Using Implementation Science-Informed Strategies to Improve Transitions of Care for Patients with Venous Thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, are common causes of preventable hospital death. Most VTEs diagnosed in the outpatient setting are directly linked to a recent hospitalization or surgery.

METHODS

A type 2 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study was conducted to develop and implement targeted interventions to improve care for patients with VTE in six US health systems. Primary outcomes included (1) 7-day follow-up after VTE diagnosis (phone calls, office visits); (2) VTE-related hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits within 45 days of acute VTE diagnosis; and (3) anticoagulant-associated adverse drug events (ADEs). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) identified interventions associated with improved care for patients with VTE.

RESULTS

Among 1,265 patients, follow-up within 7 days of an index VTE diagnosis improved from 25.2% to 33.6% (p < 0.0001); among 2,002 patients, hospitalizations/ED visits within 45 days of VTE diagnosis decreased across settings from 7.8% to 6.3% (p = 0.033), and the rate of anticoagulant-associated ADEs remained low (3.1% to 3.4%, p = 0.528). Factors characteristic of improving 7-day follow-up included combinations of (1) safer prescribing and management of anticoagulants and standardized protocols with centralized care processes or (2) safer prescribing and management of anticoagulants with improved care team communication and expanded anticoagulation clinic access for patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants. Factors associated with 45-day hospitalization/ED visits improvement included high baseline rates of 7-day follow-up, high rates of baseline 45-day hospitalization/ED visits (larger opportunity), improved care team communication, and improved standardization and centralization of protocols.

CONCLUSION

Combinations of interventions, tailored to local context and team dynamics, improved ambulatory follow-up rates and reduced VTE-related utilization. Health systems may benefit from considering novel, implementation science-informed strategies to foster improvement.

The effects of different positions on lower extremity hemodynamics during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the effects of two different positions on lower extremity hemodynamics during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer.

METHODS

A total of 196 patients who underwent RARP in our hospital from February 2020 to March 2022 were included in this study. Among them, 98 patients who underwent surgery with the Trendelenburg position and split-leg position with calf reverse arch from March 2021 to March 2022 were assigned to the observation group, while 98 patients who underwent surgery with the Trendelenburg position and low lithotomy position from February 2020 to February 2021 were assigned to the control group. Using an ultrasound diagnostic instrument to detect the internal diameter, mean blood flow velocity, and mean blood flow volume of the left deep femoral vein at different times, such as the supine position (T0), after 5 minutes of placing the patient in the leg spilt or low lithotomy position (T1), after 5 minutes of pneumoperitoneum (T2), after 5 minutes of head-down tilt or head-down tilt and calf reverse arch (T3), 1.5 hours after the start of surgery (T4), before the removal of CO2 gas (T5), and before the patient left the operating room (T6). As well as the patency of deep venous blood flow in both lower extremities before leaving the operating room, RESULTS: After establishment of pneumoperitoneum, the internal diameter of the deep femoral vein increased significantly, while the mean blood flow velocity and mean blood flow volume decreased significantly in both groups(T0) (P<0.001). With the prolongation of surgical time, the impact on lower extremity hemodynamics in the observation group was smaller than that in the control group. From T2 to T6, the internal diameter of the femoral vein in the observation group was smaller than that in the control group, while the mean blood flow velocity and mean blood flow volume were increased compared to the control group (P<0.05). Before leaving the operating room, the patency of deep venous blood flow in the observation group was better than that in the control group (P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

Placing patients in the Trendelenburg position and split-leg position with calf reverse arch during RARP for prostate cancer has a smaller impact on lower extremity hemodynamics than the low lithotomy position, and can relatively reduce the risk of postoperative deep vein thrombosis.

Incidence of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in a Population-Based Cohort

The incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) changes over time from the first VTE event and depends on the presence of risk factors. In this study, we aimed to determine the yearly incidence of VTE recurrence during five years of follow-up after a first-ever VTE event. For this cohort study, we identified persons who experienced a validated first-ever VTE between 2006-2014 in northern Sweden. These patients' medical records were reviewed to identify recurrent VTE events during five years of follow-up. The yearly incidence rates (IRs) of recurrent VTE per 100 person-years were calculated and stratified into three groups defined by characteristics at the first-ever VTE event: no risk factors, cancer, or other risk factors. A total of 1413 persons experienced a first-ever VTE during the study period, of whom 213 experienced a recurrent VTE. Among persons without risk factors, the IR was 4.2 during the first year of follow-up, and 4.1 during the fifth year. Among persons with cancer, the IR was 9.5 during the first year, and 5.4 during the fifth year. Among persons with other risk factors, the corresponding IRs were 6.1 and 2.3. In conclusion, after a first-ever VTE event, persons with cancer had the highest recurrence rate during the first years of follow-up. Among persons with cancer who were alive after five years, the incidence of recurrent VTE during the fifth year was similar to that in participants without risk factors.

