how these therapies interact with other immunosuppressive agents and the underlying abnormal immune system to enhance the development of lymphomas and atypical lymphoid proliferations.

Anaphylactic reaction to anakinra in a rheumatoid arthritis patient intolerant to multiple nonbiologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of probable anaphylaxis due to anakinra in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and multiple drug allergies.

CASE SUMMARY

A 46-year-old Indian female with rheumatoid arthritis demonstrated distinct adverse reactions to all commercially available anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine. Over a 4-year period her disease remained active during therapy with methotrexate and prednisone. Biologics were added sequentially, with development of intolerable reactions, first to infliximab (urticarial rash, infusion reactions) after 3 doses, and then to etanercept (autoantibodies, worsening Raynaud's phenomenon, digital microinfarcts) after 1 year. Following 2 months of daily injections of anakinra, she experienced an immediate immunoglobulin E-mediated anaphylactic reaction within 20 minutes of an injection, as evidenced by positive testing to both anakinra and histamine with the skin prick method. The patient subsequently started adalimumab therapy, which was discontinued after the fourth dose due to the development of generalized hives.

DISCUSSION

The Naranjo probability scale demonstrated a probable relationship between anaphylaxis and anakinra in this patient. Although cases of anakinra-related hypersensitivity have been reported in patients in which therapy was interrupted and then reintroduced, to our knowledge, this is the first report of anaphylaxis with continuous therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This unusual case of a patient with multiple drug allergies presents a difficult clinical scenario, which was unsuccessfully managed with multiple biologic therapies on a trial-and-error basis. In the future, pharmacogenetics may help to better identify individuals at risk for multiple drug reactions and preclude unnecessary exposure to potentially harmful therapeutic options in similar patients.

Tocilizumab: a review of its use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis

Tocilizumab (RoActemra or Actemra) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that acts as an interleukin (IL)-6 receptor antagonist. Intravenous tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (and no less than 4.8 mg), in combination with methotrexate, is approved in the EU for the treatment of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis in adult patients with inadequate response to, or who are intolerant of, prior disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) or tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy. It may also be administered as monotherapy in patients intolerant of methotrexate or in whom methotrexate therapy is inappropriate. Tocilizumab is also approved in Japan for the treatment of polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis, systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis and Castleman's disease. Intravenous tocilizumab was effective and generally well tolerated when administered either as monotherapy or in combination with conventional DMARDs in several well designed clinical studies in adult patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Tocilizumab-based therapy was consistently more effective than placebo, methotrexate or other DMARDs in reducing disease activity, and some trials also showed significant benefits with tocilizumab in terms of reducing structural joint damage and improving health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Notably, tocilizumab-based therapy was effective in patients with long-standing disease in whom anti-TNF therapy had previously failed. More data are required to determine the comparative efficacy and safety of tocilizumab versus other biological agents and to establish their relative cost effectiveness. However, the present data suggest that tocilizumab is an important emerging treatment option in adult patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis.

Role of MAPK kinase 6 in arthritis: distinct mechanism of action in inflammation and cytokine expression

Development of p38alpha inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis has been hindered by toxicity and limited efficacy. Therefore, we evaluated whether MKK6, an upstream kinase that regulates multiple p38 isoforms, might be an alternative therapeutic target in inflammatory arthritis. Wild-type (WT), MKK6(-/-), and MKK3(-/-) mice were administered K/BxN serum to induce arthritis. Articular expression of activated kinases and cytokines was determined by Western blot, qPCR, ELISA, and multiplex analysis. Immunoprecipitation and confocal microscopy experiments were performed to determine the subcellular location of MKK6, P-p38, and MAPKAPK2 (MK2). Arthritis scores were significantly lower in MKK6(-/-) mice compared with WT mice. Joint destruction and osteoclast differentiation were lower in MKK6(-/-), as were articular IL-6 and matrix metalloproteinase-3 expression. Phospho-p38 levels were modestly decreased in the joints of arthritic MKK6(-/-) mice compared with WT but were significantly higher than MKK3(-/-) mice. P-MK2 was low in MKK6(-/-) and MKK3(-/-) mice. Uncoupled p38 and MK2 activation was also observed in cultured, MKK6(-/-) FLS and confirmed using kinase assays. Immunoprecipitation assays and confocal microscopy showed that P-p38 and MK2 colocalized in activated WT but not MKK6(-/-) FLS. Distinct patterns of cytokine production were observed in MKK6(-/-) and MKK3(-/-) cells. MKK6 deficiency suppresses inflammatory arthritis and joint destruction, suggesting it might be a therapeutic target for inflammation. Although MKK3 and MKK6 activate the p38 pathway, they regulate distinct subsets of proinflammatory cytokines. MKK6 appears mainly to facilitate p38 and MK2 colocalization in the nucleus rather than to phosphorylate p38.

Tocilizumab: the first interleukin-6-receptor inhibitor

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, and role of tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Tocilizumab is a novel monoclonal antibody that competitively inhibits the binding of interleukin-6 (IL-6) to its receptor (IL-6R). Inhibiting the entire receptor complex prevents IL-6 signal transduction to inflammatory mediators that summon B and T cells. Tocilizumab has a nonlinear pharmacokinetic profile. The hypothesis that targeting and inhibiting IL-6R with tocilizumab can result in significant improvement of the signs and symptoms of RA appears to have been substantiated in one Phase III and two Phase II clinical trials, which have demonstrated a marked reduction in disease activity and the acute-phase response. The results of these studies indicate that tocilizumab treatment, both as a combination with methotrexate and as monotherapy, has a safety profile consistent with that of other biological and immunosuppressive therapies. In general, tocilizumab as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate appears to be well tolerated. Adverse events were not dose dependent and were of similar frequency in all groups. Tocilizumab appears to provide an additional option for those patients who do not respond sufficiently to methotrexate. Since IL-6R inhibition has a distinct mechanism of action, some patients who do not respond to antitumor necrosis factor agents or who have a partial response may respond to tocilizumab.

CONCLUSION

Tocilizumab, a novel IL-6R inhibitor, may be beneficial for the treatment of RA in patients who do not respond to methotrexate or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. A large clinical trial is needed to confirm tocilizumab's clinical efficacy and safety.