Trajectories of adherence to extended treatment with direct oral anticoagulants and risks of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding

BACKGROUND: Little is known about medication adherence patterns and their association with effectiveness and safety among patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) receiving direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy beyond 3-6 months of initial treatment. OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations between adherence trajectories of extended treatment with DOAC and the risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding among patients with VTE. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with incident VTE who completed 6 months of initial anticoagulant treatment and received either DOAC extended therapy or no extended therapy using MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (2013-2019). We used group-based trajectory models to identify distinct adherence patterns during extended treatment. Using inverse probability treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards models, we examined the association between the adherence trajectories and the risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding. RESULTS: Among 10,960 patients with extended treatment with DOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban) and 5,133 patients with no extended treatment, we identified 4 distinct trajectories (consistently high, gradually declining, rapidly declining, and no extended treatment). Compared with the no extended treatment group, the groups with consistently high adherence (hazard ratio = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.05-0.17) and with gradually declining adherence (0.13, 0.03-0.53) showed decreased recurrent VTE risk without increased major bleeding risk (consistently high adherence 1.19, 0.71-1.99; gradually declining adherence 1.96, 0.81-4.70). There was no difference in the risk of recurrent VTE (0.34, 0.10-1.16) for the group with rapidly declining adherence, but this group was associated with increased major bleeding risk (2.65, 1.01-6.92). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the clinical importance of continuing and remaining adherent to extended DOAC treatment without increased major bleeding risk for patients with VTE. DISCLOSURES: This research was supported by the BMS/Pfizer Alliance American Thrombosis Investigator Initiated Research Program. The funding source had no role in the design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data or the decision to submit the article for publication. Dr Lo-Ciganic reported receiving research funding from Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Dr Dietrich reported receiving honorarium for training and education from BMS/Pfizer. Dr DeRemer is a stockholder of Portola Pharmaceuticals and reported receiving personal fees for advisory board meeting from BMS. No other disclosures were reported.

Venous thromboembolism recurrence among one-and-done direct oral anticoagulant users: a retrospective longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the American Society of Hematology guideline-recommended treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the United States (US).

AIM

To compare risk of VTE recurrence between patients who, following the first fill, discontinued ("one-and-done") versus those who continued ("continuers") DOACs.

METHOD

Open source US insurance claims data (04/1/2017 to 10/31/2020) were used to select adult patients with VTE initiated on DOACs (index date). Patients with only one DOAC claim during the 45-day landmark period (starting on the index date) were classified as one-and-done and the remaining as continuers. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to reweight baseline characteristics between cohorts. VTE recurrence based on the first post-index deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism event was compared using weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models from landmark period end to clinical activity or data end.

RESULTS

27% of patients initiating DOACs were classified as one-and-done. After weighting, 117,186 and 116,587 patients were included in the one-and-done and continuer cohorts, respectively (mean age 60 years; 53% female; mean follow-up 15 months). After 12 months of follow-up, the probability of VTE recurrence was 3.99% and 3.36% in the one-and-done and continuer cohorts; the risk of recurrence was 19% higher in the one-and-done cohort (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.19 [1.13, 1.25]).

CONCLUSION

Substantial proportion of patients discontinued DOAC therapy after the first fill, which was associated with significantly higher risk of VTE recurrence. Early access to DOACs should be encouraged to reduce the risk of VTE recurrence.

Venous Thromboembolism Recurrence Among Patients Who Abandon Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in the USA: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study

INTRODUCTION

Among patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended for preventing thromboembolic recurrence, complications, and mortality. This study compared the risk of VTE recurrence among patients who abandoned their first DOAC fill ("abandoners") relative to patients who did not ("non-abandoners").

METHODS

Adults with VTE who were prescribed DOACs were selected from Symphony Health, an ICON plc Company, PatientSource®, April 1, 2017 to October 31, 2020. Patients who abandoned their first (index) DOAC fill were classified as abandoners and patients with an approved index DOAC fill as non-abandoners. Baseline characteristics were balanced between cohorts using inverse probability of treatment weighting. VTE recurrence based on the first post-index VTE event (deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) was ascertained and compared between cohorts using weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models during the follow-up period (i.e., index DOAC fill date to end of clinical activity or data availability).

RESULTS

After weighting, 152,443 and 153,931 patients comprised the abandoner and non-abandoner cohorts, respectively (mean age 60 years; 53% female; mean follow-up duration 15 months). After 3 months of follow-up, the probability of VTE recurrence was 7.74% in the abandoner cohort and 4.65% in the non-abandoner cohort; the risk of recurrence was 72% higher in the abandoner versus non-abandoner cohort (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.72 [1.64, 1.82]; p < 0.0001). At 12 months, the probability of recurrence was 9.91% in the abandoner cohort and 6.89% in the non-abandoner cohort; the risk of recurrence was 53% higher in the abandoner versus non-abandoner cohort (1.53 [1.46, 1.61]; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Patients abandoning the first DOAC fill had significantly higher risk of VTE recurrence compared to patients who did not abandon the first fill. Ensuring proper access and encouraging early and continuous use of DOACs may help prevent severe and fatal complications among patients with VTE.

Risk factors for recurrent venous thromboembolism: a real-world analysis

This study was conducted in patients treated for initial venous thromboembolism (VTE) for approximately 6 months to enhance understanding of the risk factors to inform clinical decision-making about long-term anticoagulation therapy. This retrospective cohort study was conducted using a large administrative claims database in the United States. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine demographic and clinical characteristics associated with recurrent VTE. A total of 13 831 patients had an index VTE event, and recurrent VTE occurred in 844 (6.1%) of these patients over a median follow-up of 22.8 months. Baseline comorbidities of arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease were significantly associated with recurrent VTE. During the period of anticoagulation treatment after the index VTE, use of antidepressants was associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE, whereas use of antibiotics and major surgery were associated with a decreased risk. In the 6 months prior to index VTE, anti-inflammatory agents and major surgery were associated with a decreased risk of recurrent VTE. The type of index VTE was also significantly associated with recurrent VTE, with an increased risk observed in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) alone or PE with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) versus DVT alone. This real-world analysis identified baseline comorbidities, medications, and index VTE type to be factors predictive of recurrent VTE among patients treated for index VTE for approximately 6 months. Consideration of these factors may assist in the identification of patients who may benefit from extended anticoagulant therapy.

Anticoagulant therapy management of venous thromboembolism recurrence occurring during anticoagulant therapy: a descriptive study

Limited evidence exists regarding management of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) that occurs during anticoagulant therapy. We aimed to describe patient characteristics, drug therapy management, and outcomes of patients with VTE recurrence during anticoagulant therapy. We identified 30 relevant episodes of VTE recurrence. Mean age was 48.9 (15.9) years, 56.7% were male, and 93.3% were White. Common VTE risk factors included cancer (46.6%), recent surgery (33.3%), and prolonged immobility (30.0%). At the time of recurrent VTE, 40.0% were receiving enoxaparin, 30.0% warfarin, and 23.3% direct oral anticoagulants. Potential causes for VTE recurrence included indwelling venous catheters (40.0%), cancer (33.3%), subtherapeutic anticoagulation (26.7%), and nonadherence (23.3%). Recurrent VTE management strategies included switching anticoagulants (26.7%), increasing anticoagulant dose (20.0%), temporarily adding enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin to oral anticoagulation therapy (13.3%), or no change in anticoagulation therapy (43.3%). Only four adverse 90-day outcomes occurred among 17 patients who received anticoagulant therapy changes in response to VTE recurrence, whereas eight adverse outcomes occurred in the 13 patients who received no change in anticoagulation therapy in response to a recurrent VTE episode (P value 0.04). Regardless of the potential etiology of recurrent VTE during anticoagulant therapy; switching anticoagulants, temporarily adding injectable anticoagulants, or increasing anticoagulant intensity appears preferable to continuing current anticoagulant therapy unchanged.

A descriptive study of antithrombotic medication patterns in adult patients with recent venous thromboembolism

Objectives:

The objective of this study is to describe the most common self-reported antithrombotic therapy utilization patterns in a national cohort of patients with recent venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Methods:

Extant data from a national online survey administered to 907 patients 18 years of age or older with VTE in the last two years were analyzed. Patients’ self-reported antithrombotic usage patterns used during three phases of treatment for the most recent VTE episode were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results:

The following overall antithrombotic usage patterns were identified: warfarin (38.7%), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (26.1%), switching between warfarin and DOACs (13.3%), aspirin only (8.7%), switching between different DOACs (4.5%), injectable anticoagulants only (3.9%), and no treatment (4.7%). Extended antithrombotic therapy beyond 90 days was reported by 65.7% of patients. Aspirin coadministration with anticoagulant therapy occurred for 33.7%.

Conclusions:

In this national sample of recent VTE sufferers warfarin therapy remains the most used anticoagulant followed closely by DOAC therapy. Switching between warfarin and DOACs and between different DOACs was common which could indicate adverse events or affordability issues. Aspirin coadministration with anticoagulant therapy was present in 1 of 3 patients and is a potential medication safety intervention for anticoagulation providers.

Cost comparison of continued anticoagulation with rivaroxaban versus placebo based on the 1-year EINSTEIN-Extension trial efficacy and safety results

AIMS

The EINSTEIN-Extension trial (EINSTEIN-EXT) found that continued treatment with rivaroxaban for an additional 6 or 12 months (vs placebo) after 6-12 months of initial anticoagulation significantly reduced the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) with a small non-significant increased risk of major bleeding (none fatal or in critical site). This study aimed to compare total healthcare cost between rivaroxaban and placebo, based on the EINSTEIN-EXT event rates.

METHODS

Total healthcare cost was calculated as the sum of treatment and clinical event costs from a US managed care perspective. Treatment duration and event rates were obtained from the EINSTEIN-EXT study. Adjustment on treatment duration was made by assuming a 10% non-adherence rate. Drug costs were based on wholesale acquisition costs. Cost estimates for clinical events (i.e. recurrent deep vein thrombosis [DVT], recurrent pulmonary embolism, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding) were determined from the literature. Results were examined over a ±20% range of each cost component and over 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of event rate differences in deterministic (one-way) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA).

RESULTS

Total healthcare cost was $1,454 lower for rivaroxaban-treated (vs placebo-treated) patients in the base-case, with a lower clinical event cost fully offsetting drug cost. The cost savings of recurrent DVT alone (-$3,102) was greater than drug cost ($2,723). Total healthcare cost remained lower for rivaroxaban in the majority (73%) of PSA (cost difference [95% CI] = -$1,454 [-$2,396, $1,231]).

LIMITATIONS

This study was conducted over the 1-year observation period of the EINSTEIN-EXT trial, which limited "real-world" applicability and examination of long-term economic impact. Assumptions on drug and clinical event costs were US-based and, thus, not applicable to other healthcare systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Total healthcare costs were estimated to be lower for patients continuing rivaroxaban therapy compared to those receiving placebo in VTE patients who had completed 6-12 months of VTE treatment.

Impact of apixaban vs low molecular weight heparin/vitamin k antagonist on hospital resource use in patients with venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

The clinical and economic benefits associated with apixaban treatment have been established in clinical trials and published economic evaluations. The benefits associated with apixaban could extend to improving hospital efficiencies, potentially influencing hospital resource use, and bed days. The objective of this study is to estimate the impact of 6-month treatment with apixaban vs low molecular weight heparin/vitamin k antagonist (LMWH/VKA) on hospital resource use among patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE).

METHODS

A model was developed to assess the impact of apixaban vs LMWH/VKA for treatment of VTE and prevention of recurrences on hospital resource use and costs. Resource use items included total hospitalizations, length of stay (LOS), and emergency department (ED) visits, estimated for all incident VTE patients in the UK over a 5-year time horizon. Rates of hospitalizations, ED visits, and LOS associated with recurrent VTE, major, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding were obtained from the AMPLIFY trial; costs were obtained from UK published sources.

RESULTS

Over a 5-year time horizon, the model predicted that, compared to 6 months of LMWH/VKA, 6 months of apixaban led to 3,954 fewer hospitalizations (consisting of 2,341 fewer new admissions and 1,613 fewer re-admissions) and 32,214 fewer bed days, among 332,607 incident VTE patients. ED visits were reduced by 1,582. The reduction in hospital resource use led to a cost saving of ∼£4.5 million in a market of patients treated with apixaban as compared to a market treated with LMWH/VKA. Sensitivity analysis indicated these findings were robust over a wide range of inputs.

CONCLUSIONS

6-month treatment with apixaban for treatment of VTE and prevention of recurrences on hospital resource use led to a reduction in hospitalizations and LOS in comparison to LMWH/VKA. These findings can help the efforts in reducing the growing burden of preventable re-admissions to hospitals.